
Cyclists send record amount of video to police showing close passes by drivers
Some 15,779 clips of incidents were submitted to forces in England and Wales last year, information obtained by road safety charity IAM RoadSmart found.
That is more than double the total of 7,249 in 2021.
Many cyclists capture footage of their journeys, with basic cameras available for under £50.
IAM RoadSmart sent a Freedom of Information request to 43 police forces asking how many pieces of footage showing a close pass of a cyclist by a motorist were submitted as part of Operation Snap, an initiative introduced in 2017.
Twenty forces provided data.
The responses show the percentage of reports leading to a notice of intended prosecution being served rose from 38% in 2021 to 54% last year.
A separate survey of 655 drivers who are members of IAM RoadSmart indicated that 58% are not aware the Highway Code recommends the minimum gap they should leave when passing cyclists is 1.5 metres (4.9ft).
Harriet Hernando, the charity's active travel spokeswoman, said: 'It is extremely concerning that more than half of motorists don't know how much space to give a cyclist when overtaking.
'Passing too closely to a cyclist can be intimidating and dangerous, especially if they need to move out to avoid a pothole.
'It is small wonder then that record numbers of cyclists are installing cameras and submitting footage of dangerous or careless drivers to the police.
'While it is heartening to see that prosecution rates have increased, it would be better if it didn't reach that stage and motorists weren't doing it in the first place.'
Provisional Department for Transport figures show 85 cyclists were killed on Britain's roads in 2024.
Between 2019 and 2023, most cyclist fatalities occurred in collisions involving a car.
IAM RoadSmart has launched a No More Close Calls campaign aimed at eradicating close passes.
Ms Hernando said: 'When overtaking a cyclist, always look beyond them to judge your ability to get past safely, leaving at least 1.5 metres of space when overtaking at speeds of up to 30mph and give them more space when overtaking at higher speeds.
'By hanging back two or three car lengths, you'll be able to see further up the road and look out for oncoming traffic.
'If it isn't safe to overtake then don't try and squeeze past – shaving seconds off your journey isn't worth taking someone's life.'
Duncan Dollimore, head of campaigns at Cycling UK, said it has 'not seen the big safety impact we'd hoped for' from changes to the Highway Code in 2022 providing more protection to cyclists.
He went on: 'The majority of people who drive simply aren't aware how much distance to give to people who cycle when overtaking.
'This is why it's crucial to educate all road users of their responsibility to protect those most vulnerable.'
He called on the Government to 'address this oversight by better promoting the new Highway Code'.
A Department for Transport spokesperson said: 'We take road safety extremely seriously, and there are already strict penalties in place for those who put the safety of cyclists at risk.
'Our roads are among the safest in the world, but we are always looking to improve.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

South Wales Argus
an hour ago
- South Wales Argus
Why the latest official UK inflation figures are not what they seem
The discrepancy is to do with an error made in the initial calculation of April's inflation rate. When April's Consumer Prices Index figure was first reported by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), on May 21, it was stated as being 3.5%. However on June 5, the ONS issued a statement saying this figure was incorrect and that it should have been 3.4%. The ONS said it had spotted a mistake in the way April's rate had been calculated. The error was to do with data from the Department for Transport concerning vehicle excise duty (VED). This data had overstated the number of vehicles subject to VED – which in turn led to the ONS overstating April's overall rate of inflation by 0.1 percentage points, reporting it to be 3.5% instead of 3.4%. But while April's rate is now known to have been wrong, the ONS has a policy of not revising official inflation figures in subsequent publications. This is why, in the inflation data published on Wednesday, the ONS said April's inflation rate was 3.5%, not 3.4% – and why its figures suggest inflation eased month on month, instead of what actually happened, which is that it remained at 3.4%. April's inflation figure will continue to be stated by the ONS as 3.5%, despite it actually being 3.4%.

Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Why the latest official UK inflation figures are not what they seem
The discrepancy is to do with an error made in the initial calculation of April's inflation rate. When April's Consumer Prices Index figure was first reported by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), on May 21, it was stated as being 3.5%. However on June 5, the ONS issued a statement saying this figure was incorrect and that it should have been 3.4%. The ONS said it had spotted a mistake in the way April's rate had been calculated. The error was to do with data from the Department for Transport concerning vehicle excise duty (VED). This data had overstated the number of vehicles subject to VED – which in turn led to the ONS overstating April's overall rate of inflation by 0.1 percentage points, reporting it to be 3.5% instead of 3.4%. But while April's rate is now known to have been wrong, the ONS has a policy of not revising official inflation figures in subsequent publications. This is why, in the inflation data published on Wednesday, the ONS said April's inflation rate was 3.5%, not 3.4% – and why its figures suggest inflation eased month on month, instead of what actually happened, which is that it remained at 3.4%. April's inflation figure will continue to be stated by the ONS as 3.5%, despite it actually being 3.4%.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Latest official UK inflation figures explained and why they are not what they seem
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) initially stated on May 21 that the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) for April was 3.5 per cent. However, on June 5, the ONS corrected this figure, confirming the actual rate was 3.4 per cent. This discrepancy arose due to an error in the calculation of vehicle excise duty (VED) data provided by the Department for Transport. Despite the reported easing of inflation from 3.5 per cent in April to 3.4 per cent in May, the actual inflation rate remained unchanged at 3.4% for both months. This data had overstated the number of vehicles subject to VED – which in turn led to the ONS overstating April's overall rate of inflation by 0.1 percentage points, reporting it to be 3.5 per cent instead of 3.4 per cent. But while April's rate is now known to have been wrong, the ONS has a policy of not revising official inflation figures in subsequent publications. This is why, in the inflation data published on Wednesday, the ONS said April's inflation rate was 3.5 per cent, not 3.4 per cent – and why its figures suggest inflation eased month on month, instead of what actually happened, which is that it remained at 3.4 per cent. April's inflation figure will continue to be stated by the ONS as 3.5 per cent, despite it actually being 3.4 per cent.