logo
Major $2,300 cost-of-living relief for Aussies under new $2.3 billion plan

Major $2,300 cost-of-living relief for Aussies under new $2.3 billion plan

Yahoo06-04-2025

Australians could save up to $2,300 on their energy bill if they install a new solar and battery system under Labor's latest cost-of-living election promise. If re-elected, the government would cut the cost of a typical battery by 30 per cent.
The Cheaper Home Batteries Program would come into effect for households, small businesses and community facilities from July 1, 2025. Department of Energy estimated those with an existing rooftop solar could safe $1,100 under the plan.
Those installing a new system have been tipped to save up to $2,300.
Under the plan, households, small businesses and community facilities would receive a 30 per cent discount on the upfront cost of a typical battery — a saving of around $4,000.
RELATED
Aussie dad saves $3,000 and avoids paying electricity bill for years: 'Game-changing'
Aussie mum reveals $160,000 superannuation 'shock' impacting millions at retirement
Coles, Woolworths side hustle offering $320 a year that any Aussie can do: 'No-brainer'
"We want to make sure Australians have access to cheaper, cleaner energy," Albanese said.
"This is good for power bills and good for the environment."
The government's energy rebate program was extended to offer two more $75 quarterly installments, paid from July 1.
'The contrast is clear – a re-elected Albanese government will take pressure off household energy bills, while Peter Dutton's Liberals will spend $600 billion on a nuclear plan that drives power bills up,' Energy Minister Chris Bowen said.
The Property Council and Smart Energy Council have welcomed the move.
Peter Dutton is expected to release a battery subsidy policy before the election, with speculation that it will be means tested.
Adelaide teacher Ryan Parsons told Yahoo Finance he had cut his family's $2,000 annual electricity bill down to zero since installing a solar and battery system in his home.
It cost $9,500 to install the solar panels and inverter on the family's Forrestville home. He had to spend a further $15,000, less a $1,000 state government rebate, for a BYD battery.
But the father-of-two said it was a "no brainer" after calculating the return on investment for the solar would be less than two years, while the battery would be seven years after that.
Now, the family only takes electricity from the grid during a patch in winter, with the costs offset by money they receive by pumping power back into the grid.
'Basically, the entire rest of the year we were completely powered by the battery and our solar. That makes a massive difference. That's really what stopped us from completely paying any bills at all,' Parsons told Yahoo Finance.
The government has estimated one in three Australian households have solar panels, but just one in 40 have their own battery.
Having a battery would help households store surplus power generated during the day, which would reduce reliance on the grid and push down cost and demand in peak periods.
Uptake will be limited to one system per home.
There will be 5 kWh to 50 kWh systems eligible for support, with total capacity not exceeding 100 kWh.
Costs and uptake would be assessed each year to ensure the subsidy has been set at the next level.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Landlord's 'unreasonable' request after tenant has a baby: 'It changes things'
Landlord's 'unreasonable' request after tenant has a baby: 'It changes things'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Landlord's 'unreasonable' request after tenant has a baby: 'It changes things'

Welcome to legal column where lawyers Alison and Jillian Barrett from Maurice Blackburn tackle problems everyday Aussies face — whether it be consumer, property, money matters impacting relationships or work. This week, a landlord questions their rights after a tenant has a baby. Question I'm a property investor and I've recently learned that my tenant had a baby and didn't tell me. I feel like it changes things and now there are more people living in the property than when we first made the lease agreement. Did I have a right to be told when she fell pregnant? Answer As a property investor, it's natural to be concerned about changes in your rental property, especially when it involves an increase in the number of occupants. If you've recently discovered that your tenant had a baby without informing you, you might be wondering about your rights and whether you should have been notified. In Australia, tenancy agreements are governed by state-specific Residential Tenancies Acts, which outline the rights and responsibilities of both landlords and tenants. Generally, these agreements specify the number of occupants allowed in the rental property. However, the birth of a child is typically not considered a breach of the lease agreement. Tenants are not legally required to inform landlords about changes in their family composition, such as having a baby. The Residential Tenancies Acts in various states do not mandate tenants disclose personal events like pregnancy or childbirth. This means that while the addition of a new family member may change the dynamics of the household, it does not necessarily violate the terms of the Tradie turned landlord with $4 million portfolio reveals biggest property mistake: 'Lemons' $4,400 ATO car tax deduction that most Aussies miss: 'Easy win' Centrelink $1,011 cash boost for Aussie farmers doing it tough: 'Get back on track' The situation may be different if an additional family moved in. If, for example, your property is a 2 bedroom, 1 bathroom unit and the lease agreement stipulated one couple but another couple also moved in with their three children – so there are now four adults and three children – that would unlikely be reasonable and would be a breach of the lease agreement. As a landlord, you do have the right to ensure that the property is being used in accordance with the lease agreement. If the increase in occupants leads to issues such as overcrowding or excessive wear and tear, you may have grounds to address these concerns. It's important to approach the situation with sensitivity and understanding, as tenants have the right to privacy and to live comfortably in their rented home. Open communication can often resolve potential problems before they escalate. Additionally, you can review the lease agreement to ensure that it clearly outlines the expectations regarding occupancy and property use. You should be aware that your actions may be viewed as unreasonable and potentially a breach of discrimination laws if you evict your tenants for simply having a baby. These laws are designed to protect individuals from unfair treatment based on certain characteristics. Addressing this matter with sensitivity and ensuring that all parties are treated with respect and fairness is crucial. This legal information is general in nature and should not be regarded as specific legal advice. If you need legal advice, you should consult a solicitor.

Hidden reason behind Australia's growing job crisis: 'Breaking point'
Hidden reason behind Australia's growing job crisis: 'Breaking point'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Hidden reason behind Australia's growing job crisis: 'Breaking point'

Australian jobseekers have been warned of the critical understaffing in the recruitment sector as thousands of people desperately try to find their next gig. The job market is incredibly tight at the moment due to a variety of factors, and it's not uncommon to see hundreds or even thousands of people apply for a single role. Many are applying and not hearing anything back from the hiring managers or recruiters. Chris Field has submitted more than 40 applications in the last few weeks in the Sydney real estate sector and told Yahoo Finance it's an exhausting and brutal experience. "It bothers me a lot and hurts my confidence," he said. Common 'red flag' resume mistake job seekers are urged to avoid $4,400 ATO car tax deduction that most Aussies miss: 'Easy win' Centrelink $1,011 cash boost for Aussie farmers doing it tough: 'Get back on track' "The most frustrating part is not necessarily applying for it, but you spend all this time going to these interviews, spending time and fuel commuting there and back, and you just don't get anything from it." He has tried to remain positive and find the lesson in each experience, but said finding a job at the moment is a bit like shouting into the void. In some cases, he'll send off an application and get zero response. In other roles, he gets through a few rounds before they suddenly "drop all lines of communication". Sadly, his story is all too there might be many who apply for jobs they're not suited to, many well-qualified individuals are "slipping through the cracks" because there aren't enough people to sift through all the applications. JobAdder has revealed that the average recruitment agency in Australia is juggling more than 2,170 resumes in just one quarter. The workload is overwhelming recruiters and pushing some to "breaking point". 'The job market is challenging for both job seekers and recruiters," JobAdder CEO Martin Herbst said. "Applications are flooding in and recruiters are drowning. "There aren't enough hours to sift through hundreds of CVs, field candidates, consult with clients and keep all applicants updated. "Recruiters are only human, and they're stretched too thin. It's no surprise burnout is on the rise, and job seekers are getting the silent treatment. It's not about talent; it's about time." JobAdder's State of Recruitment report showed the average number of applications per role has jumped by 42 per cent year-on-year. In 2024's December quarter, recruiters were sifting through more than 41 CVs for every job, which is around 725 resumes every month. Over a quarter of recruiters reported a poor work-life balance as they tried to chip away at the growing workload, while 37 per cent said they're struggling with burnout. What's even more worrying is that some recruitment sectors are shrinking, with one in three recruiters admitting that their workload is only going to get bigger as the internal headcount drops. Paul Mitchinson, director of growth and partnerships Asia Pacific and Japan at recruitment and consultancy firm Think and Grow Inc, told Yahoo Finance the system needs to be fixed. "Application volume for roles is unprecedented right now," he said. "Significant layoffs over the past 18 months have created record levels of competition. "This is placing immense pressure on hiring teams, and traditional recruitment tools simply aren't equipped to manage the sheer volume of applications. "There might only be one talent acquisition manager in a business and let's say they've read through 100 applications, or even 50 and they've found 10 that they really, really like, and think are a great fit, what is the incentive to keep on reading another 200 or 300 applications? "That's the reality of the situation." But because there is little transparency about this "dehumanising" environment, jobseekers are left questioning what's wrong with them. He and Herbst said the problem could be fixed by implementing more artificial intelligence into certain workflows or processes, which could give additional spare time to look at more applications. "It's not about replacing recruiters; it's about keeping them," the JobAdder CEO said. "AI gives people tools and time to make better hiring decisions and offload some of the grunt work, so candidates don't get ghosted. "If we keep hiring the old way, great talent will keep slipping through the cracks, and recruiters will burn out. Everyone loses. Something has got to give.'Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data

Privatisation shelved as premier fights to stay afloat
Privatisation shelved as premier fights to stay afloat

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Privatisation shelved as premier fights to stay afloat

A retracted privatisation promise by Jeremy Rockliff has added pressure on the embattled Tasmanian premier to resign. Mr Rockliff has stopped prominent economist Saul Eslake from preparing a report on viable opportunities to sell government-owned businesses to support Tasmania's troubled finances. He promised legislation ensuring that any sales would require a two-thirds majority support in parliament. Today, I can confirm that there will be no privatisation under a Government I will also be changing the law so that a government business can only be sold in future if it receives a two-thirds majority in the Parliament. — Jeremy Rockliff (@jeremyrockliff) June 7, 2025 "There will be no privatisation. Nil," Mr Rockwell said. However, not everyone is convinced by his backtracking. "Frankly, Jeremy Rockliff saying that he won't be proceeding with privatisation cannot be believed and, even if it could, it doesn't go far enough," Unions Tasmania secretary Jessica Munday said. "The community ... will be rightly cynical about the timing of this announcement and the commitment underpinning it, given it comes as the premier is fighting for his political life." Mr Rockliff's backflip comes as the Greens ramp up pressure on him to resign, saying they are ready to offer "confidence and supply" to Labor leader Dean Winter as premier. "Just because we don't see eye to eye on everything doesn't mean we can't work constructively for our state," Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff said on Saturday. "Jeremy Rockliff could make sure there is no election by resigning. "But with the premier refusing to do so, it is incumbent on Dean Winter as opposition leader to engage with the Greens and the wider crossbench to prevent the state heading to the polls." Mr Winter has ruled out forming government in a deal with the Greens, without whom Labor doesn't have the numbers. The ongoing political fractures could send Tasmanians back to the polls for the fourth time in seven years, unless the Liberal party opts to remove Mr Rockliff and negotiate a new deal with crossbenchers. An election could be called on Tuesday. Despite feuding over the state's finances, Tasmania's proposed $715 million stadium looms as the biggest issue. The roofed Macquarie Point proposal is a condition of an AFL licence, with the state government responsible for delivery and cost overruns. Labor and the Liberals support the stadium but recent polls suggest Tasmanians are not sold. Firebrand senator Jacqui Lambie, independent federal MP Andrew Wilkie and acclaimed author Richard Flanagan are among well-known Tasmanians who oppose the project.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store