WeightWatchers files for bankruptcy - what went wrong?
The diet brand, which was founded more than 60 years ago, said on Tuesday that it was filing to write off $1.15bn of debt and to focus on transitioning into a remote telehealth services provider.
Founded in 1963 by American businesswoman Jean Nidetch, the company aims to help members monitor their diets by using a points system, with the goal to try and avoid foods with higher points.
At its peak in 2018, WeightWatchers had 4.5 million subscribers, and its stock traded as high as $100 (£75). But it has since lost value and rebranded to become WW International.
So what is behind the slimming down of WeightWatchers?
Its overall revenue for the 2024 financial year was $786m (£592m), down 11.7% on the previous year.
The report said the decline was "primarily driven" by recruitment challenges and the closure of the consumer products business.
While the company also sells a range of ready meals, snacks and low-calorie wines, it has been primarily focused on subscribers.
Big names leaving the brand
In September, WW International CEO Sima Sistani resigned, and Tara Comonte was named interim chief executive.
In a statement on Tuesday, she said: "As the conversation around weight shifts toward long-term health, our commitment to delivering the most trusted, science-backed, and holistic solutions -grounded in community support and lasting results - has never been stronger, or more important."
In another blow to the company, Oprah Winfrey, a long-time ambassador, quit the WeightWatchers board last year.
In March 2024 the television personality announced she had quit ahead of the airing of a special programme titled An Oprah Special: Shame, Blame And The Weight Loss Revolution, saying she did not want a "perceived conflict of interest," as she wanted to publicly discuss her use of weight-loss medication.
She said she had donated all of her shares in the company to the Smithsonian Museum Of African American History And Culture.
Targeting the younger generation
The company has also struggled to attract younger customers.
In an attempt to do so in 2018, WeightWatchers bought the app Kurbo.
A year later, it launched the platform to the public, aimed at helping children aged between eight and 17 create healthy habits.
The app followed a paediatric weight control programme made by Stanford University and offered 15-minute personal training sessions as a way to log food intake and recipes.
However, it was met with criticism by celebrities, including actress and activist Jameela Jamil, nutritionists and members of the public, who raised concerns it would make children obsessed with weight and counting calories.
1:22
The influence of weight loss injections
WeightWatchers has also been struggling to keep up as a key player in the industry due to the introduction of effective weight loss drugs, including Wegovy, created by Danish pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk.
The drug soared in popularity by offering a quicker fix to obesity, which is a growing health concern around the globe.
Some people also take Ozempic to lose weight.
The medication, also used to treat Type 2 diabetes, slows down how quickly food is digested and can reduce appetite, making people eat less.
Both Ozempic and Wegovy are different brand names for the same injectable drug, semaglutide. The drug works by making you feel fuller for longer.
To try and compete with the booming industry, WeightWatchers bought subscription-based telehealth platform Sequence in 2023 to expand into obesity drug prescriptions.
In its latest earnings report on Tuesday, WeightWatchers' first-quarter revenue declined 10% while its loss on an adjusted basis totalled 47 cents per share.
However, it clinical subscription revenue - or weight-loss medications - jumped 57% year over year to $29.5m.
WW International has said it expects to emerge from bankruptcy within 45 days, if not sooner.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
MAGA billionaire announces he's backing new school in four states with VERY apt name
Billionaire Bill Ackman is continuing his charge to change education in America as he's backing new, AI-assisted 'Alpha Schools' in four states. While much of Ackman's activism has been aimed at rooting DEI and ' woke ideology' out of the Ivy League schools that helped make him, Alpha Schools are aimed at K-12 education. Alpha Schools already exist in Texas, Florida and California and are coming to four states this fall, including a Manhattan campus, heading to Ackman's backyard, where he will become an ambassador. The schools use artificial intelligence and teachers are known as 'guides' - many of whom don't have traditional teaching backgrounds - who help 'speed-teach' two hour lessons to students. They claim that the two-hour, AI-software backed lessons teach students twice as much than a traditional school. Children are still kept active in the afternoons with 5-mile bikerides and AI-generated plans that allow children to explore personal hobbies and teaching practical skills like entrepreneurship, public speaking and financial literacy, according to WSJ. Ackman, whom some have hailed as the new Warren Buffett, hailed the program on social media: 'The first truly breakthrough innovation in K-12 education that I have seen since the Kipp Academy.' 'The bottom line: Alpha kids love school and have incredible outcomes.' While much of Ackman's activism has been aimed at rooting DEI and ' woke ideology' out of the Ivy League schools that helped make him, Alpha Schools are aimed at K-12 education Co-founder Mackenzie Price noted that social issues and politics are not allowed in her classrooms. 'We do not let anything - political, social issues - come in the way. We stay very much out of that,' she said. The schools are charging 'founding families' anywhere from $45,000 to $60,000 a year for tuition. Unsurprisingly, liberal teachers union head Randi Weingarten is not a fan of Price's ideas. 'Students and our country need to be in relationship with other human beings. When you have a school that is strictly A.I., it is violating that core precept of the human endeavor and of education,' she told The New York Times. Ackman has long been at odds with Harvard, criticizing the university for not doing enough to protect students from antisemitism. Early last year he launched an unsuccessful bid to get four candidates on the ballot for a governing board. The financier runs New York-based hedge fund firm Pershing Square Capital Management and has been a vocal supporter of Trump's policies on tariffs and spending. Harvard is 'a collection of buildings, nice real estate' located in Cambridge, Massachusetts next to the Charles River, he said. But its cutting-edge faculty, researchers and students could easily move elsewhere, he said. 'This is the best time in history to start a university.' He also again hit out at the school's governing board, saying it has become insular and that there is no mechanism to remove members the way there is in corporate America where investors can run board challenges.
Reuters
30 minutes ago
- Reuters
Elon Musk must face lawsuit claiming he ran illegal $1 million election lottery
Aug 20 (Reuters) - Elon Musk was ordered on Wednesday by a federal judge to face a lawsuit by voters accusing the world's richest person of defrauding them into signing a petition to support the U.S. Constitution for a chance to win his $1 million-a-day giveaway. U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman in Austin, Texas said Jacqueline McAferty plausibly alleged in her proposed class action that Musk and his political action committee America PAC wrongly induced her to provide personal identifying information as part of the giveaway, late in the 2024 election campaign. Lawyers for Musk and America PAC did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Musk founded America PAC to support Republican Donald Trump's successful 2024 presidential run. McAferty, an Arizona resident, said Musk and America PAC induced voters in seven battleground states to sign his petition by promising that $1 million recipients would be chosen randomly, as in a lottery, though the voters had no real chance to collect. She said voters who signed were also required to provide names, addresses, email addresses and phone numbers. In seeking a dismissal, Musk listed several "red flags" as proof he had not run an illegal lottery. He said these included statements that the $1 million recipients were "selected to earn" the money and expected to become America PAC spokespeople, defeating the idea that the payment was a "prize." But the judge cited other statements suggesting the defendants were "awarding" the $1 million, and the money could be "won." "It is plausible that plaintiff justifiably relied on those statements to believe that defendants were objectively offering her the chance to enter a random lottery--even if that is not what they subjectively intended to do," Pitman wrote. The judge was appointed to the bench by President Barack Obama in 2014. Musk had also rejected the suggestion that petition signers suffered harm by providing contact information. Pitman said an expert in political data brokerage could testify what that information was worth for voters in battleground states. The lawsuit was filed on Election Day, Nov. 5, 2024. A day earlier, a Philadelphia judge refused to end Musk's giveaway, saying that city's top prosecutor failed to show it was an illegal lottery. Musk is a Texas resident, and his electric car company Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab is based in Austin. The case is McAferty v Musk et al, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, No. 24-01346.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Costco just made a major change to its food court drinks
Costco has finalized its transition from selling Pepsi products to exclusively Coca-Cola products in its food courts nationwide. The change has generated a mixed reaction among customers, with some expressing disappointment over the loss of Pepsi and others welcoming the return of Coca-Cola. Costco had previously offered Coca-Cola before switching to Pepsi products in 2013, a move reportedly made to maintain the $1.50 price of its popular hot dog combo. The wholesaler's CEO, Ron Vachris, confirmed in January that the company would be converting its food court fountain business back to Coca-Cola. The shift has been noted as triggering a strong customer reaction, reflecting the cultural significance and personal attachment many have to either the Coca-Cola or Pepsi brand.
