Georgia NAACP calls on KSU to not eliminate Black studies major
The Georgia NAACP is calling on Kennesaw State University to reverse its decision to eliminate its Black studies major.
The school announced this week that it was removing three majors due to low enrollment.
The NAACP called the program's elimination a "regressive and damaging decision."
COBB COUNTY, Ga. - Kennesaw State University is facing criticism from the Georgia NAACP after the college eliminated its Black studies major.
The school announced this week that it was removing the major along with two others - philosophy and technical communication - due to low enrollment.
What we know
According to KSU's website, the Black studies major "fosters an understanding of the global experiences of African, African American, and African-descended peoples with a range of intellectual tools and practical strategies for engaging race, gender, class, and culture."
Students examine the Black experience and cultural and historical relations between Africans and people in the Diaspora. The program has been at the university for 20 years.
In a statement to FOX 5, a spokesperson for Kennesaw State University said the university made the decision to remove the majors "in accordance with the University System of Georgia's established thresholds."
"While the Black Studies, Philosophy and Technical Communication programs have all consistently fallen short in enrollment and degree output over at least the past 10 years, a two-year teach-out plan will still allow current students to complete their degrees," the statement read. "Faculty will also continue offering courses in these areas for minors, electives and general education."
The Atlanta Voice reports that existing students in the majors will be able to complete their programs.
What they're saying
In a statement, the Georgia NAACP called the move "deeply troubling," saying it "raises urgent concerns about the institution's commitment to equity, academic integrity, and inclusive education."
The group described the major as "a cornerstone of truth-telling, cultural affirmation, and intellectual exploration that serves all students" and said eliminating the program would be "a regressive and damaging decision."
"This is more than a curriculum issue—this is a moral issue," said Georgia NAACP President Gerald Griggs. "We will not stand by while educational spaces critical to Black identity, history, and scholarship are threatened."
What's next
The NAACP is calling for a meeting with KSU President Kathy Schwaig and university leadership to discuss the program's elimination.
It is not clear whether the university has responded to the NAACP's demands for action.
The Source
Information for this story came from a release by the Georgia NAACP, KSU's website, and a report by th Atlanta Voice.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas Democrat Spends Night on House Floor to Protest Map She Says Erodes Black and Latino Voting Power
The redistricting battle in Texas has taken a turn. After state House Democrats returned from their walkout, they were informed on Monday that they would need a police escort when they leave the chamber floor in order to prevent them from fleeing the state again before the House reconvenes on Wednesday. State Rep. Nicole Collier, however, refused to sign what Democrats are calling 'permission slips,' and she spent the night on the chamber floor in protest. 'My constituents sent me to Austin to protect their voices and rights,' she said. 'I refuse to sign away my dignity as a duly elected representative just so Republicans can control my movements and monitor me with police escorts.' Collier added that her community, which is majority-minority, expects her to fight for fair representation. 'When I press that button to vote, I know these maps will harm my constituents — I won't just go along quietly with their intimidation or their discrimination,' she said. Dozens of Texas House Democrats fled to Illinois, New York, and Massachusetts on Aug. 3. They hoped that their absence would deny the chamber the quorum it needs to conduct business and, as a result, block the proposed congressional map, which is designed to aggressively favor the Republican Party in the 2026 midterm later said they were prepared to return once their Republican colleagues adjourn the special legislative session and California releases a retaliatory map of its own. Advocates have criticized the Texas map, unveiled just days before the 60th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act, for potentially chipping away at the political power of Texans of color. Texas state Rep. Jolanda Jones is one of the Democrats who left the state. 'The districts that are targeted overwhelmingly are Black districts [that are represented by Democrats],' Jones said at a press conference earlier this month. 'They're pitting [U.S. Rep.] Jasmine Crockett against [U.S. Rep.] Marc Veasey. And they're pitting [U.S. Rep] Al Green against [the vacant] CD18, where there was a Black representative.' For instance, in Green's current district, which includes a portion of the Greater Houston area, the Black voting-age population would drop from 39% to 11%. Similarly, the Black voting-age population of Veasey's Fort Worth-based district, currently 25%, would also drop. On Aug. 14, California Gov. Gavin Newsom formally called on state lawmakers to approve a Nov. 4 ballot measure that would temporarily allow California to redraw its map without having to go through its independent commission. Here's more information about the latest developments in the Lone Star State — and beyond. Why did Texas House Democrats flee the state? For months, President Donald Trump has been pushing his allies in Texas to redraw district lines. Doing so could give the Republican Party five additional seats in the U.S. House in next year's midterm elections. Historically, midterm elections haven't been kind to the party of the sitting president. Trump is attempting to build on Republicans' 219-212 majority in the House, where four seats are vacant. It wasn't until after Trump called Abbott this summer that the Texas governor put redistricting on the agenda for a special legislative session, according to The Texas Tribune. The 30-day session began on July 21. Its agenda included 18 items, from national disaster preparation and property taxes to redistricting. Texas House Democrats slammed Abbott for putting items related to this summer's deadly flooding on an agenda that they say was filled with partisan priorities. The lawmakers hoped to run out the clock on the session by leaving the state, though Abbott has already called another session. Yet the battle over map-drawing is expected to have ramifications across the U.S. And some say that it could possibly trigger a redistricting arms race. Democratic leaders in a number of other states — including California, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, and New York — have vowed to retaliate if Texas House Republicans continue with the unusual move to redistrict in the middle of the decade instead of after the next census in 2030. And according to some legal scholars, the U.S. Supreme Court likely won't provide a way out of the crisis. 'The court determined in 2019's Rucho v. Common Cause that partisan gerrymandering presented a non-justiciable political question, so federal courts couldn't intervene and hear those cases,' Melissa Murray, a law professor at New York University, told Capital B. 'The only avenues for relief would be state courts or redistricting commissions.' What are politicians saying about the Texas map? Crockett, a vocal Democratic critic of the Trump administration, blasted state Republicans on Aug. 3, but said that the issue is 'bigger than Texas.' 'This isn't just about the five seats in Texas,' Crockett told MSNBC. 'This is about a power grab. It's about basically setting the tone for what Donald Trump will try to do throughout the country so that he can suppress the voices of Black and brown folk just so that he can stay in power.' Texas state Rep. Ron Reynolds, one of the Democrats who left the state, echoed some of these thoughts, saying that he and his colleagues won't 'relent to an authoritarian president that wants to steal and racially gerrymander our Black and Brown districts.' Trump has also pressured Republican state lawmakers in Florida, Indiana, Missouri, New Hampshire, and Ohio to redraw their maps. Some Democratic leaders have vowed to use every tactic at their disposal to prevent any mid-cycle redistricting. 'Everything is on the table,' Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, who has met with the Texas Democrats, said on July 30. 'We've got to preserve democracy.' Maryland House Majority Leader David Moon, also a Democrat, went even further. He told The Associated Press on Aug. 1 that he would introduce a bill permitting mid-cycle redistricting if Texas continues down its current path because 'we can't have one state, especially a very large state, constantly trying to one-up and alter the course of congressional control while the other states sit idly by.' Former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, who runs the Democratic Party's redistricting efforts and has traditionally pushed for a nonpartisan approach, seemed to give the green light — at least for now — to Democrats exploring map-drawing outside the census period. 'We have to understand that the nature of the threat that has been put upon the country through what they're trying to do in Texas has really increased the danger to our democracy,' he told ABC News on Aug. 3. 'As a result of that, we've got to do things that, perhaps in the past, I would not have supported.' 'I think that responsible Democrats in other states have to take into account the threat to our democracy, the need to preserve our democracy, so that we can ultimately try to heal it,' he added. 'And I would hope that they will take steps that are, again, as I said, temporary but responsible.' What does the walkout say about the Voting Rights Act? To many advocates, the redistricting battle illustrates the precarious state of voting rights. On Aug. 13, Texas House Minority Leader Gene Wu, one of the Democrats who left the state, called the Texas map a 'racist and unconstitutional gerrymandering effort.' He also said that it was an attempt to 'stifle Americans who have had enough.' This latest controversy erupted on the eve of the 60th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act, which some legal scholars say is standing on its last leg. Over the past decade, the Voting Rights Act has been scaled back through various legal challenges. In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court gutted a section of the act that required jurisdictions with histories of discrimination against Black voters to secure federal approval before changing its election laws. 'If we don't know our history, we don't know nothing,' Khadidah Stone, who was a plaintiff in a major 2023 Supreme Court case, recently told Capital B. 'Especially if you aren't a white man, you need to be putting yourself on the line fighting for voting rights just as much as anybody else.' What's the next move for Democrats? Though many Democratic leaders are exploring retaliatory measures, not all of them can move as quickly as Texas House Republicans. That's because different states have different procedures for redrawing maps. In Texas and a number of other Republican-controlled states, state legislatures handle redistricting. This means that in these states the task of redrawing maps is simpler and faster and that the party in power can almost guarantee that its lawmakers will be reelected. Meanwhile, in many Democratic-controlled states, including California and New York, redistricting is done through an independent commission. This is meant to minimize partisan influence and maximize competitiveness, though reliance on this model also slows down the speed with which maps can be redrawn. It remains to be seen how Democratic leaders' countermoves will play out. This story has been updated. The post Texas Democrat Spends Night on House Floor to Protest Map She Says Erodes Black and Latino Voting Power appeared first on Capital B News.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
ICE Barbie Speechwriter Said J6ers ‘Did Absolutely Nothing Wrong'
A devout supporter of President Donald Trump hired as a speechwriter for the Department of Homeland Security has a long record of praising the Jan. 6 attack and espousing extremist and racist rhetoric online. Eric Lendrum, who writes speeches for DHS Secretary Kristi Noem—dubbed 'ICE Barbie' for her love of highly stylized cosplaying in a variety of uniformed roles—has repeatedly defended Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol, according to posts reviewed by NOTUS and the Daily Beast. According to his LinkedIn profile, Lendrum was hired as a speechwriter by DHS. 'The J6'ers did nothing wrong. Absolutely no violence was committed by Trump supporters on that day. Fact. Period,' Lendrum wrote in August 2023. In a December 2021 blog post, he falsely described the Capitol riot as 'peaceful' and compared the treatment of conservatives to the persecution of Jews during the Holocaust and the enslavement of Black people. 'It has been said that the most surefire way to create an authoritarian regime is to completely dehumanize a significant portion of the population, so that their subsequent enslavement by the state will not face any larger resistance,' Lendrum wrote on the American Greatness blog. 'It was true during slavery, it was true during the Holocaust, and it is true now.' Despite insisting Jan. 6 was 'peaceful,' Lendrum mocked lawmakers who hid from Trump supporters—which included members of far-right groups found guilty of seditious conspiracy, those who attacked police officers, and people carrying zip ties—on his Right Take podcast just weeks after it took place. 'There's something so gratifying about seeing the images of these members of Congress—especially the Democrats—crouching under their chairs, putting on those stupid, like, bubble masks, those anti-gas bubble masks, and then taking selfies,' he said. Lendrum further said the Great Replacement Theory—a white supremacist conspiracy that minorities and immigrants are replacing white Americans through immigration and demographic growth—was 'real' on another episode of his podcast in October 2022. NOTUS and the Daily Beast also uncovered multiple hateful posts from an X account belonging to Lendrum. In November 2023, he advocated for drivers to plow through pro-Palestinian protesters blocking traffic. 'Cars are bigger and heavier than any one of these freaks. All it takes is one brave driver to do what needs to be done, then others will follow,' he wrote. The same account, which follows several DHS and White House staffers, repeatedly attacked members of the LGBTQ+ community, calling them 'freaks." He referred to trans people as 'child molesters,' using a slur, and on multiple posts on the American Greatness dismissed transgender identity as a 'mental illness.' In response, a DHS spokesperson emailed the Daily Beast a link to the First Amendment of the Constitution, which protects freedom of speech.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Spike Lee Says Trump Should ‘Think Twice' if He Considers a Federal Takeover of New York: ‘The Boogie-Down? Harlem?'
"This is a scary time," the "Do the Right Thing" director tells the Rev. Al Sharpton on MSNBC Spike Lee's characters say 'Wake up!' in 'Do the Right Thing,' 'School Daze' and 'Malcolm X' – and now the director has put the signature line in his weekend MSNBC appearance, too. Speaking with 'Politics Nation' host Rev. Al Sharpton on Saturday to promote the Denzel Washington film 'Highest 2 Lowest,' Lee said the Trump administration's federal law-enforcement takeover in Washington, D.C., wouldn't go quite the same if the president tried it in New York City. More from TheWrap Sabrina Carpenter, Busta Rhymes, Ricky Martin, J Balvin and More Set to Perform at 2025 VMAs John Oliver Marvels at Trump-Putin Meeting Going 'So Badly' Even Fox News Couldn't Spin It 'Drag Race' EP Explains How Pop Culture and RuPaul Himself Inspire the Show's Challenges 'Fallout' Debuts First-Look Images for Season 2, Teasing New Vegas 'This country right now is … it's bananas, and this and this guy trying to take over D.C. and just weaponize these things,' Lee said. 'And I mean, he's going to think twice [if he tries] to do that in New York though. The Boogie Down? Harlem?' Sharpton agreed, saying that it would 'be a different kind of reaction.' Chuckling with glee, Lee responded: 'Oh yeah. It's gonna be very different.' Sharpton asked Lee what he thought about Trump mobilizing federal agents and National Guard troops 'in heavily Black and brown cities with Black mayors,' given how Lee has portrayed authoritarian law enforcement throughout his films. 'They're weaponizing these other agencies of the United States government,' Lee said more gravely. 'And this is — this is a scary time. The last word in 'School Daze' … my brother … Lawrence Fishburne saying, 'Wake up!' And the first line in 'Do the Right Thing' you know — Samuel Jackson saying, 'Wake up.' So we need to wake up. We need to wake up. You know, it's some serious times and we gotta be on point and just be in the moment and see this three-card-monte game — watch the black, watch the black, watch the black! … you can't win.' 'Highest 2 Lowest' is in theaters now. Watch the entire exchange in the video above. The post Spike Lee Says Trump Should 'Think Twice' if He Considers a Federal Takeover of New York: 'The Boogie-Down? Harlem?' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.