Edinburgh street named as one of UK's 'unhealthiest' in new study
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
A city centre street in the heart of Edinburgh has been named as one of the UK's unhealthiest High Streets.
The Royal Mile has landed at 16th on the list, with the tourist hotspot being singled out for being home to an astronomical number of unhealthy stores.
Chemist4U found that, on the Royal Mile, there are 123 stores that it classed as unhealthy. With 546 food-related stores in total in a 500-metre radius, this equates to 22.53 per cent being non-healthy, the Daily Record reports.
Obesity experts at Chemist4U investigated which high streets are the unhealthiest by analysing the most populated cities to see where people are most likely to be affected. They noted the number of unhealthy stores and outlets within a 500-metre radius of each one, including fast food outlets and confectioneries.
According to the results, Buchanan Street in Glasgow is the most unhealthy high street in Scotland. The iconic city street also placed at number seven on the UK-wide list.
Join Edinburgh Live's Whatsapp Community here and get the latest news sentstraight to your messages.
The experts found that 28.37 per cent of stores in a 500-metre radius of Buchanan Street are "unhealthy". According to Chemist4U, there are 99 stores with poor diet options and 349 food-related stores overall around the street.
Elsewhere, topping the overall list as the unhealthiest high street in the UK is St. Peter's Street in Derby. Within a 500-metre radius, it was found that 46.1 per cent of stores were classified as "unhealthy".
Head of Pharmacy at Chemist4U Jason Murphy commented: "It's easy to fall into unhealthy eating habits when fast food and sugary snacks are so readily available on our high streets.
"While the occasional treat is fine, regularly relying on processed foods can have long-term effects on your weight, heart health, and energy levels.
"Small, sustainable changes, such as swapping fizzy drinks for water or choosing grilled options over fried, can make a real difference. If you're unsure where to start, speak to your pharmacist."
To put together their list, the experts narrowed down the results to focus on the most populated cities in the UK. They then counted the number of unhealthy points of interest such as fast food outlets, ice cream parlours, vending machines, confectioneries, bakeries, tortilla shops, and convenience stores.
To determine the percentage of unhealthy stores surrounding each high street, they calculated the ratio of unhealthy points of interest to total food-related points of interest. This percentage allowed Chemist4U to identify the high streets with the highest concentration of unhealthy establishments.
See below for the list of the UK's 19 unhealthiest high streets. Additional information can be found on the Chemist4U website.
Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox
The UK's unhealthiest high streets
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Huge boost in fight against colon cancer: Daily over-the-counter pill already in millions of medicine cabinets PREVENTS disease, study reveals
Taking a daily aspirin could help prevent bowel cancer in thousands of people at high risk, new research suggests. A major British study has found that even a low dose of the over-the-counter drug can halve the chances of developing the disease—offering protection with fewer side effects than previously thought. The findings are particularly important for people with Lynch syndrome—an inherited condition that affects about 175,000 people in the UK. It dramatically increases the lifetime risk of bowel cancer and other types of cancer. While the NHS already recommends aspirin for those with the condition, only around a quarter are currently taking it—often due to fears over side effects such as indigestion, ulcers and kidney problems. Researchers, led by Professor Sir John Burn of Newcastle University and funded by Cancer Research UK, found that a daily dose as low as 75 to 100mg—commonly known as 'baby aspirin'—was just as effective as the 600mg dose used in previous studies. 'The trial now tells us that aspirin can prevent bowel cancer at lower doses, minimising the chances of side-effects whilst offering vital protection,' said Professor Burn. He added: 'Too many people are missing out on a potentially life-changing opportunity to prevent cancer.' Lynch syndrome is thought to be responsible for around three per cent of bowel cancer cases in the UK. People with the condition are also more likely to be diagnosed with cancer before the age of 50. As well as bowel cancer, Lynch syndrome also significantly increases the risk of other cancers—including womb, ovarian and prostate cancer. One of those to benefit from the trial is Nick James, 46, who discovered he had the condition after undergoing genetic testing. 'Finding out I had a faulty gene that causes Lynch syndrome was extremely daunting,' he said. 'But taking part in this trial has given me hope that there's something that can reduce the chances of me and others developing cancer. Following the results, experts are now calling on the NHS to update its guidelines so more people at risk can benefit from the protective effects of aspirin. Professor Sir Burn said: 'We're now engaging with the regulators to change prescribing guidelines so that aspirin can be used more widely for people with a high risk of bowel cancer. 'We have a chance to give more people with Lynch syndrome protection which would reduce their fear of bowel cancer in the future.' Bowel cancer is on the rise in younger adults, even as rates fall among older generations. People born in 1990 are three times more likely to develop bowel cancer than those born in the 1950s, according to global research. In the UK, the disease kills nearly 17,000 people a year. While the vast majority of cases still occur in over-50s, around five per cent now affect adults aged 25 to 49—and that figure is steadily climbing. The main symptoms include changes in toilet habits, such as softer stools, diarrhoea or constipation. Going more or less often than usual, blood in the stool, or a feeling that you still need to go even after just going, can also be warning signs. Cancer Research UK estimates that more than half—54 per cent—of bowel cancer cases are preventable. Known risk factors include a diet low in fibre, eating too much red or processed meat, and obesity.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Millions of women who missed out on vital cancer screening to be sent groundbreaking at home testing kits - are you eligible?
Millions of women will be offered DIY cervical screening tests they can do at home in a bid to boost uptake and cut deaths from the disease. The initiative will see women who fail to attend an in-person check sent a self-sampling kit in the post which can be returned via pre-paid mail. Those who found to have the human papillomavirus (HPV), which causes most cases of cervical cancer, will be encouraged to see a clinician. The Department of Health and Social Care said the new approach could save up to 5,000 lives a year across England. It said that the new programme 'specifically targets those groups consistently missing vital appointments' including younger women, those from minority ethnic backgrounds, people with disabilities and LGBT-plus people. The UK National Screening Committee backed the move in March, with the rollout expected to begin next January. The NHS offers cervical screening tests—previously known as smear tests—to all women aged 25-64 every three years. But many people do not take up the offer, with a number citing a lack of time, discomfort or embarrassment. Data published by the NHS last November showed five million women are not up to date with routine check-ups. Now, officials have said that at-home kits will be offered to women who have rarely or have never attended their cervical screening. Research has suggested that offering DIY testing kits could boost uptake. The YouScreen trial, which was led by King's College London in partnership with NHS England, found that offering self-sampling kits to 'under-screened' women when they attend their GP practice and by posting kits to women's homes could boost uptake in England by about 400,000 each year. Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said: 'These self-sampling kits represent healthcare that works around people's lives, not the other way around. 'They put women firmly in control of their own health, ensuring we catch more cancers at their earliest, most treatable stages. 'Our 10-year health plan will fundamentally reform the NHS, shifting focus from treating illness to preventing it before it starts. 'We know the earlier cancer is diagnosed the better the chances are of survival. 'By making screening more convenient, we're tackling the barriers that keep millions of women from potentially life-saving tests.' The test checks cells for the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV), a sexually transmitted infection that has no symptoms but is known to cause 99.7 per cent of all cervical cancers. If HPV is detected, women are invited for another check a year later, with further investigations ordered if the cells show abnormalities that could develop into cancer. Dr Anita Lim, chief investigator of the YouScreen trial from King's College London, added: 'This is a significant step forward for cervical cancer prevention and brings us closer to the NHS goal of eliminating the disease by 2040. 'The YouScreen trial, which provided self-sampling HPV kits to under-screen women in London, demonstrated that self-sampling could reach people who find it difficult to attend traditional screening—including those from diverse and underserved populations. 'It's hugely positive to see this now reflected in national policy, helping more people get protected from this highly preventable cancer.' Michelle Kane, NHS England's director of screening, added: 'There are a number of reasons that stop some women taking up the offer of screening and we hope the introduction of self-testing will encourage more women to take up this life-saving test in a way that works for them. 'I'd encourage anyone who gets an invite for a cervical screening, either from their local GP practice or the NHS App, to attend and if you have any worrying symptoms, please contact your GP. It could save your life.' The announcement comes just a fortnight after health minister Ashley Dalton told Parliament that millions of women will be invited to cervical cancer screening less frequently under NHS plans to slash unnecessary appointments. From next month, those aged 25 to 49 who test negative for HPV will only be recalled for screening every five years rather than every three. NHS England said the change will 'enable millions of women and people with a cervix in England to benefit from more personalised cervical screening'. Currently, women aged 25 to 49 in England are offered cervical screening every three years, extending to every five years for those aged 50 to 64. Beating cervical cancer must mean beating it for all says Cancer Research UK's CEO In the UK, hundreds of women die every year from cervical cancer and around 3,300 new cases are diagnosed. The mortality rate has dropped by around three quarters since the early 1970s, thanks to the success of vaccination programmes, screening, and the tireless work of NHS staff. But that progress, including NHS England's ambitious goal of eliminating the disease by 2040, could be at risk. Around 25 years ago, Cancer Research UK scientists helped uncover the link between human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer—which causes 99.7 per cent of cases. This discovery laid the foundation for modern screening and vaccination programmes, and today anyone aged 11 to 13 is eligible for vaccination in the UK. Worryingly, the number of people getting the HPV vaccine is heading in the wrong direction. Before the pandemic, around 89 per cent of year 9 girls were vaccinated, but by 2023-4, this fell to around 74 per cent. And in the same year, just 76.9 per cent of women were screened for cervical cancer by the age of 35. This falls well short of NHS England's targets of 90 per cent vaccination uptake and 80 per cent of screening uptake. This problem needs to be addressed. We know that some women receive their screening invitation and think, 'Do I really want to do this? Will it be awkward? When will I find the time?' Our own surveys show that barriers like embarrassment, worries about pain, and work commitments stop nearly 30 per cent of people from attending screening. That's why today's announcement from the Department of Health and Social Care to introduce self-sampling home kits is such an important step forward. It will help to break down some of the barriers people face and has the potential to improve participation rates in cervical screening by allowing people to take a sample in the privacy of their own home. We know this approach works. The YouScreen trial, led by Dr Anita Lim and supported by Cancer Research UK, provided HPV self-sampling test kits to over 8,000 women who were at least six months overdue for cervical screening. The results saw a 22 per cent increase in women being tested who had previously not attended screening. However, if NHS England is to reach its ambitious target-the UK government must commit to investing more in cancer research, as well as rolling out innovations, like self-sampling, to reach the people who need them most. More must be done to tackle the inequalities that still exist in our healthcare system, particularly improving access for those in deprived areas and ethnic minorities who face challenges in accessing appointments. For now, if you receive a screening invitation, or a self-sampling kit, please consider attending or using it, and encourage your loved ones to do the same. Beating cervical cancer means beating it for everyone, so I urge all parents and guardians to ensure young people don't miss out on getting the HPV vaccine. Behind the nine women diagnosed with cervical cancer in the UK every day is a person—a mother, a daughter, a friend. With bold action, we can ensure that we can bring about a world where everybody can live longer, better lives, free from the fear of cancer.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Vet bills: More pets being put down due to rising costs, BBC told
Pet owners are increasingly having their sick animals put down or they are delaying taking them for treatment to avoid spiralling vet bills, vets and animal charities have animal lovers are giving up pets to rehoming centres, while others have decided not to own any more in the future due to high costs, the BBC has been veterinary surgeons and nurses say treatment prices have been pushed up after big corporations have bought up British Veterinary Association (BVA) said the cost of care had increased for a variety of reasons and fees reflected the prices businesses needed to charge to remain financially viable and open. Hundreds of pet owners have contacted Your Voice, Your BBC News, with concerns over vet told us about her dog Dougie after File on Four Investigates revealed the "constant pressure" some vets felt to generate income. The 12-year-old Cavachon has a heart condition, but Avril says she has had to cut back on vet appointments as prices have risen every year. Now Dougie has gone deaf and Avril worries his condition may have got worse because she cut back on follow-up appointments due to the said she's gone through "a lot of soul searching", adding that at times she worries not taking him is to blame."At least I'm still hanging in there and get to keep him," she said, but added she felt "desperately sorry for those people who have given up their pet". Caroline also got in touch after paying more than £4,500 to treat her 19-year-old cat Ozzie when she was diagnosed with a brain bill was so expensive she could not afford to cremate Ozzie after the cat died - so instead she brought her home and buried her in the back garden. She said the cost of treating Ozzie, who died in 2022, was so high it has put her off owning another pet."I'm currently in my early 60s and I don't want to be 10 years down the line having to find £4,500," she said. "I don't want the emotional upset of possibly not being able to afford it and then having to ask for somebody to rehome the cat as well."Animal welfare charity Blue Cross warned increased treatment costs are a "ticking time bomb" for the welfare of pets."Access to affordable vet care has reduced and we're seeing more animals not getting the treatment they need and even being relinquished because their owners can no longer afford to keep them," said Paul Manktelow, director of veterinary services for the Cross runs a fund for people who can't afford emergency care and it's seen a 264% increase in applications in the past year, going from 1,319 in 2023 to 4,807 in 2024. The BBC has spoken to 25 veterinary surgeons, nurses and industry insiders working for a range of companies and the majority blamed higher vet bills on big companies buying up said life became "hellish" when their practice was taken over. Another said a regional manager bought them a cake when they hit their financial targets, which "went down badly" with staff, who were busy and covered in animal blood and urine at the time. Only one person did speak to us publicly because others feared never working again. Locum vet Dr Callum Ladell, who has worked at more than 250 practices, says public trust in vets has been lost and he is seeing fewer clients bringing in their animals for treatment because they are expecting a big bill."We're having cases come in, having been left for months and months, and normally, it ends up being euthanasia - putting an animal to sleep - because they can't afford the bill and because it works out cheaper than fixing them," he told the BBC. The British Veterinary Union in Unite (BVU) - which represents workers in the industry – says people are increasingly choosing to euthanise their pets due to cost pressures, even when there are other medical options available.A survey of 10,000 cat owners by the charity Cats Protection found 58% did not visit the vet as often as they would like, with cost described as the biggest barrier. Dr Ladell said he treated a friend's cat, called Elvis, who suffered a wound to his leg in sedated the cat, cleaned out the wound and stitched it up at a cost of £93.19. This didn't include his clinical time, which he estimated would have added £300 to the cat later opened up the wound – making it larger - and this time, Dr Ladell took him to the practice at which Elvis was registered, which is owned by the corporate chain CVS. The case notes and final bill, which have been seen by the BBC, showed vets treated the cat under full anaesthetic, removed tissue, reopened the wound, flushed it out, put a drain in and stitched it up. The bill came to £1, Ladell didn't criticise the quality of care received but said he feels more cost-effective treatment could have been done with an equally good outcome, particularly if the owner was not someone who could afford more than £1,000 for this "gold standard" service. CVS, which owns around 500 veterinary practices across the UK and Australia, said the two procedures were not comparable.A spokesperson said: "It would be incorrect for us to comment publicly on an individual case as we are bound by confidentiality rules. It would also be unprofessional for us to compare the high-quality treatment we offer with another member of the veterinary profession, particularly if the level of surgical intervention is very different."In 2013, only 10% of vet practices in the UK were owned by large corporate groups. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said six large corporate vet groups - IVC Evidensia, CVS, Medivet, Pets at Home, Linnaeus, and Vet Partners – now account for 60% of the for pet owners have risen as corporate ownership has increased - by more than 60% - between 2015 and 2023, figures from the CMA show. This is almost double the rate of inflation or the increase in vet salaries over that time. The CMA is currently investigating whether a lack of competition in the veterinary sector has contributed to soaring vets at practices owned by IVC Evidensia told File on Four Investigates they were monitored and subject to targets set by the said he and his colleagues were encouraged to compete against other practices owned by IVC over the number of certain procedures they carried out on animals, through what the company called "clinical challenge milestones".IVC said the health and welfare of animals was always its first priority and stressed these "clinical challenge" targets weren't financial but designed to improve the clinical care of pets. The selected procedures, it says, are all carefully chosen because they are essential to ensuring a prompt diagnosis and stabilisation of emergency patients. Corporate vet chains have said there are a variety of reasons why vet costs have increased – including advances in treatments, rising running costs and demands from pet owners for higher CMA has put forward suggestions of changes designed to make veterinary services more affordable – including price caps on medicines, prescriptions and other services like British Veterinary Association (BVA), the vet union BVC and veterinary staff all agree regulation of the industry needs to be updated. However, the BVA said the CMA's proposed remedies may have the "unintentional consequence of reducing consumer choice and potentially increasing vet fees"."If owners are concerned about cost, speak to your vet because they will always prioritise the welfare of the animal in their care and work closely with owners to find treatment plans that work for their circumstances," said British Veterinary Association president Dr Elizabeth CMA was due to publish its final report towards the end of the year, but that's been delayed by three to six months due to the volume and complexity of feedback from vets on its proposed changes. Caroline says she can't bring herself to remove the cat flap she had for Ozzie, because that completely closes off ever having a she insists that even though she loves having animals around, the cost of looking after one means she is going to "fight the urge to get another pet".
