Why does time change when traveling close to the speed of light? A physicist explains
Why does time change when traveling close to the speed of light? – Timothy, age 11, Shoreview, Minnesota
Imagine you're in a car driving across the country watching the landscape. A tree in the distance gets closer to your car, passes right by you, then moves off again in the distance behind you.
Of course, you know that tree isn't actually getting up and walking toward or away from you. It's you in the car who's moving toward the tree. The tree is moving only in comparison, or relative, to you – that's what we physicists call relativity. If you had a friend standing by the tree, they would see you moving toward them at the same speed that you see them moving toward you.
In his 1632 book 'Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems,' the astronomer Galileo Galilei first described the principle of relativity – the idea that the universe should behave the same way at all times, even if two people experience an event differently because one is moving in respect to the other.
If you are in a car and toss a ball up in the air, the physical laws acting on it, such as the force of gravity, should be the same as the ones acting on an observer watching from the side of the road. However, while you see the ball as moving up and back down, someone on the side of the road will see it moving toward or away from them as well as up and down.
Special relativity and the speed of light
Albert Einstein much later proposed the idea of what's now known as special relativity to explain some confusing observations that didn't have an intuitive explanation at the time. Einstein used the work of many physicists and astronomers in the late 1800s to put together his theory in 1905, starting with two key ingredients: the principle of relativity and the strange observation that the speed of light is the same for every observer and nothing can move faster. Everyone measuring the speed of light will get the same result, no matter where they are or how fast they are moving.
Let's say you're in the car driving at 60 miles per hour and your friend is standing by the tree. When they throw a ball toward you at a speed of what they perceive to be 60 miles per hour, you might logically think that you would observe your friend and the tree moving toward you at 60 miles per hour and the ball moving toward you at 120 miles per hour. While that's really close to the correct value, it's actually slightly wrong.
This discrepancy between what you might expect by adding the two numbers and the true answer grows as one or both of you move closer to the speed of light. If you were traveling in a rocket moving at 75% of the speed of light and your friend throws the ball at the same speed, you would not see the ball moving toward you at 150% of the speed of light. This is because nothing can move faster than light – the ball would still appear to be moving toward you at less than the speed of light. While this all may seem very strange, there is lots of experimental evidence to back up these observations.
Time dilation and the twin paradox
Speed is not the only factor that changes relative to who is making the observation. Another consequence of relativity is the concept of time dilation, whereby people measure different amounts of time passing depending on how fast they move relative to one another.
Each person experiences time normally relative to themselves. But the person moving faster experiences less time passing for them than the person moving slower. It's only when they reconnect and compare their watches that they realize that one watch says less time has passed while the other says more.
This leads to one of the strangest results of relativity – the twin paradox, which says that if one of a pair of twins makes a trip into space on a high-speed rocket, they will return to Earth to find their twin has aged faster than they have. It's important to note that time behaves 'normally' as perceived by each twin (exactly as you are experiencing time now), even if their measurements disagree.
You might be wondering: If each twin sees themselves as stationary and the other as moving toward them, wouldn't they each measure the other as aging faster? The answer is no, because they can't both be older relative to the other twin.
The twin on the spaceship is not only moving at a particular speed where the frame of references stay the same but also accelerating compared with the twin on Earth. Unlike speeds that are relative to the observer, accelerations are absolute. If you step on a scale, the weight you are measuring is actually your acceleration due to gravity. This measurement stays the same regardless of the speed at which the Earth is moving through the solar system, or the solar system is moving through the galaxy or the galaxy through the universe.
Neither twin experiences any strangeness with their watches as one moves closer to the speed of light – they both experience time as normally as you or I do. It's only when they meet up and compare their observations that they will see a difference – one that is perfectly defined by the mathematics of relativity.
Hello, curious kids! Do you have a question you'd like an expert to answer? Ask an adult to send your question to CuriousKidsUS@theconversation.com. Please tell us your name, age and the city where you live.
And since curiosity has no age limit – adults, let us know what you're wondering, too. We won't be able to answer every question, but we will do our best.
This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Michael Lam, Rochester Institute of Technology
Read more:
Why is astronomy a science but astrology is not?
How your emotional response to the COVID-19 pandemic changed your behavior and your sense of time
How could an explosive Big Bang be the birth of our universe?
Michael Lam does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Endometriosis can take years to diagnose. A 'smart' sanitary pad could speed up the process.
Many women see four or five doctors before their pain is taken seriously. Imagine spending years with painful cramps, heavy bleeding, fatigue and fertility struggles, all while bouncing from doctor to doctor trying to figure out what's causing them. That's the stark reality for the more than 6 million women in the U.S. living with endometriosis. There's a reason it often goes underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed for so long: There's no simple test for it and symptoms can manifest differently for different women or overlap with other health problems. The only way to know for sure that you have it is to go through laparoscopic surgery, which allows doctors to see if there's endometrial tissue growing where it shouldn't be. 'The gold standard in diagnosis is surgical pathology,' Dr. Christine Greves, an ob-gyn at the Winnie Palmer Hospital for Women and Babies in Orlando, Fla., tells Yahoo. But surgery is invasive and time-consuming, and for many women, it isn't an option they can afford. But what if there was an easier, less invasive way? Thanks to advancements in technology, that's becoming an option. Innovative diagnostic tests — some newly developed, others currently in the works — are using menstrual blood to look for biomarkers of endometriosis, as well as other reproductive conditions like uterine fibroids. These tests are as simple as inserting a tampon or putting a smart pad in underwear, allowing women to get answers quickly and painlessly. While these tests aren't mainstream just yet, doctors say they hold a lot of promise for the future. The problem: Women with endometriosis and other reproductive health conditions can spend years in pain and discomfort before finding out what the problem is. Even once these conditions are suspected, surgery may be needed to get a definitive diagnosis. By the numbers: It can take four to 11 years to get an endometriosis diagnosis. Many see four or five doctors (or more) before their pain is taken seriously, according to Yale Medicine. The solution: Two newer, cutting-edge products are aiming to take the guesswork and long waits out of diagnosing endometriosis and similar reproductive health conditions. Qvin's Q-Pad, which is FDA-cleared and has been dubbed 'a pad with a purpose,' features an embedded and removable strip to collect and analyze period blood. Once a sample has been collected, the strip is removed and sent to a lab for testing. The process of using Q-Pad is easy: A doctor orders the test, the patient uses it at home and results are delivered through the Qvin app. 'The Q-Pad is a non-invasive way to get access to endometrial tissue, which comes naturally and regularly,' Dr. Sara Naseri, chief executive officer and cofounder of Qvin, tells Yahoo. 'This will enable women to get diagnosed faster and non-invasively. Because the Q-Pad is a modified menstrual pad, women can self-collect in the comfort of their own homes, which also means more women can get access to early diagnosis.' In a similar vein, the NextGen Jane Smart Tampon, which is not yet cleared by the FDA, is a diagnostic tampon that collects menstrual blood to look for biomarkers of reproductive health conditions. 'Our tampon-based system looks at molecular signals in tissue you naturally shed during your period and evaluates whether you might have endometriosis,' Ridhi Tariyal, chief executive officer of NextGen Jane, tells Yahoo. 'We are trying to make diagnosis as simple as mailing in your tampon.' NextGen Jane is still in development and currently has several clinical trials that are open for enrollment. 'This product could change how people interact with their health,' Tariyal says. 'It is hard to chase down symptoms you are having when you and your doctor are underpowered — meaning we collectively don't have the tools to answer questions easily.' Tariyal says that women 'intuitively know' when their monthly cycles may be a sign that something is off. 'We are amplifying that intuition by going deeper and looking for actual molecular signals in a tampon,' she says. Ob-gyns applaud the tests. 'I love that people are thinking of ways to diagnose endometriosis and other conditions that don't require surgery,' Greves says. Women's health expert Dr. Jennifer Wider, cohost of the Open Wider podcast, tells Yahoo that the tests are a 'pretty smart idea.' 'The shedding of the uterine lining provides the chance for people to collect on their own and send it to a lab,' Wider says. 'The scientists can then look at cell markers and molecular signals and potentially speed a diagnosis of endometriosis and other diseases.' There's no getting around the fact that surgery is invasive, but Greves says the procedure can allow doctors to remove endometrial adhesions that form with endometriosis and ultimately help to reduce pain. 'Finding out by tampon or pad will let someone know if they have a condition, but it won't help with the pain,' she says. Wider encourages checking in with your health care provider if you're dealing with pain or other symptoms of endometriosis. They can give you a proper evaluation, as well as next steps to help you get relief. Naseri urges women to think of their menstrual blood as an important tool. 'Women should know that their period isn't a waste product, but in fact a unique opportunity to get insights about their own health non-invasively and regularly,' she says. 'These insights allow women to stay on top of what is going on in their bodies, which will ultimately prevent late-stage disease.' Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Endometriosis can take years to diagnose. A 'smart' sanitary pad could speed up the process.
Many women see four or five doctors before their pain is taken seriously. Imagine spending years with painful cramps, heavy bleeding, fatigue and fertility struggles, all while bouncing from doctor to doctor trying to figure out what's causing them. That's the stark reality for the more than 6 million women in the U.S. living with endometriosis. There's a reason it often goes underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed for so long: There's no simple test for it and symptoms can manifest differently for different women or overlap with other health problems. The only way to know for sure that you have it is to go through laparoscopic surgery, which allows doctors to see if there's endometrial tissue growing where it shouldn't be. 'The gold standard in diagnosis is surgical pathology,' Dr. Christine Greves, an ob-gyn at the Winnie Palmer Hospital for Women and Babies in Orlando, Fla., tells Yahoo. But surgery is invasive and time-consuming, and for many women, it isn't an option they can afford. But what if there was an easier, less invasive way? Thanks to advancements in technology, that's becoming an option. Innovative diagnostic tests — some newly developed, others currently in the works — are using menstrual blood to look for biomarkers of endometriosis, as well as other reproductive conditions like uterine fibroids. These tests are as simple as inserting a tampon or putting a smart pad in underwear, allowing women to get answers quickly and painlessly. While these tests aren't mainstream just yet, doctors say they hold a lot of promise for the future. The problem: Women with endometriosis and other reproductive health conditions can spend years in pain and discomfort before finding out what the problem is. Even once these conditions are suspected, surgery may be needed to get a definitive diagnosis. By the numbers: It can take four to 11 years to get an endometriosis diagnosis. Many see four or five doctors (or more) before their pain is taken seriously, according to Yale Medicine. The solution: Two newer, cutting-edge products are aiming to take the guesswork and long waits out of diagnosing endometriosis and similar reproductive health conditions. Qvin's Q-Pad, which is FDA-cleared and has been dubbed 'a pad with a purpose,' features an embedded and removable strip to collect and analyze period blood. Once a sample has been collected, the strip is removed and sent to a lab for testing. The process of using Q-Pad is easy: A doctor orders the test, the patient uses it at home and results are delivered through the Qvin app. 'The Q-Pad is a non-invasive way to get access to endometrial tissue, which comes naturally and regularly,' Dr. Sara Naseri, chief executive officer and cofounder of Qvin, tells Yahoo. 'This will enable women to get diagnosed faster and non-invasively. Because the Q-Pad is a modified menstrual pad, women can self-collect in the comfort of their own homes, which also means more women can get access to early diagnosis.' In a similar vein, the NextGen Jane Smart Tampon, which is not yet cleared by the FDA, is a diagnostic tampon that collects menstrual blood to look for biomarkers of reproductive health conditions. 'Our tampon-based system looks at molecular signals in tissue you naturally shed during your period and evaluates whether you might have endometriosis,' Ridhi Tariyal, chief executive officer of NextGen Jane, tells Yahoo. 'We are trying to make diagnosis as simple as mailing in your tampon.' NextGen Jane is still in development and currently has several clinical trials that are open for enrollment. 'This product could change how people interact with their health,' Tariyal says. 'It is hard to chase down symptoms you are having when you and your doctor are underpowered — meaning we collectively don't have the tools to answer questions easily.' Tariyal says that women 'intuitively know' when their monthly cycles may be a sign that something is off. 'We are amplifying that intuition by going deeper and looking for actual molecular signals in a tampon,' she says. Ob-gyns applaud the tests. 'I love that people are thinking of ways to diagnose endometriosis and other conditions that don't require surgery,' Greves says. Women's health expert Dr. Jennifer Wider, cohost of the Open Wider podcast, tells Yahoo that the tests are a 'pretty smart idea.' 'The shedding of the uterine lining provides the chance for people to collect on their own and send it to a lab,' Wider says. 'The scientists can then look at cell markers and molecular signals and potentially speed a diagnosis of endometriosis and other diseases.' There's no getting around the fact that surgery is invasive, but Greves says the procedure can allow doctors to remove endometrial adhesions that form with endometriosis and ultimately help to reduce pain. 'Finding out by tampon or pad will let someone know if they have a condition, but it won't help with the pain,' she says. Wider encourages checking in with your health care provider if you're dealing with pain or other symptoms of endometriosis. They can give you a proper evaluation, as well as next steps to help you get relief. Naseri urges women to think of their menstrual blood as an important tool. 'Women should know that their period isn't a waste product, but in fact a unique opportunity to get insights about their own health non-invasively and regularly,' she says. 'These insights allow women to stay on top of what is going on in their bodies, which will ultimately prevent late-stage disease.' Solve the daily Crossword
Medscape
37 minutes ago
- Medscape
Diabetes Technology Updates: We Should Be Proud
This transcript has been edited for clarity. Technology was once again at the front and center of the recent American Diabetes Association (ADA) meetings. Now, I'm not going to go through all of the details of all that was presented, but I think we should all be proud, as part of the diabetes community, in terms of where we've come and where we're going because our ability to use technology and help our patients has really made a difference. In many studies that were presented — and many of them were real-world data with all sorts of different automated insulin delivery (AID) systems and such — we really saw improvements in outcomes. I think this further cements our recommendations that these kinds of tools should be used in people with type 1 diabetes and insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes. My sadness to much of this is the difficulty in getting some of these devices for underresourced patients and the fact that, to some degree, technology does worsen some of the divide between those who are well-served and those who are underserved. I know these tools can be used to help everybody, and I think that regardless of socioeconomic status we can use these, but we need to be sure to use them in the appropriate context with the appropriate support. Suffice it to say that almost any system you want to look up was discussed, and pretty much all systems provide benefit in our patients with diabetes. It's true for patients with type 2 diabetes who are and aren't on insulin, as well as people who take insulin. There were even interesting abstracts about people who don't have diabetes yet, who have prediabetes, who are using the devices that they can get over the counter. This is a field that's evolving, and at each ADA meeting, there are even more interesting bits of data that you can learn as you go through the meeting. In addition to data on AID systems, there were data on continuous glucose monitoring use in a wide variety of settings, which included people with type 2 diabetes who weren't on insulin, people with prediabetes, and even people using the over-the-counter systems. We have much to learn from all the data that are being aggregated. It makes me happy because I've been such a fan of diabetes technology since it came on the market, and I think it's really spread out to help many people. The downside to this is that there are many people who don't have access to these expensive tools, and I think there's a large amount of effort that's been made both by the ADA and others to expand access. I think it's important that people recognize that we want to provide access to the tools that people need to appropriately manage their diabetes no matter what their socioeconomic status. Now, in terms of one specific device, I'm going to discuss the twiist system (Sequel Med Tech). The reason I'm discussing this is because it's just about to come on that market. It's a pump that's actually a circle, and it's called 'twiist' because it twists. It's different from other pump systems. It's designed by Dean Kamen, who is the man who designed the first Medtronic pumps, and it's got some interesting features. First of all, it uses the Loop algorithm. This is the do-it-yourself algorithm that was developed a while ago that has many features, including the fact that it's got a large amount of adjustability so you can set varying targets. I think it's a pretty good algorithm. I haven't used it with this pump yet, but my feeling is that embedded in the pump and used as an AID system, it's going to be very helpful. This pump also has an occlusion alert so that if there's an occlusion to the insulin delivery, it's going to make noise so that patients are alerted to this. It worries me a little bit because I think patients get occlusions all the time — like they sit funny and the catheter kinks or something. I think that for really bad occlusion issues, where people's glucose levels start to go to the 300s and 400s and they have to do troubleshooting, this might alert people in advance before they become very hyperglycemic so they can change out the infusion set. I think it's an interesting concept, this occlusion alarm. I think it's interesting that this pump uses the Loop algorithm, which is now FDA approved. It's a different pump in that it is physically different. It is a tethered pump, but I think that our patients are going to find this interesting and we're going to need to see how they like it because I can never tell for sure what I think about something until my patients tell me. It does work with the FreeStyle Libre 3 Plus, and that's what it's going to be launched with in terms of the sensor. It will also work with the Eversense 1-year implantable sensor within the next several months. Eventually, it will also integrate with the Abbott dual glucose ketone sensor. I think there are going to be many interesting different ways in which to use this, and we'll see what patients think and how it worked. They did present data from two trials. One, a small investigator-led study, and one, some real-world data, which showed that the pump was effective and there were improvements in time in range without a significant increase in time below range. This sounds promising. I love that my patients have more options, and we'll see what happens as our patients begin to use it and give us feedback. This has been Dr Anne Peters, for Medscape.
