Indian Army took less than 22 mins to teach Pak a lesson: Yogi
2
Lucknow: Chief Minister
Yogi Adityanath
on Saturday said that it was every Indian's duty to show respect towards the uniform. The CM cited several instances when Pakistan challenged India's sovereignty and how India's response forced the neighbouring country to retreat on all occasions.
Recalling the Pulwama attack, Yogi said that 22 innocent lives were lost in the Pakistan-backed terrorism. In a befitting reply, the
Indian Army
took less than 22 minutes to destroy their terror camps, showcasing India's unwavering resolve, he added. "During Operation Sindoor, Pakistan sought help from the US, and India was not just fighting Pakistan, but also Turkey, China, and other countries that had shown support for Pakistan.
However, Pakistan stood no chance in front of India's brave forces and was forced to surrender," the CM said.
Speaking at the Kargil Shaheed Smriti Vatika in Lucknow to mark the
Kargil Vijay Diwas
, he said, "The Kargil war was forced upon India by Pakistan. Despite warnings, when the infiltrators did not retreat, the then PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee took decisive action, and it was on this very day (July 26) that Vajpayee announced India's victory in the war," the CM added.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Her blood cancer has relapsed; she needs another transplant
Donate For Health
Donate Now
Undo
Yogi recalled that even then, the Pakistan president went to the US, but the Indian PM did not bow to any pressure, and Pakistan was forced to surrender in the end. He credited the endurance of India's army for showing courage in Kargil's challenging terrain with temperatures falling to minus 50 degrees Celsius, for India's victory.
He said: "Our soldiers did not retreat, which is why we won Kargil. Those who flee never succeed, and those who spread hatred in society never achieve victory."
Hitting out at the Opposition, the CM added that some people, after coming to power, attempt to damage the social fabric through politics and casteism. "Whenever we fall into the trap of such tendencies, we pay a heavy price. We have no shortage of warriors, glory, or intelligence, but at that time, some people divided the nation for their own interests, which led to the country becoming enslaved," he said.
Yogi said that even today, some political parties are working to create divisions, warning people against divisions in society.
He emphasized that the country needs to move forward unitedly to build a strong and empowered nation, making the idea of 'Ek Bharat, Shreshtha Bharat' a reality. "Kargil Vijay Diwas also gives a message of unity. The sacrifice of the brave soldiers inspires us to realize the vision of a powerful and capable India.
Today is a day to remember the great brave sons of India. On this day, India completed Operation Vijay, defeated Pakistan, and surprised the world.
We bow to the brave soldiers of India. This day is also a symbol of the valour of the Indian Army," the CM said.
He listed out the benefits given by the state govt to soldiers and their families, saying that when a soldier is martyred on duty, the state govt provides Rs 50 lakh in assistance to his family while one family member is given a govt job. Since 2017, he added, the govt also honours a martyred soldier by creating a memorial or institute, or naming a road in the soldier's village, town, or city after him. Most recently, the govt decided to provide a 20% reservation in the Uttar Pradesh Police Force for Agniveers.
During the programme, the CM honoured the families of the martyrs. The families of Captain Manoj Pandey, Lance Naik Kewlanand Dwivedi, Rifleman Sunil Jung, and Major Ritesh Sharma were present at the event.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
18 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Not found suitable: Reality of Dalit, Adivasi and OBCs in Indian universities
Various bodies governing academic institutions have established systems to ensure transparency and accountability in recruitment, promotions, and related academic activities. The teaching experience, papers published in refereed journals, research projects, and other accomplishments are the blueprints on which academic careers are built. All these 'academic' activities are not value-neutral and must be read through a socio-political prism. Often, the media highlights caste-based discrimination during recruitments/promotions. Still, nothing changes. Last week, while responding to a question from Rajya Sabha MP Manoj Jha, the Centre informed the RS that 80 per cent of the posts sanctioned in central universities for professors under the OBC category and nearly 83 per cent in the Scheduled Tribe (ST) category are currently vacant. However, there is no centralised data on 'not found suitable' (NFS). It was recently reported that the University of Delhi snubbed a scientist belonging to the SC community as NFS to be promoted as professor. Similar instances could also be found during direct recruitments for reserved positions. The Registrar of Rajasthan Central University, in a notification dated May 29, provided a list of selected candidates for teaching positions. More than 50 per cent of positions were declared 'NFS' — 11 among them belong to SC/ST/OBC and EWS (two positions) categories at various levels. The data provided fails to mention the number of women candidates from these communities who have been declared NFS. The data compiled on higher education reveals that increasing numbers of SC/ST and OBC candidates are accessing higher education institutions. So, it is not the lack of 'qualified' and eligible candidates that keeps these seats vacant. According to German philosopher Jürgen Habermas, universities carry the seeds of the reproduction of social life-worlds and hence, constant vigilance is required to unleash its transformative potential. Similarly, sociologist Pierre Bourdieu emphasised that education plays a key role in maintaining the status quo , thereby perpetuating existing social inequalities. This is apparent in the deeply hierarchical Indian society. In public institutions, due to constitutional provisions, reservation has become mandatory, but a line needs to be drawn when it comes to teaching appointments/promotions. Only through promotions will the candidates from the marginalised communities be able to become associate professors, professors, deans and heads of the departments. This is the only way to ensure their active participation in decision-making bodies. However, 'casteplaining' prevalent in academia doesn't let this happen. Recently, Bangalore University was in the news as Dalit faculty alleged that despite having served in administrative roles for several years, alongside their teaching responsibilities, they are being 'sidelined' in appointments to statutory positions and are being given only 'supervisory' roles without adequate authority or recognition. Academia involves not only the attainment of relevant knowledge but also the grasping of soft skills such as mannerisms, clothing, diction, etc. This cultural capital, or the lack of it, becomes difficult to navigate during the selection process. Women candidates lose out if their speech or body language is seen as aggressive. Such candidates seem to disturb the equanimity of the department. I was part of an interview panel to select assistant professors for a private university. A Dalit woman candidate had a good grasp of the subject matter but lacked a polished English accent. The head of the panel observed that she would not be able to 'manage' the class as her speaking skills were limited. The class had students from management and commerce backgrounds from affluent families. Hence, even after recruitment, many were asked to perform more administrative duties than classroom teaching. Another bone of contention during the selection process is the quality of publications, which are subjective in nature. The publishing field is an exclusive zone, and very few students have the wherewithal to publish in 'reputed'/'impact factor' journals. Support of the research supervisor/mentors/peer group is vital in getting published, as one needs the right academic network to get labelled a good scholar. For the past few years, UGC has published the Care List of journals, and only those publications have been given weightage. Many journals that dealt with caste, gender, marginality, exclusion, etc., were removed from the list. Often, dubious and predatory journals had a higher 'impact factor' than scholarly ones such as the Economic and Political Weekly. Many were forced to pay to get the required scores. Even after the applications are screened by a duly constituted committee, the interview panel can refuse to recognise the publications commenting on their quality, language and content. What has seldom been acknowledged in the recruitment process are the ideological affiliations of the institutions/candidates. This is also a major reason for candidates being declared NFS. In the majority of the selection committees, experts constitute a small pool, belonging to the dominant communities, while exercising their caste and gender privileges. In DU colleges, the same set of experts is called to conduct the interviews, which raises questions of impartiality and fairness of the selection process. In DU and JNU, many teachers who protested against the institution were denied promotions for many years, citing flimsy reasons. The situation in regional and state universities is even worse. Journalist and author Isabel Wilkerson succinctly observed that when an 'accident of birth' aligns with what is most valued in a given caste system — being able-bodied, male, white, or other such traits — it becomes their moral duty to develop empathy for those who must endure the indignities they have been spared. It calls for a radical kind of empathy. This implies that as a society, we need to relearn a new consciousness, to understand another's experience from their perspective, not as we imagine. Only through such engagements can we rebuild institutions based on equality and fraternity, and the objective of social justice be attained. The writer is professor in Political Science, Department of Political Science, University of Delhi. He is the author of Caste Discrimination and Exclusion in Indian Universities: A Critical Reflection (Routledge)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
21 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Congress, Chidambaram speaking Pakistan's language: Shivraj Chouhan
Union minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan on Monday accused the Congress and its leader P Chidambaram of "speaking the same language" as used by Pakistan and claimed that the Opposition was "running away" from a discussion in Parliament on Operation Sindoor out of fear of being unmasked. Speaking to reporters inside the Parliament complex, he said when the government is ready to discuss the issue then why is the Opposition running away from it. The Lok Sabha was adjourned till 2 pm on Monday amid opposition protests on the revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, delaying the start of the discussion on Operation Sindoor. A political row erupted on Monday over Chidambaram's reported remarks that the terrorists behind the Pahalgam could have been "homegrown". "It was their demand only that a discussion should be held on Operation Sindoor. And, when the government is ready for discussion, why is it running away from it? The entire Opposition is not letting a discussion on terror and terrorism. Is there a fear of being unmasked?" Chouhan said. Reacting to former home minister Chidambaram's reported remarks related to the Pahalgam terror attack in a video interview, Chouhan said, "Why is P Chidambaram saying this?" "The language in which Pakistan is speaking, the same language is being used by Chidambaram and Congress... The mask has been removed from the Opposition's face," he said, wondering if the Congress leader was asking for proof about Pakistan's hand in the attack. Chidambaram, in an interview with The Quint, said, "...for all we know they could be homegrown terrorists, why do we assume they came from Pakistan?". He, however, later said that his remarks had been taken out of context. "Trolls are of different kinds and use different tools to spread misinformation. The worst kind is a troll who suppresses the full recorded interview, takes two sentences, mutes some words, and paints the speaker in a black colour!" he wrote on X. Earlier in the day, BJP leader and former Union minister Anurag Thakur accused the Congress of casting doubts on the achievements of the Indian Army during Operation Sindoor. Speaking to PTI Videos inside the Parliament complex, he alleged, "When it comes to terrorist attacks, Pakistan is unable to defend itself, but Rahul-occupied Congress leaders are quick to take its side." Thakur said this was not the first time that Congress leaders have demanded evidence from the Indian Army while attempting to "absolve Pakistan in advance". "The country will not give dossiers anymore, it will give doses. We will not give proof, we will give coffins to terrorists," the Hamirpur MP said. Thakur said those who once promoted an anti-India narrative could not face the Indian Army during the operation, in a reference to Pakistan. "This mindset of placing doubt on our soldiers while shielding Pakistan shows the Congress' low thinking and anti-national attitude," he alleged. BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj said Chidambaram's comments were "deeply shameful", especially given his stature as a former home minister. Speaking to PTI Videos, she pointed out that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had declared the start of the Monsoon Session a celebration of Operation Sindoor's success. "And yet, someone like P Chidambaram gives such a should be ashamed," she said. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
Rajnath Singh's Big warning to Islamabad: 'If any misadventure occurs from Pakistan's side...'
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh issued a big warning to Islamabad, stating that if any 'misadventure occurs from Pakistan's side in the future, this Operation will be resumed.' Rajnath Singh made the comments during the debate over Operation Sindoor and the Pahalgam terror attack on Monday. On Operation Sindoor, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh says," On 10th May, when the Indian Air Force struck hard at multiple airfields in Pakistan, Pakistan admitted defeat and offered to cease hostilities. This offer was accepted with the caveat that this Operation has only been paused. If any misadventure occurs from Pakistan's side in the future, this Operation will be resumed..." (This is a developing story. Keep checking for more updates)
