Names of 65 lakh voters excluded in Bihar draft roll posted on district websites
Hearing a bunch of petitions challenging the special intensive revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar, the Supreme Court had last week asked the Election Commission (EC) to publish details of 65 lakh deleted names from the voters list with reasons of non-inclusion to enhance transparency in the process.
Addressing a press conference here, Kumar said that within 56 hours of the top court directive, the names of voters that were not included in the draft electoral roll have been posted on district websites.
He also underlined that the election system for parliament and assembly elections in India is a multi-layered, decentralised construct as envisaged by law.
Based on the guidelines issued by the Election Commission, Electoral Registration Officers (EROs), who are SDM-level officers, prepare and finalise the Electoral Rolls (ER) with the help of Booth Level Officers (BLOs).
EROs and BLOs undertake the responsibility for the correctness of Electoral Rolls, it said.
After the publication of the draft electoral rolls, their digital and physical copies are shared with all political parties and put on the EC website for anyone to see.
Following the publication of the draft electoral rolls, a full one-month period is available with the electors and political parties for the filing of claims and objections before the final ER is published, he explained.
The draft electoral roll was published on August 1 in Bihar and it will be available till September 1 for claims and objections under which parties and individuals can seek inclusion of eligible citizens or exclusion of those they believe are ineligible.
The CEC defended the SIR at the press conference on Sunday and said it is a matter of grave concern that some parties were spreading 'misinformation" on the exercise. PTI GJS SKU NAB RT
view comments
First Published:
August 17, 2025, 18:15 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
SIR is ‘new weapon' of ‘vote chori', will protect ‘one person, one vote', says Rahul Gandhi
Congress leader Rahul Gandhi on Monday (August 18, 2025) said the Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls is a "new weapon" of "vote chori" and vowed to protect the 'one person, one vote' principle. He made the remarks in a post on his WhatsApp channel while talking about his meeting with a group of people who had cast their vote in the previous Lok Sabha election but their name had been deleted in the SIR exercise in Bihar. Mr. Gandhi met the group at the launch of his 'Vote Adhikar Yatra' in Sasaram on Sunday (August 17, 2025). In his post in Hindi along with a picture of the meeting, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha said, "SIR is a new weapon of vote theft. Coincidentally, these people standing with me in this picture are 'living' proof of this theft." "All of them had cast their vote in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections - but by the time Bihar assembly elections came, their identity, their existence was erased from the democracy of India," he said. "Do you know who they are? Raj Mohan Singh (70): Farmer and retired soldier; Umravati Devi (35): Dalit and labourer; Dhanjay Kumar Bind (30): Backward class and labourer; Sita Devi (45): Woman and former MNREGA labourer; Raju Devi (55): Backward class and labourer; Mohmuddin Ansari (52): Minority and labourer," he said. The "collusion" of BJP and Election Commission is punishing them for being 'Bahujan' and poor — even our soldiers were not spared, Mr. Gandhi said. Neither will they have a vote, nor identity or rights, he added. "Due to social discrimination and economic conditions, they are unable to fight against the conspiracy of the stand here with them to protect the most basic right of 'one person, one vote'," he said. This is a question of rights and of everyone's participation in a democracy, he said, adding that "we will not let it end under any circumstances". Meanwhile, Rahul Gandhi, RJD's Tejashwi Yadav along with Vikassheel Insan Party's Mukesh Sahani prayed at the Devkund Surya Mandir here as their Voter Adhikar Yatra entered its second day. Travelling from Kutumba, the Yatra is expected to reach Gaya this evening. Embarking on a 1,300 km 'Voter Adhikar Yatra' from Sasaram, Mr. Gandhi on Sunday (August 17, 2025) had accused the Election Commission of "stealing" elections in collusion with the BJP and asserted that the INDIA bloc will not let their "latest conspiracy" to steal Bihar polls through SIR of electoral rolls succeed. After 16 days, the yatra will conclude with a rally in Patna on September 1. The yatra is being undertaken in a hybrid mode, on foot and by vehicle, as was Gandhi's Manipur to Mumbai Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra ahead of the Lok Sabha polls. It will pass through Aurangabad, Gaya, Nawada, Nalanda, Sheikhpura, Lakhisarai, Munger, Bhagalpur, Katihar, Purnea, Araria, Supaul, Madhubani, Darbhanga, Sitamarhi, East Champaran, West Champaran, Gopalganj, Siwan, Chhapra and Ara.
The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
INDIA bloc considering impeachment motion against CEC Gyanesh Kumar
The Opposition INDIA bloc is considering to move an impeachment motion against Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar, sources told The Hindu. The decision was taken at the meeting of INDIA bloc floor leaders on Monday (August 18, 2025). Parliament Monsoon Session: Follow updates on August 18, 2025 The development comes a day after the CEC held a press conference in New Delhi in a bid to address the Congress's accusation against the poll body of large scale voter theft and alleging that the Commission is working in favour of the ruling party. According to the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023, the CEC can be removed in the same manner and on the same grounds as a Supreme Court Judge. This means, Parliament can remove the CEC by a motion with two-thirds majority in both the Houses. In order for the motion to be accepted, at least 50 members have to sign in favour of it. The Opposition does not have the requisite numbers to get it passed but a senior Opposition leader said the motion is to underline their protest at the conduct of the CEC.
Scroll.in
25 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Guwahati Police summons ‘The Wire' editor despite Supreme Court protection
The Crime Branch in Guwahati has issued a summons to The Wire 's founding editor Siddharth Varadarajan in a first information report pertaining to an article on Operation Sindoor. The summons, issued on August 12, came despite the Supreme Court granting protection from arrest to Varadarajan and members of the foundation running the news outlet in another FIR filed by the Assam Police. Ankur Jain, the joint commissioner of police in Guwahati, told Scroll that the summons was issued as the Supreme Court order had come on a case filed in 'some other district'. In the latest notice, Varadarajan has been directed to appear before the investigating officer at the Crime Branch Police Station in Panbazar on August 22 at 11.30 am. The earlier case against Varadarajan was registered at Morigaon police station on July 11 under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which pertains to acts endangering the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India. It followed the publication of an article about Operation Sindoor titled ''IAF Lost Fighter Jets to Pak Because of Political Leadership's Constraints': Indian Defence Attache'. The fresh summons issued to Varadarajan cites the same charges, in addition to the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections pertaining to promoting enmity between different groups, publishing false or misleading information and criminal conspiracy. On August 12, a Supreme Court bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi granted protection from arrest to Vardarajan while hearing a writ petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 152. The petition was filed by the Foundation for Independent Journalism, which owns The Wire, and Varadarajan. The petitioners argued that the law was a repackaged version of the colonial sedition law. The bench issued a notice to the Union government and tagged the plea with another petition challenging the validity of the provision. Advocate Nitya Ramakrishnan, appearing for the petitioners, argued that the news article was a factual report of a seminar organised by a university in Indonesia and statements made by an Indian defence attaché on the military tactics used during Operation Sindoor. She added that the article also carried the Indian embassy's response to the defence attaché's remarks, which had also been reported by several other news outlets. In May 2022, the Supreme Court had ordered proceedings and criminal prosecutions for sedition under Section 124A of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code to be kept in abeyance. Critics have argued in the Supreme Court, in a separate matter, that Section 124A was slipped in again into the law in the guise of Section 152 when the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita replaced the Indian Penal Code in July 2024.
