OPINION: Controversial refereeing decision leaves rugby fans scratching their heads
Referee Andrea Piardi, left, speaks with the players during the Test between the British and Irish Lions and Australia in Melbourne on Saturday. Picture: Izhar Khan/You see, this is why rugby is so confusing. And infuriating. And simply too difficult to understand for the casual observer.
It's nothing new of course. The problem is there are just too many laws, too many things that depend on one human's beliefs, thoughts and observations.
I'm of course referring to the decisions that get made in rugby matches.
As hard as World Rugby tries to get it right, with strict rules in place about what constitutes foul play, it's not black and white and thus is open to interpretation and subjective thought.
And depending on who you support, you'll either believe the referee and officials got the decision right or you'll say they got it completely wrong.
So, if you're a British and Irish Lions supporter you'll agree that referee Andrea Piardi made the right call in allowing Hugo Keenan's late winning try to stand against the Wallabies in Melbourne on Saturday in the second Test despite an alleged dangerous clean-out at a ruck moments before.
In the lead up to the try, the Lions' Jac Morgan flew into a ruck that was being contested by Wallabies flanker Carlo Tizzano who was attempting to win a turnover, with the contact sending the latter flying out of the ruck.
While the incident was reviewed, Piardi and his officiating team deemed it to be a fair clean-out.
Another look at the cleanout.
Again, perfectly good. #Lions2025pic.twitter.com/3dKi9mVIEw — Tight Five Rugby (@TightFive_Rugby) July 26, 2025
'Different decision on another day'
Well, was it, and did they get it spot on? Or did the referee and his team not have the guts to make a hard result-changing, career-changing, potential series-changing decision?
If you watched the match and saw the incident you'll know that in many Test matches and throughout the United Rugby Championship, clean-outs like the one mentioned here result in penalties and yellow cards to offending players.
While Lions boss Andy Farrell described the win as 'fairytale stuff' and 'what we have dreamed of', Australia coach Joe Schmidt said, 'We can all see clear contact with the back of the neck which might be a different decision on another day and another time. I'm just gutted.'
What decision would have been made if the scoreline was different and if the incident took place in the 20th minute and not the 80th? That's rugby for you, so hard to understand sometimes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
4 minutes ago
- The Citizen
Springboks back in training ahead of Rugby Championship: Three focus points
The Springboks will want to look at a few areas during their two-week training camp. Springbok flyhalf Handré Pollard will likely play in every match until his younger counterparts nail their goal-kicking. Picture: Ashley Vlotman/Gallo Images After an encouraging, if not perfect, first four matches of the season, the Springboks will be getting down to business in their training camp ahead of the all-important Rugby Championship. Thirty-seven Springboks were included in the squad for the two-week camp in Johannesburg that started on Sunday. These will be eligible for the two Tests against Australia at Ellis Park on 16 August and in Cape Town on 23 August. Three U20 players, fresh from winning the World Rugby U20 Championship, are also attending the camp. It follows Bok wins against the Barbarians (54–7), Italy (42–24 and 45–0) and Georgia (55–10). These served as good warm-ups for the championship defence. But the Springboks will be focusing on a few areas of their game. Breakdown battle The Springboks recovered from the demolition they received in the breakdown battle in the first Test against Italy, but it was a whole new squad that evened things out against the 10th-ranked nation in the second Test in Gqeberha. The more experienced matchday 23 were at odds during the breakdown at Loftus. Though, to be fair, the Springboks were caught out somewhat by the referee's decision to allow Italy to flood the breakdown with players. Still, the team filled with World Cup winners could not adapt to Italy's strategy. They may need to relook at this. Who's kicking for posts? The Springboks were happy to kick for touch in the warm-up games, with their lineout and forward packs proving dominant. But it will not be so easy against the likes of New Zealand, Argentina and Australia. The Boks may need to take the three points on offer when they can. Manie Libbok and Sacha Feinberg-Mngomezulu finished the United Rugby Championship with 72.6% and 85.7% kicking success. However, the latter struggled against Georgia, only slotting one from five. Libbok, normally the less dependable goal-kicker, nailed five out of seven the week before. Still, Handré Pollard grasped his opportunities with both hands, once again proving the best post-kicker in the Springbok squad. He will likely either start or play from the bench in every match, but the other two will especially need to practice their goal-kicking. Imparting something to the U20 world champions While it won't be a focus point so much as a secondary objective, U20 loose forward Bathobele Hlekani, winger Cheswill Jooste, and scrumhalf Haashim Pead will need to soak up as much as they can on the camp. Already world champions with big-match temperament, Erasmus will likely only wish the youngsters to rub shoulders with their seniors to absorb some of the Springbok culture, and improve on their own game. According to former Junior Bok consultant Johan Ackermann, Hlekani especially needs to tighten his tackling.
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
Can the West Indies prevent a 5-0 whitewash by Australia?
The hosts from the Caribbean have played well but failed to get over the line up to now. Aussie batter Tim David has been in good form against the West Indies. Picture:Can the West Indies restore some pride today in the final match of their five-game series against the touring Australians. The men from Down Under have had all the goods to win all four matches so far, but they've hardly all been one-sided, with some big scoring being the order of the day. Australia have won by three wickets (seven balls remaining), eight wickets (28 balls remaining), six wickets (23 balls remaining) and three wickets (four balls remaining). The fifth and final match takes place late Monday in Basseterre and while the Australians will again be the favourites, a wager on the West Indies pulling off a last-gasp win isn't the worst idea. According to Betway, Australia are 1.50 for the win while the West Indies are 2.60. One other match that might interest punters this week is the first Test between Zimbabwe and New Zealand, taking place in Bulawayo from Wednesday. Zimbabwe have recently been well-beaten by the Proteas and not likely to put up much of a fight and the odds say the same. If you're keen to have a go, Betway have Zimbabwe winning the first Test at 11.50. New Zealand are at 1.12. These odds are correct at time of publishing and subject to change.
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
OPINION: Controversial refereeing decision leaves rugby fans scratching their heads
The late try allowed the visiting British and Irish Lions to win the second Test against Australia and thus the series, with a game to go. Referee Andrea Piardi, left, speaks with the players during the Test between the British and Irish Lions and Australia in Melbourne on Saturday. Picture: Izhar Khan/You see, this is why rugby is so confusing. And infuriating. And simply too difficult to understand for the casual observer. It's nothing new of course. The problem is there are just too many laws, too many things that depend on one human's beliefs, thoughts and observations. I'm of course referring to the decisions that get made in rugby matches. As hard as World Rugby tries to get it right, with strict rules in place about what constitutes foul play, it's not black and white and thus is open to interpretation and subjective thought. And depending on who you support, you'll either believe the referee and officials got the decision right or you'll say they got it completely wrong. So, if you're a British and Irish Lions supporter you'll agree that referee Andrea Piardi made the right call in allowing Hugo Keenan's late winning try to stand against the Wallabies in Melbourne on Saturday in the second Test despite an alleged dangerous clean-out at a ruck moments before. In the lead up to the try, the Lions' Jac Morgan flew into a ruck that was being contested by Wallabies flanker Carlo Tizzano who was attempting to win a turnover, with the contact sending the latter flying out of the ruck. While the incident was reviewed, Piardi and his officiating team deemed it to be a fair clean-out. Another look at the cleanout. Again, perfectly good. # — Tight Five Rugby (@TightFive_Rugby) July 26, 2025 'Different decision on another day' Well, was it, and did they get it spot on? Or did the referee and his team not have the guts to make a hard result-changing, career-changing, potential series-changing decision? If you watched the match and saw the incident you'll know that in many Test matches and throughout the United Rugby Championship, clean-outs like the one mentioned here result in penalties and yellow cards to offending players. While Lions boss Andy Farrell described the win as 'fairytale stuff' and 'what we have dreamed of', Australia coach Joe Schmidt said, 'We can all see clear contact with the back of the neck which might be a different decision on another day and another time. I'm just gutted.' What decision would have been made if the scoreline was different and if the incident took place in the 20th minute and not the 80th? That's rugby for you, so hard to understand sometimes.
