
Shein, Reliance aim to sell India-made clothes globally within a year: Report
The companies are now racing to expand their network of Indian garment manufacturers from 150 to 1,000 by mid-2026. (Photo: Reuters) Shein and Reliance Retail plan to make India a global fast fashion manufacturing hub
Aim to export Shein clothes from India to US and UK within 6-12 months
Target to increase Indian garment makers from 150 to 1,000 by mid-2026
Shein and Reliance Retail are working on an ambitious plan to transform India into a global manufacturing base for fast fashion, reported news agency Reuters.
The aim is to make Shein-branded clothes in India not just for local sales but also for international markets, starting with the US and UK, within the next 6 to 12 months, added the report, citing two people familiar with the discussions.
The China-founded, Singapore-headquartered fashion giant has partnered with Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Retail to scale up operations in India, in a strategic pivot driven partly by US tariffs on Chinese goods.
The companies are now racing to expand their network of Indian garment manufacturers from 150 to 1,000 by mid-2026, the sources said.
The Shein-Reliance collaboration is part of a broader global shift in supply chains, as fashion retailers look to diversify beyond China. 'Shein has licensed its brand for domestic use to Reliance which is responsible for manufacturing, supply chain, sales and operations in the Indian market,' the company told Reuters in a statement.
Reliance did not comment on the matter.
Shein first entered India in 2018, but its app was banned in 2020 during a broader crackdown on Chinese-linked apps amid border tensions. The brand re-entered in February 2025 through a licensing deal with Reliance Retail, which now operates SheinIndia.in.
Unlike Shein's global sites, which rely heavily on Chinese suppliers, the Indian portal sells clothes made locally.
Since relaunch, the Shein India app has been downloaded 2.7 million times across iOS and Android platforms, with monthly growth averaging 120%, according to Sensor Tower.
However, the offerings are still modest. Around 12,000 designs are available compared to over 600,000 on Shein's US site. Prices remain ultra-competitive, with the cheapest women's dresses listed at Rs 349 ($4), only slightly higher than US prices due to local production costs.
The push to export Indian-made fashion is part of a larger goal to adopt Shein's rapid, on-demand manufacturing model.
Reliance executives have been working closely with suppliers to trial small production runsâ€'sometimes as few as 100 pieces per designâ€'and scale up only for styles that perform well, added the news agency's report.
To achieve this, Reliance is also looking to build capabilities in areas where India currently lacks edge, particularly synthetic fabric manufacturing. 'The firm will invest in suppliers and help them grow which in turn will help the Shein-Reliance partnership go global,' the sources told Reuters.
The plan is to begin offering India-made Shein garments on its US and UK platformsâ€'two of its largest marketsâ€'marking a sharp break from the company's traditional China-first sourcing strategy. The timeline is still fluid, the sources said, and hinges on how quickly Reliance can ramp up its supplier network.
Union Minister of Commerce and Industry, Piyush Goyal, had hinted at this pivot in Parliament late last year, saying the Shein-Reliance deal was designed to 'create a network of Indian suppliers of Shein-branded clothes for sale domestically and globally.'
Shein, which generated over $30 billion in annual revenue through aggressive pricing and marketing, currently works with more than 7,000 suppliers in China. With this new venture, India is being positioned as a manufacturing alternativeâ€'potentially turning the country into a key node in global fast fashion supply chains.
For Reliance, the Shein partnership is one among several in fashion retail. The conglomerate already runs Ajio and has deals with international brands including Brooks Brothers and Marks & Spencer. It competes aggressively with Amazon, Flipkart and value retailers like Tata's Zudio
Shein and Reliance Retail are working on an ambitious plan to transform India into a global manufacturing base for fast fashion, reported news agency Reuters.
The aim is to make Shein-branded clothes in India not just for local sales but also for international markets, starting with the US and UK, within the next 6 to 12 months, added the report, citing two people familiar with the discussions.
The China-founded, Singapore-headquartered fashion giant has partnered with Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Retail to scale up operations in India, in a strategic pivot driven partly by US tariffs on Chinese goods.
The companies are now racing to expand their network of Indian garment manufacturers from 150 to 1,000 by mid-2026, the sources said.
The Shein-Reliance collaboration is part of a broader global shift in supply chains, as fashion retailers look to diversify beyond China. 'Shein has licensed its brand for domestic use to Reliance which is responsible for manufacturing, supply chain, sales and operations in the Indian market,' the company told Reuters in a statement.
Reliance did not comment on the matter.
Shein first entered India in 2018, but its app was banned in 2020 during a broader crackdown on Chinese-linked apps amid border tensions. The brand re-entered in February 2025 through a licensing deal with Reliance Retail, which now operates SheinIndia.in.
Unlike Shein's global sites, which rely heavily on Chinese suppliers, the Indian portal sells clothes made locally.
Since relaunch, the Shein India app has been downloaded 2.7 million times across iOS and Android platforms, with monthly growth averaging 120%, according to Sensor Tower.
However, the offerings are still modest. Around 12,000 designs are available compared to over 600,000 on Shein's US site. Prices remain ultra-competitive, with the cheapest women's dresses listed at Rs 349 ($4), only slightly higher than US prices due to local production costs.
The push to export Indian-made fashion is part of a larger goal to adopt Shein's rapid, on-demand manufacturing model.
Reliance executives have been working closely with suppliers to trial small production runsâ€'sometimes as few as 100 pieces per designâ€'and scale up only for styles that perform well, added the news agency's report.
To achieve this, Reliance is also looking to build capabilities in areas where India currently lacks edge, particularly synthetic fabric manufacturing. 'The firm will invest in suppliers and help them grow which in turn will help the Shein-Reliance partnership go global,' the sources told Reuters.
The plan is to begin offering India-made Shein garments on its US and UK platformsâ€'two of its largest marketsâ€'marking a sharp break from the company's traditional China-first sourcing strategy. The timeline is still fluid, the sources said, and hinges on how quickly Reliance can ramp up its supplier network.
Union Minister of Commerce and Industry, Piyush Goyal, had hinted at this pivot in Parliament late last year, saying the Shein-Reliance deal was designed to 'create a network of Indian suppliers of Shein-branded clothes for sale domestically and globally.'
Shein, which generated over $30 billion in annual revenue through aggressive pricing and marketing, currently works with more than 7,000 suppliers in China. With this new venture, India is being positioned as a manufacturing alternativeâ€'potentially turning the country into a key node in global fast fashion supply chains.
For Reliance, the Shein partnership is one among several in fashion retail. The conglomerate already runs Ajio and has deals with international brands including Brooks Brothers and Marks & Spencer. It competes aggressively with Amazon, Flipkart and value retailers like Tata's Zudio Join our WhatsApp Channel
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
3 minutes ago
- Time of India
Auto companies 'in full panic' over rare-earths bottleneck
Frank Eckard, CEO of a German magnet maker, has been fielding a flood of calls in recent weeks. Exasperated automakers and parts suppliers have been desperate to find alternative sources of magnets, which are in short supply due to Chinese export curbs. Some told Eckard their factories could be idled by mid-July without backup magnet supplies. "The whole car industry is in full panic," said Eckard, CEO of Magnosphere, based in Troisdorf, Germany. "They are willing to pay any price." Car executives have once again been driven into their war rooms, concerned that China's tight export controls on rare-earth magnets - crucially needed to make cars - could cripple production. U.S. President Donald Trump said Friday that Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to let rare earths minerals and magnets flow to the United States. A U.S. trade team is scheduled to meet Chinese counterparts for talks in London on Monday. The industry worries that the rare-earths situation could cascade into the third massive supply chain shock in five years. A semiconductor shortage wiped away millions of cars from automakers' production plans, from roughly 2021 to 2023. Before that, the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 shut factories for weeks. Those crises prompted the industry to fortify supply chain strategies. Executives have prioritized backup supplies for key components and reexamined the use of just-in-time inventories, which save money but can leave them without stockpiles when a crisis unfurls. Judging from Eckard's inbound calls, though, "nobody has learned from the past," he said. This time, as the rare-earths bottleneck tightens, the industry has few good options, given the extent to which China dominates the market. The fate of automakers' assembly lines has been left to a small team of Chinese bureaucrats as it reviews hundreds of applications for export permits. Several European auto-supplier plants have already shut down, with more outages coming, said the region's auto supplier association, CLEPA. "Sooner or later, this will confront everyone," said CLEPA Secretary-General Benjamin Krieger. Cars today use rare-earths-based motors in dozens of components - side mirrors, stereo speakers, oil pumps, windshield wipers, and sensors for fuel leakage and braking sensors. China controls up to 70% of global rare-earths mining, 85% of refining capacity and about 90% of rare-earths metal alloy and magnet production, consultancy AlixPartners said. The average electric vehicle uses about .5 kg (just over 1 pound) of rare earths elements, and a fossil-fuel car uses just half that, according to the International Energy Agency. China has clamped down before, including in a 2010 dispute with Japan, during which it curbed rare-earths exports. Japan had to find alternative suppliers, and by 2018, China accounted for only 58% of its rare earth imports. "China has had a rare-earth card to play whenever they wanted to," said Mark Smith, CEO of mining company NioCorp, which is developing a rare-earth project in Nebraska scheduled to start production within three years. Across the industry, automakers have been trying to wean off China for rare-earth magnets, or even develop magnets that do not need those elements. But most efforts are years away from the scale needed. "It's really about identifying ... and finding alternative solutions" outside China, Joseph Palmieri, head of supply chain management at supplier Aptiv, said at a conference in Detroit last week. Automakers including General Motors and BMW and major suppliers such as ZF and BorgWarner are working on motors with low-to-zero rare-earth content, but few have managed to scale production enough to cut costs. The EU has launched initiatives including the Critical Raw Materials Act to boost European rare-earth sources. But it has not moved fast enough, said Noah Barkin, a senior advisor at Rhodium Group, a China-focused U.S. think tank. Even players that have developed marketable products struggle to compete with Chinese producers on price. David Bender, co-head of German metal specialist Heraeus' magnet recycling business, said it is only operating at 1% capacity and will have to close next year if sales do not increase. Minneapolis-based Niron has developed rare-earth free magnets and has raised more than $250 million from investors including GM, Stellantis and auto supplier Magna. "We've seen a step change in interest from investors and customers" since China's export controls took effect, CEO Jonathan Rowntree said. It is planning a $1 billion plant scheduled to start production in 2029. England-based Warwick Acoustics has developed rare-earth-free speakers expected to appear in a luxury car later this year. CEO Mike Grant said the company has been in talks with another dozen automakers, although the speakers are not expected to be available in mainstream models for about five years. As auto companies scout longer-term solutions, they are left scrambling to avert imminent factory shutdowns. Automakers must figure out which of their suppliers - and smaller ones a few links up the supply chain - need export permits. Mercedes-Benz, for example, is talking to suppliers about building rare-earth stockpiles. Analysts said the constraints could force automakers to make cars without certain parts and park them until they become available, as GM and others did during the semiconductor crisis. Automakers' reliance on China does not end with rare earth elements. A 2024 European Commission report said China controls more than 50% of global supply of 19 key raw materials, including manganese, graphite and aluminum. Andy Leyland, co-founder of supply chain specialist SC Insights, said any of those elements could be used as leverage by China. "This just is a warning shot," he said.


Mint
6 minutes ago
- Mint
UK to end ban on retail investors buying crypto exchange-traded notes
(Refiles to remove extraneous word in the headline; no change to text) LONDON (Reuters) -Britain's financial regulator is to remove a ban on consumers buying crypto exchange-traded notes (ETNs), ditching its previous position of wanting to keep them out of the hands of retail investors. The Financial Conduct Authority said on Friday that allowing retail investors to buy ETNs would support growth and competitiveness, in the latest sign that the UK is shifting its approach to crypto as the government seeks to grow the economy and support a digital assets industry. Last year the FCA had approved the launch of crypto ETNs for professional traders but banned retail investors from access, calling the products "ill-suited" because of "the harm they pose". "We want to rebalance our approach to risk and lifting the ban would allow people to make the choice on whether such a high-risk investment is right for them given they could lose all their money," David Geale, executive director of payments and digital assets at the FCA, said in a statement on Friday. The proposal will now go out for consultation. Britain in April published draft laws for bringing cryptocurrencies under compulsory regulation for the first time, aligning it with the United States' approach, rather than the European Union, which has built rules tailored to the industry. To be sold to individual consumers, the ETNs will need to be traded on an FCA-approved investment exchange, the regulator said. A ban on retail investors trading cryptoasset derivatives would remain, the watchdog added. (Reporting by Tommy Reggiori Wilkes. Editing by Jane Merriman)


Mint
6 minutes ago
- Mint
Why more equities won't save you from low withdrawal rates in retirement
Retirees are often drawn to a tempting idea: since equities typically deliver higher returns over the long run, a retirement portfolio with more equities will produce better outcomes. Wouldn't it be nice to escape the meagre 3% withdrawal rate by investing more heavily in equities? Unfortunately, it's not so straightforward. Beyond a point, increasing equity allocation will reduce, not raise, the withdrawal rate. This is due to a crucial but underappreciated concept: sequence of return risk. In portfolios that experience regular withdrawals, not just the returns but the order in which they are earned matter, which can have dramatic consequences. Also Read: Relying on rental income in retirement? Take these steps to protect yourself. The table shows how two retirees (A and B) experience the same average returns but in different sequences. Despite identical withdrawals, A (who faces early losses) ends up with just ₹59, while B (who sees early gains) ends up with ₹71—this is sequence risk at work. In a portfolio with no withdrawals, only returns matter—not the order in which they occur. This is because multiplication is commutative: 1 × 1.1 × 0.9 × 1.2 is the same as 1 × 0.9 × 1.2 × 1.1. But when you introduce regular withdrawals, you are now subtracting from the portfolio every year. In mathematical terms, you are combining subtraction with multiplication, and the commutative property breaks down. The arithmetic changes and the sequence begin to matter. High sequence risk A retirement portfolio with heavy equity exposure is likely to face substantial volatility and heightened sequence risk. In the accumulation phase, volatility can be a friend—it brings down average cost through disciplined investing. But in the decumulation phase, volatility becomes a foe. A 20% drawdown early in retirement can cause lasting damage, especially if the retiree is simultaneously withdrawing funds to meet expenses. Unlike a young investor, the retiree cannot 'wait it out". Also Read: How to prepare for retirement in a world of increasing life expectancy This can be illustrated by conducting simulations on retirement portfolios with varying equity allocation. We conducted multiple such simulations to check how the optimal withdrawal rates vary for different asset allocations. The findings are unambiguous. Withdrawal rates initially rise with greater equity exposure, peaking at 20–40%, but then begin to fall. Portfolios with higher equity allocation produced meaningfully lower safe withdrawal rates. This is not a quirk of Indian market data or a one-off observation. William Bengen, the American financial planner who introduced the '4% rule" in 1994, found the same. In his landmark study of historical US data, Bengen was surprised to find that safe withdrawal rates declined when equity allocations increased. He even noted that the worst outcomes were not produced by conservative portfolios with low equity exposure but by aggressive portfolios with too much equity. This insight wasn't isolated. The Trinity Study, an influential academic analysis, came to similar conclusions when it tested various asset allocations and their impact on withdrawal rates using US market history. Closer to home, my 2024 co-authored study with Rajan Raju had a similar conclusion. Using Indian data, we found that withdrawal rates initially rise with equity allocation but then begin to decline beyond a certain point. Also Read: How to build a ₹5 crore retirement corpus with ₹1.5 lakh monthly salary Though equities offer higher long-term returns, more equity does not always mean more retirement income. This is a paradox we need to wrap our heads around. Retirees should construct a portfolio with a balanced allocation that reduces volatility. If you have been smirking at retirees with good fixed-income allocations in their retirement portfolio, well, the joke may be on you. Ravi Saraogi, CFA, Sebi-registered investment adviser. and co-founder, Samasthiti Advisors.