logo
Elon Musk leaving Trump administration, Internet says ‘Anyway, DOGE was a failure'

Elon Musk leaving Trump administration, Internet says ‘Anyway, DOGE was a failure'

Minta day ago

Billionaire Elon Musk has bid farewell as a Special Government Employee to Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, known as "DoGE" — formed earlier this year. The space and technology billionaire confirmed his departure in a post on X.
Musk was appointed as a "special government employee" - a designation that allows individuals to serve in a government role for up to 130 days per year. Since Donald Trump's inauguration on 20 January this year, Musk's term was expected to hit that limit by the end of May.
Read | Elon Musk exits Trump administration as 'Special Government Employee'
In his post, Musk thanked Trump for the role and said he believed DOGE would become a 'way of life throughout government.'
Following Elon Musk's announcement of his departure from DOGE, social media, as expected, had plenty to say. While the majority of internet users wished the SpaceX billionaire well for his future ventures, one user took a different route and asked Grok to summarise Musk's accomplishments during his time at DOGE.
Read | Elon Musk reacts after Starship megarocket explodes. Again. Says, 'Big improvement… lots of good data…'
Grok, a generative artificial intelligence chatbot developed by xAI, is built on a large language model (LLM) of the same name. It was launched in November 2023 by Elon Musk himself. Designed to be conversational, Grok is known for its "sense of humour" and direct access to the social media platform X (formerly Twitter).
True to form, Grok appeared to lean into its "sense of humour" in this instance too, as the AI chatbot remarked, 'The true impact of DOGE remains debated amid ongoing scrutiny.'
When asked what Musk's achievements were at DOGE, Grok replied, 'As a Special Government Employee, Elon Musk led the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), claiming $160 billion in savings by terminating wasteful contracts, like $255 million from 269 contracts, and modernising IT systems, such as digitising the OPM retirement process. DOGE also cleaned Social Security records and supported voter integrity measures.' Grok added, 'However, these efforts face criticism for potential costs of $135 billion in lost productivity, legal challenges, and service disruptions. Concerns about Musk's business conflicts and political motivations persist, with public opinion divided, as 54% view him unfavourably.'
Read | Elon Musk leaves Trump administration LIVE: Tesla chief says '… time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end'
Another user praised Musk for his contributions to the United States of America, saying: 'I honestly don't know if we could've saved America if @ElonMusk hadn't spent $40 billion to buy Twitter and rescue free speech.' This particular user's take? 'He absolutely deserves the Presidential Medal of Freedom.'
One of them asked, 'What was achieved other than Elon breaking things and leaving them broken?' while another commented, 'This has damaged your brand beyond anything you can imagine.'
A third user said: 'DOGE has been a failed endeavour. Whether it's family, business or public, it's hard to cut the money strings after you have started them.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk-Telegram AI pact sets the stage for more drama
Elon Musk-Telegram AI pact sets the stage for more drama

Time of India

time23 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Elon Musk-Telegram AI pact sets the stage for more drama

It's hard to find a pair of tech billionaires more alike than Elon Musk and Pavel Durov . Both are staunch libertarians who run large social media platforms with minimal content moderation, and both champion themselves as defenders of free speech. Both are also pro-natalists, with Durov claiming to have fathered more than 100 biological children through sperm donation. It's an ideological match made in heaven — and perhaps in business too. Durov this week announced a one-year partnership with Musk's xAI , in which the latter artificial intelligence lab would pay Telegram $300 million in cash and equity to integrate its Grok chatbot into the messaging app. In essence, Telegram gets whizzy new AI features while Grok gets distribution on a platform with roughly 1 billion users, double the number of people on X. But there are a couple of snags. Durov, for a start, appears to believe an oral contract is as good as a written one. Hours after Durov announced the partnership and its financial terms on X, Musk witheringly replied: 'No deal has been signed.' Musk may not be in the best of moods. With the true impact of his Department of Government Efficiency still unclear, he left his post at the White House this week. Now he's turning back to a business empire in flux, having leaned on AI to balance his books. The generative AI boom has pushed the value of two-year-old xAI to $80 billion, and Musk recently merged that company and X (formerly known as Twitter and worth far less) under a single entity, xAI Holdings. That gives X some much-needed stability, but xAI still needs to make money, and the Durov deal could help. More users of Grok mean more opportunities to sell subscriptions for the AI tool, which cost between $3 and $40 a there's a historical precedent for this kind of distribution partnership to work. Dell Inc. made a killing from pre-installing Microsoft Corp.'s Windows on its PCs, while Apple Inc. has earned $20 billion a year from Alphabet Inc. by making Google the default search tool on iPhones. There's another tantalizing possibility for Musk: scraping messages and content across Telegram and using both to train Grok to be even smarter. A key feature of building today's generative AI systems is that priming them with more data leads to better capabilities, and until now Grok has benefited from training on the mass of text (and bilge) on X. But Durov seems to have nixed that possibility. When a user on X asked Durov if he'd allow such scraping, he replied that user privacy was 'paramount' and that Grok would only extract messages people shared with the bot directly. Perhaps this was Durov's way of preempting Musk from seeking access to Telegram data — hence going public on the partnership so early. And maybe we shouldn't be surprised if the two hash out the issue out publicly. That isn't the only type of drama to expect from this pairing. Should Grok get plugged into Telegram's app this summer, it will be one of the deepest known integrations of an AI tool into a major Western mobile messaging and broadcasting service. You can't use AI to edit tweets on X or messages in WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger, even though all those platforms now have an AI assistant of some sort. But on Telegram, you'll be able to do just that. A video demo posted by Durov on Wednesday shows a Telegram user typing the word 'great' in a text to their work colleagues. Grok offers options to 'improve,' 'expand' or 'change tone.' When the user taps 'expand,' their message turns into: 'Excellent, team effort at its best. Keep up the good work!' This at first simply looks like another example of AI bringing blandness and vapidity to human conversation. Apple and Google both offer suggested AI replies in their email software. But using that functionality to edit mobile text messages in real time pushes the technology further into the mechanics behind human voice and intention. It also portends a darker impact on a platform like Telegram, where content rules are scant. The app is well-known for hosting extremist content and conspiracy theories, with neo-Nazi groups in the US using it to organize rallies, while some of last year's anti-immigration riots in the UK were promoted on the platform. Far-right groups, meanwhile, have found ways to 'jailbreak' AI bots like Grok, getting them to generate content that breaks the rules of other social media firms; for instance, generating a photorealistic image of mountains that spell out 'The Jews did 9/11,' according to the International Centre for Counter-Terrorism, which singled out Grok as being relatively easy to exploit. Musk has yet to publicly respond to criticisms about jailbreaking Grok. If Grok allows Telegram to create more persuasive memes and other forms of propaganda at scale, that could make it an even more powerful tool for spreading toxicity, from disinformation to hate speech to other odious content. Musk and Durov have kicked off a mini corporate drama of their own, but the real chaos could unfold on the platform itself, and it won't be pretty.

Musk Came To Washington With Chain Saw. Left Behind Upheaval, Unmet Expectations
Musk Came To Washington With Chain Saw. Left Behind Upheaval, Unmet Expectations

NDTV

time26 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Musk Came To Washington With Chain Saw. Left Behind Upheaval, Unmet Expectations

Washington: Elon Musk arrived in the nation's capital with the chain saw-wielding swagger of a tech titan who had never met a problem he couldn't solve with lots of money, long hours or a well-calibrated algorithm. President Donald Trump was delighted to have the world's richest person - and a top campaign donor - working in his administration, talking about how he was "a smart guy" who "really cares for our country." Musk was suddenly everywhere - holding forth in Cabinet meetings while wearing a "tech support" shirt and black MAGA hat, hoisting his young son on his shoulders in the Oval Office, flying aboard Air Force One, sleeping in the White House. Democrats described the billionaire entrepreneur as Trump's "co-president," and senior officials bristled at his imperial approach to overhauling the federal government. After establishing Tesla as a premier electric automaker, building rockets at SpaceX and reshaping the social media landscape by buying Twitter, Musk was confident that he could bend Washington to his vision. Now that's over. Musk said this week that he's leaving his job as a senior adviser, an announcement that came after he revealed his plan to curtail political donations and he criticized the centerpiece of Trump's legislative agenda. It's a quiet exit after a turbulent entrance, and he's trailed by upheaval and unmet expectations. Thousands of people were indiscriminately laid off or pushed out - hundreds of whom had to be rehired - and some federal agencies were eviscerated. But no one has been prosecuted for the fraud that Musk and Trump said was widespread within the government. Musk reduced his target for cutting spending from $2 trillion to $1 trillion to $150 billion, and even that goal may not be reached. In Silicon Valley, where Musk got his start as a founder of PayPal, his kind of promises are known as vaporware - a product that sounds extraordinary yet never gets shipped to market. Trump said Thursday on his Truth Social platform that he would hold a press conference Friday with Musk. "This will be his last day, but not really, because he will, always, be with us, helping all the way," Trump added. "Elon is terrific!" Musk's position was always designed to be temporary, and he had previously announced his intention to dedicate more of his time to his companies. But he also told reporters last month that he was willing to work part-time for Trump "indefinitely, as long as the president wants me to do it." Musk got a seat at Trump's table and put $250 million behind his campaign It was clear that Musk wouldn't be the typical kind of presidential adviser around the time that he showed the world his belly button. Racing on stage at a campaign rally one month before the election, he jumped for joy next to Trump, his T-shirt rising to expose his midriff. Musk had already sold Trump on his idea for a Department of Government Efficiency while also putting at least $250 million behind his candidacy. The plan called for a task force to hunt for waste, fraud and abuse, a timeworn idea with a new twist. Instead of putting together a blue-ribbon panel of government experts, Trump would give his top donor a desk in the White House and what appeared to be carte blanche to make changes. Musk deployed software engineers who burrowed into sensitive databases, troubling career officials who sometimes chose to resign rather than go along. Trump brushed off concerns about Musk's lack of experience in public service or conflicts of interest from his billions of dollars in federal contracts. Their unlikely partnership had the potential for a generational impact on American politics and government. While Musk dictated orders for government departments from his perch in the White House, he was poised to use his wealth to enforce loyalty to the president. His language was that of catastrophism. Excessive spending was a crisis that could only be solved by drastic measures, Musk claimed, and "if we don't do this, America will go bankrupt." But even though he talked about his work in existential terms, he treated the White House like a playground. He brought his children to a meeting with the Indian prime minister. He let the president turn the driveway into a makeshift Tesla showroom to help boost sales. He installed an oversized screen in his office that he occasionally used to play video games. Sometimes, Trump invited Musk to sleep over in the Lincoln Bedroom. "We'll be on Air Force One, Marine One, and he'll be like, 'do you want to stay over?'" Musk told reporters. The president made sure he got some caramel ice cream from the kitchen. "This stuff's amazing," Musk said. "I ate a whole tub of it." Looking back on his experience in government, he described it as a lark. "It is funny that we've got DOGE," an acronym that references an online meme featuring a surprised-looking dog from Japan. "How did we get here?" Musk did not give federal workers the benefit of the doubt From the beginning, Musk treated federal workers with contempt. At best, they were inefficient; at worst, they were committing fraud. His team offered them a "fork in the road," meaning they could get paid to quit. Probationary employees, generally people new on the job without full civil service protection, were shown the door. Anyone who stayed faced escalating demands, such as what became known as the "five things" emails. Musk wanted every government employee to submit a list of five things they accomplished in the previous week, and he claimed that "failure to respond will be taken as a resignation." Some administration officials curtailed the plan, concerned that it could jeopardize security in more sensitive areas of the government, and it eventually faded, an early sign of Musk's struggle to get traction. But in the meantime, he continued issuing orders like thunderbolts. One day in February, Musk posted "CFPB RIP," plus an emoji of a tombstone. The headquarters of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, created after the Great Recession to protect Americans from fraud and deceptive practices, was shut down and employees were ordered to stop working. Musk had already started gutting the U.S. Agency for International Development, a pillar of the country's foreign policy establishment and the world's largest provider of humanitarian assistance. "Spent the weekend feeding USAID into a wood chipper," he bragged. Thousands of contacts were cut off, pleasing conservatives who disliked the agency's progressive initiatives on climate change and gay rights. Musk rejected concerns about the loss of a crucial lifeline for impoverished people around the globe, saying, "no one has died." However, children who once relied on American assistance perished from malnutrition, and the death count is expected to increase. The lawsuits began piling up. Sometimes workers got their jobs back, only to lose them again. The Food and Drug Administration, which is responsible for ensuring the safety of everything from baby formula to biotech drugs, planned to lay off 3,500 employees. But again and again, the agency was forced to rehire people who were initially deemed expendable, including laboratory scientists, travel bookers and document specialists. Commissioner Marty Makary, who started his job after many of the cuts took place, told attendees at a recent conference that "it was hard and my job is to make sure we can heal from that." Only 1,900 layoffs took place, but another 1,200 staffers took buyouts or early retirement. Experts fear the agency has lost much of its institutional knowledge and expertise in areas like vaccines, tobacco and food. There are also concerns about safety on public lands. The National Park Service has been bleeding staff, leaving fewer people to maintain trails, clean restrooms and guide visitors. More cuts at the Forest Service could undermine efforts to prevent and fight wildfires. The Environmental Protection Agency faces a broad overhaul, such as gutting the Office of Research and Development, which was responsible for improving air pollution monitoring and discovering harmful chemicals in drinking water. Not even low-profile organizations were exempt. Trump ordered the downsizing of the U.S. Institute of Peace, a nonprofit think tank created by Congress, and Musk's team showed up to carry out his plan. The organizations' leaders were deposed, then reinstated after a court battle. Musk made little headway at the top sources of federal spending The bulk of federal spending goes to health care programs like Medicaid and Medicare, plus Social Security and the military. Unfortunately for Musk, all of those areas are politically sensitive and generally require congressional approval to make changes. Thousands of civilian workers were pushed out at the Pentagon, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is reducing the ranks of top generals and looking to consolidate various commands. A plan to downsize an office for testing and evaluating new weapons systems could save $300 million per year. Hegseth recently asked employees to submit one idea per week for cutting waste. However, the Pentagon budget would increase by $150 billion, for a total of more than $900 billion, under Trump's spending proposal working its way through Congress. The money includes $25 billion to lay the groundwork for Trump's "golden dome" missile defense program and $34 billion to expand the naval fleet with more shipbuilding. Another $45 million is expected to be spent on a military parade on June 14, which is the 250th anniversary of the Army's founding and Trump's 79th birthday. Musk also faced blowback for targeting Social Security, which provides monthly benefits to retirees and some children. He suggested that the popular program was "a Ponzi scheme" and the government could save between $500 billion and $700 billion by tackling waste and fraud. However, his estimates were inflated. Social Security's inspector general said there was only $71.8 billion in improper payments over eight years. Nor was there any evidence that millions of dead people were receiving benefits. Changes to Social Security phone services, pitched as a way to eliminate opportunities for fraud, were walked back after an outcry from lawmakers and beneficiaries. But the agency could still shed 7,000 workers while closing some of its offices. Musk's popularity cratered even though Americans often agreed with his premise that the federal government is bloated and wasteful, according to polling from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Just 33% of U.S. adults had a favorable view of Musk in April, down from 41% in December. In addition, 65% said Musk had too much influence over the federal government. Musk talked of staggering savings but delivered modest results During a campaign rally in October, Musk said he could find "at least $2 trillion" in spending cuts. In January, before Trump was inaugurated, he revised by saying, "if we try for $2 trillion, we've got a good shot at getting one." But in April, at a Cabinet meeting, Musk provided a different target. He was "excited to announce" that they could reach $150 billion in savings during the current fiscal year. Whether that figure proves to be accurate is difficult to measure, especially because DOGE routinely inflated or mischaracterized its work. But it falls short of President Bill Clinton's initiative three decades ago, which resulted in $136 billion in savings - the equivalent of more than $240 billion today. Elaine Kamarck, a key figure in the Clinton administration, said they focused on making the government more responsive and updating antiquated internal procedures. The work took years. "We went about it methodically, department by department," she said. The effort also reduced the federal workforce by more than 400,000 employees. However, Musk did little to seek insight from people who knew the inner workings of government. "They made some changes without really knowing what they were doing," said Alex Nowrasteh, vice president for economic and social policy studies for the libertarian think tank Cato Institute. He said there were "a lot of unforced errors." In the end, Nowrasteh said, "they set themselves up for failure."

Stephen Miller's wife Katie Miller is following Elon Musk 'full time', hours after his tweet directed at Tesla CEO's criticism of Trump Bill said: You cannot ...
Stephen Miller's wife Katie Miller is following Elon Musk 'full time', hours after his tweet directed at Tesla CEO's criticism of Trump Bill said: You cannot ...

Time of India

time28 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Stephen Miller's wife Katie Miller is following Elon Musk 'full time', hours after his tweet directed at Tesla CEO's criticism of Trump Bill said: You cannot ...

Stephen Miller 's wife Katie Miller , spokeswoman for the Department of Government Efficiency ( DOGE ), is leaving the White House to work full-time for . The development comes after Musk's official departure from his advisory role in the Trump administration. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Notably, Katie shared an X post, quoting Musk's previous quote: 'DOGE is a way of life, like Buddhism'. Musk criticizes 'One Big Beautiful Bill' The Tesla and CEO recently said that he was 'disappointed' with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill', claiming it contradicted the budget-cutting goals he pursued during his tenure with DOGE i.e. Department of Government Efficiency. Katie's husband and senior Trump aide Stephen Miller, critically responded to Musk's recent remarks. 'I think a bill can be big or it can be beautiful, but I don't know if it can be both,' he said. 'My personal opinion.' Stephen Miller counters Musk's criticism Shortly after Musk's comments about the bill, Stephen Miller took to X (formerly Twitter) to clarify the limitations of the budget bill. 'Under senate budget rules, you cannot cut discretionary spending (only mandatory) in a reconciliation bill,' Miller wrote. 'So DOGE cuts would have to be done through what is known as a rescissions package or an appropriations bill,' he added. He further stated that the bill 'does not fund the departments of government' nor finance federal agencies, pushing back against Musk's claim that it undermined DOGE's mission. Katie Miller heads to Tesla-SpaceX world Katie Miller, who previously served as a Special Government Employee — a temporary designation for private-sector professionals working in government — is expected to take on a new role with Musk, possibly involving his media relations for Tesla and SpaceX, according to CNN. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Her departure comes as Musk phases out of political involvement and refocuses on his companies. 'I think I probably did spend a bit too much time on politics,' Musk said in a recent interview with Ars Technica. Elon Musk exits DOGE Musk officially resigned from his post leading DOGE yesterday. In a post on X, he announced 'As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President Trump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending'. 'The DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store