The $150 Million Bet That Could Rewrite Black Canada's Future
That's exactly what 150 Black professionals decided in 2020 when they launched something unprecedented: a charity that doesn't just ask for change—it finances it.
Trust us, you've never seen a Black charity like this before.
Part investment engine, part resistance strategy, the Black Opportunity Fund (BOF) is a community-led Canadian charity with one mission: building sustainable wealth in Black communities.
And here's where it gets interesting.
At a time when Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) programs are being quietly shelved and anti-Black sentiment is growing louder, BOF is doing the opposite: it's doubling down.
Their latest move? Launching BOF Capital—a first-of-its-kind investment arm designed to inject equity (the kind that buys homes and scales businesses) back into Black communities.
The numbers are bold: a $100 million growth fund for Black entrepreneurs, and a $50 million housing fund to close the racial wealth gap through homeownership.
I caught up with Craig Wellington, BOF's CEO, for an interview, and he's no stranger to challenging systems. At 19, fresh from Jamaica, he sued Ontario's largest shopping mall for racial harassment—and won, changing provincial law. That early victory taught him that sometimes, not knowing the odds is what makes you bold enough to win.
Craig Wellington, CEO of Black Opportunity Fund
BB: What drove you to move forward with this bold investment when others are retreating?
This has always been part of BOF's plan—setting up an investment entity focused on creating wealth in Black communities. We're not looking for band-aid solutions. We need transformative approaches that address systemic issues, not just symptoms.
During the pandemic, Black communities were hit harder than any other group. We started with emergency grants, then built a loan program for Black businesses declined by Canadian banks, then moved to capacity building. Now we're at equity investments—but we're also launching a $50 million housing fund.
Black people in Canada have the lowest homeownership rate of any racial group. Without home equity, you can't invest in businesses, education, or health—or leave wealth to future generations. That's why the racial wealth gap keeps compounding.
This is just the latest chapter in our whole-community approach to Black economic empowerment.
BB: So, thestats are really stark; Black-led businesses received less than 1% of venture funding in Canada in 2023. Can you walk us through what this funding gap actually looks like on the ground for Black entrepreneurs trying to scale their businesses?
Black entrepreneurs have always had to bootstrap because access to capital just isn't the same. We can't rely on the 'bank of mom and dad' or leverage home equity the way others can, so we start out undercapitalized.
Even when there was a post-George Floyd spike in investment, it was short-lived. Funding for Black-led businesses dropped 73% the next year, then another 50% after that. Last year saw the lowest investment in Black-founded businesses in a decade.
The reality is, outcomes for Black Canadians in business, health, and education are worse than before, because investments have only addressed symptoms—not the systemic barriers that keep us locked out. That's why we're focused on strategic, sustainable solutions that actually close the gap.
BB: With anti-DEI and 'anti-woke' backlash rising in the U.S., do you see that sentiment threatening your work here in Canada? How is it impacting BOF's mission right now?
Backlash always follows progress. Whenever there are real steps toward equity, you see pushback—like after the #MeToo movement, or now with DEI. People treat equity like it's a pie: if someone else gets more, they get less. But equity actually grows opportunity for everyone.
What's happening in the U.S. isn't new—it's just louder now. It's easier to spot who's truly committed. Companies doubling down on equity are our real partners. Those pulling back were never mission-aligned; they were just checking boxes.
At BOF Capital, we're not about box-ticking. We're offering market-rate investments that drive both returns and real social impact. For us, equity isn't a trend. It's a smart, sustainable business decision.
BB: You've structured BOF capital with the two distinct funds, one being for business investment and the other for home ownership. Why was it crucial to address both entrepreneurship and housing wealth simultaneously in your strategy?
If we're serious about real economic empowerment for Black communities, we can't just focus on entrepreneurship—we have to tackle the root causes of the capital gap, and that starts with homeownership.
I mentioned earlier that Black Canadians have the lowest homeownership rate in the country. That's not by accident. Systemic barriers have kept us from building equity for generations—look at Africville, or the fact that the Black-white homeownership gap in the U.S. hasn't budged since 1968.
Without home equity, Black entrepreneurs can't access the capital others use to start or grow businesses. That's why we're creating pathways to build wealth through business ownership and homeownership, attacking the problem from both sides.
BB: The Ourboro Opportunity Fund focuses on a shared equity down-payment assistance model to increase Black homeownership. Can you explain how shared equity works and why this approach is powerful for closing the racial wealth gap?
Shared equity is about breaking down the biggest barrier to homeownership: the down payment. Many Black Canadians can afford to carry a mortgage, because often their rent payments are just as high or higher than what a mortgage would be. The problem is, they can't get over that initial hurdle of the big down payment.
Our program steps in to co-invest with them, helping cover the down payment so they can buy their first home.
We share in the home's equity, and when the homeowner sells, refinances, or buys us out, our share goes back into the fund to help the next family. It's a cycle—building wealth for Black families now, and for generations to come.
BB: With 145,000 Black-owned businesses across Canada, how will BOF Capital identify and prioritize which ventures to support? What criteria will determine which entrepreneurs receive backing from the Growth Fund?
We're focused on growth-stage Black-led businesses—ventures that have proven themselves, have steady revenue, and need capital to scale. About 75% of our Growth Fund will go directly to these businesses. The remaining 25% will support earlier-stage companies through investments in Black-led venture capital funds.
Our goal is impact: by prioritizing businesses ready to grow, we can help them reach the next level and create real economic change. At the same time, our partnerships with Black-led VCs and the support ecosystem from BOF charity means we're building a pipeline—helping entrepreneurs move from grants and capacity building to early-stage funding, and eventually to growth investment.
BB: Beyond capital, you're also promising mentorship and market access. What does that comprehensive support system look like? And how does it differ from traditional venture funding approaches?
For us, it's about true wraparound support. BOF Capital doesn't just invest money—we open doors. That means connecting entrepreneurs to valuable networks, offering business and strategy advice, and helping them access new markets and investors. Money alone isn't enough; real growth comes from mentorship, guidance, and market access. That's what sets us apart from traditional venture funding—we're partners in every sense, not just cheque writers.
BB: BOF is described as an initiative by and for the Black diaspora. How important was it to ensure that BOF capital remained community-controlled, rather than seeking funding from traditional institutional investors who might have different priorities?
From day one, BOF has insisted on Black leadership and excellence at every level—our board, our team, our investment committee. Too often, Black organizations are told to lower the bar. We're doing the opposite: setting new standards and proving what's possible when we lead ourselves. There's no precedent for a Black-led charity launching an investment vehicle like this in Canada—or even the U.S. or U.K. We're building this ship, sailing it, and steering it as a community. That's how we ensure real, sustainable change.
BB: How will you measure whether this initiative has truly created the generational change or the sustainable change that you're aiming for in Black communities?
Success for BOF Capital is about real, measurable impact. We'll track how many Black families achieve homeownership and build equity, and how many businesses scale and create jobs thanks to our investment. We'll measure returns that flow back into BOF the charity, fueling work in education, health, justice, and more. If we see families building generational wealth, businesses thriving, and a pipeline of new funds growing this movement, we'll know we're driving sustainable, long-term change. That's the legacy we're aiming for.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Motor 1
5 minutes ago
- Motor 1
‘I'll Keep My 4Runner:' Expert Says Millionaires Don't Buy Cars. Here's Why—And What They Do Instead
A property investment enthusiast claims that millionaires exclusively lease cars because they're depreciating assets. Abi Hookway ( @abihookwayproperty ) claims that if you're buying a car, you're missing out on building wealth via assets. She breaks down her logic in a viral TikTok that's accrued over 6.8 million views. The clip begins with her standing in front of a parking lot with myriad vehicles before launching into a monologue urging folks to always lease their rides. Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . 'Rich people do not buy cars. This is my staff car park. And I guarantee 90% of the cars in this car park are owned,' she says at the top of her clip. Hookway continues, 'They've been bought with money or loans and they're owned. Millionaires don't do that. Millionaires lease cars. So what millionaires do is they go and they buy assets. Assets that give them passive income.' Lease Cars With Your Investment Capital According to her, appreciating assets will offset the cost of a new car lease. 'And with the passive income they use it to lease a brand new nice car,' she says. 'Why are they leasing instead of buying? Because a car is a depreciating asset—it goes down in value. So why would they invest in something going down in value?' Following this, she explains what the uber-wealthy do for their transportation needs. 'What they do instead is they invest in things going up in value that give them a passive income and lease the car,' Hookway says. 'Say it with me: We lease liabilities, we buy assets.' 'Now rich people won't tell you this stuff because they keep it hidden. But I will,' she says at the end of her video. Never Buy a New Car Trending Now 'Worst Feature Ever:' Houston Woman Buys F-150. Then She Tries to Return it 30 Minutes Later After Discovering Annoying Feature 'I Got Home Around 7pm:' Woman Gets Her Truck Towed. Then She Claims the Tow Truck Company Stole Her Car Outright Other financial analysts do seem to echo some of the points made in Hookway's social media post. CNBC reports that self-made millionaire David Bach said that purchasing a brand new vehicle 'is the single worst financial decision millennials will ever make.' This same logic is echoed by GoBankingRates in a separate article from 2024. The piece touches on the same fundamental downside of car purchasing: depreciation. However, the level of depreciation depends somewhat on how new the car is. For instance, if you buy a car right when it comes out, it can lose as much as 20% of its value within the first 12 months of purchase. And depending on the make and model of the vehicle one buys, depreciation rates can hit as high as 60% after just five years. Bach recommends that those shopping for a new car should consider looking for used models between 3-5 years old. Often, these models will still have some of their original manufacturer's warranty. It's also true that recalls may have already been issued for a vehicle that's been around for a few years. More importantly, however, is that in buying a lightly used car, drivers can bypass eating the cost of its heftiest depreciation years. Lease or Buy? Some financial experts swear by the ' one-percent rule ' when it comes to leasing a vehicle. Basically, this car leasing strategy works as follows: Take the monthly payment then divide it by the total cost of the vehicle, including applicable taxes. If the monthly lease payment is equal to or close to 1% or less of the total cost, it's considered a great lease deal. But there are other factors to consider with leasing a vehicle. First: Mileage. Many leases come with a standard 12,000-mile per year limit, with more miles incurring greater costs. Road warriors may need additional breathing room on their odometers, so this option could end up costing them more money down the road. Moreover, if one purchases a lightly used car from a manufacturer renowned for its reliability, then that could ultimately be a more cost-effective solution. However, others may want to consistently have the newest vehicles with the latest features, so they may prefer a lease. Motor1 has reached out to Hookway via email for further comment. We'll update this if she responds. More From Motor1 duPont Registry Launches New Car Leasing Platform for Luxury & Exotic Vehicles Tesla Prevented Lease Buy Outs to Sell Used Cars at a Profit Dodge Is Already Pushing Cheap Charger Lease Deals The $0-a-Month Fiat 500e Lease Deal Is Real, But There's a Catch Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2026 Rivian R2 Spied With 4Runner-Like Dropdown Rear Window Down
One of the coolest features Rivian showed at the R2 EV's debut appears to be on its way into production. A pre-production 2026 Rivian R2 testing on public roads in the U.S. was spotted with its dropdown rear glass in the down position. One of the only other SUVs on the market in the U.S. with a dropdown rear glass is the Toyota 4Runner, which retained the feature for the new sixth-generation model that launched this year. While some people may not be surprised to see the dropdown rear glass on the R2 make it to production, there are changes that have been confirmed between the debut and production for the lower-cost EV for the startup automaker. At the 2026 Rivian R1T Quad launch the automaker's CEO, RJ Scaringe, confirmed to media that the R2's accessory port, originally shown at the EV's debut, will not make it to production. The Scaringe cited resources, market demand, costs, complexity, and the ability to streamline development for the demise of the accessory port. 'The accessory port is one of those really hard decisions because we have to put what we call SCAR costs, like a cost on every single vehicle, for what will be maybe a very, very small take, right? So even if 5% of people use it, everyone has to pay for it,' Scaringe said. The R2's tow receiver will now serve as the mounting point for accessories, which will not be as simple as the plug-and-play accessory port solution initially shown. Another feature Scaringe said won't make it from concept to production are the fold-flat front seats. The exec again said this came down to cost vs. market use case and everyone getting to pay for the feature's development and production. Still, Scaringe said someone should be able to sleep in the back of the R2, and the factory-backed rooftop accessory tent is on track to launch alongside the R2 in 2026. The charge port location itself on the R2 will be relocated on the production car as another change in the name of functionality. The debut car featured a charge port on the right rear fender under a flip-up cover hiding a Tesla-style NACS port. The production car features a charge port hidden under a much larger door on the driver-side rear fender. The change was made so the R2 can be easier to charge at Tesla Supercharger, which Rivians have plug-and-charge access to. Tesla's have their charge ports on the driver-side rear fender, which has dictated the design of the Superchargers themselves and the charging cord arrangements. The R2 prototype spotted rolled on BFGoodrich Trail-Terrain A/T tires and sported yellow brake calipers. On today's larger, more expensive R1 those yellow brake calipers indicate a tri-motor powertrain. The R2 will be available with a tri-motor powertrain, though certainly not at the $45,000 base price. That base model will be a single-motor model with a dual-motor model splitting the difference between the two powertrains. Those tri-motor models are said to sprint from 0-60 mph in under three seconds. Quick little buggers. We'll have to wait to see more, but not for long, as the 2026 Rivian R2 is set to enter series production in Normal, Illinois in next year. In the meantime, take a scroll through these spy shots by swiping through the gallery. See something? Say something! Send us a line at tips@
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Freight demand on shaky footing as import bookings drop
Chart of the Week: Inbound Ocean TEUs Volume Index, Outbound Loaded Container on Rail Index, Outbound Tender Volume Index – USA SONAR: Container import demand (IOTI) has collapsed over the past month, joining the truckload (OTVI) market in posting double-digit year-over-year declines. Intermodal (ORAILL) has remained relatively resilient, but given its close ties to import volumes, it may not be far behind. Uncertainty continues to dominate business decision-making, as companies remain impacted — directly or indirectly — by erratic trade policies and the rhetoric surrounding them. While this market has been anything but predictable, current indicators point to a relatively soft second half of 2025. Let's walk through the supply chain to understand why. Seasons shift The trade war has disrupted traditional seasonal freight patterns, and nowhere is that more evident than in the import sector. Aggressive tariff threats and implementations have prompted shippers to pull orders forward in an effort to avoid higher duties. In April, a 145% tariff on Chinese goods led to a 42% drop in containerized import bookings from China to the U.S. Since China accounts for over 30% of all containerized imports to the U.S., this has had a disproportionate impact on the domestic freight market. This sharp drop in imports had minimal effect on the already deflated truckload market, which has lost most of its long-haul share to intermodal. However, it did noticeably impact intermodal volumes, which were down a modest 5% year-over-year in early June. Once the tariff was paused, ordering resumed at a rapid pace, peaking in late June and early July before falling off again. Traditionally, the peak season for container imports occurs in late July and August as retailers prepare for the holidays. This year, much of that activity appears to have happened one to two months early. What that means for intermodal Intermodal typically peaks in September and October. However, the early surge in imports suggests we could see an earlier-than-usual intermodal peak — particularly for international containers. Still, the latest Logistics Manager's Index (LMI) report offers a counterpoint: inventories are currently being held upstream to avoid the higher costs of storing goods closer to the end consumer. This strategy could lead to a more spread-out or 'diffused' intermodal peak, with international volumes moving earlier and domestic movements occurring closer to the traditional time frame. Several carriers have already announced peak season surcharges for September, which could accelerate some freight movement if capacity allows. The trucking market is likely to continue its slow burn as capacity exits unless demand unexpectedly spikes. For now, consumption remains sluggish, giving shippers ample lead time to manage inventory replenishment. A few wild cards Hurricanes could temporarily disrupt freight networks, but recent years have shown that winter weather events have a more lasting impact. Holiday shipping may be chaotic if shippers are caught flat-footed. The ongoing uncertainty may leave businesses without a clear sense of consumer demand, forcing them into reactive logistics strategies. With leaner networks and less buffer in capacity, even small disruptions could snowball into panic. The broader economy remains the most unpredictable variable. While interest rate cuts, tariff deals, tax breaks, or other incentives could jumpstart investment, a significant economic rebound in 2025 still appears unlikely. About the Chart of the Week The FreightWaves Chart of the Week is a chart selection from SONAR that provides an interesting data point to describe the state of the freight markets. A chart is chosen from thousands of potential charts on SONAR to help participants visualize the freight market in real time. Each week a Market Expert will post a chart, along with commentary, live on the front page. After that, the Chart of the Week will be archived on for future reference. SONAR aggregates data from hundreds of sources, presenting the data in charts and maps and providing commentary on what freight market experts want to know about the industry in real time. The FreightWaves data science and product teams are releasing new datasets each week and enhancing the client experience. To request a SONAR demo, click here. The post Freight demand on shaky footing as import bookings drop appeared first on FreightWaves. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data