Parents of children with undescended testes not told of cancer risks
Lucy Nugent, the chief executive of Children's Health Ireland (CHI), told the Oireachtas Committee on Health that the parents did not meet the threshold for open disclosure.
Advertisement
Executive and senior clinicians from CHI appeared before the committee on Thursday to update politicians on spinal surgeries, a review of hip surgeries and other governance issues at CHI.
The committee was told that concerns about orchidopexy – a surgical procedure to correct undescended testes – were raised in an unpublished report.
Executive and senior clinicians from CHI appeared before the committee on Thursday to update politicians on spinal surgeries, a review on hip surgeries and other governance issues at CHI (Anthony Devlin/PA)
Sinn Féin TD David Cullinane said that despite young patients being put at a real risk of fertility issues and cancer later in life due to delayed treatment, parents and families were not told about the risks, nor a report into the concerns.
Mr Cullinane said: '(The report) says, despite an existing alternative options being available for quicker treatment, patients with undescended testes who require this procedure are waiting far in excess of the recommended time frame for treatment, placing those patients at real and known risk for fertility issues and or cancer in later life.
Advertisement
'I mean, that's shocking that that can happen.'
Asked why the report was not published, Ms Nugent said the anonymised report made no sense.
Mr Cullinane said 'the patients were placed at real and known risk for cancer' but parents were not told about the report.
It was also confirmed that families were not made aware of a report about concerns relating to the care of children under CHI, and other parents were not told about a separate report about concerns raised regarding oncology, which was completed in August 2021.
Advertisement
Mr Cullinane said that was 'profoundly shocking'.
Mr Cullinane said that the full breadth of crises and scandals that have hit the CHI has left it 'almost impossible' to give any justice to the families.
'We had the Boston review, we had the HIQA review into the use of non-medical grade springs. We have a waiting list still for children with spina bifida and scoliosis. We had an audit into hip dysplasia, potentially hundreds of procedures that were carried out unnecessarily.
'We have this unpublished report, which cites concerns in relation to oncology, urology, orthopaedics, a lot of different issues. It's frightening what was happening in CHI and families, I have to say, feel very let down.'
Advertisement
The committee was also told that the CHI does not accept that a report on waiting list irregularities and a 'toxic' work culture at a hospital run by the CHI met the threshold to be referred to gardaí.
The report, which has not been published, has been reported in some media outlets.
Kate Killeen White, the regional executive officer for the Dublin and Midlands health region, confirmed that the HSE referred the report to gardaí.
She told the committee that CHI has since verbalised an opinion that it doesn't believe it meets the threshold for referring it to gardaí.
Advertisement
Mr Cullinane said he found that 'extraordinary'.
He added that he could not accept that there has been a cultural shift within the CHI following the revelations.
Earlier, Ms Nugent apologised to children and families affected by practices and governance issues at CHI.
Ms Nugent, who joined as chief five months ago, said she was sorry on behalf of the management of CHI and 'I am sorry on behalf of the entire organisation'.
A clinical audit of surgeries for dysplasia of the hips in children found that a lower threshold for operations was used at CHI Temple Street hospital and the National Orthopaedic Hospital Cappagh (NOHC) than the threshold used at CHI Crumlin.
The review discovered that in the period 2021 to 2023, almost 80 per cent of children operated on at the NOHC, and 60 per cent of those at Temple Street, did not meet the threshold for surgery.
Around 2,200 families whose children had surgery since 2010 have been written to and told they will be offered a medical review.
Dr Martin Daly, a Fianna Fáil TD and health spokesman for the party, said there is 'zero confidence' in the board of the CHI.
Dr Daly, who has been a doctor for 40 years, said the 'sense of gravity' of what happened to the children was not reflected in Ms Nugent's statement to the committee.
He added that what happened to the children was 'scandalous'.
'This is about the whole system failure, and when you talk about moving into CHI, the new hospital, 2.5 billion, it's like having top-of-the-range hardware for your computer and the software is rotten,' he said.
'There's no other way to put it, and I don't think you imparted the sense of realisation of the anger.
'There is a whole generation of children who have been operated on who shouldn't have been operated on, on spurious evidence without proper audit and without proper governance.'
He said that it all happened under the watch of Eilish Hardiman, the former chief executive of the CHI, who attended the committee hearing.
Ms Hardiman is now CHI's strategic programme director.
'Miss Hardiman, you were there, it looks like under your regime, you were rewarded for substandard management of the hospital, and I am saying that strongly, because all of this happened under your watch,' Dr Daly added.
'I have to say there is absolutely zero confidence in the CHI board, zero confidence in the management, notwithstanding the changes you've outlined Ms Nugent, but there is zero confidence.'
Becoming emotional, Ms Nugent said it keeps her awake at night.
'If I in any way did not convey the gravity of the situation, I apologise. It keeps me awake,' she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
GPs warned using AI to record patient notes can lead to dangerous inaccuracies
GPs have been warned to look out for 'inaccurate or fabricated' information when using AI to write their medical notes. Family doctors are increasingly using tools that listen to their consultations with patients and automatically add summaries to their records. But the Royal College of GPs has warned AI can misinterpret the nuance of conversations, with potential dangerous consequences. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) also says there is a 'risk of hallucination which users should be aware of, and manufacturers should actively seek to minimise and mitigate the potential harms of their occurrence'. The safety watchdog is now urging GPs to report issues with AI scribes through its Yellow Card Scheme, which is typically used to report adverse reactions to medicines. This should include 'suspected inaccuracies', trade publication GP Online reports. The British Medical Association's GP Committee said earlier this year that 'the adoption of passive scribes in general practice has gathered significant pace', with practices using standalone systems or tools rolled out with other common software. Dr Phil Whitaker, a UK GP who recently moved to Canada, wrote in the New Statesman that an AI tool he used was 'not to be trusted'. He said it misinterpreted conversations with patients who asked him about his move from the UK - and recorded notes suggesting patients had recently moved to Canada instead. He added: 'I've caught it recording findings of examinations I haven't performed and detailing advice I haven't given. 'The company that makes it advises users to check its output carefully. 'For me, the time spent reading and editing outweighs any productivity gains.' And an article published by Fortune last month outlined a case in which 'a patient in London was mistakenly invited to a diabetic screening after an AI-generated medical record falsely claimed he had diabetes and suspected heart disease'. However, despite this growing use of AI and the recognition of potential problems, the MHRA said a search of its database revealed 'no adverse incident reports related to the use of AI scribes'. The government's 10-Year Health Plan says it intends to 'accelerate the adoption and spread of AI technology, such as AI scribes, by streamlining AI regulation'. A new national procurement platform will be set up next year to support GP practices and NHS trusts to adopt new technology safely. Professor Kamila Hawthorne, chair of the RCGP, said: 'AI has enormous potential for transforming the future of our health and patient care. Fewer than one in three Britons are comfortable with the prospect of using new AI features in the NHS App to diagnose their issues, a poll reveals. Health secretary Wes Streeting announced plans to revamp the app as part of Labour's 10-Year Health Plan so every patient could have a 'doctor in their pocket'. But a new survey found 44 per of the public are 'uncomfortable' with trusting the diagnosis and management of their conditions to artificial intelligence, with this figure rising to 60 per cent among pensioners. Only 31 per cent of the 2,030 respondents to the Savanta poll, for the Liberal Democrats, said they are 'comfortable' with the idea. Helen Morgan, the Liberal Democrat's health spokesperson, praised Labour for tackling bureaucracy but added: 'Making the NHS more efficient is of course welcome but it cannot come at the cost of leaving people behind as they try to grapple with digitised services rather than a real life doctor. 'Ministers need to allay these fears by offering support to those who are not digitally literate and older people to ensure that these sweeping changes benefit everyone.' Speaking at the Plan's launch last month, Mr Streeting said: 'The NHS App will become a doctor in your pocket, bringing our health service into the 21st century.' It will use patients' medical records and artificial intelligence to provide instant answers to users' questions and direct them to the best place for care. Dennis Reed, director of Silver Voices, which campaigns for elderly Britons, said at the time 'Elderly people will be sceptical about whether the plan will be delivered and concerned that greater reliance on the app could exclude them from accessing timely care. 'For some, the doctor in their pocket will be padlocked.' 'However, its use is not without risks and so its implementation in general practice must be closely regulated to guarantee patient safety and the security of their data. 'GPs are always open to introducing new technologies that can improve the experience of patients and help cut the administrative burden, and an increasing number of GP practices are now using AI scribing tools to improve the quality and efficiency of their consultations. 'While these tools can offer real benefits, particularly at a time of significant GP workforce pressures, there are some important concerns - particularly around data security of sensitive patient records, data controllership and the risk of inaccuracies. 'We are aware that AI scribes can produce inaccurate or fabricated details, and that they can also misinterpret the nuance of conversations. 'It is important that clinicians review AI-generated documentation for accuracy before adding it to the patient record.' The MHRA said: 'The MHRA is aware of this potential issue in AI enabled tools generally and this includes AI scribe tools. 'We recommend that GPs and healthcare professionals only use tools which are registered medical devices which have been determined to meet the required standards of performance and safety. 'Recently published MHRA guidance clarifies how these technologies qualify as medical devices and while this is specific to digital mental health, the principles apply across digital health applications. 'While not published by the MHRA, NHS England guidance encourages the use only of registered medical devices when used in a clinical context. 'We strongly encourage that all suspected adverse incidents, including suspected inaccuracies are reported to the MHRA via the yellow card scheme.' The watchdog said the yellow card scheme website had been updated to include 'a standalone page for software and AI as medical device'. Earlier this year, the BMA advised practices to pause use of AI scribes until they had carried out data protection and safety checks and sought assurances that the products meet NHS standards.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Hims & Hers falls as weight loss treatment shift hurts revenues
Aug 5 (Reuters) - Shares of Hims & Hers (HIMS.N), opens new tab fell nearly 9% on Tuesday after the telehealth firm reported weaker-than-expected quarterly revenue, in part as its move from branded to lower-cost, personalized weight loss treatments led to lower revenue per subscriber. Hims said it saw strong demand for its weight-loss offerings in the second quarter, but noted that a pivot toward personalized compounded GLP-1 treatments lowered the revenue it earned per order versus its previous compounded offering. The new personalized offering is more costly to run, the company said. Compounded medications are less expensive than branded drugs like Novo Nordisk's ( opens new tab Wegovy, which Hims had offered under a now-terminated partnership with the Danish drugmaker. Hims reported $190 million in GLP-1-related revenue during the quarter, down around $40 million from the preceding quarter. Overall platform subscriptions rose 31% year-over-year. Leerink Partners analysts flagged the GLP-1 revenue dip as expected. However, the market reaction was negative after the results, as investor expectations were elevated due to a surge in Hims' shares this year. The company's stock has more than doubled so far this year, while Denmark-listed shares of Novo have fallen over 50%. The brokerage called the softness in Hims' core business, which includes treatments for conditions related to sexual health, a negative surprise. Hims & Hers reported a decline in its subscribers for its sexual health business, which sells generic drugs for erectile dysfunction, in the second quarter. Canaccord Genuity echoed a near-term caution for the company, but remained constructive on the longer-term growth potential, citing strong year-over-year gains in newer specialties such as dermatology, weight management, and daily-use sexual health solutions. Despite the stock's sharp post-earnings pullback, the brokerage called the move a potential buying opportunity. Hims shares are priced at 95.85 times the company's estimated earnings for the next 12 months, a common benchmark for valuing stocks.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
I've been a personal trainer for 25 years - I avoid this 'healthy' food because it makes you look old
Demand for plant-based meat alternatives, gluten-free snacks and other 'healthy' options has undeniably taken the world by storm. Fuelled by a deluge of alarming reports into the dangers of eating too much processed meat, gluten and refined carbohydrates, supermarket shelves are now packed with 'plant based meat' and grain and nut-packed granolas. But, Tracy Campoli, a certified holistic health coach, warned these so-called "healthy" products could be ageing the body from the inside out, causing chronic inflammation and visible signs of ageing. According to Ms Campoli, some of the most popular plant-based meat-alternatives are seriously lacking in vital nutrients like protein, and are instead packed full of additives, seed oils and salt. In a video posted to YouTube, the fitness coach analysed five different "healthy foods" that are by their very nature highly processed, and concluded that fake meat is one of the worst offenders when it comes to health. 'Just because it's plant-based, it doesn't mean it's healthy—you've got to read your labels,' she warned her 347,000 subscribers. Around 12 per cent of people in the UK eat a meat-free diet, with many choosing to give up red meat in particular because of its supposed link with heart disease and even cancer. But, Ms Campoli warned: 'Some of these so-called "good for you" choices may secretly be sabotaging your skin and even speeding up visible signs of ageing like wrinkles. 'But more plant-based alternatives might actually be causing some fine wrinkles on your face. Ms Campoli continued: 'So many of those mass-marketed plant-based meat alternatives—such as Beyond Meat and Impossible Burger—all use inflammatory oils which can speed up your cellular ageing.' Seed oils such a canola oil, sunflower and rapeseed oils are high in polyunsaturated fats which, it has long been claimed, are a 'heart healthy' substitute for traditional animal fats. But in recent years, they've also found themselves at the centre of a raging health debate. Detractors refer to seed oils as 'The Hateful Eight' – which also include corn, soybean, cottonseed, grapeseed, safflower and rice bran oil. Critics say these oils—which today make up more than 25 per cent of the calories in our diets—are causing obesity and leading to a host of health problems from type 2 diabetes to depression and even migraines. It's a claim that goes against medical advice of the past few decades: butter, dripping and lard are high in 'bad' saturated fats which raise cholesterol and heart disease risk, while seed oils contain unsaturated fats that can decrease cholesterol levels and protect the heart. But according to Ms Campoli seed oils aren't always the healthier option. 'They may sound healthy, but they are actually really not great for our body, causing more oxidative stress,' she warned in the clip. The main concern us that they are high in omega-6 fatty acids, she explained. 'When we have an excess of omega-6 in our body it creates more oxidative stress, damages your skin cells and it can cause wrinkles.' She added that these alternative products are often packed with higher levels of salt than their animal-derived counterparts, as manufacturers try to mimic the taste and texture of real meat. This, she says, can cause people to bloat and make the skin look more puffy. Eating too much salt can also lead to high blood pressure, increasing the risk of heart attack and stroke. 'It's also not good for your skin because sodium can also lead to dehydration,' Ms Campoli added. 'But it's hydration from the inside out gives us that glowy more youthful-looking skin. 'If you're eating a lot of excess salt, you're going to look dry and dehydrated. She concluded: 'All of these ingredients together can cause inflammation in the body. 'Inflammation is the root cause of so many diseases and health problems so we want to do our best to keep inflammation at bay. 'You're better off eating more whole foods than looking for substitutes.' Wholegrain breads that are full of hidden sugars and emulsifiers, granola, rice cakes and gluten-free snack products also made her blacklist. 'Many of these products breads contain hidden sugars which contribute to glycation—meaning it stiffens and weakens your collagen, making your skin saggy and contributing to the visible signs of ageing.' It comes as new research suggests consuming a diet low in ultra-processed foods could help supercharge weight loss. Additive-laden foods have been vilified for decades over their supposed health risks, with dozens of studies linking them to type 2 diabetes, heart disease and even cancer. Now, British scientists who tracked dozens of adults have discovered those who ate a diet rich in minimally processed foods and avoided UPFs, lost twice as much weight as those who often consumed UPFs. Sticking to meals cooked from scratch could also help curb food cravings, they also found. However, diets high in UPFs had little impact on blood pressure, heart rate, liver function and cholesterol. Researchers argued their findings echoed calls to limit certain types of UPFs but cautioned it also showed that not all UPFs are 'inherently unhealthy'.
