Want to make less money? Florida GOP undermines voters with minimum wage scheme.
The minimum wage in Florida is under attack – and this time in a very dishonest way.
After years of purposeful inaction by state lawmakers, Florida voters took matters into their own hands five years ago by passing a constitutional amendment that raised the minimum wage in the state. The voter initiative increased the then-paltry minimum wage of $8.65 per hour for nontipped workers, by putting it on a schedule of yearly increases that tops out at $15 an hour by Sept. 30, 2026.
This year, the graduated minimum wage is $13 an hour in Florida.
The constitutional amendment passed despite a well-funded opposition led by several business groups, including the Associated Builders and Contractors of Florida, the Associated Industries of Florida, the Florida Farm Bureau, the Florida Home Builders Association and the Florida Restaurant and Lodging Association.
And it didn't sit well with the Republican-led state legislature, either. GOP lawmakers apparently have decided to disregard the state's constitution and the will of the voters expressed through that referendum. It took them five years to find a new way to circumvent the voters' wishes. What they've come up with is a real doozy.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
A new Florida bill would let employers pay below minimum wage
A bill (SB 676) working through the Florida Legislature this session rewrites labor laws in the state to allow workers to voluntarily request to get paid less than the minimum wage.
Yes, I know. It sounds crazy.
Who goes into a job asking to be underpaid? Or hopes to get a job that makes an instant pay cut sound like an exciting new opportunity?
I guess the conversation will go something like this: 'Good news! You're hired. Now, just sign here on the line that says you have agreed to participate in our floor-sweeping apprenticeship opportunity at $7.25 an hour.
'If you do well there, you'll be eligible for a french fries work-based learning opportunity as soon as you complete your restroom internship.'
Under this bill, reclassifying low-wage jobs as internships, apprenticeships or work-based learning opportunities would allow employers to sidestep the state's minimum wage law by hiring workers willing to sign away their absolute right to a minimum salary.
The bill's sponsor in the Senate, Jonathan Martin, R-Fort Myers, tried to make this Dickensian dystopia sound like a noble gesture by calling it 'trading pay for a marketable skill.'
By Martin's reckoning, Florida is full of people who don't deserve to be paid a day's pay for a day's work.
The bill doesn't define what a 'skill' is. There's also no definition in state law that defines an 'internship.'
Tellingly, the bill purposefully allows the subminimum pay to apply to workers of all ages – not just teenagers. And it is being forwarded despite clear language in the Fair Labor Standards Act and Florida case law that employees can't waive their rights to minimum pay.
We need fair wages. This is the opposite.
In the end, this bill is just a legally flawed gift to businesses looking to cut labor costs at the expense of their poorest, unskilled workers.
'If we think that $13 an hour is what a bag boy at a grocery store should be making in rural Florida, then I think we have a misconception of either what's reasonable or we're not relating that to the cost of goods and services anymore,' Martin said.
Reality check: A living wage in Florida for an adult with no children is $23.41 an hour, according to MIT's Living Wage Calculator. And there are about 1.5 million Floridians working in jobs that pay less than $15 per hour, according to data compiled by the Florida Policy Institute.
The problem in Florida isn't that wages are too high and corporate profits are too low.
This bill is a monumental step in the wrong direction. It lends a hand to those who need it least at the expense of those who are most in need.
Here's how Jackson Oberlink, the legislative director for the social justice group Florida For All, put it.
'Let's be honest, no worker truly opts out of fair wages. There is zero protections in this bill against coercion, fraud, or employer intimidation, meaning bad actors can and will exploit it,' Oberlink told lawmakers at a committee meeting earlier this month.
'Under this bill," he added, "a fast-food worker, a grocery store cashier or a construction apprentice could suddenly find themselves reclassified as an intern and making far less than the legal minimum wage.'
'If this bill becomes law, it won't just hurt individual workers. It will drive down wages across entire industries as more and more businesses push workers into these bogus exemptions to cut costs,' Oberlink said.
'All we're asking for is fair pay for a hard day's work without loopholes, without carve-outs and without games,' he said.
Is that too much to ask? We'll soon find out.
Frank Cerabino is a news columnist with The Palm Beach Post, where this column originally published. He can be reached at fcerabino@gannett.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
13 minutes ago
- Fox News
DNC chair ripped David Hogg over party infighting in leaked meeting audio: 'Really frustrating'
Several Democratic National Committee officers are accusing DNC vice chair David Hogg of leaking an audio recording exposing infighting, as the 25-year-old progressive reformer faces possible ouster. Politico first obtained about two minutes of audio from a May 15 Zoom call in which Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin is heard accusing Hogg of impacting his ability to lead. Hogg, 25, was elected vice chair in February but is currently at risk of losing that role after stirring tensions with party leadership. A survivor of the 2018 Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida, Hogg has been vocal about how his group, Leaders We Deserve, is planning to spend $20 million to support progressive – and primarily younger – candidates challenging incumbent Democrats in safe districts during the next election. "It has plenty of warts, and we're all trying to change those, for sure, but the longer we continue this fight, the harder it is for us to actually do what we all want to do, which is make a difference in this country again," Martin said in the recording, as the party is trying to regroup following Democrats' 2024 election defeat. About 10 people were on the call, including Hogg, other DNC officers and staff, according to Politico. "I deeply respect you, David. I, too, was looking forward to working with you, but this has created a situation, and I'll be very honest with you, for the first time in my 100 days on this job," Martin continued, "The other night I said to myself for the first time, 'I don't know if I want to do this anymore.' And partly, not because of the stress and all the naysayers, right? I'm used to that. I spent 14 years as a chair. I'm used to getting beat up on." "But you know, this is, this is really, everything you know from this election, this credentials report, how Malcom's been treated in this to you know, the fact the election itself, how Shasti and Jeanna were treated in this," Martin said. "I'm just quite frustrated to be in this position because what you've done, whether you like it or not, or know it or not, David, I'm trying to – no one knows who the hell I am, right? I'm trying to get my sea legs underneath of me and actually develop any amount of credibility, so I can go out there and raise the money and do the job I need to to put ourselves in a position to win." "And again, I don't think you intended this, but you essentially destroyed any chance I have to show the leadership that I need to," Martin said. "So, it's really frustrating." Several party officers alleged in statements to Fox News Digital that Hogg was behind the audio leak. "Breaking news: a human being had a frustrating day at work. That's all Ken expressed on that call – I was there," DNC Vice Chair Malcolm Kenyatta said. "For weeks, I've pointed out David's causal relationship with the truth. He proves he has no relationship with integrity if he's willing to record and leak private conversations." "The Democratic Party is not the past. The Democratic Party is what we do next. The endless, self-serving narratives – and the deliberate leaking of private conversations – by David Hogg and his allies must stop," Jane Kleeb, president of the Association of State Democratic Committees, said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "Instead of helping to rebuild the party he's supposed to serve, he's attacking it for personal gain," Kleeb continued. "That might boost his PAC's fundraising, but it erodes trust in the very institution we're trying to reform and strengthen. I'm proud of Chair Martin and the reforms we're advancing, which includes keeping the DNC out of primaries so voters decide on Democratic nominees. Just this past month, we made historic gains in traditional red states like Nebraska and Mississippi. People's lives will be better. That's the work that matters." The Democratic National Committee is holding an electronic vote beginning Monday on whether to nullify the February elections of Hogg and Kenyatta as vice chairs. Oklahoma DNC member Kalyn Free filed a formal complaint with the DNC alleging that the February election of the two male vice chairs violated the DNC's gender-balanced rules, yet Hogg has claimed the DNC is using the vote to push for his ouster as he tries to reform the party. Hogg responded to the leaked audio in a statement to X. "There's a lot going on right now. Here's what matters: Trump just nationalized California's national guard in his latest step on his authoritarian march to stomp out dissent against mass deportations," Hogg said, referring to the anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement riots in Los Angeles. "Republicans want us turning on each other so they can continue getting away with this. While Chair Martin and I have had our disagreements we are both in this to build the strongest party possible." "Our nation is in a moment of crisis and the people are looking for us to lead," Hogg said. "This is a distraction that prevents us from doing that. Do not help the GOP." Hogg also said that "a lot of people are accusing me of leaking this recording," sharing messages from the Politico reporter seeking comment on the story. He did not affirm or deny whether he was behind the leak. "BS. It was you. Everyone knows it," New York Democratic state Sen. James Skoufis responded on X. "Leaking audio of a private call with party leadership is a disgrace and shows how deeply unserious and uncommitted you are to building a better, stronger, more inclusive Democratic Party." Martin, meanwhile, said in a statement that he's "not going anywhere," and he took the job as DNC chair "to fight Republicans, not Democrats." "As I said when I was elected, our fight is not within the Democratic Party, our fight is and has to be solely focused on Donald Trump and the disastrous Republican agenda," he said. "That's the work that I will continue to do every day." In statements to Fox News Digital, more DNC officers voiced support for Martin, as well as condemnation of Hogg. "We have a lot of work to do as a party, and Chair Martin is doing it," DNC Associate Chair Stuart Applebaum said. "I have total confidence in his leadership. The stakes are so high right now that we can't afford distractions like the ones that David is creating." "Like Chair Martin said, infighting is a waste of time when Donald Trump and the Republican Congress is taking healthcare and food away from millions of Americans," DNC Vice Chair Artie Blanco said. "Ken wouldn't be here today if not for SNAP and Medicaid. That's the type of passionate leadership we should want for our party. The fact that someone would secretly record and share audio of him candidly discussing that is more a reflection of their character than the Chair's. Begs the question, what are their true intentions." DNC Associate Chair Shasti Conrad, who was briefly mentioned on the recording, said in a statement to Fox News Digital, "During the DNC Officers call, we all were operating under the assumption that this was a confidential call amongst colleagues. Does David Hogg benefit from this? Yes. Regardless, how are we able to lead if there is no trust?" Fox News Digital also reached out to Hogg and Leaders We Deserve seeking comment on the recording, but they have yet to provide a response.


CNN
13 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump to promote $1,000 ‘Trump Accounts' for newborns at WH event
President Donald Trump is set to host a roundtable at the White House Monday to promote a key feature of the sweeping Republican domestic policy bill – a provision that would provide every American newborn with a $1,000 investment account, a White House official told CNN. The accounts, which the administration has dubbed 'Trump Accounts,' would be established for all newborn US citizen children under a pilot program included in the House-passed legislation. The government's $1,000 contribution would be placed in an index fund tied to the overall stock market and managed by the child's legal guardians. The accounts will start at $1,000 per child and guardians or other private entities can contribute up to $5,000 additional dollars every year throughout the child's life. 'The passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill will literally change the lives of working, middle class families across America by delivering the largest tax cuts in history, increasing the child tax credit, AND by creating this incredible new 'Trump Account' program, which will put the lives of young Americans on the right financial path' said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. Monday's event, taking place in the State Dining Room at the White House, will feature top executives from Dell, Uber, Altimeter Capital, ARM Corp, Salesforce, ServiceNow, Robinhood and Goldman Sachs. According to the White House official, the CEOs are expected to pledge billions of dollars in investments into Trump Accounts for the children of their employees. 'The creation of investment accounts for every child will compound into substantial nest eggs providing support for education, home ownership, and starting families. Dell Technologies will proudly match dollar for dollar the government's seed investment into these accounts for all the children born to Dell team members. This bold move to an ownership society for all included in the Reconciliation Bill will have profound and far-reaching benefits for the country,' said Dell Technologies CEO Micheal Dell, who will attend the roundtable Monday. The roundtable comes as the Trump administration intensifies its push to secure Senate passage of the president's domestic policy package ahead of the Fourth of July. NBC News was first to report.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After vowing ‘90 deals in 90 days,' the White House's rhetoric runs into reality
Donald Trump clearly wants the public to believe he recently struck a trade deal with China. The president did not actually reach such an agreement, but he's leaned into his fictional narrative with great enthusiasm lately. Last Thursday, for example, the Republican published an item to his social media platform, noting that he'd spoken to Chinese President Xi Jinping about 'the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, Trade Deal.' Soon after, during an Oval Office event, he again touted the same 'trade deal.' A day later, Trump posted a follow-up item, announcing the members of a delegation who would travel to London to meet with Chinese officials about 'the Trade Deal.' The bad news is that the 'trade deal' in question does not exist, no matter how many times the American president pretends otherwise. The good news is that administration officials will actually have some discussions with their Chinese counterparts. NBC News reported: Senior U.S. and Chinese officials will meet in London on Monday in an effort to de-escalate the bitter trade dispute between the world's two biggest economies that has roiled the global economy, with China's restrictions on critical minerals high on the agenda. About a month ago, Trump announced what he characterized as a 'deal' with China, but the closer one looked at the details, the more the truth came into focus. Georgetown University professor Abraham Newman wrote a great piece for MSNBC that explained, "While the U.S. did avoid a major economic calamity, this is not a deal. The U.S. blinked. ... Far from some diplomatic coup, the U.S. climb down reflects the economic risks of maintaining such high tariffs.' The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal came to the same conclusion, noting, '[T]he China deal is more surrender than Trump victory.' Complicating matters, while the White House and Beijing reached a tentative agreement that paused the two countries' tit-for-tat tariffs, both countries have since accused each other of violating the agreement. All of which brings to mind Peter Navarro, the White House's top trade adviser, who boasted in April, 'We're going to run 90 deals in 90 days.' Navarro added that such a plan 'is possible' in part because 'the boss is going to be the chief negotiator.' Roughly two months later, the grand total currently stands at zero. Generous observers might be inclined to give Trump credit for striking a deal with the U.K., but as The Washington Post's Dana Milbank summarized in his latest column, that deal is really more of a 'vaguely phrased framework with Britain that still hasn't been made public.' What's more, a new Politico report added that a month after the agreement was announced, the U.S.-U.K. duties 'remain in place' and 'there is still no clear timeline for when they'll lift.' Or to put it another way, two-thirds of the way into the '90 deals in 90 days' vow, the White House appears to be 90 deals short. Undeterred, Navarro returned to Fox Business late last week, where he was asked when the public should expect to see some breakthroughs. 'We will have deals,' Navarro said. 'It takes time. Usually, it takes months and years. In this administration, it's gonna take more like days.' On average, the typical timeframe for a U.S. trade deal is roughly 30 months. That didn't deter Navarro from pushing the '90 deals in 90 days' talking point in April, and it apparently didn't stop him from claiming again last week that Team Trump will produce amazing results in a matter of days. The White House's top trade adviser should be going out of his way right now to lower expectations after already having set an impossibly high bar. For reasons unknown, Navarro is doing the opposite, setting up the Trump administration for additional failure. This article was originally published on