logo
Ground broken at Astor Park's residential development surrounding Lower.com Field

Ground broken at Astor Park's residential development surrounding Lower.com Field

Yahoo24-04-2025
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – Ground has officially been broken on a mixed-used neighborhood development located adjacent to Lower.com field.
Astor Park, which includes its Residential A Block complete with 261 multi-family units, Class-A offices with ground-floor retail, riverfront parks, and public art, all in plain sight of Lower.com Field, is in its infancy stages of development, according to the Columbus Crew.
LGBTQ+ music fest with Tinashe, Rebecca Black coming for Columbus Pride weekend
The team announced Wednesday that ground was broken on the project, which is set to be completed in 2027. The development of Astor Park also consists of a five-story, 154,000 square foot Class A office building with 17,250 square feet of ground-floor retail space, a 685-space parking garage, 3,700 square feet of murals, 13,600 square feet of public plaza and 39,5000 square feet of recreation in the park.
The development, which will feature studio, one-, and two-bedroom floor plans, sits across from Lower.com Field. In addition to retail options, residents of Astor Park will have access to almost 40,000 square feet of amenity space, including an indoor/outdoor fitness facility, clubroom, game room, social lounge with bar and fireplace, bike storage, dog spa, and a 35,000 square-foot courtyard with pool, outdoor kitchen and dining areas, along with curated art.
'We are thrilled to break ground on the residential portion of Astor Park,' said Dee and Jimmy Haslam, Managing Partners Haslam Sports Group. 'Our vision for Lower.com Field has always been for more than just our home on match days.'
The plan was detailed in an announcement in March 2021, when Astor Park was given its name. Astor Park will also feature a two-acre public park, a pedestrian bridge and direct access to the Olentangy Trail, as well as the Central Ohio Greenway network.
Astor Park is named after the birthplace of American soccer, Astor House, in New York City, where, in April 1913, Thomas Cahill founded the United States Football Association. It later became known as the United States Soccer Federation.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Global powerhouse dominates Tesla in highly anticipated EV race: 'Nobody looked at us'
Global powerhouse dominates Tesla in highly anticipated EV race: 'Nobody looked at us'

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Global powerhouse dominates Tesla in highly anticipated EV race: 'Nobody looked at us'

Chinese automaker BYD could soon dominate the European market and add to Tesla's struggles to recapture the hearts of electric vehicle drivers. What's happening? Fortune reported that BYD is now poised to produce around 300,000 EVs per year at its factory in Szeged, Hungary, by 2030. Starting next year, it estimates it will manufacture 150,000 of its all-electric sedans annually at the facility as it continues its push to firmly topple Tesla as the tastemaker of the EV realm, marketing its compact cars as perfect for narrow European streets. Over the first five months of the year, BYD sold 55,000 cars in Europe — three times more sales than it did during the same period in 2024. "If they keep growing at this speed, Europe should expect big disruption in the coming months," said JATO Dynamics analyst Felipe Munoz. BYD executive vice president Stella Li told Fortune that many underestimated her company as a potential EV powerhouse because of its small size. "Nobody looked at us," she said. Why is this important? Back in 2011, when speaking with former Bloomberg TV anchor Betty Liu, Tesla CEO Elon Musk laughed at the idea of BYD ever being able to compete with Tesla. In later years, he seemed to have softened his stance, demonstrating just how far the EV industry has come since Tesla first gained renown in the 2000s for successfully selling and marketing its EV to the modern consumer — inspiring other automakers to follow suit. In turn, the market is filled with increasingly affordable options for people who want to make their next car an EV, and consumers are leaping at the opportunity to purchase a more eco-friendly vehicle that offers cost savings on energy and maintenance. Would you buy an EV if there were no tax incentives for getting one? Definitely No way Depends on the sticker price Depends on the range Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Last year, EV sales worldwide rose by more than 25%, according to the International Energy Agency. Still, Tesla has the largest market cap among automakers by far at more than $1 trillion, and BYD clocks in fourth with a $130.8 billion market cap. Yet BYD has begun to establish itself as a dominant force in international markets, surpassing Tesla in global sales this year, even if Musk remains bullish on his company's ability to rise above the competition. What could this mean for American-made EVs? While Tesla has factories in Europe and China, it does most of its manufacturing in the U.S., creating thousands of jobs. For his part, Musk has criticized the Donald Trump administration's tariffs as a move that will have a "significant impact" on his company, undermining domestic manufacturers' ability to compete with automakers like BYD in international markets. For now, Tesla remains the top-selling EV in the United States despite consumer backlash to Musk's involvement in politics and high-profile mishaps with the company's Robotaxi rollout. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Opinion - Why in the world is Trump punishing Moldova with tariffs?
Opinion - Why in the world is Trump punishing Moldova with tariffs?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Why in the world is Trump punishing Moldova with tariffs?

President Trump's tariff blasts continue. The White House released its latest list on July 31 and it is clear that no nation is safe — not allies, enemies, neighbors or distant lands. No menacing power escapes the vigilance of the president's team, ever alert to those 'ripping off' the United States of America. Case in point: Moldova. Dominating both sides of the Dniester River — well, one side actually — this Eastern European colossus of 2.3 million people (about the size of Houston) could inflict mortal damage on the American economy. In 2024 alone, the U.S. bought nearly $136 million (with an 'm') worth of goods from the Moldovans, whereas they bought only $51 million from us. With the U.S. economy valued at more than $30 trillion (with a 'T') we could probably only bear such abuse for … well, forever. In a July 9 letter to Moldovan President Maia Sandu, Trump made clear that America will not be bullied by Moldova any longer. He imposed a tariff of 25 percent on every bottle of wine or fruit juice the Moldovans force us to buy. Calling the deficit with Moldova a 'major threat to our Economy and, indeed, our National Security!' the president warned of even higher tariffs if Moldova retaliates or tries to send goods into the U.S. through transshipment. The letter accuses Moldova of taking advantage of us for 'many years.' Tariff rates are one of Trump's favorite weapons, employed under the dubious premise that the U.S. faces a trade deficit 'emergency.' The legality of such action aside — the Supreme Court has yet to rule — the president uses this weapon for a variety of non-economic goals. He has threatened Canada for indicating it might recognize a Palestinian state, and Brazil to try to save former President Jair Bolsonaro from prosecution. Moldova has committed no such offenses — at least none charged — but Trump wants trade with Moldova and a host of other countries to be based on 'reciprocity.' Whatever the precipitating dynamics, punishing Moldova for its involvement in international trade serves no reasonable Western security or broader policy interests. It undermines them. Sandwiched between Ukraine and Romania, Moldova has a long history of not being a country. The people of this region, who were unwillingly traded between Romania and Russia for nearly a century, gained independence from a collapsing Soviet Union in 1991. With a population that is 75 percent Moldovan-Romanian, some within the Russian and Ukrainian minorities feared the country's absorption into neighboring Romania. During a brief internal war in 1992, Moscow positioned a 'peacekeeping force' on the eastern side of Dniester River to guard the self-proclaimed state of Transnistria — which is still there, not recognized even by Russia. This force is small, locally recruited and considered less than formidable. But it is part of a sustained campaign by Moscow to prevent Moldova from embracing the West. This same motive drove Vladimir Putin to unleash a brutal invasion and occupation of much larger Ukraine. If victorious there, he is unlikely to be more accommodating toward Moldova. Moldova is the poorest country in Europe, and its elected leaders and population have been seeking stability. After Russia invaded Ukraine, Moldova applied to join the EU. It was quickly granted candidate status, and negotiations for membership began. In 2024, the country reelected pro-EU President Sandu and in a referendum enshrined the country's 'European course' in its constitution — despite massive Russian interference and disinformation. The EU has not been cowed by Moscow and developed a generous aid and development package. Most Moldovan goods enter the world's largest trading bloc duty-free, a policy that was further extended to agricultural products last month. Under President Biden, the U.S. had been similarly supportive, providing more than $400 million in military and humanitarian aid in part to help reduce the country's dependence on Russian gas. Trump sees no need for aid to Moldova, or indeed for most foreign assistance. Other moves supporting Trump's 'America First' orientation also penalize Moldova. Eliminating the U.S. Agency for International Development meant the loss of virtually all projects in Moldova — including for democracy promotion and economic and energy development. At the same time, cutting resources for election monitoring and an independent press leaves the field open for Russian interference. Such indifference, along with Trump's shifting attitude toward Ukraine and transactional foreign policy, leaves Moldova exposed. A study by the Stimson Center concluded, 'With a White House that seems increasingly eager to align its perspectives with Moscow at the expense of traditional allies, its willingness to support Moldova's democratic transformation in the face of Russian opposition is now uncertain.' Neighboring Romania, a member of both the EU and NATO, has a huge stake in the fate of Moldova. An intimidated or occupied satellite country — a second Belarus — on the Alliance's more than 400-mile border would dramatically change the strategic equation. This should get Washington's attention — at least of those willing to honor the American commitment to NATO. Preserving an independent and economically healthy Moldova thus serves European and American interests. Increasing the cost of doing business with the U.S. and damaging democratic efforts there does not. Supporting Moldova costs the U.S. very little. Excusing a tiny trade deficit to a strategically important democracy does not make Americans suckers. Helping Moldova does not require a military commitment. The country has been cooperating with NATO but is constitutionally neutral. Rather than punishing the country, the U.S. could and should offer support. This could be based on a view of the geopolitical map — or, even better, from an appreciation of a resilient people's desire for democratic choice. Ronald H. Linden is professor emeritus of political science at the University of Pittsburgh, where he directed the Center for European Studies and the Center for Russian and East European Studies. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

Strong Crop of Earnings Eases Investors' Economic Concerns
Strong Crop of Earnings Eases Investors' Economic Concerns

Wall Street Journal

timean hour ago

  • Wall Street Journal

Strong Crop of Earnings Eases Investors' Economic Concerns

The job market is cooling. Tariff rates are rising. But American companies still seem to be doing just fine. With the latest earnings season nearly done, top- and bottom-line results from companies in the S&P 500 are handily beating expectations that had been lowered after President Trump announced sweeping duties on imports in April. Profits are expected to have risen around 12% in the second quarter from a year earlier, according to FactSet, far ahead of the 5% growth analysts predicted in early July.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store