
Comparing The 2025 Lotus Emira V6 and Porsche Cayman GTS
The 2025 Porsche 718 Cayman GTS 4.0 and Lotus Emira V6 start at $101,695 and $102,250, respectively, and couldn't be more evenly matched in their ability to put a smile on any enthusiast's face. Both produce around 400 horsepower from their mid-mounted engines, are available with a manual transmission and possess just two seats in their cabins. I recently had the chance to drive each of these six-speed manual-equipped luxury sports cars within a three-week timespan, and they both arrived with around 500 miles on the odometer. This comparison couldn't be more perfect; here's how they stack up against each other.
Exterior and Interior
The quickest of glances reveals each model's sporting intentions. They're low-slung and focused fare, with pronounced front and rear fenders and hatches in place of conventional trunk lids, plus energetic facial expressions by way of their respective grille, headlight, and front bumper designs. But each conveys sportiness in a different way—no matter color, the Porsche is more understated, ready to blend in with normal traffic. The Lotus is more angular, and, with such large vents straked across its rear fenders and doors, conjures up an aesthetic that's usually reserved for Ferrari and McLaren. They're both handsome little devils, and it's truly up to the eye of the beholder which they'd rather accumulate mileage in as a weekend toy, spicy daily commuter, or both.
Inside, it's harder to differentiate between the two. Materials are well-appointed with leather and Alcantara throughout, a comfortable sports car driving position, and a center infotainment screen that's small and out of the way. Both felt like they underwent thorough quality control in rooting out squeaks and rattles, though the Lotus is ever-so-slightly lacking here—there's also less insulation between the seats and engine, so you hear more of what's going on back there. Again, personal preference, and both have their fair share of road and tire noise.
Two areas where the Cayman has a clear advantage is cargo room and visibility. It's easier to see out of it—although the Emira isn't terrible—and it has quite a lot more storage between its trunk and frunk. However, there are interesting trade-offs between the two: The Lotus may only have a small trunk area, but it has much larger door pockets and interior storage. On the other hand, the Porsche has miniscule door pockets and not much for interior storage besides a small shelf behind the seats and the glovebox—its center armrest flips up to store exactly one average-sized cell phone, and nothing more. Connectivity-wise, the Emira reigns supreme, but that's not saying much, as it has two USB-C ports as opposed to the Cayman's single USB-A. Neither possesses the best cupholder design, but at least the Cayman's two flip out from the dashboard in front of the passenger, whereas the Emira's are rather small and inconveniently placed right behind the shifter.
Finally, interior space is quite good between the two. My tall, lanky stature fit in both quite comfortably with lots of headroom, though the Porsche was just a bit more spacious and airy, and its seat felt tailor-made for me, too. The Lotus' dimensions are more condensed, but not to an annoying degree, and its seat felt like it was better-suited for someone standing a few inches shorter.
Inputs
In our modern era of electrically assisted power steering reigning supreme, and gears being selected by way of hydraulic pressure, this may be the most important trait between the Cayman and Emira. The Porsche has the best-of-the-best on the electric end of the steering spectrum: It loads up in corners, has great feedback, and even cues you in on available grip and road texture quite well. And, because it's electric, if you choose to just cruise around in comfort and not think about these things, it'll ensure you never have to. The Lotus' hydraulically assisted rack is all this and more; you feel so much of what's going on at the front end, it's so busy and granular. Not to any unsettling degree, but you do have to keep a firmer grasp on it across awkwardly cambered surfaces and large bumps. Like their respective designs, this one's a toss-up—it all comes down to personal preference.
It's a pleasure to shift one's own gears in 2025, and both the Porsche and Lotus offer it free-of-charge at their base MSRPs. The Baden-Württemberg bruiser gets the upper-hand in this department—its shifter has perfect spring and a very positive and smooth engagement. The Emira is still a treat, but is clunkier in its operation and smooth/fast shifts are harder to master.
However, the Emira edges past the Cayman in the pedal box. While not for every shoe size, I absolutely adored the Emira's formula car-like dimensions, as it made for very precise inputs and the perfect heel-toe downshift felt like a real accomplishment. The Cayman wasn't bad here, but spacing between the brake and gas—on either axis—wasn't quite as ideal. In terms of braking inputs, themselves, I also preferred the Emira's firmer and grabbier offering, whereas the Porsche's had a hair too much initial softness.
Performance
These two European sports cars continue to be neck-and-neck in regards to their respective outputs. The Cayman's naturally aspirated 4.0-liter flat-six produces 394 horsepower and 309 lb-ft of torque, whereas the Emira V6's 3.5-liter supercharged V6 puts out 400 and 310, respectively. Considering the former's 3,196-pound curbweight, and the latter's 3,279, there couldn't be a closer match. As tested by Car And Driver, they're within a half-second of each other's 0-60 time.
It's even tougher when you start pondering each powerplant's respective personality. The 4.0's deep howl was legitimately intoxicating—I wanted to drive the Cayman as much as possible, just to hear its angry bark from the 3,000 RPM and higher. But then, the same goes for the Emira—while higher-pitched and sharper, it too sounded awesome from the mid-range and beyond, and the harmonizing supercharger whine was simply beautiful.
Finally, one area where there's a clear advantage: Gearing. The GTS is geared rather long, so it took some readjusting in my brain to determine the best cog to be in while ripping through my favorite test roads. Enthusiasts say this is to help sandbag it against Porsche's coveted 911 badge, which makes sense, but I wouldn't say it was bad. Rather, not as ideal. The Emira's gearing was much more natural and akin to what you'd expect from a small sports car, therefore it's at the top of the podium in this category.
Driving Experience
Finally, it all comes down to how each of these little mid-engine monsters take on a fun, twisty road. But, yet again, it's quite hard to select a clear winner.
They're both eager to turn in, have great overall communication, and respond with the slightest amount of roll to help key drivers in on how much lateral G each tire's contact patch is putting up with. Well, the Cayman does so with adaptive dampers (Sport was my preferred overall setting), whereas the Emira does so with conventional passive units, but both are excellent. Even though the Cayman has MacPherson suspension up front, whereas the Emira is double-wishbone all around.
Since the Emira has less bodywork and equipment ahead of the front axle, it feels slightly more lively. But the Cayman is no slouch here, either. They both have blissfully low centers of gravity, and no self-respecting cornering aficionado would gripe about their sizes on the road—between the two, you feel like it's easier to safely carve the line you want, inside your lane, unlike a lot of bloated high-performance sedans these days.
The Lotus feels more like an event, thanks to more interior noise, having to climb down into it, and its more exotic looks and driving position. The Porsche, while more refined, is also a real treat to plop down into, hear the guttural anger of its 4.0 across the entire rev band, and generally enjoy in any scenario. They're both enthusiast-comfortable in daily driving, though, the Porsche rides just a tad smoother, thanks to its adaptive dampers.
Here, it's a draw. Prospective owners will simply have to drive both and go from there.
Two Brilliant Sports Car
I was thrilled to get to drive the 2025 Porsche 718 Cayman GTS 4.0 and Lotus Emira V6 within a few weeks of each other, and with both having around 500 miles on their odometers. They're both top choices in the high-end European sports car market—it's incredibly tough to argue with either. The Emira is also available with a Mercedes-AMG-sourced turbocharged four-cylinder and dual-clutch automatic gearbox, which is also a lot of fun, but the stick-shifted V6 is my preferred iteration. The Cayman and Emira V6 handle, steer, and accelerate brilliantly, and their inputs are truly top-shelf. It would take a lot of pondering and soul-searching to decide between either, especially if purchased as new.
However, with the Cayman reportedly ceasing production this fall, the decision process may be a bit easier. I'm still pulling for Porsche to come out and say that a new gasoline-powered Boxster/Cayman generation is on the way, but time is ticking. The Emira won't be around much longer, either, so get in while the gettin's good.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Continental Auto Unit Margin Climbs Ahead of IPO
Continental's auto-parts unit improved profitability in the second quarter after cutting costs and raising prices ahead of its planned initial public offering in September. CFO Olaf Schick speaks on Bloomberg Television. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Motor Trend
an hour ago
- Motor Trend
Why Hydrogen-Powered Cars Have Yet to Blow Up
The world's very first internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle wasn't powered by gasoline but rather by hydrogen. Way back in 1807, Francois Isaac de Rivaz used a hydrogen-filled ballon to drive an engine he developed to propel an experimental vehicle—more than 50 years before the first gasoline-powered engine was invented by Nicolaus August Otto. The first electric vehicle didn't appear until 1888 via the Flocken Elektrowagen, and the basis for modern hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs) arrived a year later when Ludwig Mond and Carl Langer demonstrated and patented the technology in 1889. Hydrogen fuel cell vehicles (HFCVs) lag behind gas and electric cars due to limited infrastructure, high costs, and competition. Only three models are in the U.S. market, mostly in California. HFCVs may find more success in heavy-duty vehicles, while challenges persist in the passenger car sector. This summary was generated by AI using content from this MotorTrend article. Read Next So although hydrogen-powered vehicles theoretically came first, forerunners are not always the ultimate frontrunners, and after more than a century of passenger cars proliferating across the globe, HFCVs have lagged to a distant third behind gas and battery electric vehicles (BEVs). HFCVs have been largely regulated to research projects such as GM's 1966 Electrovan, which is widely considered to be the first modern HFCV ever produced. But several automakers persist in trying to make HFCVs viable despite significant barriers, such as a severe lack of fueling infrastructure, higher vehicle and fuel prices, and competition from a recent wave of lower-priced, more plentiful, and more easily fueled electric vehicles. Only Three Passenger HFCVs Available BEVs actually outpaced their gasoline-fueled rivals in popularity and performance during the early horseless carriage days, and in the past decade they've reemerged to challenge the dominance of ICE vehicles, with dozens of models available from traditional car companies and EV-only startups. By comparison, only three passenger HFCVs are currently available in the U.S.—the Toyota Mirai, Hyundai Nexo, and Honda CR-V e:FCEV—and all are sold exclusively in California, the state with the lion's share of public hydrogen fueling stations. Other automakers are also testing HFCVs and producing them in limited numbers. General Motors has been developing HFCVs since 2017, and in 2023 BMW began road testing of a fleet of iX5 Hydrogen vehicles that use Toyota technology. Starting in 2021, Jaguar Land Rover experimented with an HFCV concept based on the Land Rover Defender, while the Ineos Grenadier, with its retro Land Rover Defender exterior, has been outfitted with a HFCV powertrain the company said could be in production within two years. In 2022, Volkswagen partnered with Kraftwerk Tubes to create new hydrogen fuel cell tech it said was cheaper to produce and could theoretically deliver a driving range of more than 1,200 miles but has since been quiet on the HFCV front. Other automakers, including Mercedes-Benz and most recently Stellantis, have pulled the plug on their HFCV development programs. While a handful of automakers keeping pumping money into the technology, HFCVs face an uphill battle for widespread adoption in the U.S. passenger vehicle market, saidChris Liu, senior automotive analyst for new energy vehicles at the tech consulting firm Omdia. 'While the core technology is considered mature, with most components reaching high levels of readiness, critical barriers remain, particularly in cost and infrastructure.' A Huge Lack of Fueling Infrastructure Perhaps the biggest obstacle to widespread adoption of HFCVs is the severely limited public fueling infrastructure. It's the same problem that plagued early BEVs, though public charging has grown significantly along with increased sales of the vehicles—and drivers can charge their electric cars at home. As of June 2025, there are some 74,000 public EV charging stations online in America, compared to just over 50 hydrogen fueling stations, of which most are in California. In early 2024, Shell announced it was closing seven hydrogen stations in California, which was not only a blow to HFCV owners and automakers but also a setback for the California-based nonprofit Hydrogen Fuel Cell Partnership, which was formed by automakers, fuel providers, and government agencies in a bid to grow fueling infrastructure. 'The idea was to coordinate the efforts of OEMs with the fuel providers,' said Ivor John, a hydrogen fuel consultant. After initial success in California, there was a push to roll the program out nationally. 'The dynamics are very different in each state when you're bringing government entities together with the OEMs and the different providers, so they've kind of stumbled.' In addition to the challenge of building out a hydrogen fueling infrastructure, other hurdles include the high costs of hydrogen production, transportation, and storage, according to Sergey Paltsev, a senior research scientist for the MIT Energy Initiative. 'To gain traction with consumers, either these costs have to go dramatically lower, or some sudden issues with internal combustion and electric vehicles would arise to make these more established options less appealing,' Paltsev said. 'To win consumer preferences, hydrogen cars have a long way to go in terms of reducing their costs for vehicles and fuel.' As is the case with public EV chargers, HFCV stations are not always operational and available, and given those stations require hydrogen to be generated, compressed, and delivered, it can potentially add hours to refueling wait times. In June 2019, HFCV owners in the San Francisco Bay Area found out just how fragile the retail hydrogen infrastructure is when an explosion at a chemical plant in the area caused a severe shortage of working fueling stations. Bay Area HFCV drivers had to check an online report to make sure they could access a fueling station to fill their tanks, while Toyota and Honda offered free rental cars to affected HFCV owners. MotorTrend experienced a similar if not quite as volatile Hydrogen Fuelpocalypse during our long-term test of a 2021 Toyota Mirai. And it's only gotten worse: In early 2025 hundreds of HFCV owners in California banded together to sue automakers and the state, asserting they were misinformed about fuel availability. High Hydrogen Fuel Prices Along with limited availability, HFCVs can cost more to drive compared to charging a BEV or filling a tank with gasoline. Over the year with our 2021 Mirai, the price of hydrogen, which is sold per kilogram (kg), was relatively stable, and the stations we visited charged between $13.14 to $18.69 per kg. Topping off the Mirai's 5.5-kg tank from a quarter full generally cost us between $45 and $50. Driving the Mirai 13,882 miles, we spent $2,996.37 on hydrogen, which averaged to about 21.7 cents/mile. By comparison, our 2020 Hyundai Sonata used $2,746.91 worth of gasoline after driving it 17,000 miles, and we paid an average of $3.89 per gallon, or about 16.1 cents/mile. We didn't have to pay out of our pocket for the hydrogen because every new Mirai comes with a $15,000 prepaid fuel card that works at all hydrogen stations. Honda and Hyundai also provide buyers and lessees with free hydrogen fuel for limited periods. If we had to pay after the fuel freebie ended, we would have paid more because in 2023 California's largest hydrogen supplier, True Zero, boosted prices to $36/kg from a cost of $13.14/kg less than three years before—meaning filling Mirai's 5.5-kg tank from empty could have cost as much as $175. HFCVs Cost More In addition to paying more for the fuel itself, HFCVs on average cost more than their BEV and ICE counterparts. 'The cost gap between HFCVs and BEVs continues to undermine the former's viability,' Liu said. The 2025 Honda CR-V e:FCEV, for example,jointly developed with GM, uses a 17.7-kWbattery that can be plugged in and charged to provide 29 miles of additional range on top of the 241 miles supplied by the fuel cell. It starts at $50,000 and has a total range of 270 miles, whereas the 2026 CR-V Hybrid starts at $35,630 and has a maximum gasoline/electric range of 590 miles, and the 2025 Honda Prologue BEV, also codeveloped with GM, has an EPA-rated range of 308 miles and starts at $47,400. The growing availability of BEVs is also making HFCVs even less competitive from a price perspective. 'We're seeing substantial competition in the market for electric cars in terms of different car makers and the models they offer,' MIT's Paltsev said. 'It puts a downward pressure on the prices for electric cars. Hence, the cost disparity between EVs and FCVs is growing rather than narrowing.'HFCVs not only are being outpaced by BEVs but also face rising competition from plug-in hybrids, range-extending vehicles, and a growing supply of used BEVs. Heavy-Duty Hydrogen-Powered Vehicles All is not lost on the hydrogen power front, however. For automakers that serve transportation needs beyond passenger vehicles, HFCVs have more practical applications in the heavy-duty and commercial vehicle sectors. 'In the commercial vehicle space, a more diversified refueling strategy is emerging, ranging from fast charging and battery swapping to hydrogen fuel cells,' Omdia's Liu said. Toyota, Hyundai, and other automakers are working with heavy-duty truck manufacturers and other stakeholders to bring HFCV technology to the logistics industry. 'Both Korea and Japan are well aligned with that,' John said of the promise of commercial applications. 'There's no question that hydrogen is a better fit for Class 8 semi-tractor-trailers where you can refuel the vehicles in 10 to 15 minutes.' In addition to the fast refueling time, HFCV semis also don't have to haul the massive weight of batteries, which reduces a BEV big rig's maximum cargo capacity and range. HFCVs also make more sense for heavy-duty trucks than for passenger vehicles because fueling infrastructure can be installed at private depots where they need to stop to load and unload. In turn, more hydrogen-powered commercial vehicles could help drive more public fueling options. 'The expansion of highway-based hydrogen stations could in theory support fuel cell passenger vehicles,' Liu said. 'However, the utilization of these stations is likely to be dominated by heavy-duty trucks, not passenger cars.' But even if this scenario were to play out to perfection, Paltsev believes it's a long way into the future, if at all. Living the Hydrogen Future in the Present John is living the hydrogen future now. He's on his second Toyota Mirai and has been driving a hydrogen-powered car for roughly nine years now. Of course, it helps that there's a hydrogen station a mile or so from his home in Santa Barbara, California. He said he's been unable to refuel only twice—once when he had to come back the next day and once within a couple of hours. 'I have reliable five-minute fueling, I can drive about 400 miles in the Mirai, and range anxiety isn't an issue as long as I know where the next station is,' John said. But it's not his only means of transportation given the Mirai's limitations. He owns a Nissan Leaf for around town and recently bought a Toyota RAV4 Prime plug-in hybrid for longer trips. 'I really love battery electric for this, the hydrogen vehicle for that, and RAV4 plug-in has 42 miles of electric range, and when I go on a trip I don't worry about finding a charging station,' he said. While it's hard to envision HFCV passenger cars being anything more than the novelty they are now for the foreseeable future, John believes there are still opportunities ahead for the powertrain, particularly in the aforementioned heavy-duty vehicle space. 'Toyota is very committed to developing the heavy-duty vehicle opportunity with hydrogen along with Hyundai,' John said. 'But I wouldn't rule out hydrogen vehicles coming back as a light-duty alternative, and I think we should see where it takes us.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Remanufactured Automotive Parts Market Opportunity Report 2025-2034 - Electrical and Electronic Parts Segment Dominated Remanufactured Automotive Market with 30% Share in 2024
Remanufactured Automotive Parts Market Soars: Sustainability, Tech Advances Drive Demand in EVs & Hybrids, Boosting Global Expansion Through 2034 Remanufactured Automotive Parts Market Dublin, Aug. 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Remanufactured Automotive Parts Market Opportunity, Growth Drivers, Industry Trend Analysis, and Forecast 2025-2034" has been added to Global Remanufactured Automotive Parts Market reached USD 69.8 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 7.4% between 2025 and 2034. The demand for remanufactured automotive parts is surging due to technological advancements, environmental benefits, and cost-efficiency. The rapid integration of automation, digitalization, and material science innovations has revolutionized the remanufacturing process, enhancing product quality and reliability. Modern technology enables remanufacturers to efficiently restore used parts to near-new condition, ensuring optimal performance and longevity. This trend is bolstered by the rising adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrid models, which rely on sophisticated components. Additionally, stringent government regulations on emissions and sustainability initiatives are pushing automakers to invest in remanufacturing solutions, reinforcing market growth. The increasing availability of high-quality remanufactured parts at competitive prices is influencing consumer purchasing decisions as vehicle owners seek cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternatives to new components. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Great Rates and Award-Winning Service The Insurance Savings You Expect Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You The remanufactured automotive parts market is segmented into key component categories, including electrical and electronic parts, engines, transmissions, wheels, and brakes. In 2024, the electrical and electronic parts segment held the largest market share, accounting for 30%. The growing reliance on advanced vehicle technologies, such as sensors, electric drivetrains, and infotainment systems, has amplified the demand for remanufactured electrical and electronic components. These components offer a sustainable way to extend the lifespan of vehicle systems while lowering repair and replacement costs. The integration of remanufactured electronics enhances vehicle efficiency and significantly reduces electronic waste, further driving the market forward. By vehicle type, the remanufactured automotive parts market includes passenger and commercial vehicles. The passenger vehicle segment dominated the market in 2024, securing a 54.6% share. This growth is driven by efforts to extend the longevity of automotive components and reduce the carbon footprint of vehicle production. The increasing adoption of remanufactured starters, alternators, and high-voltage batteries aligns with the industry's transition toward a circular economy, where reusing and refurbishing parts minimize environmental impact and conserve valuable resources. Automakers prioritize sustainable production and repair solutions, accelerating demand for remanufactured parts in the passenger vehicle sector. North America held a significant 35% share of the remanufactured automotive parts market in 2024, with the U.S. emerging as the dominant contributor. Projections indicate that the U.S. market will reach USD 33 billion by 2034, fueled by an increasing focus on sustainability, cost-effectiveness, and OEM-backed remanufacturing programs. Major automotive manufacturers are expanding their remanufacturing initiatives, offering a diverse range of remanufactured components to cater to rising demand. With stringent environmental policies, a strong aftermarket industry, and growing consumer awareness, North America remains a key region driving the global expansion of the remanufactured automotive parts market. Comprehensive Market Analysis and Forecast Industry trends, key growth drivers, challenges, future opportunities, and regulatory landscape Competitive landscape with Porter's Five Forces and PESTEL analysis Market size, segmentation, and regional forecasts In-depth company profiles, business strategies, financial insights, and SWOT analysis Key Attributes Report Attribute Details No. of Pages 165 Forecast Period 2024-2034 Estimated Market Value (USD) in 2024 $69.8 Billion Forecasted Market Value (USD) by 2034 $141 Billion Compound Annual Growth Rate 7.4% Regions Covered Global Key Topics CoveredChapter 1 Methodology & Scope1.1 Research Design1.1.1 Research Approach1.1.2 Data Collection Methods1.2 Base Estimates & Calculations1.2.1 Base Year Calculation1.2.2 Key Trends For Market estimation1.3 Forecast model1.4 Primary research and validation1.4.1 Primary sources1.4.2 Data mining sources1.5 Market scope & definitionChapter 2 Executive Summary2.1 Industry synopsis, 2021-2034Chapter 3 Industry Insights3.1 Industry ecosystem analysis3.1.1 Automakers3.1.2 Third-party remanufacturers3.1.3 Reverse logistics providers3.1.4 End use3.2 Supplier landscape3.3 Profit margin analysis3.4 Technology & innovation landscape3.5 Patent analysis3.6 Key news & initiatives3.7 Cost breakdown3.8 Price trend3.9 Regulatory landscape3.10 Impact forces3.10.1 Growth drivers3.10.1.1 Improving remanufacturing processes3.10.1.2 Stricter environmental policies3.10.1.3 Growing emphasis on reducing waste3.10.1.4 Increasing cost savings by using remanufactured parts3.10.2 Industry pitfalls & challenges3.10.2.1 Negative consumer perception3.10.2.2 Supply chain complexity3.11 Growth potential analysis3.12 Porter's analysis3.13 PESTEL analysisChapter 4 Competitive Landscape, 20244.1 Introduction4.2 Company market share analysis4.3 Competitive positioning matrix4.4 Strategic outlook matrixChapter 5 Market Estimates & Forecast, by Component, 2021-2034 ($Bn, Units)5.1 Key trends5.2 Electrical and electronic parts5.3 Engine5.4 Transmission5.5 Wheels and brakes5.6 OthersChapter 6 Market Estimates & Forecast, by Vehicle, 2021-2034 ($Bn, Units)6.1 Key trends6.2 Passenger vehicles6.2.1 Hatchback6.2.2 Sedan6.2.3 SUV6.3 Commercial vehicles6.3.1 Light Commercial Vehicles (LCV)6.3.2 Medium Commercial Vehicles (MCV)6.3.3 Heavy Commercial Vehicles (HCV)Chapter 7 Market Estimates & Forecast, by Supply, 2021-2034 ($Bn, Units)7.1 Key trends7.2 OEM7.3 AftermarketChapter 8 Market Estimates & Forecast, by Region, 2021-2034 ($Bn, Units)8.1 Key trends8.2 North America8.2.1 U.S.8.2.2 Canada8.3 Europe8.3.1 UK8.3.2 Germany8.3.3 France8.3.4 Italy8.3.5 Spain8.3.6 Russia8.3.7 Nordics8.4 Asia Pacific8.4.1 China8.4.2 India8.4.3 Japan8.4.4 Australia8.4.5 South Korea8.4.6 Southeast Asia8.5 Latin America8.5.1 Brazil8.5.2 Mexico8.5.3 Argentina8.6 MEA8.6.1 UAE8.6.2 South Africa8.6.3 Saudi ArabiaChapter 9 Company Profiles9.1 Andre Niermann9.2 BBB Industries9.3 BorgWarner9.4 Bosch9.5 Cardone9.6 Carwood9.7 Caterpillar9.8 Denso9.9 Detroit Diesel9.10 Eaton9.11 Jasper Engines & Transmissions9.12 Lucas Electrical9.13 Marelli9.14 Maval9.15 Motorcar Parts of America9.16 NAPA9.17 Stellantis9.18 Teamec9.19 Valeo9.20 ZFFor more information about this report visit About is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends. Attachment Remanufactured Automotive Parts Market CONTACT: CONTACT: Laura Wood,Senior Press Manager press@ For E.S.T Office Hours Call 1-917-300-0470 For U.S./ CAN Toll Free Call 1-800-526-8630 For GMT Office Hours Call +353-1-416-8900