Nintendo's Switch 2 Sales Near 6 Million
'Looking at hardware sales volume in the first quarter of this fiscal year, Nintendo Switch 2 sales totaled 5.82 million units, and Nintendo Switch sales declined 53.5% year-on-year to 0.98 million units,' Nintendo stated in English-language explanatory materials accompanying the financials. 'Nintendo Switch is now in its ninth year since launch, so a year-on-year decline in sales is expected, but it continues to show stable sales.'
More from Variety
Apple Services Revenue Grows 13% to New Record, Earnings Massively Beat Street Amid Trump Tariff Uncertainty
Amazon Beats Q2 Expectations as Revenue Rises 13% to Nearly $168 Billion
Roku Drives Up Revenue 15%, Turns in Surprise Profit in Solid Q2 Earnings Beat
Nintendo's Switch 2-specific game sales have hit a modest 8.67 million, which Nintendo attributes to 'the fact that many consumers purchased the hardware bundled with 'Mario Kart World,' and that there was a wide variety of titles from other software publishers.'
Nintendo Switch software sales stood at 24.40 million units, a decline of 20.4% from the comparable period in 2024. However, it should be noted that Nintendo says, 'because Nintendo Switch 2 can play Nintendo Switch titles, the people purchasing Nintendo Switch software include not only owners of Nintendo Switch, but also people who have bought Nintendo Switch 2.'
More to come…
Best of Variety
New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
What's Coming to Disney+ in August 2025
What's Coming to Netflix in August 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
XPeng, NIO, Li Auto, ZEEKR Post Big July Delivery Gains, Yet Stocks Remain Under Pressure
Chinese electric vehicle (EV) makers XPeng (NYSE:XPEV), ZEEKR Intelligent Technology (NYSE:ZK), Li Auto (NASDAQ:LI), and NIO (NYSE:NIO) stocks dropped on Friday despite individual triumphs like XPeng's record July deliveries and ZEEKR's significant year-over-year growth. ZEEKR, a subsidiary of Geely, announced on Friday that its combined Zeekr and Lynk & Co brands delivered 44,193 vehicles in July 2025, marking a 19.7% increase from the prior year. Specifically, the Zeekr brand contributed 16,977 deliveries, while Lynk & Co accounted for 27,216 units. The company had previously unveiled its Super Hybrid Technologies on July 9, built on its new full-stack SEA-S platform. This innovative system features a 900V high-voltage architecture, tri-silicon carbide-powered e-motors, and a CATL Freevoy Super Hybrid plans to integrate this technology into its forthcoming Zeekr 9X, which boasts a peak output of 1,030kW and an impressive 0 to 100 km/h acceleration in under 3.1 seconds. Li Auto reported 30,731 vehicle deliveries in July 2025, bringing its cumulative deliveries to 1,368,541 units by the end of the month. The company also officially launched the Li i8, a six-seat battery-electric family SUV, on July 29, with customer deliveries anticipated to commence on August 20. Li Auto's expanding footprint includes 535 retail stores across 153 cities, 527 servicing centers, and authorized body and paint shops in 222 cities, complemented by 3,028 supercharging stations with 16,671 charging stalls throughout China. NIO also released its July 2025 delivery figures on Friday, reporting a total of 21,017 vehicles. This total comprised 12,675 vehicles from its premium smart EV brand NIO, 5,976 from its family-oriented ONVO brand, and 2,366 from its small high-end EV brand FIREFLY. Cumulative deliveries for NIO reached 806,731 vehicles by July 31, 2025. The company officially launched the ONVO L90, a smart flagship SUV, on July 31, with user deliveries expected to begin shortly. XPeng, which reported its July 2025 delivery results on Thursday, achieved a new monthly record with 36,717 Smart EV deliveries, marking an astounding 229% year-over-year increase. This represents the ninth consecutive month of deliveries exceeding 30,000 units. As of July 2025, XPeng's cumulative deliveries surpassed 800,000 units, with 233,906 Smart EVs delivered from January to July 2025, a 270% year-over-year surge. The company is actively expanding its global presence, having launched the 2025 XPeng G6 and G9 versions in European markets in mid-July, alongside plans to introduce the XPeng P7+ in Europe. The widespread stock market underperformance across the Chinese EV sector signals mounting investor apprehension, exacerbated by intensifying margin pressure stemming from fierce domestic price wars and considerable geopolitical headwinds. Price Action: At last check Friday, NIO's stock had dipped 2.26%, trading at $4.77 per share, while Li Auto saw a 3.83% drop premarket. XPeng, despite impressive growth, was down 1.7%, and ZEEKR's stock fell by 1.02%. Photo by Robert Way via Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? NIO (NIO): Free Stock Analysis Report This article XPeng, NIO, Li Auto, ZEEKR Post Big July Delivery Gains, Yet Stocks Remain Under Pressure originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Artificial stupidity' made AI trading bots spontaneously form cartels when left unsupervised, Wharton study reveals
A study from University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School and the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology found that when placed in simulated markets, AI trading bots did not compete with one another, but rather began colluding in price-fixing behaviors. According to the study authors, research on how AI behaves in market environments can help regulators understand gaps in existing rules and statutes. Artificial intelligence is just smart—and stupid—enough to pervasively form price-fixing cartels in financial market conditions if left to their own devices. A working paper posted this month on the National Bureau of Economic Research website from the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology found when AI-powered trading agents were released into simulated markets, the bots colluded with one another, engaging in price fixing to make a collective profit. In the study, researchers let bots loose in market models, essentially a computer program designed to simulate real market conditions and train AI to interpret market-pricing data, with virtual market makers setting prices based on different variables in the model. These markets can have various levels of 'noise,' referring to the amount of conflicting information and price fluctuation in the various market contexts. While some bots were trained to behave like retail investors and others like hedge funds, in many cases, the machines engaged in 'pervasive' price-fixing behaviors by collectively refusing to trade aggressively—without being explicitly told to do so. In one algorithmic model looking at price-trigger strategy, AI agents traded conservatively on signals until a large enough market swing triggered them to trade very aggressively. The bots, trained through reinforcement learning, were sophisticated enough to implicitly understand that widespread aggressive trading could create more market volatility. In another model, AI bots had over-pruned biases and were trained to internalize that if any risky trade led to a negative outcome, they should not pursue that strategy again. The bots traded conservatively in a 'dogmatic' manner, even when more aggressive trades were seen as more profitable, collectively acting in a way the study called 'artificial stupidity.' 'In both mechanisms, they basically converge to this pattern where they are not acting aggressively, and in the long run, it's good for them,' study co-author and Wharton finance professor Itay Goldstein told Fortune. Financial regulators have long worked to address anti-competitive practices like collusion and price fixing in markets. But in retail, AI has taken the spotlight, particularly as legislators call on companies to address algorithmic pricing. For example, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) called Delta's practice of using AI to set individual airfare prices 'predatory pricing,' though the airline previously told Fortune its fares are 'publicly filed and based solely on trip-related factors.' 'For the [Securities and Exchange Commission] and those regulators in financial markets, their primary goal is to not only preserve this kind of stability, but also ensure competitiveness of the market and market efficiency,' Winston Wei Dou, Wharton professor of finance and one of the study's authors, told Fortune. With that in mind, Dou and two colleagues set out to identify how AI would behave in a financial market by putting trading agent bots into various simulated markets based on high or low levels of 'noise.' The bots ultimately earned 'supra-competitive profits' by collectively and spontaneously deciding to avoid aggressive trading behaviors. 'They just believed sub-optimal trading behavior as optimal,' Dou said. 'But it turns out, if all the machines in the environment are trading in a 'sub-optimal' way, actually everyone can make profits because they don't want to take advantage of each other.' Simply put, the bots didn't question their conservative trading behaviors because they were all making money and therefore stopped engaging in competitive behaviors with one another, forming de-facto cartels. Fears of AI in financial services With the ability to increase consumer inclusion in financial markets and save investors time and money on advisory services, AI tools for financial services, like trading agent bots, have become increasingly appealing. Nearly one third of U.S. investors said they felt comfortable accepting financial planning advice from a generative AI-powered tool, according to a 2023 survey from financial planning nonprofit CFP Board. A report last week from cryptocurrency exchange MEXC found that among 78,000 Gen Z users, 67% of those traders activated at least one AI-powered trading bot in the previous fiscal quarter. But for all their benefits, AI trading agents aren't without risks, according to Michael Clements, director of financial markets and community at the Government Accountability Office (GAO). Beyond cybersecurity concerns and potentially biased decision-making, these trading bots can have a real impact on markets. 'A lot of AI models are trained on the same data,' Clements told Fortune. 'If there is consolidation within AI so there's only a few major providers of these platforms, you could get herding behavior—that large numbers of individuals and entities are buying at the same time or selling at the same time, which can cause some price dislocations.' Jonathan Hall, an external official on the Bank of England's Financial Policy Committee, warned last year of AI bots encouraging this 'herd-like behavior' that could weaken the resilience of markets. He advocated for a 'kill switch' for the technology, as well as increased human oversight. Exposing regulatory gaps Clements explained many financial regulators have so far been able to apply well-established rules and statutes to AI, saying for example, 'Whether a lending decision is made with AI or with a paper and pencil, rules still apply equally.' Some agencies, such as the SEC, are even opting to fight fire with fire, developing AI tools to detect anomalous trading behaviors. 'On the one hand, you might have an environment where AI is causing anomalous trading,' Clements said. 'On the other hand, you would have the regulators in a little better position to be able to detect it as well.' According to Dou and Goldstein, regulators have expressed interest in their research, which the authors said has helped expose gaps in current regulation around AI in financial services. When regulators have previously looked for instances of collusion, they've looked for evidence of communication between individuals, with the belief that humans can't really sustain price-fixing behaviors unless they're corresponding with one another. But in Dou and Goldstein's study, the bots had no explicit forms of communication. 'With the machines, when you have reinforcement learning algorithms, it really doesn't apply, because they're clearly not communicating or coordinating,' Goldstein said. 'We coded them and programmed them, and we know exactly what's going into the code, and there is nothing there that is talking explicitly about collusion. Yet they learn over time that this is the way to move forward.' The differences in how human and bot traders communicate behind the scenes is one of the 'most fundamental issues' where regulators can learn to adapt to rapidly developing AI technologies, Goldstein argued. 'If you use it to think about collusion as emerging as a result of communication and coordination,' he said, 'this is clearly not the way to think about it when you're dealing with algorithms.' This story was originally featured on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Raymond James Starts Ares Management (ARES) Coverage, Highlights Strong Fee-Based Model
Ares Management Corporation (NYSE:ARES) ranks among the . On July 28, Raymond James began coverage of Ares Management Corporation (NYSE:ARES) with a Market Perform rating. While the firm highlighted Ares' robust direct lending position and growth prospects as advantages, it also pointed out that there were no immediate catalysts for the stock. According to Raymond James, Ares Management Corporation (NYSE:ARES) is reasonably valued at its current price-to-earnings multiple of 32x next-twelve months, which is higher than the 20x anticipated P/E average for the alternative asset management industry in 2026. The firm claims that Ares' purely fee-based business model, which has little balance sheet exposure and a better growth trajectory than its peers, justifies the premium valuation. Raymond James emphasized Ares' guidance for fee-related earnings through 2028, which are expected to improve at a compound annual growth rate of 16–20%. As the company deploys about $81.5 billion in committed assets that do not currently generate fees, additional margin gains are projected. Ares Management Corporation (NYSE:ARES) is an alternative asset management with operations in Asia, Europe, and the United States. The company is divided into different divisions, including the Real Estate Group, the Private Equity Group, the Direct Lending Group, and the Tradable Credit Group. While we acknowledge the potential of ARES as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. Read More: and Disclosure: None.
