Asean to adopt KL Declaration on social media and AI use
Communications Minister Datuk Fahmi Fadzil said the declaration would help Asean countries adopt common strategies to address the growing impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI).
"This is also particularly on AI use on social media, including misuse of AI for scams, slander and many more.
"We believe Asean countries can play an active role, and social media platforms, too, must be proactive in clearly labelling AI-generated content," he said at a press conference after the launch of IPRM AI Festival 2025 here today (July 13).
Fahmi said several platforms have started tagging content to indicate when images or videos are AI-generated.
In line with this, he said, the government may consider similar measures under the Online Safety Act, which is expected to come into effect by the end of this year.
At the same time, he said, ministries, agencies, departments, organisations and companies must understand the benefits, challenges and limitations of integrating AI into their operations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BusinessToday
4 hours ago
- BusinessToday
HLIB Picks Gamuda, IJM As Benefactors From A Sector Robust In 2H
Hong Leong Investment Bank Bhd (HLIB) is maintaining its OVERWEIGHT call on the construction sector, citing a promising second half anchored by data centres (DCs), infrastructure rollouts and continued private sector demand. Gamuda and IJM remain the research house's top picks with BUY ratings and target prices of RM5.50 and RM2.96, respectively, supported by robust balance sheets and strong orderbook prospects. The KLCON Index managed to outperform the broader FBM KLCI by 3.6% in a volatile first half, despite multiple negative events. The sector saw a sharp recovery of 29% from April lows, attributed to rescinded GPU restrictions, reaffirmed capex from Big Tech, healthy contract flows and solid 1Q earnings. Gamuda and Sunway Construction delivered 1H gains of 1.1% and 29.6% respectively, outperforming the broader sector. Year-to-date (YTD), total contract awards reached RM28.9 billion, representing a 39.5% year-on-year growth. Notable contracts include the RM8.3 billion Penang LRT Segment 1 to the SRS Consortium (60% Gamuda), RM2.94 billion KSSC redevelopment to MRCB and the RM2.47 billion variation order for LRT3, also to MRCB. However, DC-related contracts in 1H fell 31% year-on-year to RM3.3 billion, which HLIB attributes to timing factors as several large-scale hyperscale tenders were only recently called. Looking into 2H25, HLIB expects a surge in DC awards, including five multibillion-ringgit tenders from a US-based hyperscaler. Larger contractors such as Gamuda, IJM and SunCon are anticipated to benefit most, leveraging their financial strength, execution track records and integrated value chain offerings. The firm remains cautious on potential AI chip export restrictions affecting Malaysia but believes such risks are partially mitigated by the sector's dependency on Western hyperscalers, with exemptions likely to be granted. On the impact of the reimposed 6% SST on construction, HLIB notes that most non-residential projects are protected by contract clauses that allow for cost pass-throughs. Government and residential projects remain exempt, narrowing the range of exposure. For DC projects specifically, the firm believes the impact will be muted due to contract structures like FIDIC and sustained demand despite cost pressures. SunCon's target price has been revised upward to RM6.70 (from RM5.93), following higher replenishment assumptions in FY25–27. HLIB now expects FY25 contract wins to hit RM7.3 billion, factoring in SunCon's growing edge in hyperscale DC execution, including ahead-of-schedule completions for projects like K2 and Yellowwood. Despite possible sector headwinds from the AI chip issue, slower property markets and subsidy rationalisation, HLIB sees room for further rerating, with forward valuations still attractive at 19.1x P/E and 1.3x P/B. Related
Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Ringgit rises as US plans new tariffs on major partners
KUALA LUMPUR : The ringgit opened higher against the US dollar on Monday, lifted by concerns over Washington's plan to impose tariffs on three major trading partners from Aug 1, 2025. Over the weekend, US President Donald Trump announced plans to impose a 30% tariff on goods from the European Union and Mexico, and a 35% tariff on Canadian products. At 8am, the ringgit strengthened to 4.2405/4.2635 against the greenback, compared with Friday's close of 4.2475/4.2525. Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Afzanizam Rashid said the US had weaponised tariffs to gain economic advantage. 'Clearly, the tariff policy instrument has been weaponised by the US to address economic imbalances. 'This means downside risks to global growth remain elevated, while the risk of higher inflation especially in the US, is becoming more apparent, complicating the Federal Reserve's decision-making on rate cuts,' he noted. Afzanizam added that the ringgit is expected to remain within a narrow range of RM4.24 to RM4.25 amid ongoing global uncertainties. At the open, the ringgit was higher against a basket of major currencies. It advanced against the Japanese yen to 2.8792/2.8950 from 2.8893/2.8929, strengthened against the British pound to 5.7234/5.7544 from 5.7524/5.7592, and gained versus the euro to 4.9546/4.9815 from 4.9679/4.9737 previously. The local note was also firmer against most Asean currencies, except the Thai baht. It rose vis-a-vis the Singapore dollar to 3.3119/3.3303 from 3.3186/3.3228, edged up against the Indonesian rupiah to 261.4/263.0 from 261.8/262.3, and appreciated versus the Philippine peso to 7.51/7.55 from 7.52/7.53. However, it slipped against the Thai baht to 13.0916/13.1711 from 13.0668/13.0886 at Friday's close.
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Ambalat needs quiet diplomacy, not open debates
The recent pledge by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto to pursue peaceful, mutually beneficial economic cooperation deserves praise for its pragmatic foresight. The pledge in June includes several promising prospects. Among them is a plan to jointly explore and develop the contested oil- and gas-rich Ambalat block in the Celebes Sea, off the eastern coast of Sabah. If this initiative proceeds, it would mark a welcome step away from the longstanding impasse over unresolved maritime boundaries between the two countries. For Malaysia, this peaceful mechanism for managing maritime territorial disputes is neither new nor unprecedented. Among ASEAN members, Malaysia pioneered the approach by signing joint development agreements — first with Thailand in 1979, and later with Vietnam in 1992 — enabling shared exploration and development of hydrocarbon reserves across vast contested areas in the Gulf of Thailand. In the context of international law, this arrangement is consistent with provisions in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which allow collaborative measures to be implemented while disputing parties seek a final resolution over the contested area. In the case of Ambalat, the intention of both countries to manage the dispute peacefully aligns with the principles embodied in the ASEAN Charter. Certain parties, though, voiced objections to jointly developing Ambalat's oil and gas resources with Indonesia. However, the public uproar also highlights a deeper issue: the misguided notion that the details of delicate negotiations and high-level meetings between leaders or government officials must be made public. Not all diplomatic negotiations are created equal, nor should they be subject to real-time public scrutiny. Some issues, especially those involving maritime territorial and boundary disputes like the Ambalat seabed, are highly technical, legally complex and inherently sensitive. Openly debating these topics risks turning nuanced discussions into populist spectacles. The reality is that maritime boundary delimitation requires expertise in international law, hydrography and history — fields in which few laypersons or politicians are truly knowledgeable. Keeping the negotiation process private, at least to a certain degree, helps prevent misunderstandings or misinterpretations that could inflame tensions or derail delicate talks. Until finalised outcomes are reached, negotiators need private space to discuss sensitive issues, test ideas, make concessions and propose creative solutions without fear of immediate political backlash or public pressure. When talks unfold under the glare of public opinion, even a hint of flexibility is often seized upon as a sign of weakness, pushing parties to retreat into rigid, uncompromising stances. At certain stages, confidentiality in negotiations — even beyond the context of the Ambalat dispute — is essential to protect national interests and security. Prematurely revealing positions can weaken Malaysia's bargaining power and expose strategic vulnerabilities. Once negotiating lines become public, adversaries can exploit them, and domestic critics can pressure leaders or negotiators into rigid stances that leave no room for compromise or manoeuvring. Beyond joint development of economic resources in the disputed maritime areas, are there alternative options to manage or resolve the Ambalat dispute peacefully? Third-party dispute settlement mechanisms are one possibility worth considering. Malaysia has previously referred its maritime sovereignty disputes to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) for adjudication, notably in cases involving the Sipadan and Ligitan islands with Indonesia, as well as Batu Puteh and two maritime features with Singapore. Nonetheless, pursuing this judicial route may not be the preferred option for Indonesia. When the ICJ awarded Sipadan and Ligitan to Malaysia in 2002, the judgment sparked protests in several Indonesian cities. Had every stage of the current Ambalat discussions been made public, nationalist fervour on either side could have derailed progress. Demanding full disclosure of every twist and turn of negotiations is unrealistic and counterproductive. In the case of Ambalat, success depends not only on what leaders decide, but also on society's willingness to trust the process. After decades of stalemate in the Ambalat dispute, we should give diplomacy the space it needs to succeed.
