As electric bills rise, evidence mounts that data centers share blame. States feel pressure to act
It's not clear that any state has a solution and the actual effect of data centers on electricity bills is difficult to pin down. Some critics question whether states have the spine to take a hard line against tech behemoths like Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Meta.
But more than a dozen states have begun taking steps as data centers drive a rapid build-out of power plants and transmission lines.
That has meant pressuring the nation's biggest power grid operator to clamp down on price increases, studying the effect of data centers on electricity bills or pushing data center owners to pay a larger share of local transmission costs.
Rising power bills are 'something legislators have been hearing a lot about. It's something we've been hearing a lot about. More people are speaking out at the public utility commission in the past year than I've ever seen before,' said Charlotte Shuff of the Oregon Citizens' Utility Board, a consumer advocacy group. 'There's a massive outcry.'
Not the typical electric customer
Some data centers could require more electricity than cities the size of Pittsburgh, Cleveland or New Orleans, and make huge factories look tiny by comparison. That's pushing policymakers to rethink a system that, historically, has spread transmission costs among classes of consumers that are proportional to electricity use.
'A lot of this infrastructure, billions of dollars of it, is being built just for a few customers and a few facilities and these happen to be the wealthiest companies in the world,' said Ari Peskoe, who directs the Electricity Law Initiative at Harvard University. 'I think some of the fundamental assumptions behind all this just kind of breaks down.'
A fix, Peskoe said, is a 'can of worms" that pits ratepayer classes against one another.
Some officials downplay the role of data centers in pushing up electric bills.
Tricia Pridemore, who sits on Georgia's Public Service Commission and is president of the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners, pointed to an already tightened electricity supply and increasing costs for power lines, utility poles, transformers and generators as utilities replace aging equipment or harden it against extreme weather.
The data centers needed to accommodate the artificial intelligence boom are still in the regulatory planning stages, Pridemore said, and the Data Center Coalition, which represents Big Tech firms and data center developers, has said its members are committed to paying their fair share.
But growing evidence suggests that the electricity bills of some Americans are rising to subsidize the massive energy needs of Big Tech as the U.S. competes in a race against China for artificial intelligence superiority.
Data and analytics firm Wood Mackenzie published a report in recent weeks that suggested 20 proposed or effective specialized rates for data centers in 16 states it studied aren't nearly enough to cover the cost of a new natural gas power plant.
In other words, unless utilities negotiate higher specialized rates, other ratepayer classes — residential, commercial and industrial — are likely paying for data center power needs.
Meanwhile, Monitoring Analytics, the independent market watchdog for the mid-Atlantic grid, produced research in June showing that 70% — or $9.3 billion — of last year's increased electricity cost was the result of data center demand.
States are responding
Last year, five governors led by Pennsylvania's Josh Shapiro began pushing back against power prices set by the mid-Atlantic grid operator, PJM Interconnection, after that amount spiked nearly sevenfold. They warned of customers 'paying billions more than is necessary.'
PJM has yet to propose ways to guarantee that data centers pay their freight, but Monitoring Analytics is floating the idea that data centers should be required to procure their own power.
In a filing last month, it said that would avoid a "massive wealth transfer' from average people to tech companies.
At least a dozen states are eyeing ways to make data centers pay higher local transmission costs.
In Oregon, a data center hot spot, lawmakers passed legislation in June ordering state utility regulators to develop new — presumably higher — power rates for data centers.
The Oregon Citizens' Utility Board says there is clear evidence that costs to serve data centers are being spread across all customers — at a time when some electric bills there are up 50% over the past four years and utilities are disconnecting more people than ever.
New Jersey's governor signed legislation last month commissioning state utility regulators to study whether ratepayers are being hit with 'unreasonable rate increases' to connect data centers and to develop a specialized rate to charge data centers.
In some other states, like Texas and Utah, governors and lawmakers are trying to avoid a supply-and-demand crisis that leaves ratepayers on the hook — or in the dark.
Doubts about states protecting ratepayers
In Indiana, state utility regulators approved a settlement between Indiana Michigan Power Co., Amazon, Google, Microsoft and consumer advocates that set parameters for data center payments for service.
Kerwin Olsen, of the Citizens Action Council of Indiana, a consumer advocacy group, signed the settlement and called it a 'pretty good deal' that contained more consumer protections than what state lawmakers passed.
But, he said, state law doesn't force large power users like data centers to publicly reveal their electric usage, so pinning down whether they're paying their fair share of transmission costs "will be a challenge.'
In a March report, the Environmental and Energy Law Program at Harvard University questioned the motivation of utilities and regulators to shield ratepayers from footing the cost of electricity for data centers.
Both utilities and states have incentives to attract big customers like data centers, it said.
To do it, utilities — which must get their rates approved by regulators — can offer 'special deals to favored customers' like a data center and effectively shift the costs of those discounts to regular ratepayers, the authors wrote. Many state laws can shield disclosure of those rates, they said.
In Pennsylvania, an emerging data center hot spot, the state utility commission is drafting a model rate structure for utilities to consider adopting. An overarching goal is to get data center developers to put their money where their mouth is.
'We're talking about real transmission upgrades, potentially hundreds of millions of dollars,' commission chairman Stephen DeFrank said. 'And that's what you don't want the ratepayer to get stuck paying for."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Thailand again accuses Cambodia of planting land mines as 3 soldiers are hurt by blast along border
BANGKOK (AP) — Three Thai soldiers on patrol were wounded Saturday when one stepped on a land mine in territory along the border with Cambodia, Thailand's army announced. The incident came just two days after the two countries reaffirmed their adherence to a ceasefire to end a brief armed conflict. The army's statement said the incident took place in Thailand's Sisaket province and 'clearly demonstrates to both domestic and international society that the use of concealed weapons in border areas continues to exist, constituting a clear violation of the Ottawa Convention by the Cambodian side.' The Ottawa Convention, also called the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Treaty, is an international agreement banning the weapons' use, and both Thailand and Cambodia have committed to it. A statement from Thailand's foreign ministry said the incident confirmed the Thai army's findings 'that new land mines are being laid in blatant violation of international law.' It also noted this was the third such incident in less than a month. Five days of armed conflict broke out last month, killing dozens of people on both sides, including civilians, and displacing more than 260,000. The fighting broke out a day after five Thai soldiers were wounded when one tripped an antipersonnel mine in disputed territory. A ceasefire that took effect on July 29 ended major fighting, though tension remained high. The two countries on Thursday at a meeting in Malaysia committed to a 13-point agreement on implementing their truce. The Thai army statement, citing its spokesperson Maj. Gen. Winthai Suvaree, charged that Saturday's mine explosion constituted 'a significant obstacle to the implementation of ceasefire measures and peaceful resolution of problems.' A statement issued in response by the Cambodian Mine Action and Victim Assistance Authority denied Thailand's allegation that Cambodia had laid new mines. 'We have not, and will not, plant new land mines,' said the statement, noting that Cambodia is a party to the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Treaty Convention, 'and has an internationally recognized record of removing, not deploying, these indiscriminate weapons." It noted that Cambodia has cleared more than 1 million mines and nearly 3 million other pieces of unexploded ordnance left over from more than three decades of war and civil unrest that began in 1970. Cambodia had suggested that two earlier explosions last month wounding Thai soldiers might be land mines from past conflicts. Tensions had simmered since May this year when a Cambodian soldier was shot dead by Thai troops in a brief fracas in another contested border area. The escalating dispute was marked by border crossing restrictions and cross-border boycotts and bans of goods and services before fighting broke out.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Police arrest demonstrators supporting the Palestine Action group in central London
LONDON (AP) — Police in London have begun making arrests after hundreds of people intentionally violated a new law banning support for a pro-Palestinian group because they say the legislation improperly restricts freedom of expression. Backers of Palestine Action have staged a series of protests across the U.K. since early July, when Parliament outlawed the group and prohibited anyone from publicly showing support for it. Lawmakers banned the group as a terrorist organization after activists broke into a Royal Air Force base and vandalized two tanker aircraft. Protesters gathered Saturday afternoon in the square outside Parliament, with dozens displaying signs reading 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' That was enough for police to step in. 'Within this crowd a significant number of people are displaying placards expressing support for Palestine Action, which is a proscribed group,' the Metropolitan Police Service said on X. 'Officers have moved in and are making arrests.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper moved to ban Palestine Action after activists broke into a British air force base in southern England on June 20 to protest British military support for Israel's war with Hamas. The activists sprayed red paint into the engines of two tanker planes at the RAF Brize Norton base in Oxfordshire and caused further damage with crowbars. Palestine Action had previously targeted Israeli defense contractors and other sites in Britain that they believe have links with the Israeli military. Supporters of the group are challenging the ban in court, saying the government has gone too far in declaring Palestine Action a terrorist organization. 'Once the meaning of 'terrorism' is separated from campaigns of violence against a civilian population, and extended to include those causing economic damage or embarrassment to the rich, the powerful and the criminal, then the right to freedom of expression has no meaning and democracy is dead,' the group Defend Our Juries said on its website. The arrests outside Parliament came amid what is expected to be a busy weekend of demonstrations in London as the war in Gaza and concerns about immigration spur protests and counter-protests across the United Kingdom. While Prime Minister Keir Starmer has angered Israel with plans to recognize a Palestinian state later this year, many Palestinian supporters in Britain criticize the government for not doing enough to end the war in Gaza. Pro-Palestinian protesters were gathering Saturday afternoon in central London for a march that is scheduled to end outside the gates of No. 10 Downing Street, the prime minister's official residence and offices. On Sunday, a number of groups are scheduled to march through central London to demand the safe release of the Israeli hostages in Gaza. Palestinian militants have held the captives since they attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Police are also preparing for protests outside hotels across the country that are being used to house asylum seekers. Protesters and counter-protesters have squared off outside the hotels in recent weeks, with some saying the migrants pose a risk to their communities and others decrying anti-immigrant racism. 'This is going to be a particularly busy few days in London with many simultaneous protests and events that will require a significant policing presence,' Adelekan said before the protests began.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Netscape: Remembering the internet's Big Bang, 30 years later
Aug. 9 marks the 30th anniversary of the internet's Big Bang moment, an inflection point in the emergent digital world. This Big Bang was the stunning stock market debut of Netscape Communications, maker of the first widely popular web browser, Netscape Navigator. Netscape — a pitch-perfect name for a web pioneer — is at best a distant memory these days. But on August 9, 1995, Netscape took its shares public in an IPO that illuminated the online world, introducing the web to millions of people only vaguely familiar with the technology. Netscape was a Silicon Valley startup whose IPO defined the audacity of the web's early days. The company had been founded in 1994 by James H. Clark, he of Silicon Graphics fame, and Marc Andreessen, then a recent college graduate whom Newsweek magazine was soon to call the 'über-super-wunder whiz kid of cyberspace.' Although its founders were colorful, the company had been a money-loser during the months before its IPO. Its Navigator browser, however, was user-friendly and becoming a preferred gateway to the early web. Clark, Andreessen, and Netscape's gentlemanly chief executive, James Barksdale, went on a multicity roadshow to pitch the company to would-be investors in the weeks preceding the IPO. There was, it turned out, no scarcity of interested parties. Five million Netscape shares were offered for sale August 9, 1995, at $28 each. Trading of the stock on the NASDAQ exchange was delayed nearly two hours because of a huge order imbalance. When Netscape did open for trading, it sold for $71 a share. By day's end, the share price had eased to $58.25, which represented a market capitalization of more than $2 billion. It was a stirring launch still celebrated as the ' Netscape Moment.' Netscape euphoria was a digital and cultural phenomenon that proved short-lived. The IPO caught the attention of the software giant Microsoft, which had been fairly slow to recognize the promise of the web. The IPO confirmed Netscape as a threat to its software dominance. Later in August 1995, Microsoft introduced its own web browser, Internet Explorer 1.0. The initial version was anemic, but Microsoft regularly released upgrades, eventually bringing Explorer to par, technically, with Navigator. What came to be called the 'browser wars' were joined. To win, Microsoft deployed what the federal government said were monopoly tactics by bundling Explorer with its Windows operating system. The government and several states sued, accusing Microsoft of misusing its power 'to develop a choke hold on the browser software needed to access the Internet.' Antitrust litigation came too late to save Netscape. Its once-overwhelming share of the browser market dwindled under Microsoft's pressure. In late 1998, Netscape was acquired by book-ending its meteoric rise and decay as an independent company. The digital graveyard is filled with 1990s startups and their thwarted ambitions. Alta Vista, for example, once promised high-speed search online. It was unceremoniously shut down in 2013. Why recall the abbreviated life of a flamboyant internet pioneer like Netscape? Several reasons offer themselves. Netscape's IPO signaled that great wealth to be made online, which helped ignite the dot-com frenzy of the late 1990s. The IPO became a standard of sorts for judging tech innovations. The other day, for example, a Reuters commentary ruminated about the 'shadow' that Netscape's IPO may cast these days over enthusiasm for artificial intelligence. More broadly, Netscape in 1995 anticipated a period of sweeping transformation online that affected and altered nearly all aspects of life. Netscape also deserves recognition as an impressively innovative company. Its lasting contributions include Secure Sockets Layer, an encryption tool that helped protect online transactions. A Netscape technologist named Brendan Eich developed JavaScript, a programming language that animated the web. Netscape also introduced those small packets of digital information known as cookies, stored on a user's computer. Netscape, moreover, was a force that contributed to a heady sense of optimism about the early web. The writer Charles Yu several years ago recalled the jauntiness of those days. 'I entered college in 1993 and graduated in 1997,' Yu wrote. 'Halfway through, the Internet became a thing. Netscape said: 'Here you go, here's a door to a brand-new place in the existence of the universe. We just started letting people in. Go ahead, it's fun. It'll keep getting bigger for the rest of your life. Also, you can change stuff in it. You get to make up new rules for everything — thinking, remembering, communicating.'' Netscape was emblematic of a promising but tentative time when, according to Pew Research Center, most Americans were 'still feeling their way through cyberspace.' The web was an inviting if a bit mysterious place back then, before the advent of social media, smart phones, and myriad apps. It's surely meaningful, then, to have at least a nodding familiarity of the days and the company that gave rise to the digital world's Big Bang.
