End of free trade era? Tariff war could stall growth for 3 years, CFO warns
"Budgeting has probably become a redundant exercise," said Abouda. "We are going through a very, very unpredictable time in terms of business environment. If there's no stability where you operate, then everything becomes quite difficult and challenging. Budgeting should be replaced by scenario forecast and I think a very frequent forecast should be the name of the game."
Ali was in conversation with Khaleej Times Chief Content Officer Ted Kemp about the impact of US tariffs on finance professionals at the sixth edition of the New Age Finance and Accounting (NAFA) summit organized by Khaleej Times. The event saw CFOs, finance leaders, policymakers, and fintech innovators engage in dialogue on various topics including taxes, ESG, and reskilling the workforce.
How does Section 301 impact trade?
One of the topics of discussion during the conversation was Section 301. Kemp questioned how the section of the Trade Act of 1974, which targets Chinese ships, would impact trade.
Abouda explained that 90 per cent of global trade was accounted for by shipping - a field dominated by China. "The US took a decision to keep the brain in the US and move the muscles elsewhere. Section 301 targets Chinese-built, owned, or operated vessels calling at US ports, imposing penalties of $500,000 to $1 million per call in addition to the tariffs.
"The resolution is expected to be effective October 4, and if this goes through, I think there will be a structural change in the whole supply chain. China, in one way or another, control about 60 percent of the shipping, either through building or through financing or operating or resources," he said.
Unclear directives from US
Abouda added that while the Trump administration was agile in decision-making, it lacked clarity. "If the US wants to build more ships, that's all good, except that it isn't something that's going to happen quickly," he said. "I don't know what's the thought process behind it."
He gave the example of how US President Donald Trump encouraged more American companies to drill oil, with his 'drill, baby, drill' slogan. "That's practically not possible, because the US doesn't have the capacity today to start increasing production by 3 or 4 million barrels immediately," he said.
"That needs a lot of regulations to be in place and a lot of investments, which the US is not ready for. If I was one of the leaders of those companies, I would think twice. If you go with the mandates of an administration that has three years left, maybe the next administration will have a totally different view," Abouda added.
He said that Trump's constant shift in tariff policies was also damaging to the industry. "The most recent example is, he imposed a 50 percent tariff on Europe and two days later, it was pushed to July 9," he said. "So, he's creating an environment which is very difficult to do business in."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Zawya
2 hours ago
- Zawya
India suspends cotton import duty in signal to US, relief for garment industry
India has suspended an 11% import duty on cotton until September 30, in a move seen as a signal to Washington that New Delhi is willing to address U.S. concerns on agricultural tariffs, while also easing pressure on its garment industry. The temporary suspension, announced late on Monday, could benefit U.S. cotton growers and provide relief to India's apparel sector, which faces tariffs of nearly 60% on shipments to the United States from later this month. A planned visit by U.S. trade negotiators to New Delhi from August 25-29 has been called off, delaying talks on a proposed bilateral trade agreement and dashing hopes of relief from an additional 25% U.S. tariff on Indian goods from August 27. President Donald Trump earlier this month announced an extra tariff on Indian goods as punishment for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil, doubling the total duty to 50% on U.S. imports of Indian goods from later this month. Indian exports had previously faced levies of 0-5%, with duties on some textiles ranging between 9% and 13% before Trump raised tariffs in April. The United States is the biggest market for India's garment exporters, who say steep tariffs are leading to order cancellations and making them uncompetitive against Bangladesh and Vietnam, which have U.S. duties of 20%, and China at 30%. India's labour-intensive sectors, including textiles, footwear, engineering goods and shrimp, have been jolted by U.S. tariffs, and are now seeking alternative markets. "The largest beneficiary of the duty free import will be the U.S., the second largest supplier to India," said Ajay Srivastava, founder of Global Trade Research Initiative, a New Delhi-based think tank, adding India already allows duty-free cotton imports from Australia within a quota. Cotton imports more than doubled to $1.2 billion in the 2024/25 fiscal year to March, from $579 million a year earlier, led by $258 million from Australia, $234 million from the United States, $181 million from Brazil and $116 million from Egypt, Srivastava said. The sharp rise in U.S. tariffs comes just as India was emerging as a stronger alternative for American garment buyers, with Bangladesh facing political uncertainty and companies seeking to diversify supply chains beyond China. Industry bodies such as the Confederation of Indian Textile Industry (CITI) had urged the government to scrap the cotton import duty to help make the sector more competitive. Reuters earlier reported that some Indian exporters were scrambling to explore manufacturing options overseas to offset the impact of the higher tariffs. India's garment sector was already grappling with a labour crunch and limited production capacity. The prospect of exporters relocating production abroad poses a further challenge to the government's "Make in India" manufacturing drive. Industry officials now expect the government to extend duty-free cotton imports beyond September.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Why is the Oval Office so gold? Donald Trump's extravagant White House makeover
When US President Donald Trump returned into the Oval Office in January, the room bore a different look from his final days there in early 2021. For his second term, the White House's most recognisable room has been remade in a style unmistakably his own, this time leaning even heavier on a gold palette. Gold trim now runs along the crown moulding, the curtains shine brighter, and even the presidential seal on the ceiling has been repainted in metallic tones. It has become tradition for incoming presidents to redecorate, and they are even allocated a $100,000 budget to do so. Where former US president Joe Biden 's pared-back decor once stood, Trump has added gilded cherubs, gleaming trophies and ornate frames, creating a room that feels less like the White House and more like Versailles. The walls, which used to hang only a few portraits, have been turned into what Trump calls a 'gallery wall,' with nearly 20 paintings of presidents and statesmen he admires. It's a sharp departure from Biden's six, and even more dramatic compared to former US president Barack Obama's minimalist approach. Trump has also reintroduced a bust of Winston Churchill, kept Martin Luther King Jr and added Benjamin Franklin to a line-up that already included George Washington and Andrew Jackson. The furniture follows the same trend. Simple wooden tables have been replaced by marble consoles, darker-framed art now hangs on the walls and the president's desk briefly gave way to a smaller stand-in while it was sent for refurbishment. The dark blue rug made for Bill Clinton, with the presidential seal at its centre, has been removed. In its place, Trump has brought back a lighter rug from Ronald Reagan's era, the same one he used during his first term. Its design still features the seal, framed by a sunburst pattern and olive branches meant to symbolise peace. Elsewhere, gold figurines sit on the mantel, ornate mirrors shine on the doors and tiny cherubs (brought in from Mar-a-Lago) peek out from above the doorways. Trump has revived some of his first term flourishes, including military branch flags and a prominent display of challenge coins. The 'Diet Coke button' is back on the Oval Office desk, a feature which was notably missing during the Biden administration. Trump's redesign features more flags, statues and memorabilia than his recent predecessors. Subtler historic details have been replaced with glittering artefacts. The changes aren't stopping with the Oval Office. The White House also confirmed that construction will begin in autumn on a $200 million, 90,000-square-foot state ballroom in the East Wing, signalling that Trump's taste for grandeur is set to continue.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
India needs to find its own ‘Trump whisperers' to deal with the US tariff threat
The threat of up to 50 per cent US tariffs on goods from India, which emerged from the White House over the past month, struck many as a bolt seemingly out of the blue. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi had had a good visit to Washington in February, and a detailed trade deal between Washington and New Delhi seemed all set for approval at the end of this month. While India will probably avoid the worst-case outcome, the level of surprise indicates that New Delhi lacks high-level advocates in Washington with the inside track. As a result, it is still struggling to grasp how US President Donald Trump makes decisions, or how he views both trade and the Indo-US equation. Until those inter-linked problems are sorted out, bilateral relations will continue to bounce between the highs of periodic direct contact by the two national leaders, and regular lows in between. India's diplomatic and business communities continue to wonder how things went so wrong between the two governments in recent months. The answer to this question lies in New Delhi's struggle to adapt to Mr Trump's commercial (rather than diplomatic) approach to dealmaking. The tariff threats to India come from two directions: the Russia-Ukraine war and the emergence of competition – as opposed to co-operation – between major trading powers facing the threat of tariffs from Washington. The war in Ukraine is the more volatile of the two factors, with the Trump administration's policy veering from Moscow's point of view, then to that of Kyiv and Brussels, and now back to Moscow's following the US-Russia summit in Alaska last Friday. This latest swing is good news for New Delhi, as the threat of secondary sanctions for buying Russian oil is likely to recede at least temporarily. But even if (or more likely when) the pendulum swings again, it is unlikely that the US will be maximalist in its demands. Any rapid and major change in Indian oil purchases would put strains on global oil supply and send prices shooting up for American voters, something that no administration wants to see. The battle between the EU and UK on the one hand, and Russia on the other, to influence Mr Trump on the war in Ukraine also provides an essential window into the challenges of diplomacy with the administration. Much has been made in commentary about the importance of top-level chemistry, and the natural advantage of strong leaders such as Russian President Vladimir Putin winning Mr Trump's respect and agreement. However, Russia's example goes to show why this just isn't enough. Mr Putin's ability to effectively communicate Russia's perspective is extremely powerful. But the lack of any other interlocutors who can engage with Mr Trump as persuasively means that Moscow struggles to build momentum. In contrast, the EU and UK have found a range of 'Trump whisperers', people below the head-of-state level who understand the US President. It is these contacts who have managed to stay appraised of Mr Trump's ever-shifting priorities and perspectives and convince him of the relevance of their positions to those priorities. Until India can find its own Trump whisperers, the positive, can-do Trump-Modi personal equation will not be enough to keep the bilateral relationship on the rails. The other half of the tariff threat is closely tied to this problem. Mr Modi's productive meeting with Mr Trump in February gave India's notoriously tough negotiators a sense of what it would take to craft an agreement that would satisfy both sides. But one of the Trump administration's greatest successes is that it has created competition rather than co-operation between countries facing the threat of US tariffs. Over the course of the summer, the larger trade partners of the US – led by the EU and UK – showed a new willingness to cross their own previous red lines to make deals with Washington. Mr Trump seems to regard it as axiomatic that these developments shifted the baseline of expectations for all others who followed. In this view, it would be up to India (currently only the US's 10th-largest trade partner) to try to improve its offer and match the depth of concessions granted by the larger US trade partners. Despite all this, India and the EU find themselves in a similar boat. The Trump administration does not view either entity to be dominant security actors in their regions (unlike say China, Russia or Israel). This magnifies his annoyance when they offer a narrative that contradicts his own – for example, the EU's constant reminders that Russia is the aggressor in the Ukraine war, or New Delhi's rejection of Mr Trump's claim that he mediated the end of the recent hostilities between itself and Pakistan earlier this year. Similarly, the US President's anger with European and Indian trade surpluses with Washington is complemented by a lack of fear over their economic advantage. In contrast, Mexico, China and Canada have greater political leverage than the EU or India that goes beyond the sheer volume of trade with the US. These exporters supply daily goods from food to energy and mid-to-low-range cars and phones that have a critical direct impact on the everyday lives of average American voters. Any trade war brings serious political costs for the Trump administration. Indian exports, on the other hand, range from engineering goods to gems and jewellery that do not carry the same risks. Neither do luxury European goods, whether cheese, wine or limousines. The one exception is India's supply of generic medications, which have become a cornerstone of American health care; a canny Mr Trump may extend a temporary waiver to generate pressure while avoiding backlash. In short, the strength of India's hand in dealing with the Trump administration is fundamentally different than it looked at the start of the US President's second term, when the new rules of the power game were just beginning to emerge. But on the other hand, the European experience suggests that even a so-so hand can be played to great advantage once those new power rules have been understood and applied.
