This quick, but not so easy, test can predict how long you'll live, study suggests
The sitting-to-rising test requires enough balance, muscle strength and flexibility to be able to sit down on the floor without using arms, hands or knees and then to stand up again just as unaided. The movement is a way to determine non-aerobic fitness and reveals potential problems that might be otherwise missed, according to the report published in the European Journal of Preventive Cardiology on Wednesday.
The team at the Exercise Medicine Clinic in Rio de Janeiro recruited 4,282 adults, mostly men, ages 46 to 75. After evaluating the participants' health, the researchers presented them with the test.
Using a zero to five point system, participants got a perfect score if they were able to go from standing upright to sitting on the floor without touching anything on the way down.
Each body part, say a hand or an elbow or a knee, that was used to guide or help balance resulted in a subtraction of one point from the total. People also lost half a point for being wobbly. On the way back up, points were subtracted if extremities touched anything.
Twelve years later, the researchers followed up with the participants. By that time, there had been 665 deaths overall due to 'natural causes,' the researchers found.
The vast majority of perfect scorers were still alive at follow-up, as compared to a little more than 9 in 10 of those who had lost two points and, dramatically, just under half of those with scores between 0 and 4.
Among participants initially diagnosed with heart disease, those with low scores on the test were more likely to have died by the 12-year mark.
Aerobic fitness is important but muscle strength, a healthy body mass index, or BMI, balance and flexibility are also vital for healthy aging, said Dr. Claudio Gil Araújo, director of research and education at the clinic and the study's lead author. People can improve on their deficits and then score better on the test.
While the study doesn't directly link a perfect score to longevity, 'it is quite reasonable to expect this,' Araújo said.
The new findings are part of a growing field of longevity. Other recent research includes a balance test: People who couldn't stand for 10 seconds on one foot were nearly twice as likely to die within the following 10 years as those who could manage the balance.
Keith Diaz, a professor of behavioral medicine at the Columbia University Medical Center, said the new test can be a conversation starter for doctors to get patients thinking about what it takes for healthy aging.
If someone scores poorly, 'you might be able to get them to start working on their flexibility and balance,' Diaz said. 'If the patient is struggling to get off the floor, it could be a red flag for their overall health.'
Dr. Joseph Herrera, chair of the department of rehabilitation and human performance for the Mount Sinai Health System, cautioned that for someone who can't successfully stand up and sit down without help, there are ways to improve.
Weight training, balance training and improving flexibility can help.
Other tests that have become popular, Herrera said, include the six-minute walk, where the point is to see how far the person can travel in six minutes; and the sit-to-stand-sit test, in which the patient is asked to sit in a chair, then rise out of a chair and then sit down again five times in 30 seconds.
'We should be looking at the results of these tests as pieces of a puzzle,' he said.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Does Being a "Boy Mom" Shorten Your Life?
The research behind whether parents of boys actually have shorter lifespans, worse health, and age faster Most of the content for parents of sons on social media seems to be very negative, especially the content for 'boy moms.' As a mother to two boys myself, I find some of this content sweet and relatable, but a lot of it is, frankly, obnoxious and verging on toxic. Recently I have seen posts circulating on social media claiming that boy moms don't live as long and age faster than girl moms. My initial response to these posts was annoyance at yet another negative message being spread about being a parent to boys. However, when I dug into the research, I was surprised to find that there may be some truth to this claim— but it's more complicated than you may think. Main Research Findings Research consistently finds that having sons is linked to a shorter lifespan and worse health in mothers. One study found that a mother's risk of death per year increased by 7% for each son that they had (two sons would mean a 14% increase, 3 sons a 21% increase, etc.). A previous study conducted by the same authors found that, for every son a woman had, their lifespan decreased by 34 weeks while daughters were associated with a slightly increased lifespan (although this was not statistically significant). Interestingly fathers may not experience the same decrease in lifespan. Another study found that mothers reported worse health in old age with each son they had. Specifically, mothers had an 11% increased odds of reporting poor health in old age with each son that they had. Finally, a recent study found that parents of sons (both mothers and fathers) showed faster cognitive decline in old age. Why Might This Be? One theory that researchers have is that sons take more of a toll on a mother's body (aka the expensive son hypothesis). The idea is that pregnancy, birth, and lactation of sons depletes maternal reserves more than daughters do and therefore the mother's health may be negatively impacted. Supporting this idea, research finds that boys require more energy during pregnancy and lactation than girls. Research also finds that having sons may increase inflammation that contributes to degenerative diseases. In particular, research finds that having boys increases the risk for cardiovascular disease in mothers. There may also be social factors at play, in addition to biological factors. For example, grandmothers are more involved in the care of their daughter's children than their son's children and being more involved in child care is linked to better health in old age. Daughters are also more likely than sons to provide care to their elderly parents, so parents of daughters may get better quality care in old age which could result in a longer lifespan and better health in old age. However, there is no research finding that this association is caused by boys being more challenging or stressful than girls, as social media would suggest. Why Parents of Boys Shouldn't Be Too Worried This research is all correlational so we cannot definitively say that having boys actually causes a shorter lifespan and more health problems. It may be that an underlying factor makes a person more likely to have a boy and more likely to have health problems. For example, higher levels of testosterone may make you more likely to have a boy and more likely to have health problems (and of course not all boy moms have higher levels of testosterone). Some Positivity for Parents of Boys As I said at the beginning of this article, I hate the negativity around being a 'boy mom' or a parent of boys more generally. Although I always strive to accurately report the research, I do not want to further this narrative. Of course, on a personal level, I can say that I love so many aspects of being a mother to my boys and even if they do shorten my lifespan, they more than make up for it in all of the joy they bring to my life. But what about the research? Does research find any benefits of being a parent to boys? Unfortunately, the research on this topic is limited but we do have some evidence for positive outcomes associated with having boys. Mothers who only have sons are the most likely to report the highest level of happiness in their marriage and there is some evidence that parents with sons may be less likely to divorce. The birth of a son may also be linked to an easier transition to being parents than the birth of a daughter. A reason for all of this may be that fathers are more involved in caring for sons than daughters. Fathers of sons also make more money than fathers of daughters. Research does find that girls show higher levels of positive emotions, and boys show higher activity levels and lower fear on average. The people who are negative about being a parent to boys may frame these personality traits as burdens or stressors, but an active and brave child can also be a lot of fun! In addition, although pregnancies with boys may be harder on your body, mothers pregnant with boys may show better working memory and spatial skills than mothers pregnant with girls. The myth of morning sickness being worse when pregnant with girls is also true— women pregnant with boys show less severe nausea and vomiting during pregnancy. You may have also heard that sons are more likely to grow distant from their mothers in adulthood but fear not because research finds that unmarried sons are the most likely group to live with their mother in adulthood! Overall Translation There is some evidence that being a parent to boys is linked to a slightly shorter lifespan, an increased risk for health problems, and faster aging. While it is not completely clear why these associations occur, researchers speculate that sons may take more out of the mother during pregnancy and lactation and that sons may have different relationships with their parents in old age. However, the most important point here is that these statistics are based on averages and have no predictive power for your life. This topic is a great example of how research typically only informs us about what is most likely to happen based on averages and not what will happen in your life. Just because the average mother of boys has a shorter lifespan does not mean that you will (or your partner will) die younger and just because daughters are more likely to provide care for elderly parents does not mean that you son won't step up and be an incredible caretaker for you in old age. These stereotypes are not always true and you have a lot of power in deciding the type of relationship you have with your son. Solve the daily Crossword


Tom's Guide
37 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Apple Watch needs this sleep feature to compete with Garmin, Oura, and Whoop — but it might be coming soon
Since my son was born, I'm more obsessed than ever with tracking my sleep. Did I get the recommended 1.5-two hours of deep sleep needed, and how many times did I actually wake up? Most nights, I'll go to sleep wearing my Apple Watch 10 and my Oura Ring 4, because despite being one of the best fitness trackers on the market, the Apple Watch falls short of one sleep feature nearly every other tracker on the market has had for years — a sleep score. Apple has been able to expertly track your different sleep stages for years, as well as your total time in bed and total time asleep. That said, you do need to remember to put your watch into sleep mode before falling asleep, and ensure it's got enough charge to record your sleep all night. If you have the vitals app pinned to your Smart Stack, you can see a breakdown of your sleep each morning, but unlike Garmin, Oura, and Whoop, Apple doesn't give you an overall sleep score. However, according to rumors, we might not have long to wait. Writer Steve Moser uncovered a graphic named 'Watch Focus Score' from deep within the code of Apple's Health app (reported by MacRumors). This score shows an Apple Watch with the number 84 in it, surrounded by three bars that curve to form a circle. The colors of the bars are red, light blue, and purple, which correspond to the sleep stages shown in the Health app — red reflecting time awake, light blue showing REM sleep, and purple reflecting time spent in deep sleep. Few more notes:1) Some other versions of this graphic have a thermometer icon which says to me that this feature will be available on old and new Apple Watches.2) Maybe this is why the sleep icon is changing from light blue to purple.3) I imagine the watch face complication… 23, 2025 It's not clear whether this feature would be part of the watchOS 26 update coming this fall (although it's not available on the public beta), or a feature launched with the rumored Apple Watch 11. Why does every other brand use a sleep score? In simple terms, it helps you see quickly what those different stages mean. For example, last night, my Apple Watch 10 recorded my 7 hours and 34 minutes of sleep (my kid slept through the night for the first time ever, a fact worth celebrating), but my Oura ring 4 gave me a sleep score of 89, and told me that yes, this was outstanding compared to my typical range. Of course, I know I slept better than I have in the past 18 months since my son was born, but I appreciate seeing the quality of sleep in the form of a sleep efficiency number. With Oura, I can also see how my sleep score changes over time, and why my sleep score might be lower from one day to the next. It allows me to make healthier decisions, such as not doom-scrolling Instagram before trying to sleep, or drinking a glass of wine too close to bedtime. Garmin and Whoop also have similar sleep features. The best Garmin watches give you a score out of 100, which is then incorporated into the watch's daily readiness number, reflecting how ready you are for a hard workout. Whoop, on the other hand, gives you an overall sleep performance score, as well as a breakdown of different metrics, all of which have their score out of 100. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. It's a metric Apple Watch users have been dreaming about for years, and hopefully one that'll roll out onto watches sooner rather than later. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Shells could stop snoring condition 8million suffer from in UK
An ancient ritual which involves blowing into a large shell could tackle the symptoms of a common sleep disorder, a study suggests. The practice of conch blowing, also known as shankh blowing, could improve sleep for patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) without the need for uncomfortable machinery, according to researchers. Shankh blowing involves breathing in deeply before exhaling forcefully into a conch, the spiral-shaped shell from a species of sea snail. The small trial, led by researchers in India, involved 30 people aged with 19 and 65 with OSA. OSA happens with the walls of the throat relax and narrow or close, with symptoms including choking noises, loud snoring and waking up a lot. The condition is thought to impact about eight million people in the UK. READ MORE: Drivers urged to fill up tanks with Petrol and Diesel before Monday READ MORE: Will strikes disrupt Ryanair flights to Alicante, Ibiza, Mallorca and Tenerife? For the trial, 16 people were provided with a traditional shankh used in yogic practices and trained in how to use it properly before taking it home, while the remaining 14 people were asked to carry out deep breathing exercises. Both groups were encouraged to practice for a minimum of 15 minutes five days a week. They were monitored during sleep and asked questions about sleep quality and how tired they felt during the day. After six months, the study found those who practised shankh blowing reported sleeping better and were 34% less sleepy during the day. They also had higher levels of oxygen in the blood during the night and had four to five fewer apnoeas, where breathing stops during sleep, per hour on average. They also had higher levels of oxygen in their blood during the night. Dr Krishna K Sharma, of the Eternal Heart Care Centre and Research Institute in Jaipur, India, said: 'The way the shankh is blown is quite distinctive. It involves a deep inhalation followed by a forceful, sustained exhalation through tightly pursed lips. 'This action creates strong vibrations and airflow resistance, which likely strengthens the muscles of the upper airway, including the throat and soft palate, areas that often collapse during sleep in people with OSA. 'The shankh's unique spiralling structure may also contribute to specific acoustic and mechanical effects that further stimulate and tone these muscles.' Continuous positive airway pressure (Cpap) machines are the first line of treatment for OSA. They involve patients wearing a mask that blows pressurised air into the nose and throat while they sleep. However, they can be uncomfortable. Speaking of Cpap, Dr Sharma said: 'While effective, many patients find it uncomfortable and struggle to use it consistently.' He suggests shankh blowing could be a 'promising alternative'. 'Shankh blowing is a simple low-cost, breathing technique that could help improve sleep and reduce symptoms without the need for machines or medication,' Dr Sharma said. Researchers are now planning a larger trial involving several hospitals. Dr Sharma added: 'This next phase will allow us to validate and expand on our findings in a broader, more diverse population and assess how shankh blowing performs over longer periods. 'We also want to study how this practice affects airway muscle tone, oxygen levels and sleep in greater detail. 'We're particularly interested in comparing shankh blowing with standard treatments like Cpap, and in examining its potential help in more severe forms of OSA.' Reacting to the findings, Professor Sophia Schiza, head of the ERS group on sleep disordered breathing, based at the University of Crete, Greece, said: 'We know that OSA patients have poor quality of sleep, and higher risks of high blood pressure, strokes and heart disease. 'A proportion of patients experience sleepiness during the day. While Cpap and other treatments are available based on careful diagnosis of disease severity, there is still need for new treatments. 'This is an intriguing study that shows the ancient practice of shankh blowing could potentially offer an OSA treatment for selected patients by targeting muscles training. 'A larger study will help provide more evidence for this intervention which could be of benefit as a treatment option or in combination with other treatments in selected OSA patients.'