logo
Walter Sofronoff had no ‘corrupt, dishonest or malicious motive' in leaking Lehrmann inquiry report, lawyer argues

Walter Sofronoff had no ‘corrupt, dishonest or malicious motive' in leaking Lehrmann inquiry report, lawyer argues

The Guardian5 days ago
Former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff sincerely believed he was acting for the public good when he leaked his report on the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann to two journalists before it was made public, the federal court has heard.
Hearings began on Monday into Sofronoff's legal challenge to findings by the Australian Capital Territory's corruption watchdog that he had engaged in 'serious corrupt conduct' by leaking the report of his investigation into the Lehrmann case to Janet Albrechtsen at the Australian and Elizabeth Byrne at the ABC, ahead of its official release.
There was 'overwhelming evidence that Mr Sofronoff genuinely believed he was acting in the public good', and attempting to aid accuracy of media reportage, his counsel Adam Pomerenke KC told the court.
'Even if Mr Sofronoff was wrong in his view, the fact remains that he genuinely and honestly held it. This is not a corrupt, dishonest or malicious motive. At worst, it could be characterised as an erroneous attempt to ensure accuracy and transparency in public discourse. That cannot rationally be described as corrupt,' Pomerenke said.
Bruce Lehrmann was accused of raping Brittany Higgins in the ministerial office of senator Linda Reynolds at Parliament House in 2019. He denied those allegations. A 2022 criminal trial was aborted because of juror misconduct, and prosecutors decided against a re-trial.
Sofronoff was appointed by the ACT government to determine whether the investigation into the aborted Lehrmann trial had been affected by political influence or interference. His report ruled out political influence or interference but made 'serious findings of misconduct' against prosecutor Shane Drumgold, which were partially overturned in March 2024.
The ACT Integrity Commission launched an investigation in May 2024 to determine whether Sofronoff acted corruptly in leaking the confidential documents.
The commission's findings, known as the Juno report, said Sofronoff claimed his conduct 'complied with the requirements of the Inquiries Act' and that, in leaking the documents, he had 'acted in the public interest to ensure the media were adequately informed' about his inquiry and 'in a position to comment accurately' about it.
The commission found that Sofronoff 'had not, in fact, acted in good faith', that his actions 'undermined the integrity of the Board's processes and the fairness and probity of its proceedings to such an extent as to have been likely to have threatened public confidence in the integrity of that aspect of public administration. It therefore constituted serious corrupt conduct.'
Sofronoff rejected a characterisation by the ACT Integrity Commission in its findings that he had become 'a fellow traveller' of Albrechtson, Pomerenke told the court.
The phrase was first used to describe Sofronoff by Justice Stephen Kaye when finding in March 2024 that Sofronoff's extensive communications with Albrechtson had given rise to an impression of bias against prosecutor Shane Drumgold during the inquiry into the Lehrmann trial.
The concept of the 'fellow traveller' being redeployed in the context of the Juno report was 'simply unrecognisable'; it was 'a meaningless slogan' with no clear definition, and 'seriously problematic' when used in that way, Pomerenke told the court on Monday.
'What is it supposed to mean? Is it that Mr Sofronoff shared an actual opinion or belief [with Janet Albrechtson]? If so, what is the opinion or belief that he actually shared? None is identified. And how could that opinion or belief rationally lead Mr Sofronoff to sacrificing the public interest in pursuit of the unidentified opinion or belief that he held?'
Even if one vehemently disagreed with what Sofronoff did, it should not be described as corrupt, Pomerenke told the court.
Sofronoff is seeking to have the finding of the corruption watchdog overturned partly on the basis of what he claims are a series of errors – an argument that turns on the interpretation of what constitutes 'serious corrupt conduct' in the integrity commission act – and on a lack of evidence that he leaked the report with malicious intent, the court heard.
The ACT Integrity Commission failed in May in an attempt to have Sofronoff's challenge to the report nixed on the grounds that it was subject to parliamentary privilege.
The hearing continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

I've seen the real face of China and it's sadistic and cruel beneath the 'Botox' façade
I've seen the real face of China and it's sadistic and cruel beneath the 'Botox' façade

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

I've seen the real face of China and it's sadistic and cruel beneath the 'Botox' façade

Former detainee Cheng Lei has warned the Albanese government to look deeper than China's public façade as she describes distressing surveillance that happens daily in Australia. Ms Cheng was imprisoned for more than three years in China, with the first six months in solitary confinement where she was forced to sit still for 13 hours per day and write 'self–bashing essays'. After almost two years free and now based in Melbourne, she has warned the Albanese government against drinking the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) 'Kool-Aid'. 'There is China's public face, and it's a great face, and it's getting better all the time, with a lot of Botox,' the mother-of-two said. 'But the surface is not how it is at the core and it spends trillions of dollars – its entire stability maintenance budget – to keep up that façade. 'We are just conveniently forgetting China is a state that prioritises the CCP's rule above all else, and individuals don't matter in that system. 'I'm lucky enough to have seen both sides and I just want to remind people at all times what it can, and does do, when it thinks nobody's looking.' Ms Cheng, who is a Chinese-born Australian journalist, described how 'cruelty is the policy' of China, inside and outside its prisons. 'The people who look at the fancy buildings and infrastructure, and think, "Oh, wow, how wonderful is this!" I want them to pause and think, "Do I want to be in that system?" 'Do I want my kids to grow up with that sort of cruelty and the back-breaking work and not having enough rights and not being able to criticise? 'People get sucked into the Kool-Aid and the fancy façade and they don't ask why Chinese people want to get out of the country, if it's such a great country to live in.' Her comments follow Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's six-day diplomatic tour of China in which he was photographed at popular tourist spots. He also received glowing reviews from Chinese media, which praised the blossoming relations between the two countries. 'I just don't see anything specific coming out of all this lovey-doveyness,' Ms Cheng told Daily Mail Australia following the meeting. 'The Chinese love for you to feel comfortable and that you are friends as long as you play ball. '(Officials) have this preoccupation with "(saving) face" and once you have that friendly vibe, it's impossible to play hardball.' In an ideal world, Ms Cheng wants Canberra to be able to have both: 'Let's talk more on trade, but yes, let's write something specific about the treatment of Aussie prisoners.' Ms Cheng was imprisoned by Chinese authorities in 2020 after being accused of 'illegally supplying state secrets overseas', allegations that were unfounded. The case concerned her sharing a government briefing with another journalist, with officials claiming it was embargoed, despite there being no time of permitted release on the document until a year after the incident. In her new book, 'Cheng Lei: A Memoir of Freedom', she speaks freely and with brutal honesty about the cruelty she endured at the hands of the Chinese prison system. For the first six months, she was placed under 'Residential Surveillance at a Designated Location' (RSDL), which the UN describes as 'enforced disappearance and might amount to torture'. Since 2012, China's Criminal Procedure Law has been amended to give police the power to take people into custody without disclosing where they will be held. 'I had to remain in the same position for 13 hours a day,' she said, adding she was permitted a few 10-minute breaks to walk between guards, only after she was visited by the Australian embassy. 'All those years, I had been told you cannot say this, you cannot mention the word 'case' at the embassy visit. You cannot mention your name. 'I had to write these self–bashing essays in which I just basically was telling lies. I had to write these untruthful things (about myself) in order to get by.' 'I just can't see another country that is as sadistic, as organised and so in tune with f***ing up your psychology that they would design something like this,' she said. Almost two years since she was liberated and, now settled in Melbourne as a Sky News host, Ms Cheng still feels as though the CCP has not forgotten her. 'There are so many strange things, like on Amazon: there are two fake books with the same name as my book,' she said. 'And last year, when I did a stand-up with (dissident Vicky Xu), there were two spies in the audience videotaping us with their hood pulled up.' But her concern remains for others, acknowledging that by striking a public figure, she appears 'safer' than others. 'I hear about ordinary Australians, for example, organising a vigil for the Tiananmen Square Massacre and being followed by hooded individuals in Western Australia,' she said, referencing a tip she had been given last week. 'While I'm personally not scared, it is extremely distressing in our country people who are doing ordinary things that are totally within their rights, are having to do it in fear.' Ms Cheng asserted China has a 'serious fear of its own people', whether in mainland China or among overseas communities. 'That's why they try to control people,' she said. 'It's either coercion through the community associations and trying to woo people, and then for them to intimidate other overseas Chinese.' One example she gave was WeChat groups in Melbourne where Ms Cheng said members are prohibited from talking about the independence of Taiwan or Hong Kong. 'If you do, (they tell you) you can get out of the group,' she said. 'They are also using fear of what might happen to the business interests or their families.' Despite the attempted intimidation, threats from online trolls and a public attempt by Chinese officials to block her during a press conference by China's second–in–command Premier Li Qiang in June last year, Ms Cheng is revelling in her freedom. 'There's nothing so blissful as having my voice back and to make a difference,' she said. 'It's hard to explain how insanely good freedom feels. 'I've been skydiving. I just got my open water dive scuba licence with my daughter. I'm playing soccer three to four times a week, making new friends.' Where does that leave Ms Cheng now? 'I wish people would make informed judgements about China because right now we just have a lot of ignorant prejudice,' she said. 'People say, "Oh, well, China is all bad." Or they just conflate Chinese people and the CCP and China, the country. 'I want people to - and I wish more overseas Chinese people would - think about what it is to live here and how we should all protect the freedoms you can't experience in China.'

Australia's 'biggest brown-noser' politician named on protest sculpture - as Albanese government signs AUKUS deal with the UK
Australia's 'biggest brown-noser' politician named on protest sculpture - as Albanese government signs AUKUS deal with the UK

Daily Mail​

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Australia's 'biggest brown-noser' politician named on protest sculpture - as Albanese government signs AUKUS deal with the UK

A provocative piece of street art has taken aim at federal Defence Minister Richard Marles, labelling him 'Australia's biggest brown–noser'. The crude installation, spotted outside his Geelong electorate office on Saturday, featured a large sculpted nose smeared with what appeared to be fake faeces. There was also a pile of 'faeces' resting on a sign which said: 'This memorial erected by The New Radicals in honour of Australia's biggest brown-noser Richard Marles.' It was chained to a nearby post in the city's CBD before disappearing by 5pm, and images of the artwork were shared on social media by the activist group. Australians praised the artwork as 'incredible', with one user on X quipping: 'The drips on the ground are what makes it.' The New Radicals have previously claimed responsibility for similar stunts in the same location, including a mock submarine called 'HMAS Richard'. The submarine are understood to have been a reference to those promised to Australia in the AUKUS trilateral defence agreement between Australia, the UK and the United States. Meanwhile, the latest piece of art coincided with Marles' formal signing of a historic bilateral security pact with the UK on Saturday. The deal, dubbed the 'Geelong Treaty', was signed in the city to represent a 50-year co-operation arrangement between the two allies under the AUKUS banner. Marles described the agreement as a transformational moment for the nation's defence and industry: 'In doing this, AUKUS will see 20,000 jobs in Australia.' 'It will see, in building submarines in this country, the biggest industrial endeavour in our nation's history, bigger even than the Snowy Hydro scheme. 'In military terms, what it will deliver is the biggest leap in Australia's military capability, really, since the formation of the navy back in 1913.' The announcement followed the annual AUKMIN talks in Sydney, with Marles and UK Defence Secretary John Healey celebrating the deal with a beer at a Geelong brewery. It came just days after the Albanese Government transferred a further $800million to the United States under the AUKUS program, despite the agreement being under a review ordered by US President Donald Trump. 'There is a schedule of payments to be made, we have an agreement with the United States as well as with the United Kingdom,' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told ABC's Afternoon Briefing on Wednesday. 'It is about increasing their industrial capacity, and as part of that, we have Australians on the ground, learning the skills so that when it comes to the SSN–AUKUS—the submarines being built here in Australia, we have those skills.' The AUKUS deal includes Australia acquiring eight nuclear–powered submarines expected to cost between $268billion and $368billion over the next three decades. Despite internal unrest, with several local Labor branches voting to oppose the deal over the previous months across the country, the government has remained firm in its support for AUKUS. The timing of the expected conclusion of the US review into AUKUS remains unclear. It is being led by Elbridge Colby, who has publicly expressed scepticism about the pact and warned it could leave American sailors exposed and under-resourced. Daily Mail Australia has contacted Marles' office for comment on the artwork.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store