Australia's Afterpay says some BNPL users told to close accounts, then sold credit cards
SYDNEY, June 10 (Reuters) - Some customers of Australia's Afterpay have been asked to close buy-now-pay-later accounts to qualify for a mortgage and offered a credit card upon qualification, the BNPL provider said on Tuesday, underscoring fierce competition in the consumer finance sub-sectors.
BNPL loans, on-the-spot interest-free short-term loans with minimal credit checks, exploded as an alternative for younger shoppers after the COVID-19 lockdowns and stimulus payments spurred an online shopping frenzy. Customers are incentivised to pay on time by the promise of maintaining or increasing their borrowing limit.
In a survey of 1,000 of its customers, Afterpay said more than 10% reported being offered a credit card by the same bank or mortgage broker that told them to close their BNPL account to qualify for a loan, without specifying which banks or brokers.
Owned by U.S. tech billionaire Jack Dorsey's Block (XYZ.N), opens new tab, Afterpay leads Australia's BNPL market with more than 3.5 million active monthly users, half the country's total BNPL accounts, according to government figures.
Lenders are required by law to make reasonable inquiries about an applicant's finances but may not give financial advice.
Spokespeople for Commonwealth Bank of Australia, the biggest lender, and No.3 lender National Australia Bank (NAB.AX), opens new tab told Reuters that they did not tell applicants to close their BNPL accounts.
A spokesperson for No.4 lender ANZ (ANZ.AX), opens new tab said the bank assessed BNPL liabilities alongside a person's other finances and "depending on the customer's overall financial position, goals, and objectives, they may choose to restructure or close certain debts – such as BNPL accounts – to support their application".
Afterpay claimed banks were capitalising on a perception of BNPL users as riskier than traditional borrowers to protect a declining lending category.
Australian interest-accruing credit card debt is down 30% in half a decade as borrowers seek cheaper options.
The company added that its survey found BNPL users had credit scores and on-time repayment records broadly in line with credit card users.
The BNPL model has avoided regulation under Australian consumer credit laws so far as it doesn't involve interest. However, "if it looks and acts like credit, then it should be regulated as such," the Australian government had said last year.
New legislation requiring BNPL firms to run credit checks on borrowers kicks in on Tuesday, which, Afterpay's Head of Public Policy Michael Saadat hopes, would improve transparency around user creditworthiness.
The main reason Afterpay customers close their accounts is because their lender or broker told them to, and "this should not be something that is driven by misperception of the regulatory requirements," Saadat told Reuters in an interview.
According to mortgage broker AFG, (AFG.AX), opens new tab one in 10 Australian mortgages are arranged by brokers. Mark Hewitt, general manager of industry and partnerships at AFG, said the company does not distribute credit cards but responsible lending rules require it to "ensure adequate enquiry is made around an applicant's ability to meet their financial commitments".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Auto Blog
2 hours ago
- Auto Blog
Kia Confirms A Tasman SUV Is Coming
The Kia Tasman may spawn a rugged SUV to take on the 4Runner. This should be good. Kia May Soon Have An Answer To The 4Runner And Bronco The Kia Tasman is a midsize pickup with styling that not everyone will gel with, and which is off-limits to American buyers for the time being. However, its eccentricity in the styling department may not negatively impact its future prospects for diversification, according to a report from Australia's Carsales. When asked by the publication whether a Kia Tasman-based SUV could be openly discussed, Kia Australia Chief Engineer for Ride and Handling Graeme Gombold answered the question directly: 'Three years down the track.' That means a new Toyota 4Runner rival could reach dealer floors by 2029. 0:00 / 0:09 Tesla sales in Europe drop yet again Watch More An SUV Is Just One Way The Tasman Could Grow Gambold's job is to fine-tune Kia suspensions for the specific demands of the Australasian region and its roadways, so it follows that the engineer would know what's coming down the pipeline. However, this new SUV, and other potential incarnations of the Tasman, first depend on the base vehicle achieving success, as the brand's marketing boss, Dean Norbiato, was quick to point out. 'If Tasman is a success, then it will open many doors, so let's get Tasman right first,' said the executive. 'Once we get that right, then we can go from there. Let us take a breath; the media was asking for a ute [pickup truck] for 10 years.' So it'll be some way off if it happens, but clearly, Kia knows it's worth exploring, and suggesting that 'many doors' can be opened indicates there may be other applications for the truck. Chances Of An American Tasman SUV Source: Kia Kia's American arm offers the Sportage and Sorento, but neither of those is constructed atop a body-on-frame architecture, which means there is still a gap in the U.S. market that Kia could potentially fill, offering something to compete with the Ford Bronco and Toyota 4Runner. However, as noted at the outset, the Tasman's chances of arrival in America seem slim, and if that's not arriving, would it be worth tweaking the eventual SUV? Perhaps not, but the good news is that Kia is bringing a pickup of some sort to our shores, and there's no reason to believe that truck can't someday spawn an SUV that fits right into a gap in the U.S. market. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. About the Author Sebastian Cenizo View Profile
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Mortgage scheme helping first-time buyers with small deposits to end in WEEKS – five other ways to get on the ladder
A MORTGAGE scheme that is helping first-time buyers get on the ladder is set to end within weeks. The mortgage guarantee scheme enables buyers to get a home with just a 5% deposit. It can be used to buy any type of home as long as you don't pay more than £600,000 for it. The scheme provides a guarantee that the Government will cover some of a lender's losses if a borrower can't afford to repay their mortgage and the home is repossessed. It's been available for buyers since April 2021 but it's scheduled to end on June 30, and there is no word yet on if or when a replacement will be launched. The Government said in February it would launch a "new, permanent, comprehensive mortgage guarantee scheme" that would "open the door to home ownership for more young families and hard-working renters". Brokers say it's possible the scheme won't be replaced - but don't be too disappointed just yet. Between the scheme's launch and the end of December last year, more than 53,000 mortgages were completed using it. Data released last week shows the total value of mortgages supported by the scheme was £10.7billion. But not every lender offering 95% mortgages has used the scheme, and many are still offering small or no deposit mortgages outside of the scheme. Justin Moy, managing director at EHF Mortgages, said the scheme may not be replaced because of renewed confidence in the mortgage market. The Sun's James Flanders explains how to find the best deal on your mortgage "This was originally designed to help lenders stretch to 90-95% Loan to Value at a time when confidence within the market was low, so this looks to be a positive step without causing too many ripples with lenders," he said. Pete Mugleston, mortgage adviser and managing director at Online Mortgage Advisor, said losing the scheme would be "mixed news" for first-time buyers. "On the one hand, the mortgage guarantee scheme was a useful way of helping first-time buyers get on the property ladder if they didn't have a large deposit," he said. "But, given that a lot of lenders are now offering mortgages with a 5% deposit and lower, losing it isn't as big an issue as it could have been. "As the government has not given any further details about the scheme it promised in February, we could be waiting a while before we hear anything." The Sun contacted the Treasury for comment. What other schemes are available? Even if the mortgage guarantee scheme is replaced, there are other Government schemes available for first-time buyers. You should look into each option thoroughly before going ahead with it and consider any disadvantages to the schemes. These are some of the options available... First Homes First-time buyers can get a home for between 30 to 50% less than its market value through the First Homes scheme. You can buy a new build home from a developer or a property from someone who's used the scheme before and is now selling. The scheme is only available in England and you'll have to be 18 or older to qualify. Your total household income must be £80,000 or less, or £90,000 in London. You'll also need to be able to get a mortgage for at least half the price of the home. Shared ownership If you can't afford all of the deposit and mortgage payments for a home that meets your needs, you could consider shared ownership. This is when you buy a share of the property and pay rent to a landlord on the rest. You'll also likely need to pay a service charge to maintain common areas shared between you and your neighbours. Buyers can usually get a share of between 10 and 75% of the home's full value. You can buy more of the home later on in a process called staircasing. However, some people who have used shared ownership have struggled to buy bigger portions of their homes due to being forced to pay increasing rents and service charges. Lifetime ISA People struggling to save for a deposit can get extra help from the Government by saving into a Lifetime ISA (LISA). You can save up to £4,000 a year into it and the Government will give you a free bonus worth 25% of whatever you save. You have to be between 18 and 39 to open a LISA and you can pay in and get the bonus until you're 50. It's worth knowing that if you withdraw your money before you're 60, it must be spent on buying your first home. If you withdraw it for any other reason you'll lose your bonus and also effectively pay a 6.25% penalty - so you'll end up with less than you put in. You should also be aware that you can only use a LISA on homes worth up to £450,000. Right to Buy This scheme was brought in during the 1980s and allows most council tenants the right to buy their council house at a discount. There are different rules for Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. You can make a joint application with up to three family members who have lived with you for the past 12 months. If you rent from a Housing Association you may also have the right to buy it at a discount under the Government's Right to Acquire Scheme. Deposit Unlock This lets you buy a new build home from any developer registered with the scheme as long as you have a 5% deposit. The scheme is available to both first-time buyers and home movers. It's available on new-build homes up to the price of £833,250. Deposit Unlock is currently available with participating lenders including Nationwide, Accord Mortgages and Newcastle Building Society. What do lenders offer? As well as Government schemes, some mortgage lenders have also been offering incentives for first-time buyers. For example, Skipton Building Society offers a 100% mortgage deal that allows you to buy a home without a deposit. A similar mortgage deal was recently launched by April Mortgages too. Accord offers a £5,000 deposit mortgage while other lenders have been slashing their affordability rules. Why you should be cautious with 100% deposit mortgages These types of mortgages can open doors for people who wouldn't be able to get on the housing ladder otherwise. Experts have generally seen the reintroduction of 100% mortgages as a positive thing and this deal from April Mortgages does have rigid lending criteria. But it's important to remember this deal won't be for everyone and they can be seen as quite controversial home loans. 100% mortgages mean you don't need a deposit - but it also puts buyers at higher risk of negative equity. This is when your mortgage is more than the total value of your home, which can happen if house prices fall. If you're in this position it can make it harder to remortgage, sell your home and get competitive rates from lenders. Typically they also have higher interest rates, making them more expensive. The general rule is that the smaller your deposit the higher your monthly mortgage repayments will be. Therefore because you won't have a deposit, your monthly repayments are likely to be more expensive compared with someone who did put down a deposit. You will need to be sure you can keep up with the payments and account for any potential financial shocks. 100% mortgages disappeared after the financial crisis in 2008, as they were seen a contributor to the sub-prime housing bubble and subsequent collapse.
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Should young Australians be worried about Labor's superannuation tax changes?
As debate rages over the Labor government's tax changes for large superannuation accounts, some young workers have asked their financial advisers whether they will be caught by the reforms. Advisers have told Guardian Australia that some young workers have even questioned whether they should stop making additional contributions. Experts say it's unlikely that younger Australians will get caught by the changes, with older, high-income earners the most exposed to the reforms. Here's what young Australians need to know about the changes. Most workers are legally entitled to be paid a guaranteed 11.5% of their wages into their superannuation fund, or 12% from July this year. The government levies a tax of 15% on the earnings on super balances of workers yet to retire and of retirees with more than $2m. Labor has proposed to lift that 15% tax to 30%, but only for the earnings from the portion of the balances over $3m. Earnings on the first $3m in an account would still be taxed at 15%. The tax would be levied each year. You can read a broader breakdown here. Economists expect most young people currently working will not hit $3m balances, though higher-income earners will have a higher chance at getting there. By the 2050s, when millennials will be looking at retirement and gen Z and Alpha will dominate the workforce, one in 10 people will have $3m balances, Treasury and Grattan Institute modelling shows. That could rise to three or four in every 10 people in the 2060s according to Diana Mousina, an AMP economist. But she says it is unlikely that 'half of gen Z' will reach $3m in super balances, contrary to some media reporting of her analysis. Mousina's modelling shows a worker earning more than $90,000 a year who works for 40 years consecutively with a 3% pay rise every year would probably achieve a $3m balance. This means a worker in their 20s who reaches $90,000 or over soon, then maintains it for the rest of their working life, could one day be affected. Workers on lower incomes who made no extra contributions and took time off work, for example to have a child, would be unlikely to reach $3m, according to Harry Chemay, a superannuation and wealth management consultant. The Financial Services Council, meanwhile, expects about 500,000 people of 14.6 million currently employed would earn enough to see their top-range tax breaks reduced slightly under the new proposal. While the reform would increase tax rates on big balances, superannuation would still be an effective way for high-income earners to reduce the tax they pay. The average superannuation balance in mid-2022 was $164,000, so most Australians are nowhere near balances over $3m. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The proposed 30% tax rate is still lower than the top income tax rate of 45%, meaning superannuation contributions would continue to offer a tax break for well-paid workers. Public debate over the tax illuminated how lightly superannuation is taxed, according to Jonathan Philpot, a wealth management partner at accounting firm HLB Mann Judd in Sydney. 'It actually highlights that super actually has much lower tax rates than virtually any other structure you can have in your retirement years,' he says. 'I wouldn't want people changing their super plans.' Experts believe it is likely the threshold for the new tax would be lifted above $3m at some point in the future, so some young people who hit the $3m figure may not end up paying extra. Mousina is among those who agree the $3m benchmark for the new extra rate will probably rise but she suggests the increase could be baked into the new laws for the tax, which need the Greens' support to pass. 'We should think about indexing it, rather than just having no legislation around when it's going to cap out,' she says. The lack of assurance on whether the tax threshold will be lifted above $3m has attracted some media outcry, despite expert consensus that the figure would have to rise. Debate has also focused on the proposal to tax a type of investment return called unrealised gains, which would see high earners pay tax on a rise in value of some assets on paper while leaving them unable to get that money back if the asset value falls in the future. Most super accounts would have limited exposure to unrealised gains, according to Chemay. Australians with self-managed super funds are more likely to struggle with this type of investment. However, self-managed super funds only make up about 1 million of the 20 million or so super savers – and just 15% of them are under the age of 45. For perspective, four million Australians have more than one super account. The government in 2018 estimated the resulting extra fees would leave the average worker about $50,000 worse off by the time they retired.
