
US' Foot Locker's sales decline 4.6%, to $1,788 mn in Q1
Comparable sales decreased by 2.6 per cent, with comparable sales in the North American region decreasing by 0.5 per cent. Comparable sales in the company's international businesses decreased by 8.5 per cent, led by softness in Foot Locker Europe.
Foot Locker reported Q1 sales of $1.79 billion, down 4.6 per cent y-o-y, with comparable sales falling 2.6 per cent. North America saw a 0.5 per cent drop, while international sales declined 8.5 per cent. Gross margin decreased by 40 basis points, and SG&A rose 100 basis points as a percentage of sales. The company opened 9 stores, closed 56, and updated 80 locations.
Gross margin decreased by 40 basis points as compared with the prior-year period. Merchandise margins decreased by 10 basis points, while occupancy as a percentage of sales increased by 30 basis points as compared to the prior-year period, the company said in a press release.
"We are continuing to execute our Lace Up Plan strategies as we look forward to the successful completion of our transaction with DICK'S Sporting Goods. As we noted at the time we reported preliminary first quarter results, we experienced softer traffic trends globally that impacted our performance. During the quarter, we remained focused on the rollout of our Re-imagined and Refresh programs to elevate our in-store experience, enhancing our digital offerings, deepening customer engagement through our FLX programme and leveraging our strong brand partnerships to generate excitement for our customers. As we have executed these and other initiatives to further advance our strategy, our teams have also remained nimble to navigate the uncertain macroeconomic environment, including managing our promotional levels, inventories, and expenses and remaining disciplined with our cash flows," said Mary Dillon, chief executive officer .
SG&A as a percentage of sales increased by 100 basis points as compared with the prior-year period, due to underlying deleverage on the sales decline and investments in technology which more than offset the cost optimisation programme and ongoing expense discipline. Compared to the prior year, SG&A dollars were down 0.7 per cent.
During the first quarter, the company opened 9 new stores and closed 56 stores, including its stores that operated in South Korea, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Greece, and Romania. Also during the quarter, the company remodeled or relocated 11 stores and refreshed 69 stores to updated design standards, which incorporate key elements of the current brand design specifications.
Fibre2Fashion News Desk (RR)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
How saying yes to overwork can hinder success: 5 lessons professionals need to learn
Modern workplaces run on an unspoken currency: Employees' willingness to say 'yes.' Yes to staying late, yes to filling in for colleagues, yes to tasks far removed from one's actual role. For decades, this readiness has been celebrated as ambition, commitment, even loyalty. But a new report exposes the darker side of this culture: workers are paying a heavy price for carrying burdens that extend well beyond their job descriptions. LiveCareer's Hidden Costs and Rewards of Extra Work Report (December 2024), based on a survey of 1,160 US employees, lays bare a paradox that defines today's labour force. On the surface, saying 'yes' can open doors, sharpen skills, promotions beckon, and paychecks fatten. But beneath that thin layer of reward lies a corrosive truth: Overwork is pushing nearly all employees toward burnout, leaving them stretched, fatigued, and disillusioned. The findings challenge one of the most enduring myths of modern careers, that extra work is always the highway to success. Instead, the survey paints a portrait of a workforce trapped in a cycle of pressure, compliance, and exhaustion, where the costs often outweigh the gains. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo A culture of overextension The numbers from the report paint a sobering picture. 77% of employees take on responsibilities outside their role at least weekly, with more than a third facing such requests daily. Only 3% say they are never asked to do more. The concept of 'extra' work, once seen as occasional, has become structurally embedded in workplace operations. This isn't about 'going the extra mile,' it's about a workplace survival strategy that relies on stretching human capacity until boundaries blur. Burnout: The hidden epidemic The toll is undeniable. A staggering 93% of employees report burnout as a direct consequence of accepting extra work. Nearly 60% say they frequently feel drained because they cannot say no. Burnout has become less of a red flag and more of a badge employees are forced to wear, a silent marker of endurance in an unforgiving environment. The normalization of this fatigue raises a critical question: When exhaustion becomes the default, is the system itself broken? Why saying 'no' rarely happen Despite the consequences, most employees still comply. 56% admit they feel pressured into saying yes, while 27% cite direct managerial influence. Recognition (24%), the desire to be seen as a team player (23%), and career ambitions (18%) also drive compliance. Only 11% set boundaries and refuse additional work. This imbalance underscores a workplace psychology where declining requests is equated with jeopardizing one's future. In a precarious labour market, self-preservation often means self-sacrifice. Where the work comes from What makes this overextension even more insidious is its source. It isn't limited to one layer of authority: 23% of requests come from direct managers, 22% from senior leaders, 22% from coworkers, 21% from other team managers, and even 13% from HR. The expectation to do more is everywhere, woven into every layer of hierarchy. The tasks themselves are telling, administrative duties, event planning, overtime, mentoring, or covering for absent colleagues. These aren't career-advancing stretch projects; they're organizational gaps papered over by human labor. The rewards that keep people hooked Yet, the story isn't entirely bleak. One in three employees credits extra work with skill development, financial rewards, or closer colleague relationships. About 31% even report career advancement opportunities. In fact, 90% of respondents feel fairly compensated for their additional contributions, and more than half believe their efforts are critical to business survival. But the benefits are uneven. Older workers (41+) are far more likely to see fairness and advancement opportunities than their younger counterparts, who often perceive the trade-off as thankless. A question of sustainability The dual reality is stark: Extra work brings rewards, but also crippling burnout. When nearly every employee admits to being overburdened, the problem ceases to be individual; it is systemic. The culture of relentless 'yes' may keep businesses afloat in the short term, but it breeds long-term instability, eroding mental health, engagement, and retention. Redrawing the boundaries What LiveCareer's report uncovers is more than statistics; it is a mirror held up to modern workplaces. Saying 'yes' has become a default response, not out of enthusiasm, but compulsion. Companies may celebrate it as commitment, but in truth, it reflects a structure built on overreliance and exhaustion. The task ahead is twofold: Employees must find the courage to draw boundaries, and employers must confront their dependence on burnout economics. Until then, the corporate culture of 'yes' will remain less about opportunity and more about erosion of energy, balance, and dignity at work. Lessons professionals need to learn In today's hyper-competitive workplace, many professionals believe that saying yes to every task is the surest way to climb the ladder. Yet, the reality is often the opposite. Overcommitment drains energy, blurs focus, and creates a cycle where effort outweighs achievement. True success lies not in endless hustle, but in mastering balance and discernment. Boundaries safeguard growth Agreeing to every request leaves little room for strategic work. Setting boundaries allows professionals to channel time and energy into projects that drive meaningful results. Productivity isn't about hours logged Staying late may look impressive, but output matters more than optics. Professionals who focus on efficiency often deliver stronger results than those stuck in the cycle of overwork. Burnout destroys long-term potential Short-term wins earned through exhaustion come at the cost of health, creativity, and sustainability. Protecting well-being ensures careers last and flourish. Selective commitments build credibility Saying yes to everything dilutes quality. By prioritizing key responsibilities, professionals establish a reputation for reliability and excellence. Rest is a competitive advantage Recovery sharpens judgment, strengthens resilience, and boosts leadership potential. In a world that glorifies busyness, choosing rest can set professionals apart. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US tariffs impact on jobs: Nearly 3 lakh workers at risk in textiles and gems; Here's what experts say
The steep tariffs imposed on Indian exports to the US have triggered sharp debate among staffing specialists, with some flagging the risk of immediate job losses and others suggesting that India's domestic demand and trade diversification could soften the blow. 'The recent imposition of additional US tariffs is expected to have a direct and substantial impact on India's employment landscape. This will especially impact those industries relying heavily on the US market for business continuity and growth,' Genius HRTech founder, chairman and managing director R P Yadav told PTI. Yadav identified textiles, auto components, agriculture, and gems and jewellery as the most vulnerable sectors, warning that micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) will absorb the heaviest shock. He estimated that 2,00,000 to 3,00,000 jobs are at immediate risk, with textiles alone—being labour-intensive—potentially losing as many as 1,00,000 positions if the tariff regime remains in force for over six months. He further cautioned that gems and jewellery hubs in Surat and SEEPZ, Mumbai, could also face widespread job losses due to shrinking demand and rising costs in the US market. However, not all experts foresee an employment crisis. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo TeamLease Services Senior Vice President Balasubramanian Anantha Narayanan argued that India's reliance on domestic consumption makes its job market less vulnerable than China's. 'At this point in time, we aren't seeing any signs of a slowdown or loss of jobs. This also by extension means that our jobs are largely in service of domestic demand too, with the exception of some sectors like ITeS among others. Our exports to the USA are USD 87 billion, which is roughly about 2.2 per cent of our overall GDP. Largely pharma, electronics etc. won't be affected for now, which will further limit the export exposure to industries such as textiles, gems and jewellery among others,' he said, quoted PTI. He also noted that the tariffs are yet to take effect, leaving space for possible negotiations. 'On the other side, we've also had several positives by way of the recently closed FTA with the UK and other countries. Even if these US tariffs do come about, we'll definitely figure out a way of redirecting or diversifying our trade to other markets. Therefore, at this point in time, we aren't seeing any signs of a slowdown or loss of jobs. It's an evolving situation and we'll get to know more in due course of time,' Narayanan said. According to him, the broader drag on employment stems from global consumption slowdown, tariff uncertainties, and ongoing geopolitical conflicts. CIEL HR MD and CEO Aditya Mishra said the tariff scenario is unsettling exporters in sectors deeply tied to the American market—including electronics, textiles, gems and jewellery, auto components, leather, footwear, shrimp and engineering goods. 'Even industries outside the direct tariff ambit, like pharmaceuticals, are feeling the ripple effect through costlier upstream chemicals and materials,' Mishra said. He added that uncertainty could persist through the third quarter of this financial year as negotiations unfold. While Mishra does not expect widespread layoffs, he noted that companies are already adopting cost-control measures—cutting discretionary spends, streamlining production, freezing hiring, and putting pressure on temporary and contractual roles. 'The immediate pressure will be on temporary and contract roles, particularly shop-floor workers, artisans, sales and logistics staff, and some mid-level managers in export-led units. This will have a cascading effect on thousands of MSMEs in the supply chain, which collectively account for a large share of employment,' he warned. Mishra also pointed to potential spillover risks for IT and global capability centres (GCCs). 'The IT sector is already experiencing slow spending and hiring, and this additional uncertainty could delay its recovery further. GCCs are likely to take a cautious approach to hiring and investments until there is greater clarity on trade negotiations and market stability. If the tariff situation persists, India's market share in the US could shrink, leading to longer-term repercussions for exporters and the industries that depend on them,' he said. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .


News18
an hour ago
- News18
US seeks shipbuilding expertise from South Korea, Japan to counter China
Washington, Aug 17 (AP) American lawmakers are using a trip to South Korea and Japan to explore how the United States can tap those allies' shipbuilding expertise and capacity to help boost its own capabilities, which are dwarfed by those of China. Sens Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill, and Andy Kim, D-NJ, who are scheduled to land in Seoul before travelling to Japan, plan to meet top shipbuilders from the world's second- and third-largest shipbuilding countries. The senators want to examine the possibilities of forming joint ventures to construct and repair noncombatant vessels for the US Navy in the Indo-Pacific and bring investments to American shipyards. 'We already have fewer capacity now than we did during 'Operation Iraqi Freedom' in 2003," Duckworth told The Associated Press. 'We have to rebuild the capacity. At the same time, what capacity we have is aging and breaking down and taking longer and more expensive to fix." Their trip comes as President Donald Trump demands a plan to revive US shipyards and engage foreign partners. The Pentagon is seeking USD 47 billion for shipbuilding in its annual budget. The urgency stems from the fact that Washington severely lags behind China in building naval ships, a situation raising alarms among policymakers who worry the maritime balance of power could shift to China, now the world's number 1 shipbuilder. Another possibility is repairing US ships in the Indo-Pacific region. 'If we have to bring ships all the way back to the United States… to wait two years to be fixed, that doesn't help the situation," Duckworth said. The discussions, she said, will focus on auxiliary vessels, which are noncombatant ships such as fuelling and cargo vessels that support naval and military operations. The Navy's auxiliary fleet is aging and insufficient in numbers, she said. The US commercial shipbuilding accounted for 0.1 per cent of global capacity in 2024, while China produced 53 per cent, followed by South Korea and Japan, according to a report by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies. A Navy review from April 2024 found that many of its major shipbuilding programmes were one year to three years behind schedule. During the trip, the senators are expected to meet representatives from major shipbuilders in the region. South Korea and the US are already making progress on shipbuilding cooperation. In March, Hanwha Ocean completed maintenance work for a 41,000-ton US Navy dry cargo and ammunition ship in South Korea. The overhaul of USNS Wally Schirra was the Korean company's first project after it secured a repair agreement with the US Navy in July 2024. Hanwha Group last year acquired Philly Shipyard in Philadelphia, which builds large merchant mariners, part of the reserve auxiliary fleet. Earlier this month, South Korea proposed to invest USD 150 billion in the US shipbuilding industry to support Trump's 'Make American Shipbuilding Great Again" initiative as part of its tariffs talk with the White House. Duckworth said she had earlier conversations with Hyundai Heavy Industries 'about them actually buying into US shipyards on US soil". This month, China formed the world's biggest shipbuilding company by merging two state-owned shipbuilders. The combined entity China State Shipbuilding Corporation produces Chinese navy's combat vessels from aircraft carriers to nuclear submarines. It commands 21.5 per cent of global shipbuilding market. (AP) NPK NPK (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: August 17, 2025, 20:15 IST News agency-feeds US seeks shipbuilding expertise from South Korea, Japan to counter China Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.