
‘They're on. They're off. We can't plan' – bourbon makers dazed by Trump tariffs
Brough Brothers Distillery is in the midst of a big expansion. A fifteen minutes' drive from its small distillery in the West End neighborhood of Louisville, Kentucky, workers are toiling away on its new site, seven times the size of the old one, in the heart of Bourbon City.
This has been a long time coming for Brough Brothers, which opened its first location in 2020 and had drawn up ambitious plans for international growth in 2025. Then Donald Trump returned to power.
The Trump administration is conducting a sweeping overhaul of the US economy, using tariffs – levies on foreign goods, paid for by importers – in an effort to reset the country's trade ties with the world, revive its industrial heartlands and force its neighbors to address illegal immigration and drug trafficking.
'Tariffs are easy, they're fast, they're efficient, and they bring fairness,' Trump said earlier this month.
The reality has proven more complex, and confusing, than the bold rhetoric. Threats have been leveled and then dropped; deadlines declared and delayed; tariffs imposed and postponed. Chaos reigns.
Victor Yarbrough, CEO of Brough Brothers, does not want tariffs. But he would take the certainty of tariffs over the current racket emanating from the White House around whether they will, or won't, be imposed; when; and on which markets.
'They're happening. They're not happening. They're on. They're off. It doesn't allow us the timeframe we need,' Yarbrough said in an interview. 'We can't plan.'
Yarbrough spoke to the Guardian the week after Trump declared there to be 'no room left' for an economic peace deal with Canada; imposed sweeping 25% tariffs on US exports from the country; and accused its prime minister of using the dispute to cling to power; only to offer a one-month reprieve.
During the interview, the president lashed out against Ontario's decision to retaliate against his tariffs with a 25% surcharge on electricity exports to the states of New York, Michigan and Minnesota, announcing that tariffs on Canada's steel and aluminum exports to the US would be doubled. Hours later, the threat was revoked.
Brough Brothers, Kentucky's first African American-owned distillery, was 'in the middle of getting a deal done' to start selling its spirits in New Brunswick when Trump took aim at Canada, straining economic ties with a typically reliable market for US exporters. 'We've effectively had to put the deal on hold indefinitely,' said Yarbrough.
Tensions are flaring worldwide. The day after the interview, the EU unveiled a €26bn ($28bn/£22bn) list of US targets – including bourbon – that it plans to hit with retaliatory tariffs, after Trump hiked US tariffs on steel and aluminum. In response, the US president threatened a 200% US tariff on European alcohol.
Several Canadian provinces meanwhile removed US liquor from store shelves as part of the dispute between Washington and Ottawa; a move that some American producers said was worse than a tariff. The question of how much it might cost to sell a product into a market was supplanted by whether it could be sold there at all.
'Having all US alcohol pulled from the shelves in Canada is a huge blow for the industry,' said Yarbrough, who just a few months ago had planned to start selling into markets including Canada, the UK, Germany, France and South Africa. 'Now we're Plan B.
'It's Canada today. It's the UK, it's the European Union, in a couple of weeks. It's China now. Is there another country [on which] they're going to implement tariffs?' he said. 'Can we pivot to a Brazil? Can we pivot to a Colombia? Can we pivot to a Panama? Or are they going to have tariffs the next month? It's just difficult to facilitate any kind of plan, just because there's so much uncertainty.'
A day after we spoke, the EU vowed to impose steep tariffs on a carefully targeted list of US exports after Trump hiked US duties on steel and aluminium. Bourbon whiskey was among them.
Yarbrough knows trade, having previously imported bourbon from the US and exported English cider while based in the UK. He knows tariffs, too. 'Ultimately it's a tax,' he said, noting that the real increase in costs is likely to be higher than the official rate, as the duty twists each link of the supply chain.
A 25% tariff, for example, would probably prompt both the importer and the retailer to adjust their costs, according to Yarbrough. 'You're not just speaking about that 25%. That's just the baseline,' he said. 'These incremental costs add up. It's beyond just the 25%.'
The tariffs mess is rattling this deep red state. Louisville has so many bourbon production plants that locals say they can often smell the whiskey in the air. A vast bottle of Old Forester towers over the headquarters of Brown-Forman, the drinks conglomerate.
Kentucky Republicans have urged Trump to dial down his tariff threats. The Republican senator Rand Paul has warned duties would 'inevitably' raise prices and invite retaliation that would reduce bourbon exports. As a stock market sell-off took hold, he wrote on social media: 'When the markets tumble like this in response to tariffs, it pays to listen.'
Lobbyists insist the spirits sector is a model of the 'fair and reciprocal' approach on trade that Trump claims to be seeking. In the two decades after the US and EU eliminated tariffs on most spirits in 1997, bilateral trade grew by 450%, according to the Distilled Spirits Council of the US.
'Tariffs back and forth would be catastrophic for the industry,' Chris Swonger, president and CEO of the council, told the Guardian.
Sure, he said, the US does have a trade deficit with key markets on spirits – importing more from markets like the EU, UK, Canada and Mexico than it exports to them. 'But it's not because of trade barriers. It's because American consumers love scotch. They love Irish whiskey … American consumers love tequila, and Canadian whiskey.'
Within these global markets, however, free trade – without tariffs, or barriers – has set the stage for the US industry's rapid growth, Swonger claimed, with the number of distilleries surging from 60 to about 3,100 in about two decades. 'It's a great American success story,' he said.
Trump, who rarely speaks in minimal terms, has conceded his grand economic reset might cause 'a little disturbance' for companies and consumers. The spirits sector, so often caught in the crossfire of trade disputes, fears the turbulence may well be bigger than billed.
Operators are calling on the White House to prioritize talking over tariffs. 'I get it. Two brothers are fighting,' said Yarbrough. 'Let's go have a drink and figure this out. Let's go have a bourbon and figure this out.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
16 minutes ago
- NBC News
Transgender troops face a deadline and a difficult decision: Stay or go?
WASHINGTON — As transgender service members face a deadline to leave the U.S. military, hundreds are taking the financial bonus to depart voluntarily. But others say they will stay and fight. For many, it is a wrenching decision to end a career they love, and leave units they have led or worked with for years. And they are angry they are being forced out by the Trump administration's renewed ban on transgender troops. Active duty service members had until Friday to identify themselves and begin to leave the military voluntarily, while the National Guard and Reserve have until July 7. Then the military will begin involuntary separations. Friday's deadline comes during Pride Month and as the Trump administration targets diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, saying it's aiming to scrub the military of "wokeness" and reestablishing a "warrior ethos." "They're tired of the rollercoaster. They just want to go," said one transgender service member, who plans to retire. "It's exhausting." For others, it's a call to arms. "I'm choosing to stay in and fight," a noncommissioned officer in the Air Force said. "My service is based on merit, and I've earned that merit." The troops, who mainly spoke on condition of anonymity because they fear reprisals, said being forced to decide is frustrating. They say it's a personal choice based on individual and family situations, including whether they would get an infusion of cash or possibly wind up owing the government money. "I'm very disappointed," a transgender Marine said. "I've outperformed, I have a spotless record. I'm at the top of every fitness report. I'm being pushed out while I know others are barely scraping by." Some transgender troops decide to leave based on finances Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has said this is President Donald Trump's directive and what America voted for. The Pentagon, he said, is "leaving wokeness & weakness behind" and that includes "no more dudes in dresses." Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois, a veteran, and 22 other Democratic senators have written to Hegseth urging him to allow transgender troops to keep serving honorably. Already, more than 1,000 service members have voluntarily identified themselves as transgender and are slated to begin leaving, according to rough Defense Department estimates. Defense officials say there are about 4,240 active duty transgender troops but acknowledge the numbers are fuzzy. For many, the decision is financial. Those who voluntarily leave will get double the amount of separation pay they would normally receive and won't have to return bonuses or tuition costs. Those who refuse to go could be forced to repay reenlistment or other bonuses as high as $50,000. That was the tipping point for Roni Ferrell, an Army specialist at Joint Base Lewis-McChord near Tacoma, Washington. Ferrell, 28, lives on base with her wife and two children and had planned to stay in the Army for at least another decade. But she said she felt "backed into a corner" to sign the voluntary separation agreement, fearing she would have to repay an $18,500 reenlistment bonus. "My commander basically said it was my only option in order to make sure my kids are taken care of," Ferrell said. The Marine, who has served for more than 25 years, said she had planned to stay and fight, but changed her mind. Lawyers, she said, told her an involuntary separation would put a code in her record saying she was forced to leave "in the interests of national security." That designation, she said, could mean those involuntarily separated could lose their security clearances, hurting future job prospects. In a statement Friday, a defense official said the code "is not intended" to trigger clearance revocations and that gender dysphoria is not a security reporting requirement, according to the director of national intelligence. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. Cynthia Cheng-Wun Weaver, senior director of litigation for Human Rights Campaign, said it's important for troops to talk with judge advocates general in their services to ensure they understand the different procedures being implemented. Other transgender troops plan to stay despite the ban The Air Force service member and a transgender officer in the Army National Guard both said they plan to stay and fight. Lawsuits over the ban continue and could change or block the policy. For troops involved in the court battles as plaintiffs, leaving voluntarily now would likely hurt their standing in the case. For others, it's simply dedication to their career. "I've really embraced military culture, and it's embraced me," the Air Force member said. "It's not about money. It's the career that I love." The Guard soldier echoed that sentiment, saying he will stay on "because it is important to me to serve. Frankly, I'm good at it, I'm well trained so I want to continue." Others without bonuses to repay or who have been in the military only a short while and won't get much in separation bonus pay may opt to stay and see what happens. National Guard troops face a particular problem National Guard members who are heading to their monthly drill weekend or annual two-week drill in June could be required to go but serve as the gender they were assigned at birth. That means they would have to wear uniforms and haircuts of that gender, use that bathroom and be referred to as "sir" or "ma'am" based on that gender. For many, that could be close to impossible and create uncomfortable situations. "If I were to show up to drill this weekend, I'd be expected to use all female facilities, I would be expected to wear a woman's uniform," said the Army Guard officer, who transitioned to male about five years ago and says others in his unit know him as a man. "I don't look like a woman. I don't feel like a woman. It would be disruptive to good order and discipline for me to show up and to tell my soldiers, you have to call me 'ma'am' now." It's not clear if Guard units are handling it all the same way, and it could be up to individual states or commanders. Some may allow troops to postpone the drill or go on administrative leave. What happens next for transgender troops? The service members interviewed by The Associated Press said they don't know what will happen once the deadline passes to leave voluntarily. Some believe that unit commanders will quickly single people out and start involuntary separations. Others say the process is vague, may involve medical review boards and could take months. The defense official said Friday that as the Pentagon takes these steps, it "will treat our service members with dignity and respect." Under Hegseth's directive, military commanders will be told to identify troops with gender dysphoria — when a person's biological sex does not match their gender identity — and send them to get medical checks to force them out of the service, defense officials have said. The order relies on routine annual health checks — so it could be months before that evaluation is scheduled. "My real big sticking point is that this administration's whole push is to reform this country based around merit, and that gender, race, etc., should have no factor in hiring," the Air Force service member said. "If that's true, I'm solely being removed for my gender, and merit is no longer a factor."


Daily Mirror
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Big price Tottenham have paid to sack Ange Postecoglou as decision finally made
Tottenham Hotspur and Ange Postecoglou have finally parted ways, despite the club's Europa League success, as the club's dire Premier League performance ultimately proves costly In the end, Tottenham Hotspur emperor Daniel Levy and the Spurs hierarchy decided it wasn't enough. Ange Postecoglou, despite winning the Europa League and earning Champions League football, had to go. Confirmation came on Friday afternoon, after months of speculation, that the ex-Celtic manager had been sacked. Ironically, the man who broke the club's 17-year wait for a trophy was binned on the two-year anniversary of his appointment. A club statement declared: "We are extremely grateful to Ange for his commitment and contribution during his two years at the club. Ange will always be remembered as only the third manager in our history to deliver a European trophy, alongside legendary figures Bill Nicholson and Keith Burkinshaw. "However, the board has unanimously concluded that it is in the best interests of the club for a change to take place. Following a positive start in the 2023/24 Premier League (PL) season, we recorded 78 points from the last 66 PL games. "This culminated in our worst-ever PL finish last season. At times there were extenuating circumstances - injuries and then a decision to prioritise our European campaign. Whilst winning the Europa League this season ranks as one of the club's greatest moments, we cannot base our decision on emotions aligned to this triumph. "It is crucial that we are able to compete on multiple fronts and believe a change of approach will give us the strongest chance for the coming season and beyond. This has been one of the toughest decisions we have had to make and is not a decision that we have taken lightly, nor one we have rushed to conclude. "We have made what we believe is the right decision to give us the best chance of success going forward, not the easy decision." In a week where both coach Ryan Mason and executive director Donna-Maria Cullen left the club and Levy was quoted when both exits were announced, it was startling that there were no words from the chairman. The decision to part ways with Postecoglou will cost the club £4million in compensation. That is on top of the £2m bonus he has earned for winning the Europa League. A replacement may also be expensive, particularly if they pursue Brentford chief Thomas Frank, who is high in their thinking. All in, it was a decision Spurs decided they had to make. It is also a costly one. Join our new WhatsApp community and receive your daily dose of Mirror Football content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice.


Scotsman
20 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Something sinister about the delay in revealing Edinburgh's bridge of sighs
What's underneath the tarpaulin on the North Bridge? asks Susan Morrison For a few years now I've enjoyed playing 'Find the Number Seven Bus Stop up the Bridges'. It wanders about, depending on the No-Way-North/South-is-Shut status of North Bridge. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Sometimes it lurks on Chambers Street, which is quite nice because there's a heating vent that blasts out warm air on wintery nights. Very cosy. North Bridge may not be over the Kwai, but it is over budget, and the work has lasted way longer than expected. Of course it has. Did anyone in their right mind really think it would stick to plan? Check out the parliament, the trams and the ferries. Their original costs rocketed faster than the price of an Easyjet ticket. It's all bargain basement until you want mad luxuries like allocated seats and three extra pairs of pants in your bag. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Well, it will be lovely when it is finished, but I can't rid myself of a niggling doubt. I'm starting to suspect a replacement bridge lurks under all that flapping tarpaulin, and when the wrapping is taken away, we'll be faced with the sort of concrete horror that graces Glenrothes. The word 'graces' is doing a lot of heavy lifting there. I think they've sold the original, just like London Bridge, to some deranged desert-dwelling American tech bro. There doesn't seem to be a shortage of moneyed mad lads. Look at that Musk one. He bought a president. He seems to be regretting it now, though. Perhaps they've cloned it. Mr Trump claimed that Mr Biden's been cloned, so if he thinks they can clone a president, they can clone a bridge. Although I'm surprised that the sinister forces that switched to Robot Biden didn't replace him with something snappier and less likely to glitch during debates. They should have asked us. We invented cloning in Scotland. A sheep was well within our capabilities, so banging out an identical bridge isn't a challenge too far. Well, we'll just have to put up with the exasperating bus stop bingo for a while longer, but I'm telling you, there's something sinister about the delay in revealing Edinburgh's bridge of sighs.