US-Europe standoff: new geopolitical order challenging BRI
The writer is a PhD scholar of Semiotics and Philosophy of Communication at Charles University Prague. Email her at shaziaanwer@yahoo.com
Listen to article
The world is not only witnessing rapid geopolitical developments but also surprising ones, leading to varied interpretations. This uncertainty makes it essential to parse public narratives before deciphering the hidden catalysts driving these shifts.
An EU-US rift regarding "global settings" has re-emerged. The last notable phase of this divide was when former German Chancellor Angela Merkel attempted to persuade Trump 1.0 over the Ukraine war.
While the EU currently pushes for continued war, the US advocates for a negotiated settlement centring a rare-earth minerals deal. Beneath the surface lies burden sharing. The transatlantic alliance seeks to divide global responsibilities - with the EU managing previous ventures and the US marching towards the Asia-Pacific. However, a key disagreement persists.
Some European leaders, such as Estonia's Kaja Kallas, support neutralising Russia first and believe that handling Moscow effectively will help counter China. "If we will do Russia right, we will do China right," insists Kallas. However, the US wants to shift its posture towards China immediately, viewing its global rise as an imminent threat while offloading the Ukraine conflict in Brussels.
The US is seemingly exploring ways to weaken Russia's alignment with China by reinforcing its dependency on Western systems like SWIFT, reinstating business ties and defrosting assets. Donald Trump has himself admitted, "The stupidity of what they've done, I'm going to have to un-unite them and I think I can do that too. I have to un-unite them."
This approach has long existed within US foreign policy circles. When US Secretary of State Marco Rubio was a senator, he suggested a potential Russia partnership to isolate China geopolitically and economically. Both Biden and Trump administrations followed suit. Trump has explicitly linked this strategy to preserving the dollar's supremacy, stating, "If we lose the dollar as the standard, that's like losing a war." Consequently, he has threatened 100% tariffs on BRICS nations and others pursuing de-dollarisation in trade. This reveals that Trump's strategy is not about peace. His administration appears to be replicating Nixon's 1972 playbook which exploited the Sino-Soviet split to weaken the USSR.
The "reverse Nixon" or "reverse Kissinger" approach references the secret 1971 trip that Henry Kissinger made to Beijing to facilitate US-China rapprochement and exacerbate the Soviet-China tensions. A similar strategy in Trump's first term was hindered by the Russia-gate hoax. This is why he has now assembled a team of neoconservatives and China hawks, like Marco Rubio as Secretary of State, Mike Waltz as National Security Advisor and Pete Hegseth as Defence Secretary.
However, this strategy will probably fail since unlike the Cold War-era Sino-Soviet tensions, Russia and China currently share deeper economic and strategic ties. While the Trump administration may try to reorient Russia westward, Moscow is unlikely to abandon its Beijing partnership, and the US may further unite these powers.
An economic war within a hybrid-strategy framework might occur. The first target might be China's supply chain infrastructure like the BRI and associated development projects. Terrorist and proxy attacks are already hampering CPEC. Additionally, Western-backed NGOs possibly disrupting BRI projects under the guise of social and environmental concerns is a tested tactic.
Governments in Africa and Europe will be constantly pressured to withdraw from BRI, and colour revolutions or coups in non-compliance cases cannot be ruled out. Ultimately, Washington's current geopolitical manoeuvring is less about global stability and more about maintaining supremacy in an increasingly multipolar world. The question remains: will the new multipolar global order evolve beyond America's traditional divide-and-conquer strategies?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Oil prices climb on US-China trade deal
NEW YORK: Oil prices rose 2% on Wednesday, to their highest in more than two months, as President Donald Trump said the US had a trade deal with China, feeding hopes for the outlook for energy demand in the world's two largest economies. Brent crude futures rose $1.32, or 1.97%, to $68.19 a barrel at 11:35 a.m. EDT (1535 GMT). US West Texas Intermediate crude was up $1.51, or 2.32%, to $66.49. Both Brent and WTI reached their highest in more than two months. Trump said Beijing would supply magnets and rare earth minerals and the US will allow Chinese students in its colleges and universities. Trump added the deal is subject to final approval by him and President Xi Jinping. The trade-related downside risk in oil has been temporarily removed, although the market reaction has been tepid as it is not clear how economic growth and global oil demand will be affected, PVM analyst Tamas Varga said. Trump said he was less confident that Iran would agree to stop uranium enrichment in a nuclear deal with Washington, according to an interview released on Wednesday. Iran threatened to strike US bases in the Middle East if nuclear negotiations fail and conflict arises with Washington. Ongoing tension with Iran means its oil supplies are likely to remain curtailed by sanctions. Supplies will still increase, as OPEC+ plans to boost oil production by 411,000 barrels per day in July as it looks to unwind production cuts for a fourth straight month. 'Greater oil demand within OPEC+ economies – most notably Saudi Arabia – could offset additional supply from the group over the coming months and support oil prices,' said Capital Economics' analyst Hamad Hussain in a note. In the US, crude inventories fell by 3.6 million barrels to 432.4 million barrels last week, the Energy Information Administration said on Wednesday. Analysts polled by Reuters had expected a draw of 2 million barrels. Product supplied for motor gasoline, a proxy for demand, rose by about 907,000 barrels per day last week, to 9.17 million bpd. US consumer prices increased less than expected in May, deepening the conviction in financial markets that the Federal Reserve will start cutting interest rates by September. Lower interest rates can spur economic growth and demand for oil.
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
PARTLY FACETIOUS: Why did FBR Chairman cancel usual press conference after budget speech?
'A universal rule prevails: lessons need not be learned if they go counter to a declared strategy.' 'I would have you know I do learn lessons - if my strategy is not working, I adjust….' 'I was not referring to a common person like you, but politicians.' 'OK but do the selected qualify as politicians?' 'Of course, once you jump into the cesspit, the cesspit owns you.' 'You haven't heard of any successful rescue missions that have extracted individuals from the cesspit?' 'Not in the cesspit of politics. Anyway, if you were referring to the Budget presented on Tuesday being the same o same o, then let me assure you that the numbers game was won even more conclusively this time, almost as conclusively as the West was won.' 'Pretty dated comment, isn't it.' 'I don't understand…' 'Today the West does not bring to mind cowboys but refers to a US- led alliance which we are wooing or trying to woo and…' 'China will have to change its immigration and investment laws and….' 'Shut up, the Finance Minister said that the FBR collected 390 billion rupees from enforcement measures and next fiscal year would bring in much more and…' 'So then, why did the FBR Chairman cancel the usual press conference after the budget speech?' 'He must have developed a medical condition, but nonetheless I would urge the Finance Minister to verify it as he then over-exposed himself by giving interviews on several channels. A word of advice: give interviews after the post budget press conference.' 'That's the politician's way - any opportunity for exposure even if it goes into the realm of over exposure must be seized with both…both…' 'Hands?' 'I would go a step further, seize the opportunity with all limbs. Anyway, when I said lessons are not learned by politicians I wasn't referring to the locals but to Western politicians. Ursula von der Leyen announced the eighteenth sanction package against Russia. Shouldn't someone ask her what she reckons the eighteenth would achieve if the first seventeen did not work? Russia's growth was over 4 percent in 2024 while that of all Europeans countries floundered…' 'The number 18 brings to mind the intent to levy a tax on the traders.' 'Or the attempt to actually cut government expenditure instead of relying on a lower discount rate to reduce outlay.' 'As I said, politicians never abandon a strategy no matter how many times it fails.' Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
US, China reach deal to ease export curbs
WASHINGTON/LONDON: A deal getting the fragile truce in the US-China trade war back on track is done, US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday, after negotiators from Washington and Beijing agreed on a framework covering tariff rates. The deal also removes Chinese export restrictions on rare earth minerals and allows Chinese students access to American universities. Trump took to his social media platform to offer some of the first details to emerge from two days of marathon talks held in London that had, in the words of US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, put 'meat on the bones' of an agreement reached last month in Geneva to ease bilateral retaliatory tariffs that had reached crushing triple-digit levels. 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me,' Trump said on the Truth Social platform. 'Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!). We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%.' A White House official said the 55% represents the sum of a baseline 10% 'reciprocal' tariff Trump has imposed on goods imported from nearly all US trading partners; 20% on all Chinese imports because of punitive measures Trump has imposed on China, Mexico and Canada associated with his accusation that the three facilitate the flow of the opioid fentanyl into the US; and finally pre-existing 25% levies on imports from China that were put in place during Trump's first term in the White House. Lutnick said the 55% rate for Chinese imports is now fixed and unalterable. Asked on Wednesday on CNBC if the tariff levels on China would not change, he said: 'You can definitely say that.' Still, many specifics of the deal and details for how it would be implemented remain unclear. China's commerce ministry did not immediately reply to a request for comment and more information.
