Wife's WhatsApp chats obtained via 'spy app' used as valid evidence about her extramarital affair in Divorce case, what Madhya Pradesh HC said
In a crucial ruling, the
Madhya Pradesh High Court
has reportedly permitted a husband to present his wife's private WhatsApp chats as evidence in a divorce case, even though they were obtained without her consent.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The court's decision, based on Section 14 of the
Family Courts Act
, 1984, allows Family Courts to consider evidence that may not be admissible under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, to resolve disputes like divorce.
The case arose when the husband, using a special app (spy app) installed on his wife's phone without her knowledge, accessed her private WhatsApp conversations. These chats allegedly revealed an extramarital affair, prompting the husband to seek divorce on grounds of cruelty and adultery.
The wife's legal team objected, arguing that presenting the chats violated her
under Article 21 of the Constitution and Sections 43, 66, and 72 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. They further contended that evidence obtained illegally should be inadmissible.
Rejecting these arguments, the High Court emphasized that while the right to privacy is a fundamental right under Article 21, it is not absolute and is subject to limitations.
Citing Supreme Court judgments, including the Sharda and Puttaswami cases, the court noted that statutory provisions like Section 14 of the Family Courts Act and Section 122 of the Indian Evidence Act permit limited invasions of privacy in the interest of justice.
The court framed the issue as a conflict between two fundamental rights under Article 21: the wife's right to privacy and the husband's right to a fair trial.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
It ruled that the right to privacy must yield to the right to a fair trial, which has broader implications for public justice. 'A litigating party has a right to bring relevant evidence before the court,' the court stated, adding that denying this opportunity would undermine the Family Courts Act's intent.
The High Court clarified that it was not ruling on the authenticity of the WhatsApp chats, leaving that determination to the Family Court.
If the chats are deemed genuine, they could support the husband's case for divorce on grounds of cruelty and adultery.
This ruling has sparked debate over the balance between privacy rights and the pursuit of justice in family disputes, with potential implications for how digital evidence is handled in Indian courts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Moral policing shadows couples in Chennai
Does the sight of young lovers or people of different genders hanging out together irk Chennaites? This February, advocate Thilagavati confronted a patrolman who harassed her for being with a male friend at night on Patinapakkam beach. She had recorded the encounter and uploaded it on social media. This led to much discussion on the topic of moral policing in public places in the city. Uproar over Ms. Thilagavati's experience had led to the officer being transferred. But the woman later faced cyberbullying about which she complained to the cyber police. 'More than men, women are targeted by law enforcement officers in such circumstances,' she says. Courts not supposed to do moral policing: Supreme Court sets aside HC order against Tehseen Poonawalla Many young men and women complain of similar experiences of being victims of the moral police brigade, that have left them traumatised. 'Couples, especially teenagers, are easily targetted. They are then threatened and blackmailed into bribing or assault,' says Ms. Thilagavati. Out with her boyfriend in Anna Nagar Tower Park, Thamizh, a woman in her twenties, says that they too were picked on by policemen. 'It happens all the time. Sometimes they even call up our parents,' she tells The Hindu. Even as she was speaking, a policewoman stared down at the young couple and asked them to 'move ahead.' They silently obeyed. UCC Bill 'introduces moral policing, criminalises autonomy' 'It is not good for young people if their future spouses see them being with another man/woman. Girls should carefully choose good boys that their parents approve of. They can do these intimate things after marriage also. Why now? That too in public,' reasons Meena (name changed), head constable at a police station in Anna Nagar. Meanwhile, a senior police officer of the Greater Chennai Police says, 'Policemen are not instructed to confront couples, unless a safety issue arises. They have the right to be together in public.' The 8.8 acre Thiru. Vi. Ka. Park in Shenoy Nagar has 26 security personnel and reportedly no CCTV camera inside. It is known for its watchful guards who spring into action when men and women sitting together even begin to think of holding hands. They whistle, glare down and show hand gestures before directly confronting the couples. 'We have instructions from the CMRL to interfere when couples sit too close together,' says Surya, a guard there. Sartorial preferences of women should not be subjected to moral policing: HC 'The Thiru. Vi. Ka. Park is designed in a way that there are no hideouts for couples to do inappropriate things. Every corner has high visibility and is covered by guards, who have been told to prevent intimacy between couples,' confirms a CMRL official, on the condition of anonymity. Those facing moral policing can assert their rights under Articles 19 (freedom of expression) and 21 (right to life and liberty). The Supreme Court and Madras High Court have upheld personal liberty under Article 21, affirming adults' rights to consensual relationships and privacy in public spaces. 'They can demand specific legal grounds for intervention, refuse arbitrary demands, and record interactions as evidence. Unlawful detention can be challenged with a habeas corpus and complaints can be filed with the Human Rights Commission or Women's Commission,' says Sonam Chandwani, an advocate. 'Healthy interaction between the opposite sexes should always be encouraged,' says advocate and human rights activist Sudha Ramallingam. 'In Western cultures, couples openly engage in public display of affection and this is not looked upon as vulgar. Why should it be vulgar here? I don't understand what morality or decency people are trying to uphold and impose by moral policing,' she adds.
Scroll.in
2 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Calcutta HC restraints Bengal from paying monthly stipend to sacked non-teaching staff
The Calcutta High Court on Friday directed the West Bengal government to stop paying monthly stipends to a group of non-teaching staff who had been sacked after the Supreme Court in April found irregularities in the 2016 recruitment process, Live Law reported. On June 9, Justice Amrita Sinha had reserved the judgement in the matter but had stayed the state government's plan to provide monthly stipends of Rs 20,000 to Rs 25,000 to the persons. In its Friday order, the court reinforced that restriction, prohibiting such payments till at least September 26. Sinha issued the direction on a writ petition challenging the provision of the allowance to the staff whose services had been terminated. The petition was filed by a candidate on the waitlist who was not recruited despite being on the merit list, allegedly due to irregularities in the hiring process. On April 3, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court's April 2024 order terminating the appointment of about 25,000 teachers and non-teaching staff by West Bengal's School Service Commission. The bench passed the order after observing that the recruitment process was 'vitiated by manipulation and fraud'. The top court on April 17 permitted 'untainted' teachers to be retained until the end of the academic year or until fresh appointments are made, whichever was earlier. However, it did not grant relief to the non-teaching staff, or Group C and Group D employees, whose appointments were also cancelled. In response, the state government had announced in April that the sacked non-teaching staff would receive a monthly allowance until the Supreme Court delivered a verdict on its review petitions. On Friday, the High Court criticised the state for attempting to financially assist individuals whose employment had been declared fraudulent by the Supreme Court and directed 'tainted' candidates to 'refund any salary/payment received', Live Law reported. By introducing a stipend scheme, the state was undermining the Supreme Court's decision, the High Court observed. 'Once the highest court of the land has decided the issue of illegal appointment conclusively and opined that the appointments were result of fraud, no person who was the beneficiary of a fraudulent act of the statutory authority ought to be provided any support, that too, from the public exchequer,' the court said. The court also instructed the state government to submit its counter-affidavit addressing the petitioners' claims within four weeks, and allowed the petitioners two weeks after that to file their response, PTI reported. In April 2024, the High Court had passed its direction on the termination of the appointments based on the findings of a re-evaluation of the Optical Mark Recognition sheets from the 2016 recruitment examination in the case. The re-evaluation found that the selected teachers had been recruited against blank Optical Mark Recognition sheets.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
5 arrested in Delhi operations targeting Chinese cyber scam networks
Delhi Police have arrested five people in separate operations for their alleged involvement in cyber fraud networks linked to Chinese operatives, officials said on Friday. The police investigation revealed that the accused persons were in contact with Chinese nationals through Telegram channels and groups. (Representational Image/pexel) According to officials, the North-West District Cyber Police Station solved a cheating case involving two accused, Pawan and Mankiraat Dhillon, who allegedly duped a victim of ₹ 21 lakh under the pretext of offering lucrative returns from share market investments. The accused lured the victim through a fake investment application that mimicked the interface of a legitimate brokerage platform, showing fabricated profits, losses, and investment details. The victim transferred the entire amount in three separate transactions to bank accounts shared by the fraudsters, who maintained contact via Telegram and WhatsApp, they said. The police investigation revealed that the accused persons were in contact with Chinese nationals through Telegram channels and groups. They procured bank accounts from individuals in their surroundings and supplied them to the Chinese nationals on a commission basis via Telegram. The accused persons were arrested from their hideout in Mohali, Punjab, and several incriminating items, including ATM cards, cheque books, passbooks, SIM cards linked to bank accounts, and mobile handsets used in the fraud, were recovered. According to the press note, the police also recovered evidence of the accused persons' travel to Nepal, where they received the cheated amount in the alleged bank account facilitated by their foreign associates. Hotel bills from Nepal and air tickets related to their travel were also recovered. In a separate incident, the Cyber Police Station, South-West District, has busted a sophisticated interstate cyber fraud syndicate, which was operating across states and channelling cheated money to China via USDT and cryptocurrency platforms. Three accused persons, Mahender Singh Rajawat, Ariph Khan, and Laxmi Narayan Vaishy, all residents of Jaipur, Rajasthan, have been arrested, and six smartphones used in the commission of cyber fraud have been seized, they said. The case stems from a complaint lodged by K Kant, who was contacted via WhatsApp and Telegram with a proposition to earn money by posting positive reviews for hotels and restaurants online. Initially, the complainant received small payments for such tasks. However, he was soon deceived into transferring over ₹ 15.8 lakh under various false pretences such as "welfare tasks," "account unfreezing," and "credit score improvement." Consequently, a case FIR U/s 318(4)/61(2) of BNS was registered at Cyber PS South-West District, and an investigation was initiated. As per the press note, though the complainant had deleted the WhatsApp number and the fraudulent link, the team conducted a detailed technical analysis and tracked the money trail, leading to multiple raids in Jaipur, Ajmer, and nearby regions. Accused Mahender Singh Rajawat was the first to be apprehended. Though he initially tried to mislead the team but thorough interrogation revealed the identities and roles of co-accused Ariph Khan and Laxmi Narayan Vaishy. Multiple raids were carried out at their hideouts, and both Ariph Khan and Laxmi Narayan Vaishy were apprehended. The investigation revealed that the accused persons were in direct contact with a Chinese national operating via Telegram from outside India. They provided multiple bank accounts for laundering proceeds of crime, and the stolen money was deposited into these accounts, withdrawn within 20 minutes, and converted to USDT (cryptocurrency), they added.
