Ongoing SC survey finds people from nomadic communities without even one govt. document
There are 51 nomadic and semi-nomadic tribes among the Scheduled Castes, while there are 23 and 47 nomadic communities among the Scheduled Tribes and backward classes, respectively, in Karnataka.
'We are coming across cases where families do not have any sort of documentation. Since they are nomadic in nature, they keep moving from place to place. In many cases, parents have died young leaving their children without any documents,' said R.V. Chandrashekar of the Bengaluru-based National Law School of India University (NLSIU), who has been deputed to the commission headed by retired Judge H.N. Nagmohan Das.
The commission is monitoring the survey that will help in determining the reservation quota for Dalit (left), Dalit (right) and others, including nomadic/ semi-nomadic communities within the larger 17 % reservation for Scheduled Castes in the State.
'Since they are migratory in nature, these families lack address proof, which is crucial in getting any of the identity documents. The same problem could be there among the nomadic and semi-nomadic communities coming under STs and BCs,' he said.
High in some districts
The enumerators have particularly found such families in Tumakuru, Raichur, Kalaburagi and Mysuru districts. In one case, a boy belonging to Sudugadu Sidda community could not get Aadhaar enrolment because his school transfer certificate (TC), which he had carefully preserved, was not accepted as address proof, since he had crossed 18.
'In a nomadic settlement in Chikkanayakanhalli, of the 18 families, we found that two families did not have any kind of documents,' Mr. Chandrashekar said.
The commission has now decided to create a separate basket for such persons. The commission has decided to separately enumerate them when they are in the booth-level camp mode that is being held from May 26 to May 28.
'As far as possible, awareness has been created among such people to attend the camp for enumeration. Since those without documents cannot be brought into the door-to-door enumeration list, Mr. Nagamohan Das has directed for a separate basket to be created to account for them,' said a source in the commission.
Director at the Directorate of Electronic Delivery of Citizen Services (EDCS), R. Yathish, who oversees Aadhaar registration in Karnataka, said that those who did not have the document can enroll themselves even now and provide the 14-digit number during the survey.
'We will ascertain if the applicant is from Karnataka or not since those residing here are eligible to participate in the survey,' he said.
The EDCS has developed a crucial app for the survey that has caught the attention of the Centre, which is set to conduct the general census in 2026.
Numbers are small
'Even if one of the family members, especially the family head, has any one document, it is good enough to participate in the survey. Though we have come across families without documents, their numbers are not big,' he said.
The ongoing survey is identifying people belonging to about 186 Scheduled Castes communities and their sub-castes for documenting their socio, economic and educational status. So far, over 20 lakh families have been enumerated out of the projected 25.72 lakh Scheduled Castes households in the State.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC order on Bihar voter roll revision vindicates concerns: CPI(ML) leader Dipankar Bhattacharya
Patna, CPI Liberation general secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya on Thursday said the Supreme Court's interim order on the ongoing Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls in Bihar has "vindicated" the concerns raised by civil society and opposition parties since the controversial drive began. SC order on Bihar voter roll revision vindicates concerns: CPI(ML) leader Dipankar Bhattacharya In a statement issued after the SC order, Bhattacharya said, "Finally, we have an interim order from the apex court in Bihar's SIR case. The order rejects the EC's stubborn refusal to heed the suggestions already made by the Supreme Court and addresses three core concerns about the practical implementation of the drive. This interim order vindicates some of the basic objections and apprehensions raised from day one since the sudden launch of the SIR". Earlier in the day, a bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi directed the EC to publish the names of the 65 lakh voters deleted from the list, along with reasons for deletion, to ensure transparency. The bench passed the order while hearing pleas challenging the June 24 EC decision to conduct the SIR of the electoral rolls in Bihar. "The issue of legality of SIR is yet to be determined by the Supreme Court. The interim order asks the EC to come clean about all the deletions with specific assigned reasons, make the information public and accessible to all electors, not routed through Booth Level Agents of political parties, and accept Aadhaar as a valid supporting document", Bhattacharya said Bhattacharya is one of the petitioners who moved the top court, seeking direction for quashing the EC order. "What happens to the 3.5 million migrant workers whose names have been removed? For people like Mintu Paswan, declared dead by the SIR, this could be a second lease of electoral life," he added. He called for the EC to take responsibility for correcting its errors, suggesting the establishment of grievance redressal camps at booth and block levels. "The scale of exclusion is massive, time is short, and most electors have been penalised without fault. "The onus of correction should also be put on the perpetrators of error. That is the principle of fairness, natural justice and transparency that the EC had invoked as guiding tenets for the SIR in its counter affidavit filed before the SC on July 21", he said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Supreme Court Permits Aadhaar-Based Claims For Bihar Voter Roll Deletions, Orders Public Disclosure
The Supreme Court has granted significant relief to Bihar voters by permitting those whose names have been removed from the draft electoral roll to file claims using their Aadhaar cards as supporting documentation. The ruling came during Thursday's hearing of a petition challenging the Election Commission's June 24 decision to conduct a Special Intensive Revision of Bihar's voter list. A bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi issued comprehensive directions requiring the Election Commission to provide extensive public disclosure of deleted voter information through multiple media channels including newspapers, radio, and television. The court emphasized the importance of transparency in the electoral process and ensuring citizens are not dependent on political parties for crucial voting information. The Supreme Court questioned the Election Commission's rationale for withholding the names of individuals whose registrations had been cancelled, particularly those who had died, migrated, or relocated to different constituencies. When informed that such lists had been shared exclusively with political parties in Bihar, the justices expressed concern about restricting public access to this vital information. The court directed the Election Commission to establish public display boards and website publications containing the names of deleted voters along with specific reasons for their removal. This measure aims to enable affected citizens to take corrective action within the stipulated 30-day period without relying on political intermediaries for information access. Following intense judicial scrutiny, the Election Commission agreed to comply with the court's demands for greater transparency in the voter deletion process. The court has mandated that the Election Commission submit a compliance report detailing implementation of these directives by August 22, demonstrating the urgency placed on resolving these electoral concerns. The legal challenge against Bihar's Special Intensive Revision was initiated by several opposition parties, including the Rashtriya Janata Dal, Congress, and the Association for Democratic Reforms. These organizations raised concerns about the potential disenfranchisement of legitimate voters through the revision process and questioned the methodology employed by the Election Commission. During previous hearings on August 13, the Supreme Court acknowledged that electoral rolls cannot remain static and require periodic updates to maintain accuracy. The court noted that the expansion of acceptable identity documents from seven to eleven for Bihar's voter list revision actually represented a voter-friendly approach rather than an exclusionary measure, contrary to opposition claims. The court's intervention addresses widespread concerns about voter suppression and ensures that legitimate voters have adequate opportunity to contest erroneous deletions from the electoral roll. By requiring Aadhaar card documentation for claims, the court has simplified the process for citizens seeking to restore their voting rights while maintaining verification standards. The directive for comprehensive media publicity serves multiple purposes, including informing affected citizens about their deletion status and providing clear pathways for remedial action. This approach recognizes that many voters may be unaware of their removal from electoral rolls until they attempt to vote during elections. The Supreme Court's emphasis on reducing citizen dependence on political parties reflects broader concerns about maintaining electoral neutrality and ensuring equal access to voting rights regardless of political affiliation. By mandating direct government communication with citizens, the court aims to eliminate potential manipulation of voter information by partisan interests. The Election Commission's agreement to implement these transparency measures represents a significant shift toward more open electoral processes in Bihar. The requirement for detailed reasons accompanying voter deletions will enable better scrutiny of the revision process and help identify any systematic issues affecting legitimate voters. The court has deferred further hearings on petitions challenging the Bihar Special Intensive Revision pending the Election Commission's compliance report, indicating satisfaction with the proposed transparency measures while maintaining judicial oversight of the process. This ruling establishes important precedents for electoral transparency across India, potentially influencing similar voter registration processes in other states. The decision balances the need for accurate electoral rolls with protection of legitimate voting rights, ensuring that administrative efficiency does not compromise democratic participation. The August 22 compliance deadline creates urgency for the Election Commission to implement these transparency measures before upcoming electoral processes, ensuring that affected voters have adequate time to address any erroneous deletions from the voter rolls.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Supreme Court Grants Relief To Bihar Voters, Allows Aadhaar-Based Appeals Against Electoral Roll Deletions
The Supreme Court delivered significant relief to Bihar voters on Thursday by ruling that individuals whose names have been removed from the state's draft electoral roll can submit appeals using their Aadhaar cards as supporting documentation. The decision came as part of a comprehensive judicial review of the Election Commission's controversial Special Intensive Revision process that has sparked widespread political opposition. A two-judge bench consisting of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi issued detailed directives requiring the Election Commission to extensively publicize lists of deleted voters along with specific justifications for their removal through newspapers, radio, and television channels. This ruling addresses growing concerns about voter disenfranchisement and ensures greater transparency in the electoral process. The court's intervention emerged during hearings on petitions challenging the Election Commission's June 24 decision to conduct the Special Intensive Revision of Bihar's voter registration database. Opposition parties, including the Rashtriya Janata Dal, Congress, and the Association for Democratic Reforms, had raised serious concerns about the methodology and potential impact on legitimate voters' rights. During Thursday's proceedings, the Supreme Court questioned the Election Commission's practice of restricting access to deleted voter information, particularly when such data had already been shared with political parties in the state. The justices expressed concern about this selective disclosure approach, emphasizing that citizens should not be dependent on political organizations to access information crucial to their voting rights. The court specifically challenged the Election Commission's reluctance to publicly disclose the names of individuals who had died, migrated, or shifted constituencies, asking why such information could not be displayed on public boards or official websites. The justices stressed that affected voters should have access to remedial measures within the statutory 30-day period without requiring political party intervention. Following intensive judicial questioning, the Election Commission agreed to comply with the court's transparency requirements and committed to sharing comprehensive lists of deleted voters from Bihar's Special Intensive Revision. The court has mandated submission of a detailed compliance report by August 22, demonstrating the urgency attached to resolving these electoral concerns. The legal challenge reflects broader anxieties about potential voter suppression through administrative processes. Opposition parties have argued that the revision methodology could disproportionately affect certain demographic groups and legitimate voters who may lack access to comprehensive documentation or awareness of the revision process. The Supreme Court addressed these concerns by acknowledging that electoral rolls cannot remain permanently static and require periodic updates to maintain accuracy. However, the court distinguished between necessary administrative updates and potentially exclusionary practices that might disenfranchise eligible voters. In a previous hearing on August 13, the court noted that expanding acceptable identity documents from seven to eleven for Bihar's voter list revision actually represented a voter-friendly approach rather than an exclusionary measure. This observation contradicted opposition claims that the revision process was designed to restrict voting access. The court's decision to allow Aadhaar card-based appeals significantly simplifies the process for affected voters seeking to restore their registration status. This approach recognizes Aadhaar as a widely accessible form of identification while maintaining reasonable verification standards for electoral integrity. The directive for comprehensive media publicity serves multiple purposes beyond mere transparency. It ensures that affected citizens receive direct notification about their deletion status and provides clear guidance on available remedial procedures. This approach reduces information asymmetries that could prevent legitimate voters from exercising their democratic rights. The Supreme Court's emphasis on reducing citizen dependence on political parties for electoral information reflects broader constitutional principles about electoral neutrality and equal access to democratic participation. By mandating direct government communication with citizens, the court aims to eliminate potential partisan manipulation of voter information. The Election Commission's agreement to implement enhanced transparency measures represents a significant shift in administrative approach to voter registration management. The requirement for detailed explanations accompanying voter deletions will enable better public scrutiny of revision processes and help identify systematic issues affecting legitimate voters. The court has postponed further hearings on petitions challenging Bihar's Special Intensive Revision pending the Election Commission's compliance report, indicating provisional satisfaction with proposed transparency measures while maintaining judicial oversight of implementation. This ruling establishes important precedents for electoral administration across India, potentially influencing similar voter registration processes in other states. The decision demonstrates judicial commitment to balancing administrative efficiency with protection of fundamental voting rights in democratic processes.
