Sunday Times letters: Rise of Reform and re-educating youth
Matthew Syed is right that our political class has become detached from those basic human concerns that Nigel Farage is so adept at plugging into ('Understand moral universalism's failures and we'll understand Farage', comment, May 4). And he is right that people want a return to sanity. But to that I would add common sense, fairness and justice.
Whether it be immigration, social care, victims' rights or any of the myriad reasons why Labour and Conservatives took such a pounding in the local elections, the common denominator is injustice and unfairness, both of which the British people abhor. So yes, we do want the change that Sir Keir Starmer keeps promising but he needs to demonstrate that he understands what
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
7 minutes ago
- The Independent
Green Party responds after Jeremy Corbyn's new party receives more sign ups
Ellie Chowns defended the Green Party after LBC 's Henry Riley pointed out that Jeremy Corbyn 's newly formed party has had more sign ups that them Chowns appeared to laugh saying, "Nobody's had to pay them any money to sign-up." Jeremy Corbyn and former Labour leader Zarah Sultana are reportedly 'getting 500 people a minute' wanting to join their new political party. Despite Chowns and other Green Party leadership candidates warning against the Greens becoming 'a Jeremy Corbyn support act' Zack Polanski has said he's 'open' to working with new Corbyn and Sultana party' opening a divide in the party.
Daily Mirror
7 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Votes for 16 year olds – what teachers think revealed with intriguing age split
Teachers are broadly in favour lowering the general election voting age but those 50s-plus are marginally against, a survey of over 9,000 shows They are arguably the best judge on 16-year-olds getting the vote but teachers are split on the issue – depending on their age. Teachers are broadly in favour but those 50s-plus are marginally against, a survey shows. It comes after it was revealed 16 and 17-year-olds will be able to vote at the next general election, under government plans. Critics may question the maturity of those that young helping decide who runs the country. But the move represents a win for supporters who think youngsters old enough to join the Army are ready for the responsibility. Sir Keir Starmer has described it as 'important' for 16 and 17-year-olds to have the vote. The PM highlighted how 'they're old enough to go out to work, they're old enough to pay taxes,' adding: 'I think if you pay in you should have the opportunity to say what you want your money spent on.' And, overall, teachers are in favour of the move – with 47% either strongly or slightly agreeing the general election voting age should be 16. Only 38% disagreed, either strongly or slightly, and 15% neither agreed nor disagreed, according to a poll of over 9,000 teachers. But when the figures are looked at closely, a fascinating difference can be observed depending on teachers' age. Those in their 20s back the change 51% for to 35% against, with 30-somethings behind it 49% to 35%. Teachers in their 40s also support the move, 45% to 39%. But it is a different story for those aged 50s-plus. Though they are marginally opposed to it overall – 44% against compared to 43% backing – a gap opens up among those who feel most passionately. Among the 50-plus aged teachers who answered, 27% strongly disagreed. Teacher Tapp surveyed 9,626 secondary and primary teachers in England on 18 July on the statement 'The voting age for General Elections should be 16'. The results were weighted to reflect national teacher and school demographics. It comes after Labour 's manifesto last year pledged: 'We will increase the engagement of young people in our vibrant democracy, by giving 16- and 17-year-olds the right to vote in all elections.' And earlier this month, the government confirmed the move with Minister for Democracy Rushanara Ali declaring: 'By delivering our manifesto commitment to extend the vote to 16 and 17 year olds, we are taking a generational step forward in restoring public trust and boosting engagement in UK democracy…' Naomi Smith, chief executive of campaign group Best for Britain, said the change was "a brave choice set to benefit generations to come". But in the Commons, Tory shadow communities minister Paul Holmes questioned: "Why does this Government think a 16-year-old can vote but not be allowed to buy a lottery ticket, an alcoholic drink, marry, or go to war, or even stand in the elections they're voting in?" The Greens and Lib Dems both welcomed the decision. The voting age was lowered to 18 in 1969. And 16-year-olds are already able to vote in Scottish and Welsh elections.
Telegraph
7 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Taliban fighters ‘brought to Britain' in ‘kill list' airlift
Former Taliban fighters are living in the UK after being airlifted from Afghanistan on British mercy flights, The Telegraph has been told. The jihadis were allegedly among thousands of people brought here for their own safety because they were on a leaked list of names of Afghans who had applied to come to the UK. Sex offenders, corrupt officials and people imprisoned under the US-led coalition are also among those who have been accepted for resettlement in the UK in an apparent failure of vetting procedures. The Telegraph has shared details with British authorities. Around 6,900 Afghans are being flown to the UK as part of Operation Rubific, the codename for the Government's response to the 2022 data breach. A British official wrongly shared the personal details of 25,000 Afghans who had applied to a relocation scheme for those who had fought with British forces during the war in Afghanistan, or worked as translators or in other support roles. Until this month, a High Court super-injunction had prevented the media from reporting anything about the leak or the airlift. As The Telegraph reported earlier this month, several Cabinet ministers raised serious concerns about Operation Rubific because they were worried about national security, and the latest disclosures appear to justify their stance. According to multiple senior sources in Afghanistan, the evacuation process was infiltrated by individuals with Taliban connections who exploited the system and got fighters to the UK, including by naming Taliban fighters as family members and dependents who needed to join them here. 'We had civilians in our office who had clear ties with the Taliban,' one Afghan official said. 'They were taken to Britain and then introduced fighters as family members and brought them to Britain…some people on the evacuation list named people with clear ties to the Taliban and introduced Taliban people as cousins, and they are in Britain.' Sources describe a pattern where corrupt Afghan officials, rather than genuine British allies, were facilitating the evacuation of Taliban-connected individuals. 'We had a lot of corrupt officials,' another Afghan official said. 'Those corrupt officials are now taking Taliban fighters to Britain rather than those who really worked for the UK. It's depressing.' The official claimed that UK personnel often seemed to rely on these corrupt individuals for consultation and recommendations, leading to the inclusion of Taliban-connected people on evacuation lists. 'When my friends see them there, they call and say, 'Wow, that guy is here', but that top commander is hiding in Kabul,' one Afghan official said. The Ministry of Defence has previously confirmed that some Afghans have brought more than 20 people with them as family members. The Telegraph has been given the names of four alleged Taliban sympathisers who are among those said to have come to the UK under resettlement schemes. One of them, who came to Britain before the fall of Kabul in 2021, is said to have arranged for several Taliban-linked family members to follow him to the UK. The Ministry of Defence confirmed the man was living in Britain. It did not confirm or deny that he had been followed by family members with alleged links to the Taliban. A second man, a logistics worker who spent four years in prison for stealing and selling Coalition weapons to the Taliban before being released in the Taliban takeover of Kabul, is currently living in Britain, the Ministry of Defence confirmed. 'They are not good for Britain' Another case involved an individual who allegedly sexually abused female workers. Defence sources said he has not moved to Britain yet and that his case is being worked through. The fourth name passed to the Telegraph was that of a British passport holder who allegedly facilitated the evacuation of Taliban-connected individuals by vouching for them under the resettlement scheme. A Ministry of Defence spokesman did not directly comment on the allegation that he had brought Taliban sympathisers to the UK, and said only that the vetting process includes biographic and document checks and not just personal recommendations. The Telegraph has previously reported that Robert Clark, a former soldier and reservist who worked on the relocation scheme, said he had been informed by Ministry of Defence personnel that full vetting of applicants secretly brought to the UK had not been completed. Mr Clark warned there would be significant national security implications for intelligence services and police if proper background checks had not been conducted to determine whether individuals had been radicalised or maintained terrorist connections. 'They are not good for Britain,' said one former senior Afghan official who spoke with The Telegraph. 'They were fighting against British forces and killed lots of Brits, but now are being fed by Brits in London. They have British blood on their hands.'
