
Pricing AI In SMB SaaS: Balancing ROI And Affordability
It's been over two years since generative AI went mainstream and several months since agentic AI claimed the throne. Early on, the race was all about being first to market with anything powered by AI. The goal was simple: find a solid use case and ship it fast.
Fast-forward to today, and the landscape is beginning to shift. AI is no longer just a shiny add-on; it's a layer of real functionality that comes with real costs. Some costs are usage-based and others are upfront. Many providers absorbed those expenses early on, but with the hype cooling, pressure is growing to prove ROI.
When serving the SMB market, monetizing AI is especially tricky. Most SMBs simply can't justify steep add-on costs. Many SMBs are hesitant about using it in their daily workflows and need to build trust gradually. This creates a delicate balance: how do you deliver AI that is trusted, drives value and allows monetization?
In this article, I'll share what we've learned at vcita and provide best practices for monetizing AI without compromising your product's trust and affordability.
Common Models For Pricing AI Features
Among SaaS players, several patterns are gaining popularity:
It may feel natural to include AI features as part of your core product offering without charging extra. For example, Zoom bundles its generative AI assistant with all paid accounts at no additional cost, aiming to make AI easy and accessible. Similarly, HubSpot offers its AI Content Assistant and ChatSpot tools for free to all users, reserving premium features for higher-tier plans.
While you'll initially absorb the cost of providing AI, these tools can significantly boost the perceived value of your product. Over time, this added value can justify a higher price—not just to recoup expenses, but to reflect what the product is now worth to customers.
Another model offers AI as a premium add-on, requiring customers to pay an extra fee to unlock AI capabilities. This approach treats advanced AI functionality as a value-added upsell.
Many large vendors have gone this route, including Microsoft's new Copilot for Microsoft 365, which is priced per user. Salesforce similarly rolled out Sales GPT and Service GPT as add-ons with a cost per user.
With the premium add-on model, AI costs are offset by new revenue and customers can pay for advanced capabilities. It can make the business case for AI features very clear: if the feature truly saves time or money, some segment will pay for it. However, the result could also be low adoption of the AI features, and if competitors start bundling similar features for free, a standalone fee becomes difficult to justify.
This model charges based on how much customers use AI—measured by outputs, API calls or tasks completed. The appeal is that it directly ties cost to consumption: your clients pay in proportion to the value they get.
A clear example is Intercom's AI customer service bot. Intercom requires at least one paid seat on its platform and then charges per resolution the AI agent handles.
For SMB customers, pay-as-you-go pricing can be attractive if it offers flexibility and a low entry cost. On the flip side, unpredictability in bills is a major concern for SMBs.
There's also the cognitive load of monitoring usage. You'll need the infrastructure for selling and billing for these quotes, providing transparency on consumption and defining fallback behaviors for the scenarios where quotas are not renewed. None of these is mission-impossible, but none can be built overnight.
Best Practices For Using AI For SMBs
It has been two years since we launched our AI solution for SMBs. As we continue to enhance and expand our product, we develop a deeper understanding of where SMBs get the best value from AI, and how best to monetize.
Since many of us share the mission of empowering SMBs with technology, I wanted to share three key lessons we've learned so far:
Many SMBs are still figuring out what AI means for them. Invest in product guides and other educational assets that help users understand the time saved or ROI gained. When customers understand the benefit, they're more likely to pay for it or upgrade.
Set pricing based on outcomes, not just features. If your AI saves users 5-10 hours a week, make sure your price reflects that. At vcita, beta testing and user interviews help us understand and validate our product's propositions and confidently communicate AI's impact.
As AI continues to evolve, strategies will likely shift as well. This article is a snapshot of our approach as of 2025. What does the future hold for the commercialization of AI products? Even AI can't predict that. Our best option is to remain flexible and respond fast.
Balancing ROI With Accessibility
Looking ahead, maintaining two versions of your software—one with AI and one without—just isn't sustainable. It can increase complexity, slow down innovation and divide focus. We believe AI will soon be a core part of every SaaS platform, embedded in its infrastructure like any other essential component. It won't be an add-on; it'll be how software works.
That said, not every AI feature should carry a premium price. Basic, value-enhancing AI will likely be included by default. Only advanced capabilities that deliver clear, measurable ROI to SMBs should come at a cost. In the SMB segment, one principle remains firm: value must match price.
The SaaS companies that win in the age of AI will be those that build with empathy, price with clarity and align revenue with customer results. Help your customers grow with AI and you'll grow with them.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here is Why ProPetro Holding (PUMP) Plunged This Week
The share price of ProPetro Holding Corp. (NYSE:PUMP) fell by 13.3% between July 11 and July 18, 2025, putting it among the Energy Stocks that Lost the Most This Week. An oil derrick silhouetted against a rising sun with a blue sky in the background. ProPetro Holding Corp. (NYSE:PUMP) is an oilfield services company that engages in the provision of hydraulic fracturing and other complementary services. ProPetro Holding Corp. (NYSE:PUMP) plunged this week following a downturn witnessed in the overall oilfield services sector, amid reports of a slowdown in drilling activity and a broader pullback in exploration and production spending. Analysts expect the sector to post a decline in earnings in the Q2 earnings season, as well as a drop in guidance for the second half of the year. Moreover, investors may also have reacted to ProPetro Holding Corp. (NYSE:PUMP) recently announcing a change in leadership, with Mr. Caleb Weatherl appointed as the company's new CFO on July 14, 2025. Following the recent decline, the share price of ProPetro Holding Corp. (NYSE:PUMP) has plunged by over 42% since the beginning of 2025. While we acknowledge the potential of PUMP as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 12 Best Oil and Gas Dividend Stocks to Buy Now and The 5 Energy Stocks Billionaires are Quietly Piling Into. Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Target downgraded, Dollar Tree upgraded: Wall Street's top analyst calls
The most talked about and market moving research calls around Wall Street are now in one place. Here are today's research calls that investors need to know, as compiled by The 5 Upgrades: Barclays upgraded Dollar Tree (DLTR) to Overweight from Equal Weight with a price target of $120, up from $95. The company is positioned to benefit from a trade down by consumes, which will accelerates in the second half of 2025, the firm tells investors in a research note. Morgan Stanley upgraded Pinterest (PINS) to Overweight from Equal Weight with a price target of $45, up from $37. The firm's advertising checks are constructive on Pinterest's improving ad efficiency and performance-driven growth. Morgan Stanley upgraded Etsy (ETSY) to Equal Weight from Underweight with a price target of $50, up from $38. The firm sees a more balanced catalyst path for the shares after they underperformed the S&P 500 Index by 20% over the past year. Seaport Research upgraded both Analog Devices (ADI) and Texas Instruments (TXN) to Neutral from Sell with no price target. While the firm sees "no strong catalysts," it acknowledges that it was "wrong" in its prior thought that the analog inventory cycle was not going to improve and the macro economy was slowing. Monness Crespi upgraded Fiserv (FI) to Neutral from Sell with no price target, telling investors that the firm sees fair value at about $155 per share. The firm's sense is that the market has been looking to revalue the stock as long as the Clover volume trajectory remains above double digits over the medium term and it recommends investors to "be ready" for the next opportunity. Top 5 Downgrades: Barclays downgraded Target (TGT) to Underweight from Equal Weight with an unchanged price target of $91. The firm says that absent a bigger strategic shift, the company's sales will continue to underperform. Needham downgraded Sarepta (SRPT) to Underperform from Hold without a price target. The company late Friday reported receiving an informal request from the FDA to voluntarily halt shipments of Elevidys and that it denied this request, the firm tells investors in a research note. Mizuho, Leerink, and Baird also downgraded Sarepta to Neutral-equivalent ratings, while Deutsche Bank cut its rating on the name to Sell. Truist downgraded Biogen (BIIB) to Hold from Buy with a price target of $142, down from $199, after a transfer in coverage. The stock's discounted multiple versus pees is warranted given the "suboptimal" growth outlook for Biogen's commercial franchise, the firm tells investors in a research note. Argus downgraded Elevance Health (ELV) to Hold from Buy, citing the ongoing pressures on the company's profit margins from medical cost trends in its Medicaid and ACA marketplace businesses. Truist downgraded Royal Caribbean (RCL) to Hold from Buy with a price target of $337, up from $275. Truist has observed a bounce-back in bookings since April's pullback, but when averaging March-early July's year over year bookings, demand pace is only up low-to-mid-single digits, well off the high-teens monthly pace that 2024 averaged, the firm tells investors in a research note. Top 5 Initiations: Loop Capital initiated coverage of Autodesk (ADSK) with a Hold rating and $320 price target. Loop is constructive on Autodesk's long-term prospects but believes the stock's current valuation reflects much of its expected growth and execution improvements. Benchmark initiated coverage of General Motors (GM) with a Buy rating and $65 price target, calling the stock "a compelling opportunity for investors seeking exposure to a durable, cash-generative U.S. industrial franchise with underappreciated upside potential." Oppenheimer initiated coverage of Affirm (AFRM) with an Outperform rating and $80 price target, offering 15% upside potential. The firm argues that Affirm stands out as a leader in the Buy Now, Pay Later space with its advanced underwriting, robust funding strategy, strong merchant relationships, and transparent pricing model. Stephens initiated coverage of Paylocity (PCTY) with an Equal Weight rating and $200 price target. The firm believes the company is well positioned to gain share "while navigating sub-optimal labor market conditions," but believes the valuation reflects expectations of a conservative guide with modest outperformance. Barclays initiated coverage of Kroger (KR) with an Equal Weight rating and $75 price target. The firm is positive on Kroger's post-deal refocus. Barclays also started Sprouts Farmers (SFM) with an Equal Weight and Albertsons (ACI) with an Underweight. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Core Laboratories (CLB) Falls Amid a Difficult Time for the Oilfield Services Sector
The share price of Core Laboratories Inc. (NYSE:CLB) fell by 11.35% between July 11 and July 18, 2025, putting it among the Energy Stocks that Lost the Most This Week. A drilling rig manned by engineers and oil field workers preparing to explore a new petroleum reservoir. Core Laboratories Inc. (NYSE:CLB) is a leading global provider of proprietary and patented reservoir description and production enhancement services and products for the oil and gas industry. Core Laboratories Inc. (NYSE:CLB) slumped this week after Stifel lowered the firm's price target from $13 to $12, while maintaining a 'Hold' rating on its shares. The move reflects the analyst's overall bearish outlook for the overall oilfield services sector, which has significantly underperformed the broader market since the beginning of 2025. The oil and gas services industry is expected to post a decline in profits this earnings season due to an overall slowdown in drilling activity, caused by falling crude oil prices and global economic uncertainty due to President Trump's tariff war. It is also expected that the guidance for the second half of this year will probably be lowered among oilfield contractors, further weighing down their stocks. While we acknowledge the potential of CLB as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 12 Best Oil and Gas Dividend Stocks to Buy Now and The 5 Energy Stocks Billionaires are Quietly Piling Into. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data