logo
Government told to set out plan to tackle ‘significant challenges' with T-levels

Government told to set out plan to tackle ‘significant challenges' with T-levels

Rhyl Journal14 hours ago

The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) has called on the Government to set out its plan to tackle the 'significant challenges' that remain with rolling out post-16 T-level qualifications in England.
T-levels have a 'critical role' to play in providing young people with the skills needed to address vital skills gaps across the economy, according to the report from the cross-party group of MPs.
But it added that the 'success' and value for money of T-levels relies on increasing student numbers.
The first T-levels were introduced in September 2020 to help meet the needs of industry and prepare students for work.
The two-year courses, which are considered to be broadly equivalent to three A-levels, are being gradually rolled out in England.
But the PAC report said only half of Year 9 to 11 students had heard of T-levels in 2023, and only a third of employers, who offer industry placements required to finish the T-level, are aware of them.
The Department for Education's (DfE) latest forecast of 66,100 T-level starters in September 2029 is significantly more than the 25,508 students who started the qualification in September 2024, it added.
The PAC also found that women and disadvantaged students are underrepresented in some T-level courses such as engineering.
The MPs have called on the DfE to develop a structured plan, within six months, setting out its 'campaign approach' to increasing student awareness and enrolments in T-levels.
The DfE should address how the curriculum can be tailored to appeal to a diverse student group while meeting employers' needs, they added.
The PAC report warns that it has been 'unclear' to students, teachers and colleges how T-levels fit alongside other technical qualifications.
It comes after the Government announced plans in December to scrap more than 200 vocational qualifications that had either no enrolments, or fewer than 100 per year over the last three years.
As part of the review of post-16 qualifications, the Government said it will keep about 70% of vocational courses, including BTecs, which the previous Conservative administration had announced it would cut.
Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chairman of the committee, said: 'T-levels have the potential to be a significant force for good in equipping young people with everything they need for their burgeoning careers.
'But without the wider awareness in industry and critical mass of student enrolments, T-levels may remain very much a minority pursuit, when they could become a natural and enriching step in many students' lives.'
He added: 'Government must enter campaign mode to inject life into T-Levels to build enrolments, focusing in and capitalising on local employment needs.'
A Department for Education spokesperson said: 'Through our Plan for Change, this government is cementing 120,000 new training opportunities for young people in key sectors such as construction, engineering, health & social care and digital, and we are encouraged by the strong growth in awareness, uptake and positive outcomes from T Levels.
'Our recent moves to slash red tape will help support T-Levels as a high-class vocational qualification, ensuring they provide a strong, hands-on experience for students, and high-quality training opportunities to build a workforce fit for the future.
'We will consider the recommendations of the PAC carefully, to help continue to increase the number of young people benefitting from these qualifications, and set out our response in due course.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Post-Brexit food labelling branded ‘bureaucratic madness' by M&S boss
Post-Brexit food labelling branded ‘bureaucratic madness' by M&S boss

The Independent

time26 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Post-Brexit food labelling branded ‘bureaucratic madness' by M&S boss

Marks and Spencer 's chief executive has lambasted a key aspect of the Windsor Framework's final phase as "bureaucratic madness," as over 1,000 products destined for Northern Ireland will soon require "Not for EU" labelling. Stuart Machin revealed the significant operational challenge, describing the new requirement as "yet another layer of unnecessary costs and red tape for retailers." From next week, a substantial portion of M&S's product range for Northern Ireland will need these specific labels affixed. The "Not for EU" labels have been progressively introduced since the post-Brexit trading deal, known as the Windsor Framework, was agreed in 2023. This framework was negotiated between the UK and the European Union to resolve complexities arising from the Northern Ireland Protocol, which effectively maintains Northern Ireland within the EU's trade orbit. The stringent labelling rules are designed to prevent goods intended for the UK market from inadvertently entering the EU single market via the Republic of Ireland. Despite the current friction, the UK Government recently indicated its expectation for a more streamlined flow of trade once its new sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) agreement with the EU is finalised. Mr Machin indicated he was hopeful that the stickers may become unnecessary following the new deal. He took to social media on Friday to express his frustration. 'Next week sees the final phase of the Windsor Framework come into effect, adding yet another layer of unnecessary costs and red tape for food retailers like M&S. – 1000+ M&S products destined for Northern Ireland will need to have a 'Not For EU' label stuck on them,' he posted on the social media platform X. 'Another 400 will need to go through additional checks in the 'Red Lane'. 'Quite frankly it's bureaucratic madness, confusing for customers, and completely unnecessary given the UK has some of the highest food standards in the world. 'The Government's SPS deal with the EU will be game-changing, and it can't come soon enough!'

County sees first Reform UK councillor in by-election win
County sees first Reform UK councillor in by-election win

BBC News

time30 minutes ago

  • BBC News

County sees first Reform UK councillor in by-election win

A town council has its first Reform UK councillor after the party's candidate won a by-election by 24 Bellhouse will sit on Bracknell Town Council as the new representative for Harmans Water following Thursday's election, which was triggered by former councillor Cherise Welch's Bellhouse won 302 votes, edging out Labour's Chloe McDougall, who won 278 votes. Chris Turrell, a Conservative and former executive member on Bracknell Forest Council, won 234 votes and Jason Reardon, the Heritage Party's candidate, came fourth with 20 UK Bracknell said on its Facebook page that it was "absolutely delighted" with Mr Bellhouse's victory. It said it was "delighted " with the result and the "first elected Reform UK councillor in the whole of Berkshire".It described it as a "significant milestone, not just for Reform UK Bracknell but for the residents, who have placed their trust in someone genuinely committed to listening, challenging and delivering real change".Mr Bellhouse is the sole councillor on the 28-person authority who is not a Labour representative. You can follow BBC Berkshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.

Tory calls for flags to be put up and taken down every day at East Ayrshire HQ
Tory calls for flags to be put up and taken down every day at East Ayrshire HQ

Daily Record

time34 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Tory calls for flags to be put up and taken down every day at East Ayrshire HQ

He described it as 'a very British way of expressing joy and pride'. A call to fly the Union Flag, Saltire and East Ayrshire flags daily at East Ayrshire Council's headquarters was roundly rejected following concerns over cost, resources, and political motivations. Conservative Councillor Neill Watts had proposed flying the three flags every day at the London Road HQ in Kilmarnock, describing it as 'a very British way of expressing joy and pride' and 'a symbol of unity.' ‌ His motion suggested that these flags be flown daily except when a different flag is more appropriate for special occasions. ‌ However, the proposal was met with strong opposition, particularly from Labour group leader Councillor Barry Douglas, who questioned both the practicality and its similarity to moves at Reform UK run councils in England. He challenged the resource implications, asking whether flags would be installed at all council buildings, how much that would cost, and who would be tasked with raising and lowering the flags. 'There's a cost involved in all of that,' Cllr Douglas said. 'Raising and lowering flags takes staff. Are council officers to stop their duties to do this every day?' He also took issue with Cllr Watts' description of the Conservatives as 'Scotland's strongest unionist party,' suggesting the recent general election results told a different story. 'Are we really talking about community cohesion,' he asked, 'or making a political point around the flag?' Labour councillor Peter Mabon also opposed the move, stating that while flags were appropriate on special days, raising them daily would eat into officer time. He said: 'We're talking about 200-plus hours every year in all weathers to raise and lower flags. Our officers have enough to do.' ‌ SNP Council leader Douglas Reid also opposed the motion, expressing support for the current approach. 'We've got a policy that's lasted before my time as leader. Raising flags for special occasions, like Ukraine or Rainbow Flag (for Pride), makes it meaningful. Changing that sends the wrong message.' Conservative councillor John McFadzean argued the proposal was modest in scale. 'For all the time it would take to hook on one flag and wind it up, there's not a huge implication. Civic pride helps lift morale.' ‌ Cllr Douglas responded by drawing parallels with Reform UK-run councils in England, where flag-related motions have gained traction. He acknowledged Cllr Watts' claim that he had been approached by Reform but had declined. 'Maybe he wants to tell the chamber something today. It is a big issue for Reform, but why is it such a big issue for him?' Chief Governance Officer David Mitchell then intervened to clarify that there is no East Ayrshire Council flag. 'There has never been a council flag and we certainly don't have one at the moment.' ‌ Cllr Watts denied any political motive, explaining his motion was based on personal observation. 'I would be more than happy just to have a flag – it doesn't matter whether it's the Saltire, it doesn't matter whether it's the flag of the United Kingdom, 'I just think that we should have at least a flag at this building as a mark of respect to our communities.' He also reiterated his Conservative affiliation and rejected any association with Reform. 'I certainly am a Conservative and I am nowhere near Reform in that respect.' In the end, councillors voted overwhelmingly to maintain the current flag policy, with 24 voting in favour of an amendment to retain existing arrangements and just four supporting the motion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store