In Tanzania, Samia's Facade of Reform Is Crumbling
At the height of her reform ambitions, Tanzanian President Samia Suluhu Hassan proudly championed the 'Four Rs' of reconciliation, resilience, reforms, and rebuilding, a program that marked a radical departure from her predecessor, John Magufuli. She reversed a number of retrograde and repressive policies implemented by Magufuli and initiated reconciliatory dialogue with the opposition. She also skillfully consolidated power within her party, Chama Cha Mapinduzi, or CCM, which has held the presidency in Tanzania since independence in 1961.
However, Samia's reforms have quickly stalled as the 2025 general elections draw nearer. The government's recent arrest of Tundu Lissu, the chair of Tanzania's main opposition party, Chama Cha Demokrasia na Maendeleo, or CHADEMA, and his subsequent indictment on treason charges related to his advocacy for electoral reform, clearly indicates that the façade of progressive change that had been constructed under Samia is crumbling and could presage a return to authoritarian rule in Tanzania.
In the wake of Lissu's arrest, CHADEMA was disqualified from the election after it refused to sign a code of conduct mandated by the Independent National Electoral Commission. Disillusioned by the government's intransigence on electoral reforms, CHADEMA passed a 'No Reforms, No Elections' resolution in December 2024. The resolution is at the center of the party's campaign strategy to expose the government's reluctance to institutionalize these reforms.
In 2022, following dialogue with opposition parties, Samia had formed a special task force on democracy and political parties, which issued a list of reform recommendations. The opposition's demands of establishing an independent electoral commission, lifting the ban on political parties, and revising various laws that govern political activity were incorporated into the task force's recommendations. The government subsequently introduced reform legislation that was presented as institutionalizing the needed reforms but which in reality largely maintained the status quo.
To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter.
For example, the opposition had demanded measures to ensure an independent electoral commission, but the president still has executive powers to appoint its members, despite a cosmetic name change from the National Electoral Commission to the Independent National Electoral Commission. Additionally, an election reform bill that became law in 2024 still allows government-appointed district executive directors to oversee election returns during elections. Finally, the task force had recommended that the results of presidential elections should be subject to challenge in a court of law, preferably a higher court, but there is still no mechanism for this to occur. In 2020, the African Court on Human and People's Rights ruled that Tanzania violated the African Charter by refusing challenges to presidential elections in court.
In addition to the lack of progress on electoral reform under Samia, continued repression, especially abductions and disappearances of CHADEMA members, have deepened mistrust of the government.
CHADEMA's reform campaign seems to have resonated with the Tanzanian public. Lissu is charged with treason because he called for disrupting the upcoming elections if his reform demands were not met. In local elections held in November, many CHADEMA candidates were disqualified, and CCM went on to win 99 percent of the local contests.
Samia's perceived outsider status, as a Muslim woman from Tanzania's semi-autonomous state of Zanzibar, was seen as something that would undermine her chances of becoming president. However, she was able to overcome these hurdles through the support of CCM's power brokers, such as former President Jakaya Kikwete. She has also been a shrewd political operator, using both party processes and the power of the presidency to eliminate rivals.
The reforms and reconciliation she had begun were quickly reversed when it became evident that the opposition was gaining momentum. After the ban on political parties was lifted, CHADEMA began holding nationwide rallies demanding a new constitution as the best pathway for consolidating reforms. The demand for a new constitution became CHADEMA's main agenda, even as they spoke vehemently against government corruption and controversial government deals such as an agreement with a Dubai-based company, DP World, to manage ports at Dar es Salaam and elsewhere in the country whose terms were unusually generous to the the company. As opposition to the deal grew, the government began employing means to silence it. Critics of the port deal and opposition figures were harassed, arrested, and detained. Accounts of abductions, disappearances, and the killing of opposition voices followed.
Then, in January 2025, during a Special CCM convention, Samia was declared the party's presidential candidate for the upcoming election in a political maneuver that went against party traditions. CCM has traditionally held its nominations in June or July of an election year. This unprecedented move demonstrated Samia's intentions of eliminating potential party rivals for the presidential nomination. With the electoral body disbarring CHADEMA from the elections, it appears that she has now eliminated any external challenger as well. This positions Samia and CCM for a landslide victory in the general election.
These developments point to a worrying democratic decline in Tanzania. In its latest Freedom in the World report, Freedom House changed the country's rating to 'Not Free' from 'Partly Free,' reflecting the country's poor performance on measures of political rights and civil liberties.
At the regional level, Tanzania's democratic backsliding mirrors similar trends in Kenya and Uganda. In November, Uganda's longtime opposition figure, Kizza Besigye, was abducted while in Kenya and later charged with treason. Tanzanian human rights activist Maria Sarungi Tsehai, who resides in Kenya, was briefly abducted in Nairobi in January, and she has said she believes the Tanzanian government was involved. In Kenya, incidences of abductions and forced disappearances were reported following youth-led protests in June 2024 over the cost of living and a proposed tax hike. These patterns suggest a broader regional shift towards repression and away from democracy.
It remains to be seen whether the Tanzanian government's decision to disqualify CHADEMA from the presidential election scheduled for October will be reversed or whether Lissu's treason charges will be dropped. But it seems clear that Samia's brief experiment in progressive reform is now over.
Nicodemus Minde is a Researcher at the Institute for Security Studies, in Nairobi. He writes on politics, culture and big-power politics in Africa.
The post In Tanzania, Samia's Facade of Reform Is Crumbling appeared first on World Politics Review.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
In Poland, Nawrocki's Win Complicates Tusk's Reform Agenda
Karol Nawrocki's narrow victory in Poland's presidential election on Sunday signals a seismic shift in the country's politics. Backed by the nationalist Law and Justice, or PiS, party and endorsed by U.S. President Donald Trump's MAGA movement, the hard-right and Euroskeptic Nawrocki edged out his liberal rival, Warsaw Mayor Rafal Trzaskowski, with 50.9 percent of the vote. Although the Polish presidency has limited formal powers, its veto authority means Nawrocki's win will be felt keenly, both in Poland and across Europe. Prime Minister Donald Tusk, a longtime supporter of the European Union who previously served as EU Council president, has already been forced to navigate a fractious cohabitation with outgoing President Andrzej Duda—also aligned with PiS—since taking office in December 2023. Nawrocki's tenure promises more of the same at home and a possible reorientation of Poland's place in Europe, especially if he uses his veto powers to stymie pro-democratic reforms and prepare the ground for a PiS return in legislative elections that must take place by 2027. Tusk took office promising to enact a reform agenda to restore democracy and rule of law after nine years of PiS rule. But Duda spent the past year blocking key legislation, including much-needed judicial reforms, using the presidential veto to grind governance to a halt. Nawrocki has signaled he will double down on that strategy to frustrate Tusk's every move. Nawrocki's victory shows that PiS' long game has worked. During its tenure, PiS embedded loyalists throughout state institutions, ensuring that even after losing power it could sabotage the new administration. Nawrocki is the capstone of that strategy. By vetoing laws and creating gridlock, he will allow PiS to portray Tusk's team as ineffective. It is a grim irony that a government elected to restore democracy is now hamstrung by holdovers from the illiberal regime it defeated. To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter. One immediate flashpoint is social policy. Nawrocki has vowed to veto any attempt to liberalize Poland's near-total ban on abortion, which allows the procedure only if a mother's life is in danger or in the case of incest. Despite mass protests and international condemnation against the draconian restrictions, they were further tightened in October 2020, when Poland's Constitutional Tribunal outlawed abortion in the case of fetal abnormalities, a move that was promoted by the country's strong anti-abortion rights movement. In addition to endorsing such hardline views, Nawrocki also opposes legalizing same-sex partnerships. In short, any law that clashes with the conservative worldview of PiS and its core supporters is likely doomed during his term in office. Another battleground is the judiciary. PiS's politicization of the courts must be reversed to fully unlock the EU funds that were withheld when the party began moving the country away from its democratic values. But Duda has thwarted every such effort since the 2023 parliamentary election that brought Tusk to power. Justice Minister Adam Bodnar has laid out a roadmap for restoring judicial independence, but most steps require presidential approval, and it is unlikely Nawrocki will cooperate any more than Duda has. With reforms stalled, millions of euros in EU funds will remain frozen, allowing PiS and Nawrocki to portray the delays as proof of government inefficiency in order to win back public support. Nawrocki's triumph has exhilarated far-right populist forces across Central Europe, where regional leaders often rail against Brussels and champion 'illiberal democracy.' Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban openly cheered Nawrocki on as a like-minded ally in Warsaw, while Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico likewise sees Poland's vote as validation of his own anti-liberal agenda. Marine Le Pen, leader of France's far-right National Rally, called Nawrocki's victory 'a rebuff to the Brussels oligarchy.' The message to Europe's far right is unmistakable: One of the EU's largest countries is tilting back into their camp. Nawrocki's victory will also boost the already tightening trans-Atlantic links among the far right. As a Trump admirer, Nawrocki won glowing praise from MAGA figures; speaking at CPAC Poland days before the presidential vote, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem called Nawrocki a 'leader that would turn Europe back to democratic values.' The ideological kinship is not just rhetorical, but also strategic. The Polish far right has studied the U.S. culture wars and now exports its version of them across Europe, echoing fears about migration and the threat to so-called traditional family values. Another flashpoint is Ukraine. Since Russia's all-out invasion in 2022, Poland has been one of Kyiv's staunchest champions. By contrast, Nawrocki ran on a 'Poland first' message that cast Ukrainian refugees as a burden and promoted a national preference policy, by which Poles would have priority access to schools and doctors over Ukrainians in the country. He also signed a pledge to block Ukraine's NATO bid and is lukewarm about Kyiv joining the EU. Though he does endorse continued military aid for the war against Russian aggression, his hard-edged nationalism signals a cooler posture toward Ukraine. This shift raises concerns about Poland's reliability as a linchpin of regional security. Western unity is crucial as tentative peace talks between Kyiv and Moscow continue in Turkey, but Warsaw's commitment could now waver. Nawrocki insists his skepticism toward Ukraine's integration into the Euro-Atlantic institutions and hostility to Ukrainian refugees is not to be confused with a pro-Russian stance, but his positions nevertheless risk undermining the united front against Moscow. Any weakening of Polish resolve would be a dramatic turn, potentially splitting NATO's eastern flank at the worst moment and handing the Kremlin an opportunity to exploit cracks in the alliance. His stance also threatens the stability of Poland's internal consensus on Ukraine. Until now, support for Kyiv had been a rare point of bipartisan agreement, and PiS' last-ditch attempt to mobilize tensions over Ukrainian grain exports to rally support weeks before the 2023 election backfired among voters. Nawrocki's rhetoric framing Ukrainian refugees as taking resources from Poles taps into a broader nationalist resentment and could further polarize the issue. With public attitudes shifting, Tusk's government may find it increasingly difficult to sustain the level of assistance it has offered Kyiv until now. For Brussels and its allies, Poland's predicament is a warning. A key member state that only recently returned to the pro-EU fold is now lurching back toward Euroskeptic nationalism. Neighbors like Hungary and Slovakia have already gone down this road, while Romania only barely resisted the trend, and capitals across the bloc are feeling the strain. Nawrocki's presidency demonstrates how difficult democratic restoration can be even after populists have been ostensibly removed from government. As a result, Poland's place at Europe's top table and its dependability on issues like Ukraine can no longer be taken for granted. Tusk's government has positioned Warsaw as a pillar of the EU mainstream and even an emerging leader in Brussels. Now, however, it is clear that a substantial proportion of Polish voters remains aligned with the bloc's nationalist fringe. The coming months will test the EU's willingness to support Poland's pro-European majority and uphold core values. If there is a silver lining, it lies in the clarity of the lesson offered by Sunday's outcome. The fight for liberal democracy in Europe is far from over, and it must be waged with renewed urgency and unity. The price of complacency has just been made painfully clear. Amanda Coakley is a strategic adviser and Europe's Futures Fellow at the Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna. In 2024 she was named an Aspen U.K. Rising Leaders Fellow. Her monthly WPR column appears on Wednesdays. The post In Poland, Nawrocki's Win Complicates Tusk's Reform Agenda appeared first on World Politics Review.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
South Asia's Rivals Are Weaponizing Water for Geopolitical Gain
India's recent suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan, alongside China's growing dominance over regional water resources and infrastructure, has heightened tensions in South Asia, one of the world's most water-stressed regions. Those geopolitical strains are exacerbated by the effects of climate change, which have altered weather patterns in an area that is home to nearly a quarter of the world's population. Most of those inhabitants depend heavily on rivers fed by the mountains of the Hindu Kush-Karakoram-Himalayan system. Those ranges are collectively known as the world's 'Third Pole' for their vast frozen reserves of glaciers, which are second only to the Arctic and Antarctic. But their glaciers are vanishing, with downstream implications for the rivers they feed. A report released last month by the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, or ICIMOD, showed that the region recorded its lowest snow persistence—the duration that snow remains on the ground—in 23 years, threatening water availability in major arteries like the Indus, Ganges and Brahmaputra rivers. Earlier, ICIMOD also warned that up to 80 percent of the region's glaciers could disappear by the start of the next century, affecting the long-term stability of South Asia's water systems. The findings underscore the rising climate stress on a region already facing rapid glacial retreat, erratic weather patterns and recurrent floods. South Asia is a global climate hot spot, and the region's children may be the ones who will have to pay the price. Astaggering 347 million children under the age of 18 are already exposed to high or extremely high water scarcity in South Asia, the highest number among all regions in the world, according to a UNICEF report. To get more in-depth news and expert analysis on global affairs from WPR, sign up for our free Daily Review newsletter. As climate change and geopolitical tensions converge, experts warn that the region's fragile hydro-politics could be entering a dangerous new era. According to a recently published study, a total of 1,158 water conflicts, including domestic and international, occurred in transboundary river basins in Asia from 1948 to 2022. Among these, the Jordan and Tigris-Euphrates/Shatt Al-Arab River basins in West Asia had the highest number of conflicts, followed by South Asia's Indus River basin. The study, which looks at water resources as a trigger for and casualty of conflict, also noted a significant upward trend across the period studied, with a positive correlation between water stress and conflict. And as the recent tensions between India and Pakistan as well as broader trends in China's hydro-politics show, water is also becoming increasingly weaponized in the context of geopolitical rivalry. On April 22, a horrific terrorist attack in Pahalgam in India-controlled Kashmir killed 26 civilians, most of them male Hindu tourists. In addition to launching military strikes in response, the Indian government announced that it will be putting the Indus Waters Treaty, or IWT, in 'abeyance,' accusing Pakistan of failing to prevent cross-border terrorist attacks originating from its territory. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi declared that 'India's water must serve India first,' while Islamabad warned that any move to restrict water flow would be treated as 'an act of war.' Tensions de-escalated after the nuclear-armed neighbors and bitter rivals reached a mutual understanding on May 10 to halt all military actions. Yet, the IWT—one of the rare examples of cooperation between India and Pakistan, even during past periods of open hostility and war—remains suspended. In the short term, this will not drastically affect Pakistan's water supply. India lacks sufficient storage capacity on the western Indus, Jhelum and Chenab rivers to cut off the flow of their waters immediately. However, New Delhi is reportedly actively exploring infrastructure projects that could reduce downstream flows over time. Such projects could have profound consequences. Pakistan depends on the Indus River system for nearly 80 percent of its agriculture. It also relies on upstream data provided by India to manage floods, forecast droughts and plan irrigation cycles. Without timely information on river flows and dam releases, Pakistan's ability to generate hydropower, ensure drinking water supplies and maintain food security could be severely compromised. The suspension of the IWT has also raised alarm bells about the status of other water-sharing agreements in South Asia. India has multiple bilateral treaties, including the Mahakali Treaty and Kosi River accord with Nepal, and the Teesta water-sharing deal with Bangladesh. While these arrangements differ in scope and legal architecture, many are politically sensitive and depend on goodwill rather than enforceable international norms. Michael Kugelman, a Washington-based South Asia analyst, told World Politics Review that other neighboring states will likely see the suspension of the IWT through the prism of India's unique relationship with Pakistan. Still, he pointed to the precedent this could set as a source of at least some fear. 'If India is willing to back out of a World Bank-mediated treaty, something that's viewed as such a big success story,' he added, 'what could it then do when it comes to other treaties that are not seen through such a prestigious, high-stakes lens?' That fear looms especially large in Bangladesh, where tensions with India over water-sharing have been brewing for years. The Ganga Water Treaty, signed in 1996, is due for renewal in 2026. But relations between the two neighbors have soured since the ouster of former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, who fled to India in 2024 amid popular protests over her increasingly authoritarian rule. Water tensions are also rising in drought-prone Afghanistan, where the Taliban-led government has revived dam and canal construction projects on key rivers like the Helmand, Amu Darya, Harirud, Kabul and Kunar. These initiatives have drawn sharp criticism from downstream neighbors like Iran, Pakistan and Turkmenistan, which have accused Kabul of using water as a bargaining chip in other negotiations over energy, trade and security. With Afghanistan's water insecurity growing and diplomatic engagement with the Taliban regime still limited—even as climate change disrupts water resources in South and Central Asia—the risk of water disputes escalating into broader confrontations remains high, as was already seen in the 2023 border clashes between Afghanistan and Iran. Meanwhile, a far more powerful upstream player continues to shape South Asia's hydro-politics: China. Beijing has refused to join any regional water-sharing frameworks, while investing heavily in dam-building, hydropower and infrastructure projects across the region. As such, it has positioned itself as a key actor in the management of the Teesta River, which flows from India into Bangladesh and remains a source of vexation between New Delhi and Dhaka. China is also involved in several hydroelectric projects in Nepal, despite Indian opposition, as it jostles for influence in the region. Beijing, which enjoys longstanding military and economic ties with Islamabad, has also ramped up the construction of its 'flagship' Mohmand Dam in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of northwestern Pakistan, according to a report by SCMP. Though India is upstream from Pakistan on the Indus River, the river originates in Tibet, under Chinese control, sparking concerns of China using water as a geopolitical tool, something it has done in the past. For instance, after the Galwan Valley clash in 2020, China blocked the Galwan River, an Indus tributary, causing water shortages in parts of India. Beijing's most ambitious project, however, lies on the Yarlung Zangbo, known downstream in India as the Brahmaputra River. Late last year, Beijing announced plans to construct the world's largest hydroelectric dam on the river. Once operational, the dam will give China unprecedented control over water flows into northeast India and Bangladesh, triggering fears about flash floods, droughts and even strategic manipulation of river flows in times of tension. In response, India has revived its own plans to construct a mega-dam on the Siang River, a major Brahmaputra tributary in Arunachal Pradesh that also feeds the Yarlung Zangbo. While framed as a defensive measure to counteract Chinese infrastructure, the race to dam Himalayan rivers carries enormous ecological risks. The region is prone to devastating earthquakes and landslides, and major dam failures could threaten millions of lives. As the effects of climate change intensify and political tensions deepen, the failure to strengthen regional institutions and modernize treaties could push already fragile arrangements past their breaking point. Water has long been a shared lifeline in South Asia. But unless it is protected, it may also become a fuse leading to conflict. Bansari Kamdar is an India-based journalist and researcher. Prior to this, she was the Europe, Middle East and Africa editor at Reuters, and she has also written for The Boston Globe, The Diplomat and Huffington Post, among other outlets. The post South Asia's Rivals Are Weaponizing Water for Geopolitical Gain appeared first on World Politics Review.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Tanzanian MP's church shut down after he accuses government of human rights abuses
NAIROBI, Kenya (AP) — Tanzania n authorities deregistered a church owned by a ruling party MP after he accused the government of human rights violations ahead of October elections. MP Josephat Gwajima's Glory of Christ church in the commercial capital, Dar es Salaam, was cordoned off by police Tuesday after hundreds of congregants turned up to protest the closure announcement. Tanzania's registrar of societies wrote a letter deregistering Gwajima's church, saying his sermons were in contravention of acceptable conduct of religious organizations. The MP last Sunday called out the government for what he called detentions and enforced disappearances warning his congregants to be wary. His message came days after a Kenyan activist and his Ugandan counterpart accused the Tanzanian police of detaining and torturing them after arresting them ahead of opposition leader Tundu Lissu's treason case court proceedings. Tanzanians are set to elect a president and MPs in October and the ruling party, the CCM, has been in power since Tanzania's independence in 1961. The main opposition party, Chadema, has been calling for electoral reforms ahead of the elections. Gwajima was elected in 2020 after he was endorsed by then-President John Magufuli. His popularity has risen over the years and he is seen as an outspoken critic of President Samia Suluhu Hassan, who is serving out Magufuli's term after he died in office. Hassan is running in the upcoming October election and has been accused of silencing her critics after opposition leaders were arrested in recent months. She struck a reconciliatory tone during her first days in office and lifted a six-year ban on political rallies that was imposed by Magufuli. Hassan's tone has in recent months changed as she warned foreign activists coming to Tanzania for the opposition leader's court case saying she will not allow them to destroy the country. Some activists were deported to Kenya on arrival in Tanzania and the Tanzanian government did not explain the reasons for deportation. Rights groups including Amnesty International have urged Tanzania to investigate the human rights abuse allegations against activists.
