IIM Student Claims He Got an A+ After Using ChatGPT To Write Project, Sparks Debate
An IIM Ahmedabad student went viral for using ChatGPT on a project.
Yugantar Gupta received an A+ on an AI-generated marketing report.
At IIM Ahmedabad, AI use is allowed, but plagiarism is strictly prohibited.
An IIM Ahmedabad student went viral on LinkedIn for claiming he used ChatGPT to complete a marketing project. Yugantar Gupta noted that while plagiarism is prohibited at IIM Ahmedabad, AI use is permitted. To his surprise, an assignment largely generated by AI earned him an A+, a rare grade typically reserved for the top 5% of students. His post sparked a heated debate about the role of AI in education, raising questions about effort, ethics, and the true value of learning.
"MBA at IIM Ahmedabad is full of assignments, projects and reports. Plagiarism is completely prohibited, but AI use is allowed. Getting an A+ on any report is difficult at IIM Ahmedabad. Some professors don't give it to anyone at all, as a policy. Most restrict it to the top 5% or fewer. While meaningless, an A+ always feels like a medal," he wrote on LinkedIn.
See the post here:
For his marketing project on cosmetics, Mr Gupta visited eight stores, observed shoppers, and took voice notes on their behaviour and questions. He then fed these notes into Chatgpt, which generated a polished report that earned him an A+ grade, one of the highest possible marks at IIM Ahmedabad. "For every observation and every interaction, I sent myself a voice note. In excruciating detail. On getting back to campus, I explained to ChatGPT our project requirements and uploaded the entire audio transcript. And out came one of my best graded projects at IIM Ahmedabad (after a lot of heavy editing, of course)," he explained.
Mr Gupta noted that the true value lies in generating unique content, such as first-hand observations, stakeholder interviews, surveys, and personal insights, which AI can't replicate. He concluded with three key takeaways for students leveraging AI in academics: focus on reviewing AI-generated content rather than writing it, engage with real people instead of trying to humanise AI output, and seek insights from professionals beyond peer discussions.
"And that's how you show that you can do something beyond what AI can on its own. At that moment, I could just remember a quote by Steve Blank, famous within startup circles - "Get out of the building' Real work gets done on the ground, not in front of your laptop," he concluded the post.
The post sparked a lively debate, with some users praising Mr Gupta's approach and others expressing scepticism. One user wrote, "AI can accelerate the process, but human curiosity, initiative, and outreach are irreplaceable."
Another commented, "I fully agree AI shouldn't be viewed as a cursed entity and rather as a tool to make ourselves more efficient and better. That's what I have been doing at my work. Also it's good to see that IIM Ahmedabad doesn't limit use of AI, would make my life a lot easier!"
A third said, "Brilliantly articulated. This is a timely reminder that real value lies in original thinking, conversations, and insights gathered from the field, not just clever prompts or surface-level summaries. AI can accelerate the process, but human curiosity, initiative, and outreach are irreplaceable. Thanks for the push to 'get out of the building' and engage with the real world."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Salary at 10 am, resignation at 10.05 am': HR criticises employee's 5-minute exit, viral post sparks debate
A LinkedIn post by an Indian HR professional has sparked a debate on social media. The post talks about an employee who reportedly resigned just five minutes after receiving their first salary. In the post, the HR professional questioned the ethics behind such a sudden exit. 'Let's talk about professional ethics. The company welcomed you, trusted you, and gave you a platform to grow. And then—five minutes after your first salary hit your account—you walked away. Was that fair? Was it ethical?' she wrote. She further said that last-minute resignations often demonstrate 'a lack of intent, maturity, and accountability,' and emphasised the importance of open communication. 'If something didn't feel right: You could've spoken up. You could've asked for clarity or help. You could've made a conscious exit, not a convenient one,' she added. She continued that no job is without its challenges, and that true professional growth takes more than just collecting the salary. 'No job is 'easy.' Every role takes commitment, patience, and effort. Growth doesn't come with your first paycheck — it comes with perseverance,' she wrote. Concludingly, she urged professionals to take responsibility for their career decisions. 'So before pointing fingers at 'culture' or 'role mismatch,' Pause. Reflect. Communicate. Because in the end, your professionalism is defined not by your post — but by your actions,' the post read. Click on the link to view the post The post quickly drew attention, with numerous LinkedIn users sharing their opinions. 'Person is not wrong But being Hr you should not post such matters on social media .It clearly shows your immaturity please,' a user wrote. Another user sided with the employee, saying, 'Ethics? Let's be clear: salaries are paid for work already done – not for charity, not in advance. If someone resigns after getting paid, it means they fulfilled their obligation for that month. And let's not forget: there's usually a notice period still to be served. So it's not like the company is being blindsided or shortchanged. If companies want lifelong loyalty, maybe they should issue marriage certificates, not offer letters.' 'It works both ways, but it's not balanced. When an employee does this to a company, the company does not usually collapse. However, when a company does this to an employee, a lot of times entire families are brought to the streets. So, please get that into perspective,' a third user reacted.
Mint
4 minutes ago
- Mint
OpenAI's $500 billion ambition puts it in elite club—and in the crosshairs
Just a week after OpenAI secured fresh funding at a $300-billion valuation, reports emerged of potential share sales at $500 billion. If it goes through, that kind of valuation would place OpenAI among only around 20 companies valued at over half a trillion dollars globally. OpenAI's latest funding round, worth $8.3 billion, was oversubscribed five times. The investor appetite reflected their confidence in the AI startup's ability to dominate a market that the UN Trade and Development projects will explode by 25 times in size in a decade. OpenAI's momentum is undeniable. The company has continuously upgraded its flagship ChatGPT product, recently launching GPT-5, which it claims can provide PhD-level expertise. Financially, its revenues have doubled in seven months, reaching $1 billion a month, with projections to hit $20 billion in annualised revenue by the end of the year. The capital influx will primarily help OpenAI scale its compute infrastructure, particularly Stargate, a joint venture with Japanese investment firm SoftBank and technology company Oracle to build the world's largest AI supercomputing infrastructure. OpenAI is also setting up its first data centre in Europe next year, which will house 100,000 Nvidia processors. This infrastructure investment is critical as companies race to control the data centres and AI chips essential for training and operating advanced artificial intelligence models. The numbers reflect this reality. Global data centre capacity surged from 20GW in 2016 to 57GW in 2024, with Goldman Sachs projecting 122GW by 2030. While OpenAI's valuation reflects investor confidence, the fundraising itself underscores the infrastructure investments needed to maintain leadership in the AI market. Challenger pack OpenAI faces growing competition from well-funded AI startups. Anthropic, founded by former OpenAI employees, is nearing a $5 billion funding round that would value it at $170 billion, up from $61.5 billion in March. Elon Musk's xAI has raised $10 billion at an $80 billion valuation and is seeking additional funding at a potential $200 billion valuation. Venture capital funding to AI companies has exceeded $40 billion in each of the past three quarters, according to Crunchbase. This financial backing is translating into competitive model performance. On the GPQA Diamond benchmark, which tests PhD-level science questions, xAI's Grok 4 Heavy scored 88.9% and Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.1 scored 80.9%. The landscape shifted when Chinese startup DeepSeek released powerful open-weight models available for free. OpenAI released its own open-weight models in response. The competition now spans both proprietary and open-source approaches. Incumbent advantage OpenAI also faces pressure from the Big Tech firms. Meta, Google, Amazon, and Microsoft have collectively spent $291 billion over the past year, largely for AI infrastructure. Last month, in a $2.4 billion deal, Google hired key executives from Windsurf, an AI coding company that OpenAI wanted to acquire. Google has also integrated 'AI Overviews' with its search engine, turning it into an 'answer engine" that directly competes with the core function of chatbots like ChatGPT. This strategy leverages Google's 2 billion monthly users and its market dominance. Meta, meanwhile, is restructuring its AI division into Meta Superintelligence Labs. It has also acquired top-tier AI researchers from OpenAI, with multi-million-dollar compensation packages. Partner paradox OpenAI's relationship with Microsoft, however, has turned complicated. Microsoft, OpenAI's primary backer with a $13.75 billion investment, is also a direct competitor seeking to lead the AI revolution. Copilot, Microsoft's AI platform, boasts over 100 million monthly users. Microsoft's server products and cloud services revenue jumped 27% year-over-year in the three months ended 30 June, driven by growth in Azure, its cloud or remote computing platform. Microsoft holds crucial leverage as OpenAI attempts to convert into a for-profit company—a prerequisite for unlocking SoftBank funding and IPO plans. However, Microsoft has been withholding approval as both companies negotiate revising their contract, set to expire in 2030. A major sticking point is a clause that could terminate Microsoft's access to future OpenAI technology if the startup's board declares that artificial general intelligence—AI's capacity to learn and understand like humans and apply that knowledge to execute tasks—has been achieved. This friction has real consequences: OpenAI's attempt to acquire AI coding startup Windsurf failed because Microsoft's IP rights would have extended to the new technology, which Windsurf rejected. OpenAI needs capital to overcome these structural challenges and funding obstacles. is a database and search engine for public data
Time of India
4 minutes ago
- Time of India
OpenAI announces million-dollar bonuses to nearly 1,000 employees to retain AI talent
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills ChatGPT maker OpenAI has announced massive bonus payouts for about 1,000 employees, which is approximately one-third of its full-time the eve of GPT-5's launch, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman sent a surprise message to employees via communication platform Slack. A quarterly bonus for two years was awarded to researchers and software engineers in the firm's applied engineering, scaling, and safety domains, according to The payouts vary by role and seniority. Top researchers will receive mid-single-digit millions as bonus, while engineers will get hundreds of thousands. Bonuses will be distributed quarterly for two years and can be received in stock, cash, or a combination of informed that the rise in compensation was a result of market dynamics, likely driven by the demand for AI talent."As we mentioned a few weeks ago, we have been looking at comp for our technical teams given the movement in the market," The Verge cited Altman's message to employees as saying."We very much intend to keep increasing comp as we keep doing better and better as a company," he wrote. "But we wanted to be transparent about this one since it's a new thing for us," he giants and well-funded startups in Silicon Valley are intensifying competition for AI expertise, announcing bonuses to attract talent. Altman has recently lost several key researchers to Meta, while Elon Musk's xAI is also seeking to attract is OpenAI's second-largest market in the world after the US, and it may well become its biggest market in the near future, according to its CEO Sam is available to all users, with Plus subscribers getting more usage, and Pro subscribers getting access to GPT‑5 pro, a version with extended reasoning for even more comprehensive and accurate answers."GPT‑5 is a unified system with a smart, efficient model that answers most questions, a deeper reasoning model (GPT‑5 thinking) for harder problems, and a real‑time router that quickly decides which to use based on conversation type, complexity, tool needs, and your explicit intent," the company noted.
