
Spaza shop awareness pays off
'Before today, I didn't know where to start or which documents were truly necessary. This workshop answered questions I've had for years. Now, I understand what compliance actually means and how to meet those expectations,' spaza shop owner Matshidiso Mooki said.
Mooki was among those who attended the session held at the City Hall in the Vereeniging Central Business District in Gauteng on Friday.
She said the campaign brought clarity.
'I am determined to ensure that I comply with all the regulations so that I can qualify for support through the Spaza Shop Support Fund,' she said of the session.
The campaign offered spaza shop owners and township-based convenience store operators critical information on how to apply for both financial and non-financial support under the R500-million fund that was launched by Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau and Small Business Development Minister Stella Ndabeni Abrahams in April.
For Matome Tshabalala, the information received at the session was a game changer. He started his shop after the COVID-19 lockdown.
'I've always operated informally, but now I want to do things the right way. What stood out for me was the emphasis on record-keeping and understanding zoning laws. I also appreciated the introduction to stock management and bookkeeping,' he said.
The campaign, which aims to formalise and support township-based enterprises, brought together local spaza shop owners, government officials and business development stakeholders.
Compliance
Participants at the session heard about the importance of compliance requirements for spaza shop permit applications.
Matshepo Madumbo, the Assistant Manager of Local Economic Development and Tourism at Emfuleni Local Municipality, emphasised the importance of adhering to municipal regulations when applying for permits.
'Many residential areas are not zoned for commercial activity. For a spaza shop to operate legally, the property owner must apply for a rezoning certificate. Without that, the business cannot be recognised as compliant.
'I cannot stress the importance of submitting a stamped building plan, an occupancy certificate, certified identity document, a proof of address no older than three months, and registration documents from the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) along with a valid tax clearance certificate,' she said.
Madumbo noted that failure to comply with these requirements often leads to unnecessary delays and missed opportunities for funding and supplier networks.
'The Spaza Shop Support Campaign continues to rollout across provinces, ensuring that township entrepreneurs are not only included in the broader economic framework but are also equipped to thrive within it.
'By focusing on compliance, formalisation, and access to resources, the campaign is helping to level the playing field for small business owners in underserved communities,' said the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition and the Department of Small Business Development. – SAnews.gov.za
At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Oupa Pilane slams MTPA over alleged Panorama Route corruption
Earlier today (August 4), Oupa Pilane, special attaché for the Kruger Lowveld Chamber of Business (KLCBT), issued a statement regarding alleged corruption in the Mpumalanga Tourism and Parks Agency's (MTPA) handling of funds allocated for the maintenance of the Panorama Route. 'Allocated a hefty R500 million to drive tourism marketing and conserve our natural heritage, the agency has squandered R490 million – 98% of its budget – on salaries, leaving a R60 million deficit for the same,' Pilane shared. He explained that the money collected at park gates and concessions, meant to maintain facilities and protect these iconic reserves, are instead being diverted to plug this financial black hole. ALSO READ: Panorama Route mismanagement threatens tourism economy In July, Pilane invited the MTPA on a tour of the Panorama Route to engage on the dilapidated condition of its tourist attractions. While the MTPA declined the invitation, the tour went ahead as scheduled, with members of the media in attendance. Neglect has resulted in crumbling infrastructure, disconnected electricity, broken water pumps, and a shameful shortage of basics like toilet paper and working toilets. ALSO READ: Mpumalanga MEC for Tourism discusses safety and Panorama Route conditions at budget speech The KLCBT urged the MTPA to collaborate with them in creating actionable plans for the better maintenance of these sites. The organisation had initially planned to share these plans within seven days of the media tour, but decided against issuing a joint statement with the MTPA. The delay was caused by further enquiries from the agency regarding the proposed plans. On the alleged corruption, Pilane said: 'The MTPA's leadership has the gall to boast about 'clean audits', as if that absolves their failures. Accounting for salaries is the easiest part of financial oversight – it's like applauding a driver for fuelling the car while crashing it into a ditch.' According to Pilane, Mpumalanga deserves leadership that prioritises its people over bloated bureaucracies, and he is demanding answers for these concerning financial figures. ALSO READ: Panorama Route mismanagement threatens tourism economy Lowvelder will share more on this in Thursday's print edition.


Daily Maverick
4 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Department of Trade, Industry and Competition says 30,000 jobs at risk from Trump tariffs
Trade and Industry Minister Parks Tau said his department would be sharing 'a set of more detailed proposals' on SA's tariff response package with the Cabinet later this week. US President Donald Trump's tariffs on South Africa could put about 30,000 jobs at risk, officials from the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) said on Monday, 4 August 2025. 'We've based this on the ongoing consultations that we have with all the sectors of the economy — from automotive, agriculture and all the other sectors that are going to be impacted — and at this stage we are sitting at approximately 30,000 jobs that could be affected by this, if it were to be mismanaged in any manner,' department director-general Simphiwe Hamilton told reporters. Hamilton, along with DTIC Minister Parks Tau, Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) Minister Ronald Lamola and Dirco director-general Zane Dangor briefed the media on SA's response to the US tariffs in Johannesburg. Last Thursday, Trump signed an executive order placing new tariff rates on dozens of countries, hours before the 1 August deadline he had set for deals to be made. Some countries received modified tariff rates, while South Africa's remained at the 30% previously proposed by the US. The tariffs are expected to come into effect at 12.01am on 8 August, according to Lamola. In response, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced on Friday, 1 August, that Pretoria was preparing a package to support companies that were vulnerable to the US tariffs, which included the formation of an Export Support Desk to support South African exporters, set up by the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition last week. On Monday, Tau said his department would be sharing 'a set of more detailed proposals' on SA's tariff response package with the Cabinet on Wednesday that 'would elaborate on the structure of the support package'. The US is South Africa's third-largest trading partner (7.5% of total exports), with China being its second-largest trading partner (11%) and the EU its largest, with 17%. Daily Maverick reported previously that Trump's 30% tariffs would be a devastating blow to South Africa's automotive sector and citrus industry. While the risk to the South African automotive and agricultural industry is valid, it's not all doom and gloom. While the potential for the loss of 30,000 jobs is real, there is nuance, as chief wealth economist at Old Mutual, Izak Odendaal, explained to Daily Maverick. 'You can't say that as of this morning, the whole industry has collapsed,' he said. 'It's about whether individual US customers choose to absorb the tariffs, cancel contracts or gradually unwind their supply chains.' While Odendaal highlighted the automotive sector as particularly vulnerable, he made it clear that both the record of tariff uncertainty coupled with the pivot to new markets mitigated the risk of Trumpian tariffs. 'These are economic policies pursued for political reasons,' said Odendaal. 'Brazil getting 50% tariffs and Canada 35% suggests this is less about economics and more about realignment or punishment.' He added that US courts might still challenge whether such tariffs complied with trade laws that permitted restrictions only for economic emergencies. 'The hard truth,' Odendaal added, 'is that South Africa doesn't have much leverage. We don't export anything to the US that they can't get elsewhere. So our best bet is to be pragmatic — use our foreign policy to unlock trade, not constrain it.' He suggested that if long-standing allegiances — such as ties to Iran or Cuba — came with measurable economic costs, the government should be transparent with citizens about those trade-offs, without suggesting moral compromise. Left in the lurch Tau and Lamola said that their teams had been working frantically for months to secure a trade deal with the US to avert Trump's punishing tariffs. 'Since the beginning of the seventh administration, South Africa embarked on a process to stabilise and enhance mutually beneficial trade and investment relations with the US. The aim has been to address long-standing bilateral issues of concern for both sides in ways that move the trade relations forward. South Africa has been engaging the US at various levels with a view to ensuring predictability in trade. However, even with these efforts, the US decided to impose a 30% unilateral tariff on South Africa,' said Lamola. South Africa proffered a proposed framework deal to US trade representatives in Washington in May, before Ramaphosa and Trump met at the White House on 21 May. At a meeting in June, US representatives told Department of Trade, Industry and Competition officials that they needed to revise this proposal, in accordance with the Trump administration's new template for US trade with sub-Saharan Africa, which they said would be shared ' soon '. On Monday, Tau revealed that this template, in fact, never arrived. According to Tau, after waiting for the template, the department followed up, and the US then suggested that SA sign a confidentiality agreement that would 'unlock the discussions'. 'We signed the confidentiality agreement. We did not get a signed confidentiality agreement on the other side,' he said. Two days before Trump's 1 August deadline, Pretoria asked the US for the trade template and confidentiality agreement. However, Tau said the feedback from America was to regard the template as a 'red herring at this point', and to put forward a trade offer for the US to respond to. Tau said SA was told 'that offer should not be a negotiating offer'. 'It's a very difficult negotiating platform to enter into,' he added. 'When you are in that situation, part of your reality is that you actually don't know what tariff you're going to get even after making that offer.' 'Cheap political scoring' Lamola said that Pretoria's efforts to reset the relationship with Washington had been 'undermined by some actors' within South Africa. He accused political parties, including some of those in the Government of National Unity (GNU), of 'cheap political scoring' on this issue. Lamola said this 'undermined' the process. 'Our view is that, when you're dealing with such complex issues, all South Africans should speak with one voice in the national interest — whether [in] opposition or in the GNU,' he said. This comes after both the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition and the Presidency have issued statements condemning, in particular, the DA's actions in relation to SA-US relations. Last week, Tau accused the DA of continuing to release ' reckless statements ' that undermined the progress the department was making toward the 1 August deadline set by Trump. In a statement issued on 4 August, the DA blamed ministers Tau and Lamola for the tariff outcome, accusing them of 'negligence and ineptitude' in failing to secure a trade deal. The party criticised the new Export Support Desk as a 'laughable help desk' and pointed to Botswana's reduced 15% tariff as evidence of better diplomacy in the region. Commenting on whether issues such as BEE and South Africa's case against Israel at the International Court of Justice played a role in tariff negotiations, Lamola said: 'We didn't want to focus on speculation, whether it was affirmative action or any other politics… We remain open to engage the US.' Asked by reporters who was to blame for SA's failure to secure a trade deal with the US, Tau said the government remained 'focused on the task and not on who to blame'. 'Should we be apportioning blame? I think we should leave that to those who seek to score political points, as opposed to finding solutions to the challenges that we have,' said Tau. DM

IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
The absence of SA's ambassador not to blame for US 30% tariff hike, says Lamola
Minister Ronald Lamola says South Africa's absence of an ambassador in Washington is not the reason for the 30% US import tariffs. Image: AFP International Relations Minister Ronald Lamola said he does not believe South Africa's current lack of an ambassador in Washington has affected the country's ability to negotiate an agreement following the United States' decision to impose steep 30% tariffs on imports. Speaking at a joint media briefing on Monday at the Germiston Civic Centre in Ekurhuleni, alongside Trade, Industry and Competition Minister Parks Tau, Lamola addressed the diplomatic fallout after former South African ambassador to the US Ebrahim Rasool was expelled in March. 'We had an ambassador in the US and that ambassador was expelled,' said Lamola. 'President (Cyril) Ramaphosa has always prioritised the US in terms of ambassadorial responsibility.' Lamola said the expulsion has complicated the process of appointing a new ambassador. 'The fact that our ambassador was expelled means that the new process to appoint the ambassador will not be as easy as it would have been when an ambassador had not been expelled,' he said. 'We have to take all careful consideration, all due diligence, and I can confirm that that process is at an advanced stage. The President, at the right time, will announce who will become the ambassador of South Africa to the US.' Lamola said that the appointment would be made solely by the president, in accordance with the Constitution. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The 30% tariffs, introduced by the administration of US President Donald Trump, are set to take effect at 12:01 a.m. on August 8. While other African countries, such as Lesotho and Zimbabw,e will face a 15% tariff, South Africa has been singled out for a significantly steeper duty. Lamola, however, dismissed suggestions that the absence of an ambassador had weakened South Africa's negotiating position. 'Ambassadors do not negotiate any trade deals,' he said. 'The trade deal is being negotiated under the leadership of the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC), with coordination and support from the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO).' Lamola confirmed that South Africa currently has a chargé d'affaires (a diplomat) in Washington who engages with key stakeholders but does not lead negotiations. 'There are countries that do have ambassadors in Washington. They don't have a trade deal. So, the trade deal is negotiated by the relevant line function department. In this instance, it is the DTIC, which we are supporting, including our chargé d'affaires in the US, who does from time to time point to the relevant people,' he said. He further rejected claims that the absence of an ambassador directly caused South Africa's failure to secure a tariff exemption. 'If that were the case, all countries with ambassadors in Washington wouldn't be having the same challenges we're facing,' said Lamola. 'This is a global phenomenon, not a South African problem.' Rasool, who previously served as ambassador to the US from 2010 to 2015 during the Barack Obama administration, was reappointed in January 2025 under the Joe Biden and later Trump administrations. Rasool was dismissed in March after the remarks he made during a webinar hosted by the Mapungubwe Institute for Strategic Reflection (Mistra), under the theme 'Implications of Changes in US Administrations for SA and Africa'. During the event, Rasool urged South Africans to familiarise themselves with the country's national interest framework, calling it a critical guide amid shifting global dynamics.