Are we brave enough to finish what 1956 began for the women's movement?
South Africa again paused for Women's Day this past weekend. There were speeches and televised tributes to the heroines of 1956, the women who marched on Pretoria and declared: 'Wathint' Abafazi, Wathint' Imbokodo!' (You strike a woman, you strike a rock). Their courage laid the foundation for our democratic freedom.
However, nearly 70 years later, we must ask a difficult question. Do South African women truly have as much to celebrate as we claim, or have we grown so accustomed to ceremony that we mistake it for progress?
Consider this contradiction. South African women lead in education. About 13.1% of women aged 25 to 64 hold tertiary qualifications, compared with 12.3% of men (Stats SA). A landmark study after the 2008 matric cohort found that females were 56% more likely to complete an undergraduate qualification and 66% more likely to earn a bachelor's degree than their male peers.
Fewer women have a voice in shaping the laws, budgets and policies that govern the nation, despite constituting more than half the population. This is more than a gap in representation; it is a profound waste of talent and potential
Yet when ambition meets power, the story changes. Only four of the JSE Top 40 companies are led by female CEOs, and women hold only 23% of executive roles, a proportion that is declining (Just Share report).
According to the Labour Research Service 'studies suggest companies with more women in executive positions or as CEOs tend to outperform their peers in terms of profitability, market share and overall shareholder returns'.
Excluding women from leadership is not only unjust, but also bad for business.
Political representation has also regressed. After the 2024 elections, women held only 43% of seats in the National Assembly (Gender Links), down from 46% in 2020. At the Cabinet level, women account for about 43.8% of ministerial positions, a decline from the gender parity briefly achieved in 2019 (World Bank Gender Data).
Fewer women have a voice in shaping the laws, budgets and policies that govern the nation, despite constituting more than half the population. This is more than a gap in representation; it is a profound waste of talent and potential.
Women outperform men in education, yet they remain underrepresented in leadership and influence. The result is not only the betrayal of individual ambition but a loss for the entire nation. Alongside the inequalities lies a crisis that statistics cannot fully capture. South Africa remains one of the most dangerous places in the world to be a woman. Between July and September 2024, 957 women were murdered, 1,567 survived attempted murder, 14,366 suffered assault GBH, and more than 10,000 rapes were reported to police.
When the SA Police Service released its official crime statistics for the fourth quarter of 2024/25, data on gender-based violence (GBV), including murder and assault of women and children, was omitted entirely (IOL). The message, whether intended or not, is that it has become normal. If women's pain is not even counted, how can it ever be solved? What does that omission say about us as a nation?
As a survivor of (GBV), I have seen first-hand how laws mean little without enforcement. Paper promises do not protect women; action does. GBV must be tracked and addressed with the same urgency as murder or robbery, not hidden from view. Too often, silence around this violence is normalised. A woman who has been beaten is asked: 'What did you do to deserve it?' Such questions shift blame away from perpetrators and keep women trapped in cycles of fear and shame.
Progress is not only limited by systemic barriers, sometimes, it is also shaped by how we as women treat one another. I have been fortunate to have incredible female mentors who opened doors and amplified my voice. Yet I have also felt the sting of being excluded or undermined by other women. It is not easy to admit, but these moments are real. Competition, fear and the belief there is room for only a few women at the top can quietly erode solidarity. True progress is never a solitary climb. It happens when one hand reaches back to pull another woman forward, knowing power shared is power multiplied.
If equality is truly our goal, we must challenge the patterns and choose to rise together, creating a culture where every woman's success opens the door for the next. Women must have equal access to capital, fair pay and relief from the invisible burden of unpaid care work that limits their freedom. Representation must finally reflect reality. Women are 51% of South Africa, and our boardrooms and legislatures should reflect that fact.
The women of 1956 marched because they had had enough of being ignored. They were not celebrating their power; they were claiming it. Nearly 70 years later, we must decide whether we are content with speeches and hashtags or whether we are prepared to demand something more meaningful.
We owe more than tributes and luncheons to the next generation. Somewhere in this country, a young girl is standing at the edge of her future, full of promise yet uncertain of the world that awaits her. Our responsibility is to ensure her intelligence leads to real opportunity, that her voice carries into every room where decisions are made and her safety is never negotiable.
Before we celebrate, we should pause and ask ourselves: Do we treat women as true equals in every space we occupy? Do we continue to see women through outdated notions of weakness, or do we recognise them first and foremost as equal human beings? Do we speak out against the sexism and violence that continue to shape daily life, or do we stay silent? Do we teach boys and girls a girl is a child first, before being seen through the lens of gender, and a woman's role is not confined to the kitchen or the maternity ward? Are we willing to accept a country where half the population continues to wait for its turn to lead?
The march on Pretoria was a turning point, but the work they began remains unfinished. The greatest tribute we can pay those women is not only through speeches or ceremonies, but by building a South Africa where power, opportunity and safety belong to everyone. That is the freedom they dreamed of. It is the freedom we owe to the next generation.
• Chodeva is a strategic communications and entrepreneurship specialist with more than 25 years of cross-industry experience. She is passionate about advancing equality in leadership.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The South African
3 hours ago
- The South African
Tristan Tate defends Dricus against 'racist' comments
Tristan Tate – the brother of Andrew Tate – has defended Dricus du Plessis against critics who labelled him a 'racist'. Like the former UFC Middleweight World Champion, Tristan is known for his outspoken views on farm killings, 'white genocide,' and his endorsement of US President Donald Trump. Tristan, like Andrew, is also a former professional kickboxer. On his X account, Tristan Tate defended Dricus du Plessis against his critics. Tagging the former UFC Middleweight World Champion, Tristan posted: 'The hate @dricusduplessis is getting from people is totally unjustified.' He added, 'Chin up, champ, ignore the noise'. Tristan previously defended Dricus after fellow UFC fighter Israel 'Izzy' Adesanya claimed that the South African was 'not African'. He posted: 'Saying @dricusduplessis isn't African because he's white is super racist. 'He's African and so is Elon, do none of you know basic history?'. On X, many South Africans have accused Dricus of being a 'racist' after he publicly praised US President Donald Trump, who accused South Africa of promoting a 'white genocide'. Earlier this year, the 31-year-old said of the newly re-elected statesman: 'He is amazing, and I've had the privilege of meeting him. 'He said good changes are coming. He's holding many people and countries accountable for everything, and it's amazing to see'. Dricus also gave a 'big shout out to fellow South African Elon Musk for also doing the right thing.' Dricus du Plessis has praised Donald Trump and Elon Musk for speaking out about South Africa. Images via Instagram: @ufc Dricus – who has been vocal about farm killings – also infamously criticised South African President Cyril Ramaphosa. Speaking to US interviewer Nina Drama ahead of his UFC title fight last year, the Pretoria MMA fighter accused the government of 'screwing up' the country. He said: 'It's the worst government in the world by a long shot. We are truly and exceptionally s**t…it's the most corrupt in the world.' He continued: 'Our country is beautiful, the people are amazing…..There are a lot of great people doing great work. But I have to say, the government is terrible. Do I admit the tenacity with which they screw up? It's astonishing'. Of President Cyril Ramaphosa, he added: 'He takes all the money.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
South African journalists protest against the murder of Palestinian reporters
South African journalists embarked on a protest to stand against Israel's murders of Palestinian reporters in Gaza. Image: Ayanda Ndamane/Independent Newspapers Dozens of South African journalists embarked on a protest to stand against Israel's brutal murders of Palestinian reporters in Gaza. The protest took place at Cape Town's Sea Point and was organised by Journalists Against Apartheid (JAA), in solidarity with protesters around the world who have condemned Israel's killings. This follows the assassination of six journalists, including prominent Al Jazeera correspondent Anas Al-Sharif, in a targeted attack on a media tent outside Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City on August 10. A total of 269 Palestinian journalists have been killed so far, according to Al Jazeera's data from the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), the International Federation of Journalists and The CPJ believes that at least 26 of them, including Al-Sharif, were deliberately targeted for being journalists. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Israel has for years accused Al-Sharif of being a terrorist but provided no credible evidence, according to the CPJ. JAA was formed last year in honour of the journalists who have been killed. The organisation said powerful governments failed to protect Al-Sharif from this assassination, and as a result, 'on Sunday night, Israel took away a father, husband, and son simply for doing his job'. 'Israel admitted to targeting Al-Sharif, remaining silent on the five other journalists it killed in the same attack,'' said the group. 'These journalists are an inspiration to us. They have been working in the harshest conditions for 22 months, without respite. Despite the lack of significant international action, the unfolding genocide, and forced starvation, they keep reporting on the horrors they themselves are victims of,'' JAA said. "Israel's history of false accusations against journalists is distressing. The CPJ's 2023 'Deadly Pattern' report details five claims of terrorism or militant activity against journalists killed by Israeli forces between 2004 and 2018, and how many journalists Israel has accused of being members or suspected members of militant organisations - all with questionable "evidence" or none at all." JAA spokesperson Deshnee Subramany said: 'We are enraged by Western media that have repeated Israeli lies without scrutiny while silencing Palestinian voices, permitting this genocide to continue. "Many media outlets have contributed to Israel and the United States' disinformation campaign against Palestine, flouting basic journalistic principles,'' she said, adding that the organisation demands that these media houses cease this disastrous propaganda. Subramany also condemned South African media organisations who have undertaken 'sponsored propaganda trips to Israel and published this propaganda' without declaring how these trips were funded. 'This falls far short of journalism ethics, and is shameful in a country where the media's bravery was central to dismantling apartheid. "We stand in solidarity with protesters around the world who have condemned Israel's reprehensible killings.''


Eyewitness News
6 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Marikana Massacre: SA govt receives backlash from EFF and BOSA
JOHANNESBURG – The South African government is facing criticism for its silence on the 'Marikana Massacre' as the country remembered 34 mineworkers who were gunned down by police in 2012. Saturday marked 13 years since the incident took place at the Lonmin Platinum Mine – now known as Sibanye-Stillwater - in the North West province during a wage protest Although a commission of inquiry had been conducted, no one has faced prosecution for the tragedy to date. Several organisations and political parties honoured and commemorated the lives that were lost during the tragic incident that occurred 13 years ago - and renewed their calls for accountability. For its part, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) pointed out that many families lost fathers, brothers and sons - men who were fighting for their basic human rights and for dignity. ALSO READ: The party also criticised President Cyril Ramaphosa, a shareholder at the time at Lonmin, and the African National Congress (ANC) for failing to deliver justice. Build One SA (BOSA) also called on Ramaphosa to commemorate the massacre with a National Day, in honour of those breadwinners who were killed 13 years ago. The Association of Mineworkers and Construction Union (AMCU) also reiterated their demands for justice. And the Socio-Economic Rights Institute of South Africa (SERI) emphasised that true justice could only come through successful prosecutions.