Fact Check: Meme doesn't accurately show Venezuela as darker at night than rest of South America
A meme authentically shows a satellite image of South America where Venezuela stands out as the only country without any lights on at night.
Rating:
In July 2025, a meme posted to X claiming people can see socialism on display in Venezuela from space went viral, being viewed over 800,000 times within a week. The post (archived) included an image of an alleged nighttime satellite map of South America, in which Venezuela's borders were clearly visible because the country appeared starkly darker than the rest of the map covered by city lights. Text on the image said, "Socialism, so awesome you can see it from space."
The image has been shared periodically on social media for at least six years. For example, it was posted to Facebook in 2020 and to Reddit in 2019.
But the city lights satellite map in the meme had been edited. In reality, Venezuela is not starkly darker than the rest of the South America and therefore not clearly visible from space.
NASA makes daily nightlight data visible through its Black Marble program. Snopes used the program's interactive timeline map to see the nightlights of the northern part of South America, where Venezuela is located, on July 5, 2025, the night before the viral meme was posted. Venezuela's largest cities along the northern coastline of the country were lit up and clearly visible, just like the cities in neighboring countries. There was also a heavy cluster of lights in the east of the country, where many oil wells are located.
(NASA)
(NASA)
The daily Black Marble maps can be interrupted by cloud cover, and are less clear than the satellite map included in the meme. However, NASA periodically releases cleaner, blue-hued maps of Earth at night such as the one edited for the meme. An example of such a map is this high-resolution one from 2016. But Venezuela's cities and oil wells were lit up in these maps, too, and the country blends in with the rest of the continent rather than standing out as clearly darker.
The map from 2016 was not an aberration, either. A NASA timeline of the Earth at night between 2012 and 2023 shows that Venezuela has never been distinguishably visible when viewed from space at night.
Even during Venezuela's nationwide blackouts in March 2019, the country was not entirely dark. Lower quality NASA maps from the time show there were fewer areas of light in the country when the blackout occurred, but there were still lights in some cities and oil wells.
Venezuela at night from March 6, 2019, to March 10, 2019. Nationwide blackouts began March 8. (NASA)
The southern part of Venezuela is bereft of lights visible in these nighttime maps, but not even that part of Venezuela stands out in contrast to the country's neighbors. That's because the southern portion of the country is covered by the Amazon rainforest, which is sparsely populated in all of the countries it covers. If you pick a random point on Venezuela's border with Brazil or the southern half of Venezuela's border with Colombia on Google Maps, you are unlikely to see any buildings for potentially hundreds of miles. There's no reason uninhabited rainforest would appear darker at night on one side of a border than it does on the other side.
Snopes has previously fact-checked other edited, inaccurate or otherwise mislabeled maps.
Elkins, Kel. "Change in Night Lights between 2012 and 2023." NASA Scientific Visualization Studio, 27 May 2024, svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/5276/. Accessed 10 July 2025.
"Night Light Maps Open up New Applications." Earthobservatory.nasa.gov, NASA, 13 Apr. 2017, earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/90008/night-light-maps-open-up-new-applications. Accessed 10 July 2025.
"Worldview: Explore Your Dynamic Planet." Nasa.gov, NASA, worldview.earthdata.nasa.gov/. Accessed 10 July 2025.
Google Maps, maps.app.goo.gl/FtFBNSLp6FSgkVV97. Accessed 10 July 2025.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
42 minutes ago
- CBS News
What to know about the Perseids and when to view the 2025 meteor shower
The Perseids meteor shower begins this week and is expected to offer one of the best shows in the sky of 2025. The event is considered the best meteor shower of the year, according to NASA, and is also the most popular. The shower begins on Thursday, July 17, and will continue for several weeks, until at least Aug. 23, according to NASA and the American Meteor Society, a nonprofit organization. The meteor shower is expected to peak from Aug. 12-13, although moonlight will impact meteor visibility. The moon will be 84% full during the peak. NASA says the best time to view the Perseids is early in the morning, before dawn, in the Northern Hemisphere. Sometimes, however, the meteors can be seen at night as early as 10 p.m. "The Perseids are one of the most plentiful showers with about 50 to 100 meteors seen per hour," NASA says. "They occur with warm summer nighttime weather allowing sky watchers to comfortably view them." Perseids often leave long "wakes" of color and light when they move through Earth's atmosphere. NASA notes they are also known for their fireballs. "Fireballs are larger explosions of light and color that can persist longer than an average meteor streak," the space agency says. "This is due to the fact that fireballs originate from larger particles of cometary material. Fireballs are also brighter." The meteor shower occurs when Earth passes through an area of space debris left by a comet coming around the sun. Debris interacts with Earth's atmosphere and disintegrates, resulting in colorful lines in the sky, according to NASA and the American Meteor Society. "The pieces of space debris that interact with our atmosphere to create the Perseids originate from comet 109P/Swift-Tuttle," which last visited the inner solar system in 1992, NASA says. Swift-Tuttle takes 133 years to orbit the sun, NASA said, and in 1865, Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli became the first person to determine this comet was the source of the Perseids. When looking at the Perseids, they appear to come from the constellation Perseus, which is why this meteor shower has its name. But as NASA explains, the meteors don't actually originate from the constellation.


Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Commissioner Jim Biggs doesn't show at council meeting as controversy continues over dispatch
Porter County Commissioner Jim Biggs was placed on the agenda to speak at Monday's Chesterton Town Council meeting, but didn't show to the disappointment of council members. Chesterton town council members said that Biggs twice was publicly invited in particular to discuss his statements about the Chesterton/Porter joint dispatch center after the June 18 officer-involved shooting in front of the Hilton Inn on Gateway Boulevard. Joseph P. Gerber, 45, died from a self-inflicted wound after exchanging several gunshots with two Chesterton police officers, wounding one of them. But Biggs said in a statement issued to the Post-Tribune that he 'was never formally invited through email, phone call, or written letter to attend this meeting.' 'Furthermore, no town official has approached me with an invitation to attend this meeting. It was only through a newspaper article, and a Facebook post did I learn that I had been added to the agenda. Lastly, it does our public and the concern for officer safety an injustice to attend and be subjected to more petty personal attacks in order to deflect from the real issue at hand,' Biggs said. Council President Sharon Darnell, D-4th, said that she and Councilwoman Erin Collins, D-2nd, had attended a news conference Biggs held on July 1 and spoke to him afterward. She said that Biggs stated his most pointed issue was to be able to discuss 'freely and openly' the county E911 center and the Chesterton/Porter joint dispatch. 'I am not a person who likes to meet anywhere but in a public forum,' Darnell said. 'Maybe we'll figure something else out, but that's the only way we're going to figure this whole thing out. We're not going to do it in a closed room.' Collins said that Biggs was invited twice by the council to appear. 'I think it was an opportunity for Commissioner Biggs to address the very people that he was elected to represent and serve. His absence tonight is a disservice to them and to the spirit of transparency and accountability in local government,' Collins said. Biggs lives in Chesterton and is the commissioner who represents northern Porter County. He is the president of that board. Collins said that at some point, the town and the county should have a meeting. 'They must take place in public. Not behind closed doors, not through political press conferences and certainly not by exploiting a tragedy to advance a narrative.' Collins said. Collins said the council stands firm in its call for the resignation of Debby Gunn as the E-911 administrator 'for repeated unprofessional conduct and false and misleading public statements.' Gunn contended there was a nearly five-minute delay in the request for an ambulance to the officer, an allegation that was staunchly denied by the town of Chesterton. On the morning of the shooting, Biggs contacted the Post-Tribune and noted that it was time for the Chesterton/Porter dispatch to join the county's E-911 system and that an increase in the county law enforcement tax was needed to cover it. Councilman James Ton, R-1st, said that Chesterton adheres to the standards of the Shared Ethics Advisory Commission and should a meeting occur, the town is committed to 'civility and transparency'. 'I haven't witnessed this in some discussions of this in the past,' Ton said. Biggs, in his statement to the Post-Tribune Monday, said as a resident, some might have the same questions about why Chesterton and Porter would continue to want to have a separate dispatch center. The commissioner listed several questions which included: why in a police emergency is a caller required to speak to two different dispatchers in two location; if the E911 center handles all medical and fire calls, aren't they good enough to handle police calls; if the E911 center is good enough to dispatch police for every other municipality, why isn't it good enough for Chesterton and Porter; and do the residents receive any money outside of Chesterton and Porter taxpayers' dollars to fund the separate dispatch center. 'If the residents of Chesterton and Porter have more questions concerning this issue, I, as their commissioner, would be happy to facilitate a forum of non-biased public safety officials to provide answers,' Biggs said. 'It is true that Chesterton and Porter are under no obligation to consolidate now or ever. This is also true from the county's perspective. As things now stand, this will continue to be the financial responsibility and public safety liability for the governing bodies and law enforcement leadership of both towns.' Chesterton Police Chief Tim Richardson said he did receive an email from Gunn two days ago, asking if he and Porter Police Chief Dan Dickey would want to sit down with her to speak about how to make the operation between the two dispatch centers more efficient. Richardson said that if the meeting occurs, he wants to have his council liaison, who is Ton, attend. Jennifer Klug, a Porter resident, said that she believes the towns should keep their joint dispatch center. 'I don't appreciate Mr. Biggs or Ms. Gunn saying some of the things they did in public. I think that it's not only unprofessional, but I think in a situation like that, people have to stand together and work on something,' Klug said.


The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Houston, we have a problem: Scrapping the space station harms the US
American astronauts have been in low-Earth orbit aboard the International Space Station for nearly a quarter century. Their continuous presence in space has led to innovations such as cochlear implants that help deaf people hear, technology that makes our phone cameras sharper, better water filtration and so much more that benefits us back here on Earth. Unfortunately, President Trump's budget effectively decommissions the space station, despite years of potential usefulness still ahead. In its own words, the administration plans to 'focus on maintaining minimal safe operations and very limited research essential to Moon and Mars exploration until [the station's] retirement in 2030.' That includes exploring reduced cargo and crew flights as today's transportation capacity won't be needed in a minimal operations environment. Such a move may seem penny-wise, but it is absolutely pound-foolish. The nation has invested billions of dollars into this national asset and transportation options to take astronauts to and from the platform. Additionally, the station generates substantial economic benefit domestically and soft power internationally. In fact, according to the International Space Station National Lab, the nonprofit organization that runs science aboard the station, startups who have flown their experiments to the station have secured nearly $2.2 billion in funding after their flights. This figure highlights the incredible value science and technology development performed on the station is generating today. Beyond these near-term returns, the space economy, of which low-Earth orbit remains a core component, is expected to be worth up to $2 trillion in total by 2040. But the U.S. will not be able to fully realize its potential in this new economic frontier without its own astronauts and labs in orbit. Plans call for commercial successors to the International Space Station, which requires a broad range of customers beyond NASA. Shutting down regular access to the station for technology demonstrations now will make it challenging for non-government customers to close their business cases as commercial stations aren't expected to be operational for a few years. This would amount to a death spiral in a strategically significant domain. Discerning readers may question why the federal government needs to invest, given the commercial interest in low-Earth orbit. This investment is necessary because the United States isn't the only game in town and the pipeline for industries in space is still quite nascent. The nation is engaged in a great power competition with China, which is heavily investing in their low-Earth orbit capabilities. China already has its own space station, Tiangong, in orbit and offers other nations access to it to conduct their science experiments and technology demonstrations. Scientists and countries are already choosing to send their experiments to the Chinese station instead of the International Space Station, given the advanced facilities and reduced level of competition for flights. Moreover, Beijing released a road map that will likely establish China as the global leader in space by 2050, or sooner, if the U.S. persists in the direction charted by Trump's budget request. Beyond these economic benefits, Tiangong also bolsters China's reputation internationally and earns Beijing diplomatic goodwill. The U.S. currently benefits similarly from the international exchanges that occur on the International Space Station. But if the U.S. stops conducting robust research aboard its station, as intended by the Trump administration, it will leave international goodwill on the table for China to pick up on the cheap. In other words, the Trump administration appears intent to inflict significant geopolitical and economic harm on the U.S. to save a few pennies in the overall federal budget.