Labour respond as 400k back petition for repeal of Online Safety Act
While aimed at preventing children from accessing pornography as well as other harmful content including self-harm, suicide, eating disorders and extreme violence, the law has had a much wider impact.
READ MORE: VPN use surges in UK as Ofcom's new age verification rules kick in
A petition on the [[UK Government]] website raising concerns about the Act – which was introduced by the Tories but Labour have staunchly defended – argued it is 'far broader and restrictive than is necessary in a free society'. It had gathered more than 389,000 signatures by Tuesday afternoon.
The petition argued that online hobby forums were 'shutting down' as they did not have the resource to comply with the act, adding: 'We think that Parliament should repeal the act and work towards producing proportionate legislation rather than risking clamping down on civil society talking about trains, football, video games or even hamsters.'
The Government must respond to all petitions that gather more than 10,000 signatures, and consider any that gather more than 100,000 for debate.
While the date for a debate has not been set, the Labour administration has now published its response, insisting that the Online Safety Act will not be repealed.
'The Government has no plans to repeal the Online Safety Act, and is working closely with Ofcom to implement the act as quickly and effectively as possible to enable UK users to benefit from its protections,' the statement said.
It said the aim of the act 'is not to penalise small, low-risk services trying to comply in good faith'.
'Ofcom – and the Government – recognise that many small services are dynamic small businesses supporting innovation and offer significant value to their communities,' it went on.
'Ofcom will take a sensible approach to enforcement with smaller services that present low risk to UK users, only taking action where it is proportionate and appropriate, and will focus on cases where the risk and impact of harm is highest.'
The response comes with Nigel Farage's Reform UK pledging to repeal the Act should they win power at Westminster.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage (Image: James Manning) Former party chairman Zia Yusuf claimed the laws do 'absolutely nothing to protect children' but work to 'suppress freedom of speech' and 'force social media companies to censor anti-government speech'.
Technology Secretary Peter Kyle then stoked a row by claiming that Farage would be on the side of notorious paedophile Jimmy Savile.
'So you know, we have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. [[Nigel Farage]] is on their side,' Kyle told Sky News.
'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.'
Farage labelled Kyle's remarks 'below the belt' and 'so absolutely disgusting that it's almost beyond belief'. He urged people to sign the petition calling for the legislation to be repealed.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer defended the act on Monday, saying the UK would protect free speech 'forever' and insisting the act was about 'child protection' rather than censorship.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
4 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Homelessness minister must resign over rent hike after tenants' exit, Tories say
Labour's homelessness minister is facing calls to resign after reports claimed she hiked rent on a property she owns by hundreds of pounds just weeks after the previous tenants' contract ended. Four tenants who rented a house in east London from Rushanara Ali were sent an email last November saying their lease would not be renewed, which also gave them four months' notice to leave, the i Paper reported. Ms Ali's property was then re-listed with a £700 rent increase within weeks, the newspaper said. Kevin Hollinrake, the Conservative party chairman, called for the minister to stand down, accusing her of 'staggering hypocrisy' over her handling of the rental property. A spokesperson for the minister said: 'Rushanara takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements.' The house, rented on a fixed-term contract, was put up for sale while the tenants were living there, and it was only re-listed as a rental because it had not sold, according to the i Paper. Tory frontbencher Mr Hollinrake said: 'I think it shows staggering hypocrisy. Rushanara Ali has been somebody who's obviously a Government minister in charge of homelessness. 'She's spoken out about exploiting tenants, about providing more protections to tenants. 'You can't say those things, then do the opposite in practice, as a landlord. She's got to resign.' He said the conduct appeared to be 'unethical, not illegal' but 'we can't just say one thing and do another'. Speaking to the i Paper, Ms Ali's former tenant Laura Jackson said she was one of four tenants who received an email giving four months notice to leave the property, for which they collectively paid £3,300 in rent. Ms Jackson, a self-employed restaurant owner, said she saw the house re-listed weeks after she and her fellow tenants had left, but with a rent of around £4,000. The 33-year-old told the i Paper: 'It's an absolute joke. Trying to get that much money from renters is extortion.' She also said two letting companies managing the property for Ms Ali had attempted to charge £395 in cleaning fees and £2,000 to repaint the house when they left. The tenants successfully challenged this, as landlords are prohibited from charging tenants for professional cleaning, and from repainting costs unless serious damage has occurred. A Labour voter, Ms Jackson suggested it was a 'conflict of interest' for MPs to be landlords, especially in their own constituencies. Ms Jackson declined to comment further when approached by the PA news agency but confirmed the details of the i Paper's story. The minister's actions have also faced scrutiny from rental rights campaigners, as the Government seeks to clamp down on what it sees as unfair rental practices. The Renters' Rights Bill includes measures to ban landlords who end a tenancy to sell a property from re-listing it for six months. The Bill, which is nearing its end stages of scrutiny in Parliament, will also abolish fixed-term tenancies and ensure landlords give four months' notice if they want to sell their property. Ben Twomey, chief executive of Generation Rent, described the allegations as 'shocking and a wake-up call to Government on the need to push ahead as quickly as possible to improve protections for renters'. He added: 'It is bad enough when any landlord turfs out their tenant to hike up the rent, or tries their luck with unfair claims on the deposit, but the minister responsible for homelessness knows only too well about the harm caused by this behaviour. 'These allegations highlight common practices that the Government can eradicate. 'The Renters' Rights Bill would ban landlords who evict tenants to sell the property from re-letting it within 12 months, to deter this kind of abuse – but unfortunately members of the House of Lords have voted to reduce this to six months. 'The Government can also use its review of the deposit protection system to penalise landlords who make exaggerated claims at the end of the tenancy.' Tom Darling, director at the Renters' Reform Coalition, said: 'It's mind-boggling that we have a homelessness minister who has just evicted four people in order to rake in more rent – something that will soon be illegal under the Renters' Rights Bill her own department is bringing through Parliament. 'The Government are currently considering an amendment to the legislation from the House of Lords which reduces the ban on re-letting after eviction from 12 months to six months. 'The Government must remove this amendment, and at the very least minister Ali must recuse herself from any discussions on this within Government.' Mairi MacRae, director of campaigns and policy at homelessness charity Shelter, said it 'beggars belief that after months of dither and delay, the Government's own homelessness minister has profited from the underhand tactics the Renters' Rights Bill is meant to outlaw'. Cabinet ministers lined up to defend Ms Ali when questioned about the allegations. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, speaking to broadcasters, said: 'I don't know any of the details of this but I understand that she has followed all of the rules in this case.' Chancellor Rachel Reeves said she 'didn't understand' why the Conservatives were calling for Ms Ali to resign, as she was interviewed in South Wales, saying: 'I don't know the details but Rushanara Ali seems to have done everything in accordance with the law.'
STV News
4 minutes ago
- STV News
Scottish Government announces £20m to speed up dangerous cladding removal
The housing secretary has announced a further £20m to speed up action to remove dangerous cladding in Scotland. Mairi McAllan announced the additional funding and expanded eligibility on Thursday, stating that social housing will now be eligible for remediation funding. It comes after the Scottish Government has been repeatedly criticised by opposition parties over the pace of remediation work following the 2017 Grenfell Tower disaster in London, which killed 72 people. 'Scotland's cladding remediation programme is progressing at pace and the additional £20m I've announced today will further expedite this vital work,' McAllan said. 'Ultimately I am determined that, by 2029, every high-risk residential building over 18 metres will have been resolved, with buildings between 11 and 18 metres placed on a clear pathway to resolution.' The announcement follows criticism that Scotland's removal of dangerous cladding is behind other parts of the UK. Out of an estimated 1,450 buildings that may require work to remove cladding, just three have been fully assessed under the cladding remediation programme. Only two buildings in the country currently have active remediation work being undertaken. Another 12 single building assessments (SBA), which assess any risk to life caused by cladding, are currently under way. The Scottish Liberal Democrats said the Government was moving at a 'glacial pace'. McAllan, who was given the newly created role in June, said the additional money will speed up actions to make Scotland's buildings safe. It will boost the Scottish Government's single open call fund, which was launched in March. The fund, which was launched in March, allows owners and residents to apply for an assessment to determine the work required to make buildings safe. She also set a deadline of October 31, 2025, by which developers must sign the developers' remediation contract, an agreement between the UK government and major developers, requiring them to fix life-critical fire safety defects in buildings they developed or refurbished over the past 30 years. The Scottish Government said the fund has already made 258 initial grant funding offers for building owners and residents to take forward a single building assessment. The £10m additional funding will ensure every eligible application received before the end of December will be progressed. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
North Sea giant to move jobs overseas as tax rate hits 111pc
Britain's biggest oil and gas producer is to move skilled jobs out of the UK after windfall taxes left it with an 111pc tax rate. Harbour Energy plans to wind down its North Sea investments and has already announced 250 job losses in Aberdeen, a city once regarded as the oil and gas capital of Europe. On Thursday, a spokesman said the company would be offering jobs in its overseas operations to suitable UK workers but most of the staff marked for redundancy would be leaving the company. It came as Harbour report half-year results that made clear the impact of the energy profits levy, or windfall tax, which was initially imposed by the Conservatives and increased under Labour. Harbour made a profit before tax of $1.6bn (£1.2bn) but faced a tax bill of $1.8bn, resulting in a post tax loss of $174m. This was largely down to UK windfall levies plus foreign exchange transactions. The report said: 'The effective tax rate for the six months ending on June 30 2025 was 111pc, compared to 85pc for the same period in 2024.' The company said the increase was 'primarily' down to a deferred tax charge resulting from Labour's decision to extend windfall taxes to 2030. Linda Cook, Harbour's chief executive, said: '[The UK] remains a challenging environment for us... the fiscal regime means investment here just finds itself hard to compete with the opportunities we have in other countries. 'Going forward, we do expect investment to decline in the UK, given the fiscal and regulatory conditions. We will still have some high return opportunities, but overall investment is likely to decline and will be replaced by investment in Norway, Argentina and, over time, Mexico. 'The UK is one of our highest countries for unit operating costs… and it's one of our highest tax environments as well. So that [UK] production will get replaced over time with production from other countries, and that's a good thing for us overall.' Focus shifts permanently from UK Last week, Donald Trump said Britain was wasting a 'treasure chest' of oil and gas. He wrote on Truth Social: 'The taxes are so high, however, that it makes no sense. They have essentially told drillers and oil companies that, 'We don't want you.'' The US president said reopening the North Sea could deliver a 'vast fortune' for the UK and 'far lower energy costs for the people!' Harbour was a primarily UK-focused oil and gas producer but has shifted its focus as successive governments imposed ever-tougher windfall taxes and climate-related drilling restrictions. Last year the company acquired the upstream operations of Germany's Wintershall Dea, giving it production centres in Norway, Argentina, Germany and Mexico. The move tripled output to 475,000 barrels of oil a day compared to the 159,000 seen in the first half of 2024, with reserves also tripled at an estimated 1.3 billion barrels. The company still operates several oil and gas production hubs in UK waters. Investment is focused on two of them, J-Area and Greater Britannia Area, in the central North Sea. However, Ashley Kelty, an analyst at Panmure Liberum investment bank, said Harbour had permanently shifted its focus from the UK to other parts of the world. Harbour also published an 'adjusted profits' figure discounting the impacts of windfall taxes, showing underlying profits of $410m, and announced a $100m share buyback programme alongside a $455m dividend for shareholders.
