
Turmoil and trade wars dominate China's 'summer Davos'
TIANJIN — Oil prices have hit their lowest in two weeks after Israel agreed to US President Donald Trump's proposal for a ceasefire with Iran.
But business leaders at a key economic meeting in the northern Chinese port city of Tianjin find themselves troubled by the state of the global economy, and the prospect for meaningful growth.
The rapid escalation of the conflict between Iran and Israel - which has now pulled in the United States - temporarily replaced trade, tariffs and inflation at the top of a long list of concerns with far-reaching consequences.
"It is the most complex geopolitical and geo-economic backdrop we've seen in decades," Borge Brende, president and chief executive of the World Economic Forum (WEF), said ahead of the summit, dubbed the "Summer Davos".
"If we are not able to revive growth again, we can unfortunately see a decade of lower growth."
WEF has long been a symbol of the merits of free trade and a globalised world - but Trump's tariff wars have upended supply chains and the ability of businesses to plan for the future.
"We live in an environment of radical uncertainty," says Jeffry Frieden, professor of international and public affairs and political science at Columbia University.
"Businesses have to figure out what has happened over the past several years as we come to the end of an era, in my view, of international economic and political affairs and move into a new era."
Geopolitical risks have significant implications for the global economy.
Higher oil prices can push up the operational costs of energy for goods producers - and at some point, those additional costs may be passed onto the consumer.
People may in turn hold back on spending, as increased prices dampen demand. If inflation remains high, central banks will be reluctant to bring down interest rates.
Geopolitical tensions can also lead to losses as the result of other factors, such as the rerouting of flights and disruption to tourism activities.
Investors can get rattled by uncertainty, leading to sell-offs on the market and a rush for safe haven assets like gold and the US dollar.
Iran's threat to close the Strait of Hormuz – one of the world's most critical transit routes, through which roughly a quarter of the world's global oil supply passes – would leave China especially vulnerable. It is estimated that Beijing imports 90% of the oil Iran sells.
Chris Torrens, head of China at advisory and advocacy firm APCO, points out that some of the country's bigger machinery sectors, including the new high technology industries that Beijing is trying to support, still rely on oil.
"So anything that disrupts that oil supply is going to be a worry to Beijing," he says.
The WEF event comes at a critical moment for China's economy, which has for years struggled from a protracted property crisis, high unemployment and sluggish domestic spending.
Beijing has unveiled a string of measures to try to stimulate the economy.
Until now, China is still achieving its official growth target of around 5%, and economists say the country could account for almost 30% of global growth this year.
Mr Torrens says Chinese officials detect an opportunity, and suggests that in a sense the country is opening its doors through the WEF event.
"I think the US is giving China a massive PR opportunity to portray itself as a champion of globalisation," he says. "To say that China is a bastion of free trade is still a work in progress, because there are still market access issues. But China is certainly keen to play its part and step up as a regional and a global player."
With Trump's trade war now threatening exports from the manufacturing powerhouse, Beijing is looking to emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) as potential sources of growth.
"Trade has been an important engine of growth for the last decade or two, but it's clear that certain technologies have a huge potential to help us with new sources of growth and competitiveness," said Mirek Dusek, managing director at WEF.
Accounting firm PwC says AI could boost global growth by 15% by 2035.
At the WEF event, though, tariffs are never far from the minds of business leaders, as they try to make alliances and navigate an uncertain economic environment.
In the coming weeks, Trump's pauses on his hefty reciprocal levies are due to expire. And there's little certainty as to how the global business landscape might look after that.
"It's very difficult for businesses to make long term plans," Frieden explains. "If you don't know what the level of goods on your tariffs are, you can 't figure out if it makes sense to relocate in the US or keep your activities overseas – whether you're an American corporation, or a non-American corporation." — BBC
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Leaders
40 minutes ago
- Leaders
US Strikes May Have Only Delayed Iran's Nuclear Program: Report
A preliminary US intelligence assessment has revealed that recent strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities may have only delayed Tehran's program by months, three sources familiar with the matter shared this information with Reuters. The Defense Intelligence Agency prepared the initial report, which is one of 18 US intelligence agencies. The assessment indicates that Iran could restart its nuclear program within months. One source estimated that the earliest restart could occur in one to two months. This classified assessment contradicts statements from President Donald Trump and high-ranking US officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. They claimed the strikes effectively eliminated Iran's nuclear capabilities. On Tuesday, Trump's administration informed the UN Security Council that the strikes had 'degraded' Iran's nuclear program. This statement fell short of Trump's earlier claim that the facilities had been 'obliterated.' When asked for comment, the White House referred to spokesperson Karoline Leavitt's statement to CNN. She called the assessment 'flat-out wrong.' 'Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000-pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration,' Leavitt stated. Damage Assessment Remains Uncertain A US official who reviewed the assessment noted that it included several caveats and 'ifs.' This official also mentioned that a more refined report is expected in the coming days. Analysts suggest that if the assessment relied on satellite imagery, it might not reveal the full extent of damage to the deeply buried Fordo uranium enrichment facility. Trump has argued that the attacks were necessary to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. However, Iran denies seeking such a weapon, asserting that its nuclear program serves peaceful purposes. Evaluating the damage at the Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz nuclear sites presents significant challenges. The Defense Intelligence Agency is not the only agency tasked with this evaluation. One source indicated that the assessment faced disagreement and was not universally accepted. A US official, speaking anonymously, stated that the true extent of the damage remains unknown. Nevertheless, the initial assessment suggests that the strikes may not have been as successful as the Trump administration claims. Infrastructure Damage Reported The report indicates the US attack caved in facility entrances and damaged infrastructure. However, one source noted that the strike did not collapse underground buildings. Restarting operations will depend on how long it takes Iran to dig out and repair power and water supply facilities. The Washington Post reported some centrifuges for enriching uranium remained intact after the strikes. The Pentagon disputed claims that the damage was insignificant but did not deny the existence of the DIA assessment. 'Based on everything we have seen — and I've seen it all — our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons,' Hegseth stated to Reuters. He emphasized that the bombs hit their targets perfectly, resulting in devastating impacts buried under rubble. However, one source indicated that Iran's enriched uranium stocks had not been eliminated. David Albright, a former UN nuclear inspector, expressed that the US attack effectively destroyed Iran's uranium enrichment program for now. However, he warned that it failed to eliminate the longer-term threat. 'Iran retains an ability to break out and produce weapon-grade uranium,' Albright stated in a post on X. He highlighted that Iran's stock of near-weapons-grade highly enriched uranium, sufficient for about nine warheads, remains unaccounted for. Ongoing Debate and Canceled Briefings Initial military assessments can evolve as more information becomes available. It is common for opinions to vary across different US intelligence agencies. Democrats have previously stated that Trump's claims about the strikes eliminating or significantly hindering Iran's nuclear program lack supporting evidence. 'There's zero evidence that I've seen that the nuclear program was completely and totally obliterated as Donald Trump has claimed,' House of Representatives Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said on Monday. Classified briefings for members of the House of Representatives and Senate regarding this matter were canceled on Tuesday. Short link : Post Views: 4


Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Hamas says Gaza ceasefire talks ‘intensified in recent hours'
Hamas said on Wednesday that Gaza ceasefire talks have 'intensified in recent hours.' Earlier in the day, US President Donald Trump said that he believed that 'great progress' was being made to bring an end to the conflict between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. 'I think great progress is being made on Gaza, I think because of this attack that we made,' said Trump, suggesting the US strikes on Iran could have a positive impact on the Middle East. Developing

Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
US will not sanction Russia yet, Rubio tells Politico
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Politico that the United States will not impose further sanctions on Russia yet, and still wants room to negotiate a peace deal. 'If we did what everybody here wants us to do, and that is come in and crush them with more sanctions, we probably lose our ability to talk to them about the ceasefire and then who's talking to them?,' Rubio told Politico in an interview on the sidelines of the NATO summit. Rubio added that President Donald Trump will 'know the right time and place' for new economic measures against Russia, and that the administration is working with Congress to make sure they allow Trump the appropriate flexibility, Politico reported. 'If there's an opportunity for us to make a difference and get them (Russia) to the table, we're going to take it,' Rubio said.