Trump wants to bury the Epstein story — his MAGA base won't let it go
Trump's core Make America Great Again base has erupted in anger over the White House's handling of the so-called 'Epstein files,' viewing it as a betrayal by the Republican and his allies who have long championed the unfounded theory that powerful elites orchestrated a massive child sex trafficking cover-up.
Calls for the release of those files could intensify after a US media report on Wednesday said Trump's name was among hundreds found during an official review of documents on Epstein, a claim the White House has denied.
Faced with a choice between alienating a base fervently demanding answers or defying Trump — who has implored them to move on — MAGA-aligned influencers and podcasters find themselves in a political bind.
MAGA media are 'definitely walking a fine line with the Epstein debacle,' Mike Rothschild, an expert on conspiracy theories, told AFP.
'Trump demanding that nobody talk about Epstein should be a betrayal for them. But they're so invested in supporting Trump, and have built their financial support around it, that they really can't do anything but make excuses and tie themselves in knots.'
Some MAGA influencers, however, turned sharply critical in recent weeks.
Among them is Rogan O'Handley, who was invited to the White House in February alongside a handful of influencers and presented with binders labeled 'The Epstein Files: Phase 1,' only to find they offered little new information.
'This is a shameful coverup to protect the most heinous elites,' O'Handley told his 2.2 million followers on X earlier this month.
'We were told multiple times the files would be released and now it looks like backroom deals have been made to keep them hidden.'
'Fanatically loyal'
Charlie Kirk, a Trump loyalist and podcaster, faced an avalanche of criticism from the MAGA base after he initially said he was 'done talking' about Epstein, and added he was going to trust 'my friends in the administration.'
'Trump's base has been fanatically loyal, and influencers are hesitant about opposing Trump directly if that threatens the size of their audiences,' Matt Gertz, senior fellow at the watchdog Media Matters for America, told AFP.
Fueling the MAGA base's anger were conclusions from the Justice Department and FBI that Epstein — a disgraced financier who died in jail in 2019 — did not maintain a 'client list' as conspiracy theorists have contended. Attorney General Pam Bondi emerged as their key target for criticism after announcing no more information would be forthcoming.
But Trump has defended Bondi, while claiming without evidence on Truth Social that the Epstein files were written by his political rivals 'Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the losers and criminals of the Biden administration.'
That response prompted disbelief from Benny Johnson, a longtime Trump supporter and right-wing podcaster.
' By admitting that the Epstein Files are real, and that you've read them, and you don't like their contents, and they were written by your enemies, it doesn't make the most compelling case as far as I'm concerned. Holy moly,' Johnson said.
'Moving target'
Seeking to redirect attention within the MAGA base — an echo chamber fueled by constant grievance and outrage — Trump has launched attacks on familiar enemies: former president Barack Obama and the media.
The White House has promoted the unfounded claim that Obama led a 'years-long coup' against Trump around his victorious 2016 election. The former president has rejected the claim.
The White House has also barred The Wall Street Journal from traveling with Trump during his upcoming visit to Scotland, after the newspaper reported that he wrote a bawdy birthday message to Epstein.
Last Friday, Trump sued the WSJ and its media magnate owner Rupert Murdoch for at least US$10 billion (RM42.1 billion) over the allegation in the article, which Trump denies.
Following those moves, Stephen Bannon, host of the influential War Room podcast, sought to rally influencers behind Trump, telling US media that the MAGA base was 'completely unified because now we're on offense.'
'The MAGA media's take on the Epstein case is both fractured and very much a moving target,' said Gertz.
'Trump's recent attacks on The Wall Street Journal and new conspiracy theories about Obama seem to be refocusing their attention away from Epstein — though it's unclear for how long, particularly given the new revelation that Trump himself is named in the files.' — AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
42 minutes ago
- The Sun
US probes Duke University over alleged race discrimination in funding threat
WASHINGTON: The US government has launched an investigation into Duke University and its law journal over claims of race-based discrimination, marking the latest in a series of federal funding threats against American universities. The Education Department stated the probe focuses on whether the Duke Law Journal's editor selection process unfairly favors minority candidates. 'This investigation is based on recent reporting alleging that Duke University discriminates on the bases of race, color, and/or national origin by using these factors to select law journal members,' the department said. Education Secretary Linda McMahon and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. sent a letter to Duke's leadership, accusing the university of applying racial preferences in hiring, admissions, and scholarships. The letter urged Duke to review its policies and form a panel to address alleged civil rights violations. The university has yet to respond. The move follows similar actions against Harvard and Columbia, with Harvard reportedly negotiating a $500 million settlement—double Columbia's recent agreement—to resolve federal scrutiny. Harvard has resisted external oversight, viewing it as unacceptable. Rights advocates warn the administration's crackdown threatens academic freedom. Meanwhile, Brown University secured a $500 million loan after facing federal grant cuts, highlighting growing financial pressures on institutions. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, universities receiving federal funds are barred from racial discrimination. The Trump administration has previously targeted schools over DEI programs, transgender policies, and pro-Palestinian protests. President Trump has repeatedly claimed, without evidence, that DEI initiatives discriminate against white people and men—a stance rights groups reject, arguing such programs correct historical inequities. - Reuters
The Sun
42 minutes ago
- The Sun
Trump may visit China but not seeking Xi summit
US President Donald Trump stated on Tuesday that he is not pursuing a summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping but hinted at a possible visit to China if formally invited. Trump clarified his position in a post on Truth Social, saying, 'I may go to China, but it would only be at the invitation of President Xi, which has been extended. Otherwise, no interest!' The remarks come amid ongoing geopolitical tensions between the US and China, with trade and security issues remaining unresolved. Trump's statement suggests a willingness to engage diplomatically, though only under specific conditions. Analysts speculate that a potential visit could signal an attempt to ease strained relations, though no official plans have been confirmed. The White House has yet to comment further on the matter. - Reuters
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
US, China hold new talks on tariff truce, easing path for Trump-Xi meeting
STOCKHOLM: Top US and Chinese economic officials met in Stockholm on Monday for more than five hours of talks aimed at resolving longstanding economic disputes at the centre of a trade war between the world's top two economies, seeking to extend a truce by three months. US Treasury Chief Scott Bessent was part of a US negotiating team that arrived at Rosenbad, the Swedish prime minister's office in central Stockholm, in the early afternoon. China's Vice Premier He Lifeng was also seen at the venue on video footage. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with President Donald Trump's administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end weeks of escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. Negotiators from the two sides were seen exiting the office around 8pm (1800 GMT) and did not stop to speak with reporters. The discussions are expected to resume on Tuesday. Trump touched on the talks during a wide-ranging press conference with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland. "I'd love to see China open up their country," Trump said. Without an agreement, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from US duties snapping back to triple-digit levels that would amount to a bilateral trade embargo. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said he did not expect "some kind of enormous breakthrough today" at the talks in Stockholm that he was attending. "What I expect is continued monitoring and checking in on the implementation of our agreement thus far, making sure that key critical minerals are flowing between the parties and setting the groundwork for enhanced trade and balanced trade going forward," he told CNBC. The Stockholm talks follow Trump's biggest trade deal yet with the European Union on Sunday for a 15 per cent tariff on most EU goods exports to the United States. XI-TRUMP MEETING? Trade analysts said another 90-day extension of a tariff and export control truce struck in mid-May between China and the United States was likely. An extension would facilitate planning for a potential meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in late October or early November. The Financial Times reported on Monday that the US had paused curbs on tech exports to China to avoid disrupting trade talks with Beijing and support Trump's efforts to secure a meeting with Xi this year. Meanwhile, in Washington, US senators from both major parties plan to introduce bills this week targeting China over its treatment of minority groups, dissidents, and Taiwan, emphasizing security and human rights, which could complicate talks in Stockholm. Taiwan President Lai Ching-te is set to delay an August trip his team had floated to the Trump administration that would have included stops in the United States, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters on Monday. The potential visit would have infuriated Beijing, possibly derailing the trade talks. China claims Taiwan as its own territory, a position Taiwan rejects, and denounces any show of support for Taipei from Washington. Previous US-China trade talks in Geneva and London in May and June focused on bringing US and Chinese retaliatory tariffs down from triple-digit levels and restoring the flow of rare earth minerals halted by China and Nvidia's H20 AI chips, and other goods halted by the United States. So far, the talks have not delved into broader economic issues. They include US complaints that China's state-led, export-driven model is flooding world markets with cheap goods, and Beijing's complaints that US national security export controls on tech goods seek to stunt Chinese growth. "Geneva and London were really just about trying to get the relationship back on track so that they could, at some point, actually negotiate about the issues which animate the disagreement between the countries in the first place," said Scott Kennedy, a China economics expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington. Bessent has already flagged a deadline extension and has said he wants China to rebalance its economy away from exports to more domestic consumption -- a decades-long goal for US policymakers. Analysts say the US-China negotiations are far more complex than those with other Asian countries and will require more time. China's grip on the global market for rare earth minerals and magnets, used in everything from military hardware to car windshield wiper motors, has proved to be an effective leverage point on US industries.
