
Funeral director on why she speaks to dead people, her hardest moment and one thing she wishes people didn't do
Today, we hear from Ayesha Slader, a funeral director at Walter C Parson Ltd.
From the moment you come into the office, you could be faced with contacting families who have lost a loved one... visiting families at home or meeting with them in the office to arrange the funeral. Checking and dressing the deceased to ensure they are resting peacefully. Cleaning fleet vehicles, bringing individuals into our care and conducting funerals. It's a real mix.
I started on minimum wage... and worked my way up. Funeral directors in the UK will be salaried between £24,000 - £31,000 on average. Whether you participate in a paid on-call rota or whether this is built into your salary also varies.
A traditional attended funeral service would roughly cost... £4,200 as a guide. A direct cremation with a trusted, reliable, local funeral director will range between £1,600 - £2,300 on average.
To help cut costs... use social media for obituary notices and announcements. Create your own orders of service or floral tributes. This may save money but can add additional pressure. Using family cars rather than limousines, if you feel comfortable enough to drive on the day, also saves money. Ultimately, budget within your means. A simple service does not make the service any less tailored or unique.
To stay positive... a good team and environment makes all the difference. Without that, it would be a struggle. It's really important to have hobbies outside of work, too. My release is rugby and that gives me a balance. Time to switch off.
Occasionally, the odd few tears escape... certain days are tough and we are human. The day I stop being affected by my work is the day I hang up my hat.
I didn't always want to be a funeral director... I'd imagined being a physio or solicitor. Then cancer came. During my journey, it stole many of my friends. It was then, at 15, that I knew what I was destined for. I wanted to care for people at the very end. Show love, appreciation and dignity.
The biggest misconception about my job is that we are all old, miserable men... and that you must be slightly odd to want to do this job. Another is that we rip people off. A funeral is made up of many expenses, including disbursements. Disbursements make up over a third (if not more) of the funeral costs, which often surprises people.
This profession is one where you learn on the job. Nothing prepares you for it... there are qualifications that you can gain, such as the National Association of Funeral Directors (NAFD) Diploma in Funeral Directing. I think it is important to qualify and ensure your knowledge is up to date. We advise families during their darkest moments. That advice should be accurate and never misleading. Regarding skills, being good with people is essential and knowing how to be empathetic without being overly sympathetic. If you're not good with people, you will struggle. They are at the heart of all we do.
I never get scared being with dead bodies... they are people. Precious to someone, somewhere. I often speak to them, always saying good morning, goodnight, updating them on the world's events. The conversation is very one-sided but it gives me a sense of peace. I look after them like they are my own. There's no reason to fear the dead.
I believe that when someone passes, their energy has to go somewhere... where I do not know. I often speak to people I have lost. They can never truly leave you. Whether there is an afterlife or ghosts, I wouldn't like to say.
The most rewarding part of the job is... learning about how much someone fits into their lives, building a rapport and watching individuals' relief when everything comes together. It blows my mind that people thank us for what we do. And that is an incredible feeling, knowing you helped in some way.
The worst part of the job is... when you cannot give people the opportunity to say goodbye due to factors out of your control - COVID was a prime example of this. The toughest part is when you don't have the answers. That's often what families want and you can't give them that. Suicide is one of the hardest for me.
My first ever funeral is my most memorable moment... I had not long passed my exams and was alone covering an office. I ended up arranging a young woman's funeral in which the family trusted me with the most precious person in the world to them. We had numerous floral tributes, horses and doves. I was extremely nervous and having a big phobia of horses didn't help. Paging in front of the two 17-hand Friesians had me sweating. Throw into the mix an emergency road closure en route to the house, and we had to adjust very quickly. Once we had navigated this, I felt much more at ease. It was a baptism of fire as my previous role was predominantly mortuary-based. My manager at Walter C Parson encouraged and supported me in all aspects, allowing me to see the funeral through. It taught me to back myself. I was capable and I am proud of how that one moment has shaped my career ever since. The funeral was after the unexpected death of a woman with a young child. The circumstances meant an extra pressure on the family, and I visited them several times following the service. In fact, I am still in touch with them now.
There are no longer any rules when it comes to what you can do at a funeral... funerals are much more unique and I love that. The non-attended services have become more popular but after the service, some families often say it's difficult to begin the grieving process without the physical service. If this is something you're thinking about, always speak to your family first (where possible).
I wish people would stop leaving their phones on... or not placing them on silent. There's nothing worse than it going off halfway through. It happens almost weekly! No big arguments over it so far but there are the judging looks and tuts from others in attendance at the service. Avoid embarrassment, turn it off! Aeroplane mode is recommended before going onto a service.
There are too many unique requests to name... but we love something different. If it makes the funeral or send-off more personal, why not? As long as it's not offensive, we can do it.
Personally, nothing looks better or shows respect more than a hearse being paged and the coffin being shouldered... so many people are carried on a wheel bier when, with the correct number of pallbearers, the coffin would be safe to shoulder. It's a tradition I feel should be upheld unless the family request something different.
The biggest issue facing our sector is... the media and misconceptions. Most funeral directors' pure focus is to provide the most dignified and respectful service possible, even paying to be scrutinised by an outside organisation such as the National Association of Funeral Directors (NAFD) to ensure standards are high and the service is second to none. Publications on funeral services are often emotionally charged in the hope that it increases reader engagement. You don't hear much about the positive work funeral directors do for others, while sacrificing their personal time with their own families. We care immensely and I am incredibly proud of that.
We've seen a surge in direct cremations... however, not everyone understands what they entail. To ensure you know everything you need to, speak to your local funeral directors. Visit more than one and get all the information. We're actually rather nice people. From speaking with families following a direct cremation, you find that most struggle with the grieving process. A funeral provides the finality that someone is now gone. Whereas with a direct cremation, you do not have a funeral (funerals are the ceremony, not the cremation or burial). Your loved one is taken to a place of rest, the day and time of cremation are not always disclosed, and the location of the cremation can be a significant way away.
By considering a local funeral director for this type of service, you are... reassured your loved one will be resting locally in the care of the trusted funeral director you have met, that the crematorium of your choice is used, and that there is aftercare provided. This is not always the case with some direct cremation services.
It's important to check for hidden costs... some national direct cremation providers have an attractive headline price, but upon closer inspection, they may not include things like the removal of the deceased from their home address or nursing home, or the return of the cremated remains to the family. My tips? Ask plenty of questions, locally or nationally.
We do provide services for free... if anyone passes under the age of 18 years, we provide our services at no cost. No one should experience this kind of loss. People often upgrade from the simple package we provide, which can then incur a cost. There is also the Children's Funeral Fund, in which burial and cremation fees are covered for under 18s and they often provide a contribution towards other elements.
My first job was as a waitress... I loved that job and it really helped with my people skills. I became a funeral director by sheer persistence. There weren't many of us ladies out there when I started 15 years ago (now we're taking over).
My best piece of advice is to always ensure you cover what the deceased wants, but seriously think about what you need from the day... everyone has an opinion but if you don't say goodbye in the way you need, you may look back with resentment in the future. It's not about how fancy it can be. Celebrate the life. That's what truly matters.
If I had my time again I would... not change a thing! I'd do more networking with other funeral directors, as oddly we rely on each other to make things work. More importantly, I'd tell my team I appreciate them more - without the bearers, operatives, administrators, embalmers, us funeral directors are nothing but a person in a fancy suit. It takes an army and I'm incredibly proud of mine!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Sky News
20 minutes ago
- Sky News
House of Lords under fire for dropping rule that once caught out cricket legend and historian
Campaigners have criticised a change to the rules around declarations of interest in the House of Lords as a "retrograde step" which will lead to a "significant loss of transparency". Since 2000, peers have had to register a list of "non-financial interests" - which includes declaring unpaid but often important roles like being a director, trustee, or chair of a company, think tank or charity. But that requirement was dropped in April despite staff concerns. Tom Brake, director of Unlock Democracy, and a former Liberal Democrat MP, wants to see the decision reversed. "It's a retrograde step," he said. "I think we've got a significant loss of transparency and accountability and that is bad news for the public. "More than 25 years ago, the Committee on Standards in Public Life identified that there was a need for peers to register non-financial interests because that could influence their decisions. I'm confused as to what's happened in the last 25 years that now means this requirement can be scrapped. "This process seems to be all about making matters simpler for peers, rather than what the code of conduct is supposed to do, which is to boost the public's confidence." Westminster Accounts: Search for your MP Rules were too 'burdensome', say peers The change was part of an overhaul of the code of conduct which aimed to "shorten and clarify" the rules for peers. The House of Lords Conduct Committee argued that updating non-financial interests was "disproportionately burdensome" with "minor and inadvertent errors" causing "large numbers of complaints". As a result, the register of Lords interests shrunk in size from 432 pages to 275. MPs have a different code of conduct, which requires them to declare any formal unpaid positions or other non-financial interests which may be an influence. A source told Sky News there is real concern among some Lords' staff about the implications of the change. Non-financial interest declarations have previously highlighted cases where a peer's involvement in a think tank or lobbying group overlapped with a paid role. 4:23 Cricket legend among peers to breach code There are also examples where a peer's non-financial interest declaration has prompted an investigation - revealing a financial interest which should have been declared instead. In 2023, Lord Skidelsky was found to have breached the code after registering his role as chair of a charity's trustees as a non-financial interest. The Commissioner for Standards investigated after questions were raised about the charity, the Centre for Global Studies. He concluded that the charity - which was funded by two Russian businessmen - only existed to support Lord Skidelsky's work, and had paid his staff's salaries for over 12 years. In 2021, Lord Botham - the England cricket legend - was found to have breached the code after registering a non-financial interest as an unpaid company director. The company's accounts subsequently revealed he and his wife had benefitted from a director's loan of nearly £200,000. It was considered a minor breach and he apologised. 'Follow the money' Lord Eric Pickles, the former chair of the anti-corruption watchdog, the Advisory Committee on Business Appointments, believes focusing on financial interests makes the register more transparent. "My view is always to follow the money. Everything else on a register is camouflage," he said. "Restricting the register to financial reward will give peers little wriggle room. I know this is counterintuitive, but the less there is on the register, the more scrutiny there will be on the crucial things." 'I was shocked' The SNP want the House of Lords to be scrapped, and has no peers of its own. Deputy Westminster leader Pete Wishart MP is deeply concerned by the changes. "I was actually quite horrified and quite shocked," he said. "This is an institution that's got no democratic accountability, it's a job for life. If anything, members of the House of Lords should be regulated and judged by a higher standard than us in the House of Commons - and what's happened is exactly the opposite." Public confidence in the Lords is already at a low ebb after the PPE controversy surrounding Baroness Michelle Mone, who took a leave of absence in 2022. The government has pledged to reform the House of Lords and is currently trying to push through a bill abolishing the 92 remaining hereditary peers, which will return to the House of Commons in September. But just before recess the bill was amended in the Lords so that they can remain as members until retirement or death. It's a change which is unlikely to be supported by MPs. A spokesperson for the House of Lords said: "Maintaining public confidence in the House of Lords is a key objective of the code of conduct. To ensure that, the code includes rigorous rules requiring the registration and declaration of all relevant financial interests held by members of the House of Lords. "Public confidence relies, above all, on transparency over the financial interests that may influence members' conduct. This change helps ensure the rules regarding registration of interests are understandable, enforceable and focused on the key areas of public concern. "Members may still declare non-financial interests in debate, where they consider them directly relevant, to inform the House and wider public. "The Conduct Committee is appointed to review the code of conduct, and it will continue to keep all issues under review. During its review of the code of conduct, the committee considered written evidence from both Unlock Democracy and Transparency International UK, among others."


Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Death of Prince William's businessman pal who 'collapsed after swallowing a bee' sparks a £3billion inheritance row
The death of an Indian billionaire and friend of Prince William who swallowed a bee has triggered a feud over a £3 billion inheritance. Sunjay Kapur, 53, collapsed in front of horrified teammates during the game at Guards Polo Club in Windsor. Indian-born Mr Kapur was thought to have suffered a fatal heart attack after being stung in the mouth, potentially triggering anaphylactic shock. Kapur was the heir too the global car parts giant Sona Comstar, a £2.7 billion business founded by his father. Now the company has been plunged into a bitter succession battle, between the businessman's mother Rani Kapur and the firm's board of directors, The Telegraph reported. Rani Kapur reportedly wrote to the board on July 24 saying her son had died in 'suspicious and unexplained circumstances'. It came just a month after the board unanimously appointed a new chairman on June 23. In the letter, she reportedly accused people in the company of exploiting the family's grief to 'wrestle control' of the company. She said she had been forced to sign documents behind locked doors while under emotional distress. Mrs Kapur claimed she had been blocked from accessing her bank accounts and did not authorise appointments to represent her family. In her letter, which was also sent to India's market regulator, she claimed her late husband, who died in 2015, made her the sole beneficiary of his estate as well as majority shareholder of the Sona Group. The company said Mrs Kapur had not been a shareholder for six years and said she was not majority shareholder of the group. Sunjay Kapur's widow Priya Sachdeva also appears to have sided with Sona Comstar. Ms Sachdeva was appointed as a non-executive director at the company's annual meeting on July 25, despite Ms Kapur's objections and request to delay the meeting. Her office last week shared the coroner's report which confirmed that her husband had died of natural causes. The report said he died from ventricular hypertrophy and ischaemic heart disease and the investigation was closed. Ms Kapur wrote to the UK authorities calling for an investigation into his death, which was rejected. Mr Kapur's sister Mandhire Kapur has also been dragged into the dispute. In an Instagram post, she shared a photograph with her brother and mother saying she would 'protect what you would have wanted, and what Dad dreamed' Mrs Kapur claimed there was a conspiracy to take control of the company away from her family. Vaibhav Gaggar the senior advocate who represents Ms Kapur, told The Telegraph: 'It quite clearly reinforces what she's been saying, that her entire legacy is being usurped and no one is willing to look into the cause of death.' 'It may all be very well interlinked and she has quite unequivocally said there is a conspiracy behind her son's death.'


Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Sir Keir Starmer would not call shoplifters 'scumbags', No 10 says in the wake of 'data protection' saga
Sir Keir Starmer would not call shoplifters 'scumbags', No 10 has said amid the 'data protection' saga. Last week, a shopkeeper was left stunned after police told him to change his sign in which he called shoplifters 'scumbags' because it may be offensive. Rob Davies, 61, who runs the Run Ragged vintage shop in Wrexham, North Wales, installed the notice to tell shoppers some cabinets were locked against theft. The hard-working retailer put it up after he caught five thieves red-handed in the last 12 months alone and lost roughly £200 of stock to shoplifting. He felt the police did little to help when he reported the five thefts and so he gave up doing so, instead taking matters into his own hands to protect his small business. But officers later showed up at his store, demanding he remove a handwritten note that calling thieves 'scum bags' because it was 'provocative and potentially offensive'. Now, Downing Street has said that the Prime Minister would not use the same word to describe the thieves blighting Britain's retailers. When asked if he resonated with Mr Davies' view, the PM's official spokesman said: 'It is not the language I would directly use', the Telegraph has reported. The spokesman did, however, state that the government had been 'clear through our actions' that they see shoplifting as a 'serious' issue and recognise the detrimental impact it is having on the UK's high streets and local businesses. It comes following a warning from the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) that shaming shoplifting suspects could 'breach data protection' laws. On an advice page for tackling shoplifters, the UK data watchdog warned that putting up images of thieves in a local area could 'not be appropriate' behaviour. As a result, they advised retailers to 'only share personal information that's proportionate and necessary to achieve your purpose'. But shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick called the advice 'madness' and suggested that shopliters should be 'named and shamed'. He told The Telegraph: 'We should be letting the general public know of the photographs of people who have a track record of stealing in towns.' Meanwhile, Labour MP Alex Davies-Jones admitted that shoplifting across the UK had 'got out of hand'. When asked if it was right to display images of thieves in shop windows, Mr Davies-Jones responded: 'I think it is on all of us to be aware of what is going on in our local communities.' Taking to X, Shadow home office minister Katie Lam recounted a story about a constituent who had been ordered by police to remove pictures of suspected shoplifters. 'He gives police CCTV, card details, licence plates. No action apart from a visit to say he must take down pics of thieves "because of GDPR",' she wrote. 'Our system should crush the lawless and protect the law-abiding. It does the opposite.' The number of shoplifting incidents taking place in pharmacies and chemists across England has also been described as both 'unacceptable' and 'appalling' by Henry Gegg, the National Pharmacy Association (NPA) chief executive. In the past year, around nine in 10 pharmacies experienced an incident of shoplifting, while the number of thefts of drugs and other medical supplies increased by 88 per cent, according to figures obtained by the NPA. Of the 476 pharmacies across England surveyed, 87 per cent reported an increase in aggressive or intimidating behaviour towards staff, while 22 per cent recounted instances of physical assault. Around nine in 10 pharmacies experienced an incident of shoplifting, while the number of thefts of drugs and other medical supplies increased by 88 per cent in the past year, according to the National Pharmacy Association (NPA). Meanwhile, nearly three-quarters of those who had reported an incident to the police described the response as insufficient. Several pharmacy owners have resorted to putting up photos of thieves in their shop windows, wearing body cameras and even paying for security guards. Sanjeev Panesar, who owns a pharmacy in Birmingham, described a 'noticeable rise' in hostility towards staff As a result, several pharmacy owners have resorted to putting up photos of thieves in their shop windows, wearing body cameras and even paying for security guards. Sanjeev Panesar, who owns a pharmacy in Birmingham, described the 'noticeable rise' in hostility towards staff as both 'disheartening' but also capable of having a 'lasting effect on job satisfaction, morale, and feelings of safety at work.' Ashley Cowen, owner of three pharmacies across Leeds and York that have been subjected to incidents, described the lack of police action on the issue as 'shocking'. He also described witnessing brazen thieves going as far as to burn, cut and even sow through 'steel grilles' in a bid to access drug stock. Mr Davies, who says he was driven to put his handwritten sign on his shop door because of escalating shoplifting in Wrexham, told The Mail on Sunday that he had no intention of taking it down. He added: 'The sign is staying – and I may even get a bigger one. 'It's a simple point, in my opinion, and succinctly put, and can't cause offence apart from to anyone intending to steal from me. 'I was even polite and put "Thank you" on the bottom.' Mr Davies, 59, said he put it up a month ago in frustration after discovering that he was losing almost his entire monthly profit because of thieves – but was astonished to then get a visit from the police. He said: 'A police officer and PCSO came in. They said the sign was provocative and potentially offensive. 'When I asked, "Why, who it could be offensive to?" the officer didn't answer. The only person who can be offended by the words "scum bag" is a scum bag who wants to steal from me!' Mr Davies said he had received overwhelming support from fellow shopkeepers in the face of a tidal wave of theft in the town. 'There's been massive support everywhere since the sign went up,' he added. 'Shopkeepers are all in the same boat; everyone is having stuff stolen, even cafes.' A spokesman for the Information Commissioner's Office said: 'We don't set strict requirements on how organisations should respond to shoplifting, as data protection law recognises that circumstances can vary. Instead, we provide guidance to help organisations use people's information in a way that is lawful, fair and proportionate. 'Data protection law enables retailers to share images to prevent or detect crime, as long as it's necessary and proportionate in the circumstances. For example, this could include sharing images with the police, shopping centre security teams, or other relevant authorities. 'Retailers will need to consider the relevant privacy implications, such as having a legal reason and appropriate security measures, when considering publishing any images of suspected shoplifters.' North Wales Police said: 'All reports of shoplifting are taken extremely seriously. We are committed to combatting retail theft.' Shoplifting figures released this week by the British Retail Consortium (BRC) showed just 2.5 per cent of offences were recorded by the police each year. It said 50,000 shoplifting incidents go unreported every day as firms give up on the police. BRC chief executive Helen Dickinson said: 'Many retailers do not see the point of reporting incidents to the police.'