
I just tested these incredible stereo speakers — and they're better than any soundbar I've ever tested
But the ever-present allure of a pair of stereo speakers is often just too much to take. The musical abilities of even the most expensive soundbars often leaves a lot to be desired, and there are times when even clever Dolby Atmos virtual mixes pale in comparison to actual, real stereo separation.
The KEF LSX II have long been a pair of speakers that I've wanted to test out. The brand is my favorite — the Blade speakers are my 'money is no object' dream speakers, my LS50 Metas have powered my HiFi for a long time, and the interesting-looking 'Uni-Q driver' that dominates their speaker fronts appears often in my sleeping moments.
So what are they like to use?
The KEF LSX II are the smaller option in KEF's wireless speaker range. They sound amazing not just for their size, packing in big speaker performance to a small package. They're not cheap, but they're well worth their high asking price.
The KEF LSX II are a pair of connected smart speakers that the brand might call its 'luxury low-end' price point. They cost $1,499, or about $500 more than the Sonos Arc Ultra will set you back before you add a subwoofer.
They're going up against similar models for Technics and other HiFi brands, and they're also angled at potential soundbar customers. To that end, they've got an HDMI port on the back so that you can connect a TV without needing a weird dongle. It also means they can be controlled with a TV controller, which is always helpful.
The speakers themselves feature KEF's Uni-Q drivers, which house a tweeter and the main driver in the same unit. Not only do they look really cool, but they also allow for the brand's signature detail and excellent sonic timing.
There are two units, and unlike some speakers at this format and size, they both need power. That's because they both contain amplifiers. Only one speaker has inputs and outputs, however, while the other has a socket to plug the other speaker in and a pairing button.
Why a pairing button? These speakers can be hooked up to one another wirelessly, which avoids some cables trailing around the floor. Instead, you can mount them on stands and have the power cables routed down the legs — that'll look pretty delicious indeed.
I'm not going to tell you these are the best-looking powered speakers around — that honor goes to anything that's made by Bang & Olufsen — but they're a very handsome option that sits next to your big-screen TV.
The front is dominated by the Uni-Q drivers in a contrasting color to the main unit, and then a logo and a small status light sit above and below. From the front they look like smaller versions of my LS50 Meta, which is pretty cool. The sides of the grey model that I tested are covered with fabric, which lends some extra texture to proceedings, but other colors have an all-over resin finish.
I'd recommend sticking them on speaker stands or even using some wall mounts for the speakers to finish the look — they're a minimalist speaker, and I think they deserve to sit on their own rather than on a TV stand. They're nice and small though, which makes them more flexible than some of the other options.
KEF has filled the LSX II with some seriously cool features. My favorite is the Wi-Fi connection, which means I can stream my favorite tunes from the best music streaming services without worrying about some kind of cable to make things work.
That also means I can slip them into my Roon server, so that I can stream tracks from my home music streaming setup, which is always a massive bonus. The App connects over the internet as well, which opens up even more features.
From there you can select the HDMI eARC system, which is helpful, or between the other inputs. There's a Bluetooth connection, as well as an optical port, and a 3.5mm aux for older devices. You can plug them into the network as well to make for a more stable connection.
All of the features work pretty well, although I did run into a couple of problems with the HMDI eARC. Sometimes I had to turn the speakers on separately when I turned on my TV, and sometimes I didn't. It wasn't the worst problem in the world, but it was irritating. Not enough to dampen my experience with the speakers.
So the KEF LSX II don't look all that big. That's because they're not — each unit is about the same size as a HomePod 2. You might expect that they'd only be good for smaller rooms as a result, but I'm not sure it's entirely possible to be more wrong.
Thanks to some impressive power being fed to the drivers by their individual amplifiers, they're able to pump out some seriously impressive sound. I was able to fill a large living room with the LSX II situated either side of my TV, with a massive bass body that didn't need to stretch itself to fill the space. Given how smaller speakers have really struggled in my space before, I was taken aback immediately by the sound of the LSX II.
I knew they were going to be good, my experience with KEF gear already told me as such. I knew there'd be some incredible detail mixed with spectacular instrument separation, but I didn't know they'd be able to do it when they had to bring sound to my living room.
But, boy, did they bring the noise. The depth of the guitars in Watain's They Rode On was enough that I could get lost within. The vocals were crystal clear, cutting through the thick, molasses-like instrumentation, matched by the impressive detail as the rest of the ensemble joined the fray.
The drums were impactful, the bass guitar meaty, and the electric guitar edged like a terrifying sacrificial knife. It was leagues above my Sonos Arc Ultra's music performance.
It mostly comes down to the stereo separation as much as it does the sonic capability of the speakers themselves. Music likes to be spread apart physically so that you can appreciate each different element of the track, while also serving to extend the soundstage. The LSX II are the perfect example of what happens when you give music space to breathe.
Controversially, I will take a properly separated stereo mix over a virtual surround mix any day of the week. The tiny drivers loaded into a soundbar can only do so much in making a mix sound bigger than it actually is, and even the best soundbars pale in comparison to the wizardry that goes on when the soundstage is physically widened.
With more space for the drivers to do their dirty work, you'll immediately notice more space. Even then, the dialog sits in the center of the mix, while sounds come from all around you.
It's not as impressive as having 11 speakers dotted around the room, of course, but add in a KEF subwoofer and you'd be hard-pressed to tell me whether you prefer the sound of the Sonos Arc Ultra or the KEF LSX II when it comes to watching your favorite blockbusters.
The opening scene of "Top Gun: Maverick" tells me all I need to know. The planes fly alongside you as chains and ropes whip around in the melee on board the carrier. The soundtrack sounds impeccable.
You miss some of the spatial imaging of the multi-channel soundbar, but the sound is altogether more pleasing to the ear. It lacks the slightly synthetic edge of a soundbar, and gives you more sonic body overall.
I'm not saying everyone should go and replace their soundbar with a pair of the KEF LSX II — but I am saying you should think about it. Hard.
I am a HiFi faithful. I like my systems separated into different components so I can better control the sonic output. There's still something cool about having a stack of devices plugged in together, flanked by a big pair of speakers rippling with drivers and tweeters. But it would be remiss of me not to admit that I'm slightly stuck in the past.
The mid-range HiFi system could well be on the way out, replaced by the likes of the KEF LSX II. Rather than spending $1,500 on an amplifier, a streamer, a Bluetooth dongle and some speakers, you can buy it all at once and get something that sounds just as good and plugs into your TV.
I don't think the really high-end stuff needs to worry — but I will be keeping an eye on systems like this more. After all, not everyone has enough space for a HiFi setup like mine, but they still want epic musical sound. the KEF LSX II might just be the best way to get it.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
Hisense U8QG vs. TCL QM8K: which Mini-LED TV is right for you?
The Hisense U8QG boasts some of the highest brightness we've seen in our lab tests and rocks an incredible sound system. On top of that, it's got great gaming features and good smart home integration through its Google TV smart platform. The QM8K is TCL's flagship model in 2025, and as a result, you'll pay more for its performance and features compared to the QM7K, but it's well worth it. The QM8K also uses the Google TV smart platform and boasts both high brightness and exceptional color vibrancy. In my opinion, the Hisense U8QG Mini-LED TV is one of the best TVs in 2025. But so is the TCL QM8K. Making matters tricky is that both 65-inch models of both TVs come in at the exact same price, sitting just under $1,300, which isn't half bad when considering the performance curve. So, which one is the better buy? It's Hisense U8QG vs TCL QM8K to see which Mini-LED TV is the better Mini-LED TV. Read on below to see which one wins in this faceoff. Hisense U8QG TCL QM8K Sizes 55", 65", 75", 85", 100" 65", 75", 85", 98" Ports 3x HDMI 2.11x USB-C 2x HDMI 2.12x HDMI 2.0 Resolution 3,840 x 2,160p 3,840 x 2,160p Refresh rate 165Hz 144Hz HDR Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR10, & HLG Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR10, & HLG Smart TV software Google TV Google TV ATSC 3.0 support? Yes Yes Processor Hi-View Engine Pro processor AIPQ Pro processor Both the Hisense U8QG and TCL QM8K are very similar displays, leveraging Mini-LED backlighting and a quantum dot film. The QM8K has a WHVA panel, while the U8QG has an ADS Pro panel, both of which boast several advantages over IPS and VA types. Neither is slim and light, however. The 65-inch U8QG, in particular, weighs about 53 lbs without the stand and 10 lbs more with the stand, making it a pretty hefty display. The TCL QM8K, on the other hand, weights less at just 46 ponds without the stand, but you'll still want some help if you decide to wall-mount it. In terms of their audio, the U8QG has a 4.1.2-channel system with a power output that varies across screen sizes. The 65-inch model sits at 72W, and supports Dolby Atmos surround sound. Meanwhile, the QM8K has a 2.2.2-channel Dolby Atmos system designed by Bang & Olufsen. It's tough to pick out a major winner here, given the similarities between these two TVs. If there is one thing the U8QG has over its flagship Mini-LED TV rival, it's that punchier sound system, which could be a particular highlight for users who don't want to spend extra on one of the best soundbars. For that, I feel the Hisense U8QG is the better choice here in terms of design. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Winner: Hisense U8QG The Hisense U8QG is a bit of an oddball when it comes to its port selection. Instead of having four HDMI ports like most TVs, it's equipped with just three HDMI 2.1 inputs and a USB-C port video output and charging. While that's an interesting addition on the U8QG, I find it a little niche for most TV buyers. It would make a whole lot more sense for the U8QG to have four HDMI slots with the USB-C port, as it's intended primarily for PC gamers. The TCL QM8K does have four HDMI ports, but only two of them are the higher HDMI 2.1 spec. This is common for most budget Mini-LED models, but with so many sets moving away from HDMI 2.0 and the introduction of HDMI 2.2 making waves in the market, it's about time TV makers start offering a full range of 2.1 ports. From this, you can deduce the U8QG is a slightly better display for gaming, but only if you're running one of the best gaming PCs. I do like the addition of a USB-C port, but I think it's a little niche right now. Even so, the U8QG still has three HDMI 2.1 ports, giving it a slight edge against its counterpart. Winner: Hisense U8QG Both Hisense and TCL have some great remotes to offer. There isn't too much of a difference between them, though I do like how the U8QG has a bit more button variety. I think all-in, both are fantastic pieces of equipment and work well in bringing out the full range of use across your TV. It's also handy having a backlight on both remotes, so hats off to both contenders here. Winner: Tie Let's take a peek at the test results of both Mini-LED TVs to see how they stack up before diving into their performance. Hisense U8QG TCL QM8K SDR Brightness (10%, in nits) 2,908 249 Delta-E (lower is better) 2.4 2.7 HDR Brightness (10%, in nits) 3,916 4,437 UHDA-P3 Gamut Coverage 97.53% 97.28% Rec. 2020 Gamut Coverage 83.98% 80.11% Input latency (milliseconds) 9.7 13 As I already mentioned, the U8QG sports some of the highest metrics we've seen this year and doesn't hold back in either SDR or HDR content. That being said, the QM8K still topples it in the HDR category, which is really interesting, but the excess brightness might not be very valuable: Although Dolby Vision and HDR10 can spit out HDR images at up to 10,000 nits, most HDR content is mastered between 1,000 and 4,000 nits. This means the U8QG hits the perfect number of 3,916 nits for HDR content. It also has a wider range in color coverage, if only very slight, with a Rec2020 gamut of 83.98% and UHDA-P3 of 97.53%. Those are especially superb, seeing as most TVs can barely top 70% of the Rec2020 gamut. Of course, the QM8K isn't too far behind. Their low Delta-E scores (the lower the better) are particularly noteworthy for their excellent color accuracy right out of the box. These TVs are truly neck-and-neck, showing just how far Mini-LED TVs have come in the last five years. In terms of non-quantifiable qualities, both TVs have an anti-glare film to diminish reflections, but I found the U8QG still suffered from them. This was especially true for late-night viewing with the lights on, which is really unfortunate. On the other hand, the QM8K seemingly didn't standout in its off-axis viewing potential. That's a common complaint on a lot of Mini-LED TVs, so it only makes sense seeing it here on TCL's flagship 2025 set. We also noted some poor audio performance on the QM8K, which is certainly not the case on the U8QG. The latter display has a truly bombastic system. Give its higher SDR brightness metrics, subtle improvements in color volume and accuracy, improved input latency, and better audio, the standout winner here is the U8QG. But, it's still a very close competition. Winner: Hisense U8QG Both the Hisense U8QG and the TCL QM8K run on Google TV, making them both pretty adept in navigation and content curation. I've mentioned it before, but Google TV is probably the best interface you can ask for, even if it doesn't see many updates like its rivals in webOS and Tizen. That being said, you still have access to all of the best streaming services, with the addition of tons of free content to dive into. Google TV has its own slew of channels to enjoy, but also has the Roku Channel for even more coverage of free FAST channels, which is great if you're not glued to one particular platform. Google TV is also equipped with several smart home features, making it a great combo piece if you have smart shades, lights, or other smart tech around the house with hands-free voice controls. Gemini AI is also set to be added to Google TV later this year, which could give such sets a major boost in quality, especially in search and recommendations. We can't recommend Google TV enough here at Tom's Guide. It's great on both TVs. Thus, both TVs get the win in my book. Winner: Tie It's here where things get a little tricky. The TCL QM8K is built with several awesome features that make it stand out for gamers, even though it skimps on HDMI 2.1 ports. Meanwhile, the U8QG has a really low input latency and a USB-C video output for wider PC adoption. What stands out for me on the QM8K is its dynamic refresh rates: It can run games at higher speeds in lower resolutions, like 1080p and 1440p content in 288Hz, which is pretty awesome but really only pertains to PC gamers. Both have pretty extensive gaming hubs and they're both equipped with AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, which is great if you have an AMD GPU in your PC. Otherwise, it won't be that much of a major improvement for most users. I find both TVs are fine for gaming, though I do think the U8QG might be the better comprise here for console players given its low input latency and additional HDMI 2.1 port. If you're more of a PC gamer, though, it really won't matter which TV you pick, as they're both some of the best gaming TVs. Winner: Hisense U8QG Hisense U8QG TCL QM8K Specs (25) 22 20 Design (25) 23 21 Performance (25) 24 23 Features (25) 23 23 Total Score (100) 92 86 The Hisense U8QG is one of the best TVs you can buy right now for the price, but given it shares the same price as the QM8K, you really can't go wrong with either one. Both displays are built on the robust Google TV smart platform, offering you tons of free content to enjoy. Design-wise, they share almost identical qualities. Their panel types differ only ever-so-slightly, but you'll still get largely the same results out of both. You can find the 65-inch QM8K for $1,297 and the 65-inch U8QG for $1,297 on Amazon at the time of writing. That's pretty incredible, especially seeing as the QM8K has dropped in price by a lot since its launch. I think what matters here is the type of content you're watching on the regular. The U8QG has a better overall color volume and accuracy, but I find the QM8K will be beneficial most for those who want to get the best performance in HDR. If you're more of a gamer, especially someone running a PS5 or Xbox Series X, the U8QG might be the better option. Then again, the QM8K does have some interesting features for PC players, but seeing that it doesn't have anything lower than 65-inch, I wouldn't recommend it. Overall, the Hisense U8QG ekes out a win, but I wouldn't fault you for picking either.


Tom's Guide
a day ago
- Tom's Guide
I've tested 10 Bluetooth speakers in 2025, here are the 3 I'd buy
As befetting the biggest audio nerd at Tom's Guide (if it was a competition, I'm not sure that actually be all that many of my colleagues who'd want to partake), I've been able to average out at around 1.2 Bluetooth speakers per month in 2025. That's not bad at all — and it's given me a great picture of which you should be spending your hard earned dollars on. Perhaps you're looking something that'll shake the room with it's room filling bass and innovative built-in subwoofer, or maybe you want a retro throwback that's anything but a pastiche. From a low-end hero to a design project from a Scandinavian powerhouse, these three Bluetooth speakers are my favorite portable noise makers of 2025 — and I'm going to tell you why you should add them to your backpack. Bang & Olufsen makes premium devices — although one of it's cheapest pieces of equipment the brand produces is also one of its best. The brand new A1 3rd gen is still expensive, but at $399 it's more affordable than anything else you'll find in the B&O range. It's also really, really good. From its aluminum shell that comes in some wicked colors and lends an extra element of luxury to the fun carrying and hanging strap that make it easy to use anywhere and everywhere, the A1 3rd gen has been extremely well considered. The sound is detailed and expressive, and it makes the speaker sound much larger than it actually is. Battery life is good at 24 hours, and the IP67 ruggedization means you can take your luxury speaker anywhere. My favorite bit are the replaceable parts. Should anything in the speaker break, be that a battery that runs out too fast or a driver that doesn't drive anymore, you can send the speaker to a B&O repair center, where your speaker will be brought back to life. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Considering loads of Bluetooth speakers end up as e-waste when something goes wrong, this is a big plus for the A1 3rd gen. The palm-sized aluminum wonder from B&O takes a classic Bluetooth speaker design and reinvents the insides for 2025. It's fully renewable, sounds amazing, and feels wonderful in the hand thanks to its wonderful metal construction. It's not cheap, but it's a stunning piece of premium Bluetooth speaker design. If you like bass, the bass, and nothing but the bass, then the Brane X is the Bluetooth speaker for you. Thanks to some impressive audio engineering, which apparently (and I'm using air quotes here) 'breaks the laws of physics,' there's an entire subwoofer inside the speaker that can pump out seriously impressive low end. Place the speaker on a table and get some dance music playing and you'll not only have the room up and throwing shapes, but also everything that isn't nailed down. Your TV will wobble, your coffee table will shake, and your sofa will get groovy. Considering how big the speaker is, it's pretty incredible to feel the amount of bass that the speaker can pump out. The Wi-Fi connection seals the deal on top of the already pretty stellar sound quality, and the Brane X becomes one of my favorite speakers of the last few years, let alone 2025. It's not cheap, but it'll fill a much larger room than you expect — and do it with the jaw-breaking force of a bass-focussed subwoofer. Get two for even more sonic fun, if you can stomach the price.. The bassiest thing that ever did bass, the Brane X is the Bluetooth speaker for those that want all of the low-end. It sounds great beyond its subwoofer, of course, and the extra Wi-Fi connection makes it more flexible than other options out there. You can even connect loads together — if you're a millionaire. This speaker isn't exactly cheap. Marshall constructs some of my favorite-looking devices in the audio world. I love the way that the speakers and headphones that brand makes look, thanks to their brass accents and retro amplifier-like designs. The Kilburn III is the latest in a long list of perfectly styled Bluetooth speakers, but it ups the ante with some extra features and a very solid sound profile indeed. 50 hours of battery life to supercede just about everything out there? Check. Useful physical controls to change the sound without pulling your phone from your pocket? Also check. Big, bassy sound with plenty of detail and presence? Check again for the full Bluetooth hero trifecta. I love the Kilburn III, so much so that it became my favorite Bluetooth speaker of the year. It's going to top our list of the best Bluetooth speakers, and it won the category in the Tom's Guide audio awards. If there's any more evidence you need that the Kilburn III is epic, just give one a go for yourself. You'll likely fall in love just as quickly as I did. The epic-looking Kilburn III is more than just a pretty face — it also sounds amazing too. The battery life is extremely impressive, and the on-device tone controls make keeping the music going easier than anything else. It also, you know, looks really cool.


Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Terry Reid, rock singer known as ‘Superlungs,' dies at 75
In his prime, in the late 1960s and the '70s, Mr. Reid's powerful vocal stylings were compared favorably to the likes of Rod Stewart and Bad Company's Paul Rodgers. Graham Nash, who produced Mr. Reid's 1976 album, 'Seed of a Memory,' once described his talent as 'phenomenal.' Robert Plant of Led Zeppelin called him 'probably the best singer of that period.' Advertisement After he released his debut album, 'Bang, Bang You're Terry Reid,' in 1968, when he was just 18, Franklin said, 'There are only three things happening in England: the Rolling Stones, the Beatles and Terry Reid.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Mr. Reid never had a major hit song or album, although a few of his albums eventually came to be regarded as minor masterpieces — particularly 'River' (1973), with its blend of blues, jazz, folk, R&B, and Brazilian music. Although it climbed no higher than No. 172 on the Billboard 200, the British rock magazine Mojo later described 'River' as 'one of the most lazily magnificent records of that or any other year.' His song 'Without Expression,' which he wrote at 14 and included on his first album, was later covered by John Mellencamp, REO Speedwagon, and other artists. Jack White of the White Stripes recorded Mr. Reid's 1969 song 'Rich Kid Blues' in 2008 with his band the Raconteurs. Advertisement Even so, Mr. Reid's career was too often framed by what he didn't do. His shot at rock immortality came in late 1968, when guitar sorcerer Jimmy Page, late of the Yardbirds, was putting together his next venture, which was originally called the New Yardbirds and would evolve into Led Zeppelin. He was well aware of Mr. Reid's gift — a voice that could swing from a raspy croon to a flamethrower blues howl — since Mr. Reid had opened for the Yardbirds, and he and the band shared a manager, the intimidating ex-wrestler Peter Grant. 'Jim called me up and said, 'You'd really be good as the singer,'' Mr. Reid said in a 2016 interview with Mojo. But there were complications, starting with his contract to produce solo work for pop impresario Mickie Most, who had minted hits for the Animals, Donovan, and others. And then there were the Rolling Stones. Mr. Reid had made a handshake agreement with guitarist Keith Richards to accompany the Stones on their 1969 tour. 'I said, 'Yeah, I'd love to give it a shot,'' Mr. Reid recalled telling Page in a 2007 interview with The Independent of Britain. ''But I've just got to pop off for a minute to do this Stones tour and I don't want to be the one to tell Keith I'm not going.' ' 'Oh, no, we've got to do it now,' Mr. Reid recalled Page telling him. The supergroup Cream, featuring Eric Clapton, Ginger Baker, and Jack Bruce, 'had broken up and everybody in London was trying to put one of those groups together, so it's a big scramble who's first.' Advertisement Instead, Mr. Reid suggested two members of a group called Band of Joy — Plant, blessed with a similarly searing voice, and berserker drummer John Bonham. 'I contributed half the band,' Mr. Reid later said. 'That's enough on my part.' Terrance James Reid was born Nov. 13, 1949, in St. Neots, a town in Cambridgeshire, England, the only child of Walter Reid, a car salesman, and Grace (Barker) Reid. He grew up in the nearby village of Bluntisham and attended St. Ivo Academy in St. Ives. He started his first band, the Redbeats, at 13. Two years later he left school and joined Peter Jay and the Jaywalkers, which got a blast of exposure opening for the Rolling Stones on their 1966 British tour. One gig, at the Royal Albert Hall, was 'all screaming girls,' Mr. Reid told Mojo. 'It was scary. You couldn't hear anything, your ears were shut down.' The Jaywalkers broke up soon after, and Mr. Reid embarked on a solo career. His knack for sidestepping history continued. On the Stones' 1969 tour, Mr. Reid chose not to play the final gig — the chaotic, violence-marred Altamont Speedway Free Festival, which left one fan dead. 'I had a bad feeling about Altamont and said so to Keith,' he later recalled. Around that time, opportunity knocked again when guitarist Ritchie Blackmore invited him to become the lead vocalist for the heavy metal progenitors Deep Purple, replacing Rod Evans. Again Mr. Reid slammed the door, ceding the job to Ian Gillan. Advertisement 'They were going into a real hard-rock thing that I wasn't so into,' he later told Mojo. Mr. Reid spent years tangled in litigation with Most. He eventually wriggled free and relocated to the United States, where he signed with Atlantic Records. When the label's star-making president, Ahmet Ertegun, first heard 'The River,' he told Mr. Reid, 'You've given me a jazz album,' Mr. Reid recalled to Mojo. 'Which it was, in the sense that David Crosby's 'If I Could Only Remember My Name' or Van Morrison's 'Astral Weeks' were jazz.' His solo career wound down in the 1980s, although he did session work for the likes of Jackson Browne, Don Henley, and Bonnie Raitt. His comeback album, 'The Driver,' released in 1991, featured a star-studded cast, including Joe Walsh, Enya, and Stewart Copeland, best known as the drummer with the Police. He released his final studio album, 'The Other Side of the River,' in 2016. In addition to his wife, Mr. Reid is survived by two daughters from an earlier relationship, Kelly and Holly Reid; and two stepdaughters, Erin Grady Barbagelata and Chelsea King. Following Mr. Reid's death, Plant, who remained a friend, paid tribute to him on social media: 'Such charisma. His voice, his range … his songs capturing that carefree era … Superlungs indeed.' 'He catapulted me into an intense new world he chose to decline,' Plant added. For his part, Mr. Reid, who was burdened for life with questions about his near miss with Led Zeppelin, was not so sure that he would have been a Plant-scale supernova in some alternative universe. 'Who's to say what would have happened if Jim and me had got a band?' he said in an interview with The Independent. 'It might have been a bloody failure.' Advertisement This article originally appeared in