Frito-Lay closes plant in Rancho Cucamonga
The plant has been a major employer in the area since opening in 1970, staffing thousands over its 55-year run.
The facility also gained cultural significance as the birthplace of Flamin' Hot Cheetos, which were introduced in 1991, though the origin story has been the subject of litigation.
Frito-Lay is owned by parent company PepsiCo Foods U.S., which confirmed the shutdown of manufacturing operations at the site.
'We are truly grateful for all the support over the last five decades from our Rancho Cucamonga manufacturing team as well as the local community,' the company said in a statement Monday. 'We are committed to supporting those impacted through this transition and we are offering pay and benefits to impacted employees.'
The company did not specify how many employees were affected.
Former workers posted on social media that they were given 10 weeks of severance pay.
The abrupt nature of the closure left employees scrambling to figure out their next steps.
'I was supposed to get married this year, now I have to find a new job or at least figure a way to survive,' one laid-off worker said on Reddit.
The Employment Development Department confirmed that Frito-Lay had not filed a Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification, or WARN, with the state, which typically requires employers to give 60 days advance notice of mass layoffs.
The Rancho Cucamonga closure is part of a broader pattern of PepsiCo facility shutdowns. Earlier this year, the company announced the closure of a Frito-Lay plant in Liberty, N.Y., laying off 287 workers, and cut 56 jobs at a warehouse in Maryland.
The closures come as PepsiCo faces declining snack sales. In its most recent earnings call, chief executive Ramon Laguarta said the company was 'right-sizing the cost' of its snacks division after Frito-Lay sales volume dropped slightly in the first quarter.
Warehouse, distribution, fleet and transportation services will continue to operate out of the facility.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
16 minutes ago
- New York Post
Costco's Pepsi-to-Coke switch goes viral as members sound off
Costco's decision to switch from Pepsi to Coca-Cola became a viral conversation when the membership warehouse club announced it was making the swap from one carbonated soft drink to the other. Members were mixed on social media as the swap was finalized by Tuesday, with some saying on a Reddit thread that 'Pepsi tastes like flat Coca Cola' and 'Hot dogs don't taste the same anymore without Pepsi.' Advertisement 'If this isn't a sign of the apocalypse then I don't know what is,' another person posted on X. Others, however, welcomed the change, which began rolling out across Costco warehouses in early July, posting on X that 'Coke is so much better.' The company previously noted that all of its food courts will offer Coca-Cola products by the fall. Costco CEO Ron Vachris said in January the company would be 'converting our food court fountain business back over to Coca-Cola' this summer. The company has offered Pepsi products since 2013. Advertisement 3 Costco's food courts have started switching from Pepsi to Coca-Cola. Getty Images 3 Costco members had mixed reactions to the soda switch. AFP via Getty Images 3 The rollout of Coca-Cola products began in early July. jetcityimage – Food courts are one of the company's many ancillary businesses, which are credited for encouraging members to make trips to the warehouse retailer more often. Advertisement Manhattan-based psychotherapist Jonathan Alpert told FOX Business that this struck a nerve with so many because they saw it as more than a simple soda swap. 'Coke vs. Pepsi has always been a cultural dividing line, like Yankees vs. Red Sox or Apple vs. PC,' he said. 'People attach memories, family traditions, and even a sense of who they are to a brand. So when Costco suddenly took sides, it triggered a reaction far bigger than soda itself.'
Boston Globe
10 hours ago
- Boston Globe
The chatbot updated. Users lost a friend.
On Aug. 7, OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, released a new version of its chatbot, called GPT-5. This version, the company said, would allow for deeper reasoning, while 'minimizing sycophancy' — the chatbot's tendency to be overly agreeable. Advertisement Users weren't having it. People immediately found its responses to be less warm and effusive than GPT-4o, OpenAI's primary chatbot before the update. On social media, people were especially angry that the company had cut off access to the previous chatbot versions to streamline its offerings. 'BRING BACK 4o,' a user named very_curious_writer wrote in a Q&A forum that OpenAI hosted on Reddit. 'GPT-5 is wearing the skin of my dead friend.' Sam Altman, OpenAI's CEO, replied, saying: 'What an…evocative image,' before adding that 'ok we hear you on 4o, working on something now.' Hours later, OpenAI restored access to GPT-4o and other past chatbots, but only for people with subscriptions, which start at $20 a month. Schmidt became a paying customer. 'It's $20 — you could get two beers,' he said, 'so might as well subscribe to ChatGPT if it does you some good.' Advertisement Markus Schmidt, a composer and one of many ChatGPT users who was disappointed when OpenAI released a new version of its chatbot, called GPT-5, in Paris on Aug. 18. ELLIOTT VERDIER/NYT Tech companies constantly update their systems, sometimes to the dismay of users. The uproar around ChatGPT, however, went beyond complaints about usability or convenience. It touched on an issue unique to artificial intelligence: the creation of emotional bonds. The reaction to losing the GPT-4o version of ChatGPT was actual grief, said Dr. Nina Vasan, a psychiatrist and the director of Brainstorm, a lab for mental health innovation at Stanford University. 'We, as humans, react in the same way whether it's a human on the other end or a chatbot on the other end,' she said, 'because, neurobiologically, grief is grief, and loss is loss.' GPT-4o had been known for its sycophantic style, flattering its users to the point that OpenAI had tried to tone it down even before GPT-5's release. In extreme cases, people have formed romantic attachments to GPT-4o or have had interactions that led to delusional thinking, divorce and even death. The extent to which people were attached to GPT-4o's style seems to have taken even Altman by surprise. 'I think we totally screwed up some things on the rollout,' he said at a dinner with journalists in San Francisco on Thursday. 'There are the people who actually felt like they had a relationship,' he said. 'And then there were the hundreds of millions of other people who don't have a parasocial relationship with ChatGPT, but did get very used to the fact that it responded to them in a certain way and would validate certain things and would be supportive in certain ways.' Advertisement (The New York Times has sued OpenAI for copyright infringement; OpenAI has denied those claims.) Altman estimated that people with deep attachments to GPT-4o accounted for less than 1 percent of OpenAI's users. But the line between a relationship and someone's seeking validation can be difficult to draw. Gerda Hincaite, a 39-year-old who works at a collection agency in southern Spain, likened GPT-4o to having an imaginary friend. 'I don't have issues in my life, but still, it's good to have someone available,' she said. 'It's not a human, but the connection itself is real, so it's OK as long as you are aware.' Julia Kao, a 31-year-old administrative assistant in Taiwan, became depressed when she moved to a new city. For a year, she saw a therapist, but it wasn't working out. 'When I was trying to explain all those feelings to her, she would start to try to simplify it,' she said about her therapist. 'GPT-4o wouldn't do that. I could have 10 thoughts at the same time and work through them with it.' Kao's husband said he noticed her mood improving as she talked to the chatbot and supported her using it. She stopped seeing her therapist. But when GPT-5 took over, she found it lacked the empathy and care she had relied on. 'I want to express how much GPT-4o actually helped me,' Kao said. 'I know it doesn't want to help me. It doesn't feel anything. But still, it helped me.' Dr. Joe Pierre, a professor of psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco, who specializes in psychosis, notes that some of the same behaviors that are helpful to people — like Kao — could lead to harm in others. Advertisement 'Making AI chatbots less sycophantic might very well decrease the risk of AI-associated psychosis and could decrease the potential to become emotionally attached or to fall in love with a chatbot,' he said. 'But, no doubt, part of what makes chatbots a potential danger for some people is exactly what makes them appealing.' OpenAI seems to be struggling with creating a chatbot that is less sycophantic while also serving the varying desires of its more than 700 million users. ChatGPT was 'hitting a new high of daily users every day,' and physicists and biologists are praising GPT-5 for helping them do their work, Altman said Thursday. 'And then you have people that are like: 'You took away my friend. This is evil. You are evil. I need it back.'' By Friday afternoon, a week after it rolled out GPT-5, OpenAI announced yet another update: 'We're making GPT-5 warmer and friendlier based on feedback that it felt too formal before.' After OpenAI pulled GPT-4o, the Reddit commenter who described GPT-5 as wearing the skin of a dead friend canceled her ChatGPT subscription. On a video chat, the commenter, a 23-year-old college student name June who lives in Norway, said she was surprised how deeply she felt the loss. She wanted some time to reflect. 'I know that it's not real,' she said. 'I know it has no feelings for me, and it can disappear any day, so any attachment is like: I gotta watch out.' This article originally appeared in .
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reddit, Roku, Remitly, Coinbase, and Udemy Stocks Trade Down, What You Need To Know
What Happened? A number of stocks fell in the afternoon session after investor apprehension intensified ahead of a key policy speech and perplexing inflation signals clouded the economic outlook, leading to a wider market retreat from growth-oriented stocks. The downturn in the market was largely attributed to a significant sell-off in megacap tech and chipmaker shares. Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices (AMD), and Broadcom all saw notable drops, dragging down the VanEck Semiconductor ETF. Other major tech-related companies like Tesla, Meta Platforms, and Netflix were also under pressure. A key reason for this trend is that much of the recent market gains have been concentrated in the "AI trade," which includes these large technology and semiconductor companies. So this could also mean that some investors are locking in some gains ahead of more definitive feedback from the Fed. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Among others, the following stocks were impacted: Social Networking company Reddit (NYSE:RDDT) fell 6.4%. Is now the time to buy Reddit? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Consumer Subscription company Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU) fell 3.6%. Is now the time to buy Roku? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Financial Technology company Remitly (NASDAQ:RELY) fell 4.9%. Is now the time to buy Remitly? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Financial Technology company Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) fell 5.6%. Is now the time to buy Coinbase? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Consumer Subscription company Udemy (NASDAQ:UDMY) fell 3.4%. Is now the time to buy Udemy? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. Zooming In On Reddit (RDDT) Reddit's shares are extremely volatile and have had 61 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business. The previous big move we wrote about was 6 days ago when the stock gained 5.4% on the news that markets continued to rally as the latest inflation data reinforced expectations for a Federal Reserve rate cut as soon as September. The latest Consumer Price Index (CPI) report for July showed inflation holding steady, reinforcing market expectations that the Federal Reserve could begin cutting interest rates as soon as September. Lower interest rates generally stimulate the economy by making borrowing cheaper for consumers and businesses. This can lead to increased consumer spending and e-commerce activity, which directly benefits online retail and marketplace companies. The positive economic outlook fueled a broad-based rally, pushing the S&P 500 and Nasdaq to new record highs and lifting most growth-oriented technology stocks. Reddit is up 37.6% since the beginning of the year, and at $228.31 per share, it is trading close to its 52-week high of $246.50 from August 2025. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Reddit's shares at the IPO in March 2024 would now be looking at an investment worth $4,526. Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) semiconductor stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report on our favorite semiconductor growth story. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
