Mayors return from Nashville as Helene relief bill passes
JOHNSON CITY, Tenn. (WJHL)—Mayors from the region traveled to Nashville earlier this week for Governor Bill Lee's special session to advocate for East Tennesseeans. They returned home on Thursday feeling hopeful for their counties after the passage of the Hurricane Helene relief bill.
One of them was Unicoi County Mayor Bubba Evely, who was emotional when speaking about the devastation his county had experienced.
Tennessee General Assembly passes Helene recovery bill
'Just to the industrial park devastation, we've lost about 15% of our gross revenues,' Evely said. 'And until that's rebuilt, you know, we lose property tax. We lose personal property tax. Our sales tax will probably be lower. And so the governor's pledge that this wasn't the end of what the state would do in our meeting yesterday, I was really excited about that. He said he would continue to be here for the counties that were hit hardest.'
Carter County Mayor Patty Woodby told News Channel 11 she was frustrated that it took so long for the session to be held and funds awarded, but she's focused on the future.
'There has been a level of frustration, and we've been saying what we said to the committee for several months now,' Woodby said. 'Whether it be at the local level, the state level and the federal level, all of the northeast, northeast Tennessee mayors have been preaching their concerns to every level of government that we could possibly get in touch with.'
'I cannot speak, and I still don't have an answer as to why it took four months to get us there. But what I can say is that we are truly grateful [for] the bill that passed last night. The main goal now is to not look at the past and what has happened. The main goal now is to see that this bill is passed and that we're accessing the funds to build our communities back.'
Woodby said her priority is ensuring that the community, which has already endured a lot, does not bear the financial burden.
'Everything revolves around money,' Woodby said. 'And we're a small rural county with a small tax base, and our only stream of revenue is our taxpayers. And we do not, and I will not support putting that burden on our taxpayers. That's one reason why we're looking at every option to offset even having to discuss anything about a tax increase on our citizens. It's just not in the cards.'
Evely and Woodby emphasized their gratitude for funding but agreed that this would not cover the total loss – expecting future bills and additional funding.
'I think this is a step forward to kind of give guidance on what's going to be needed and just get us some money moving into our communities,' Woodby said. 'But I do not for a minute think that this will be enough. They will have to look at passing future bills as they get into session next week for their full session, and myself and my colleagues, other mayors will continue to let them know the needs and concerns and the dollar amounts needed here.'
The bills will now go to Gov. Lee's desk for him to sign.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
"We're going to give it out directly": Trump plans to scrap FEMA, have White House distribute aid
President Donald Trump said he plans on 'phasing out' the Federal Emergency Management Agency after the current hurricane season. Moving forward, Trump explained, states would be responsible for their own disaster relief, adding that federal aid would decrease and that what's left would be distributed by the White House. "We're going to give it out directly. It'll be from the president's office. We'll have somebody here, could be Homeland Security," Trump said, per Reuters. Trump's announcement comes after the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration forecasted above-normal hurricane activity in the Atlantic Ocean this season. NOAA expects a potential 10 hurricanes this season. Hurricane season officially started on June 1 and will last until November 30; Trump's FEMA head appeared unaware of hurricane season until recently. On Tuesday, Trump said he plans to 'wean' states off of FEMA. 'A governor should be able to handle it, and frankly, if they can't handle it, the aftermath, then maybe they shouldn't be governor,' Trump said. FEMA is part of the Department of Homeland Security, with a budget of around $30 billion, and employed more than 20,000 people prior to layoffs earlier this year. CNN reported that FEMA is already understaffed, having lost 10% of its staff since January. And a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office found that FEMA had a 35% gap between actual and needed staff in Secretary Kristi Noem, who co-chairs Trump's FEMA Review Council along with Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, said that FEMA 'fundamentally needs to go away as it exists.' In its place, Noem said, the administration is encouraging states to work together: 'We're building communication and mutual aid agreements among states.' Trump argued that it's the governors' responsibility to take care of disaster relief: 'It's extremely expensive, and again, when you have a tornado or a hurricane or you have a problem of any kind in a state, that's what you have governors for. They're supposed to fix those problems.' Under Trump, FEMA has denied federal assistance for tornadoes in Arkansas and rejected North Carolina's request for extended relief funding in the wake of Hurricane Helene.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - As hurricane season ramps up, Trump is giving FEMA the USAID treatment
Editor's note: This story was corrected to update National Weather Service predictions. So far, President Trump's message to states in crisis after catastrophic natural disasters has been 'you're on your own.' Last month, he reduced federal aid to Hurricane Helene-stricken parts of North Carolina. In April, he denied aid to tornado survivors in Arkansas as they tried to recover from severe storms that killed 40 people. Imagine the tragic toll of death and destruction if fire departments across the U.S. were sharply downsized or even closed in the name of efficiency. Unfortunately, we could see a similarly horrific outcome as the result of Trump administration actions that have shrunk the Federal Emergency Management Agency and might even abolish it. FEMA has been helping states deal with the devastating impacts of catastrophic natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, wildfires and floods since it was created in 1979. But federal aid to places hard-hit by disasters dates to 1803, when Congress recognized the federal responsibility to respond to emergencies too severe for states to handle on their own. Trump has threatened to abolish FEMA — something that could legally happen only with congressional approval. In January, he said he would 'begin the process of reforming FEMA or getting rid of FEMA,' arguing that it would be better for states to deal with disasters on their own, with the federal government paying for some of their expenses. But Trump wants to use federal money as a weapon. Trump has repeatedly acted or threatened to act to cut off assistance to states, local governments and universities if they don't follow his policies. So state officials could never be sure if he would reimburse their disaster spending or how large the reimbursement would be. We know Trump's team won't trust the experts. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, whose agency oversees FEMA, testified before a congressional committee in May that 'FEMA as it exists today should be eliminated.' The next day, FEMA acting Director Cameron Hamilton took the opposite position, telling the committee: 'I do not believe it is in the best interest of the American people to eliminate the Federal Emergency Management Agency.' He was forced out of his job a day later. Trump may try to bypass Congress to cut FEMA. He has already allowed it to get dangerously smaller. The agency has lost about 2,000 full-time employees — about a third of its staff — as a result of firings and resignations of employees taking buyouts pushed by Elon Musk to supposedly make the government more efficient. But rather than make FEMA more efficient, big cuts to its workforce, including the loss of 16 senior executives, have weakened FEMA. Trump might decide to shrink the agency even further with more job cuts, effectively rendering it unable to carry out its duties, as he has done with the U.S. Agency for International Development and other agencies. This would enable him to justify abolishing a crippled FEMA. Effective disaster response is a labor-intensive task requiring skilled and courageous men and women working in dangerous conditions. It can't be accomplished by AI or by clever computer programmers sitting comfortably at desks far away. This hit home for me two decades ago. Federal and state officials deployed almost 5,900 FEMA employees, more than 30,000 National Guard troops, nearly 13,000 active-duty military troops and others — including state employees and many thousands of volunteers — to respond to Hurricane Katrina in my home state of Louisiana and nearby states in 2005. Tragically, Katrina killed about 1,800 people and caused $170 billion in property damage. The federal response was far too slow, but the toll of the disaster would have been even worse if the number of people responding to Katrina had been reduced by one-third. The recovery from Katrina showed me how important FEMA can be. Members of my extended family in Louisiana were left homeless by the hurricane and evacuated to cities across America. When it was time for them to return home, FEMA was there with essential supplies and assistance to help them start rebuilding. This was life-changing, but Trump's plan would leave the next struggling family on their own. FEMA has been largely revamped since Katrina. But as extreme weather gets more frequent and more destructive, it needs more investment. FEMA must be returned to its previous size and preferably expanded. And it needs competent and experienced leadership. Trump's purge of FEMA officials has served as a brain drain that has reduced the agency's effectiveness. Trump appointed David Richardson, who has no experience in disaster management, as acting director of FEMA in May. Richardson surprised his staff by telling them he was not aware the nation had a hurricane season — a remark a Department of Homeland Security official later claimed was a joke. Hurricane season runs from June 1 through November, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration forecasts that 13 to 19 named storms will strike during the period. Serious hurricanes are increasing due to climate change, NOAA reports. Meanwhile, as of Tuesday, the National Weather Service reported that 1,114 tornadoes have struck in the U.S. this year. AccuWeather forecasts that 1,300 to 1,450 will hit by the end of the year, above the historic average of 1,225. It is impractical for the federal government to hand off more responsibility for disaster response to states. Although there are disasters every year somewhere in the U.S., there are not necessarily disasters every year in every state. FEMA is in a better position than individual states to respond rapidly with skilled and experienced professionals wherever and whenever a natural disaster strikes and to coordinate action by multiple states when a disaster crosses state lines. We need a national response to defend America from natural disasters in the same way we need a national response when we defend America militarily. That's why we have a national armed forces, rather than a separate Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and Space Force in every state. America needs a fully staffed and well-led FEMA. Sadly, we are not getting this today. Donna Brazile is a political strategist, a contributor to ABC News and former chair of the Democratic National Committee. She is the author of 'Hacks: Inside the Break-ins and Breakdowns That Put Donald Trump in the White House.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
9 hours ago
- The Hill
As hurricane season ramps up, Trump is giving FEMA the USAID treatment
So far, President Trump's message to states in crisis after catastrophic natural disasters has been 'you're on your own.' Last month, he reduced federal aid to Hurricane Helene-stricken parts of North Carolina. In April, he denied aid to tornado survivors in Arkansas as they tried to recover from severe storms that killed 40 people. Imagine the tragic toll of death and destruction if fire departments across the U.S. were sharply downsized or even closed in the name of efficiency. Unfortunately, we could see a similarly horrific outcome as the result of Trump administration actions that have shrunk the Federal Emergency Management Agency and might even abolish it. FEMA has been helping states deal with the devastating impacts of catastrophic natural disasters such as hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, wildfires and floods since it was created in 1979. But federal aid to places hard-hit by disasters dates to 1803, when Congress recognized the federal responsibility to respond to emergencies too severe for states to handle on their own. Trump has threatened to abolish FEMA — something that could legally happen only with congressional approval. In January, he said he would 'begin the process of reforming FEMA or getting rid of FEMA,' arguing that it would be better for states to deal with disasters on their own, with the federal government paying for some of their expenses. But Trump wants to use federal money as a weapon. Trump has repeatedly acted or threatened to act to cut off assistance to states, local governments and universities if they don't follow his policies. So state officials could never be sure if he would reimburse their disaster spending or how large the reimbursement would be. We know Trump's team won't trust the experts. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, whose agency oversees FEMA, testified before a congressional committee in May that 'FEMA as it exists today should be eliminated.' The next day, FEMA acting Director Cameron Hamilton took the opposite position, telling the committee: 'I do not believe it is in the best interest of the American people to eliminate the Federal Emergency Management Agency.' He was forced out of his job a day later. Trump may try to bypass Congress to cut FEMA. He has already allowed it to get dangerously smaller. The agency has lost about 2,000 full-time employees — about a third of its staff — as a result of firings and resignations of employees taking buyouts pushed by Elon Musk to supposedly make the government more efficient. But rather than make FEMA more efficient, big cuts to its workforce, including the loss of 16 senior executives, have weakened FEMA. Trump might decide to shrink the agency even further with more job cuts, effectively rendering it unable to carry out its duties, as he has done with the U.S. Agency for International Development and other agencies. This would enable him to justify abolishing a crippled FEMA. Effective disaster response is a labor-intensive task requiring skilled and courageous men and women working in dangerous conditions. It can't be accomplished by AI or by clever computer programmers sitting comfortably at desks far away. This hit home for me two decades ago. Federal and state officials deployed almost 5,900 FEMA employees, more than 30,000 National Guard troops, nearly 13,000 active-duty military troops and others — including state employees and many thousands of volunteers — to respond to Hurricane Katrina in my home state of Louisiana and nearby states in 2005. Tragically, Katrina killed about 1,800 people and caused $170 billion in property damage. The federal response was far too slow, but the toll of the disaster would have been even worse if the number of people responding to Katrina had been reduced by one-third. The recovery from Katrina showed me how important FEMA can be. Members of my extended family in Louisiana were left homeless by the hurricane and evacuated to cities across America. When it was time for them to return home, FEMA was there with essential supplies and assistance to help them start rebuilding. This was life-changing, but Trump's plan would leave the next struggling family on their own. FEMA has been largely revamped since Katrina. But as extreme weather gets more frequent and more destructive, it needs more investment. FEMA must be returned to its previous size and preferably expanded. And it needs competent and experienced leadership. Trump's purge of FEMA officials has served as a brain drain that has reduced the agency's effectiveness. Trump appointed David Richardson, who has no experience in disaster management, as acting director of FEMA in May. Richardson surprised his staff by telling them he was not aware the nation had a hurricane season — a remark a Department of Homeland Security official later claimed was a joke. Hurricane season runs from June 1 through November, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration forecasts that 13 to 19 named storms will strike during the period. Serious hurricanes are increasing due to climate change, NOAA reports. Meanwhile, as of June 4, the National Weather Service reported that 1,047 tornadoes have struck in the U.S. this year. AccuWeather forecasts that 1,300 to 1,450 will hit by the end of the year, above the historic average of 1,225. It is impractical for the federal government to hand off more responsibility for disaster response to states. Although there are disasters every year somewhere in the U.S., there are not necessarily disasters every year in every state. FEMA is in a better position than individual states to respond rapidly with skilled and experienced professionals wherever and whenever a natural disaster strikes and to coordinate action by multiple states when a disaster crosses state lines. We need a national response to defend America from natural disasters in the same way we need a national response when we defend America militarily. That's why we have a national armed forces, rather than a separate Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines and Space Force in every state. America needs a fully staffed and well-led FEMA. Sadly, we are not getting this today. Donna Brazile is a political strategist, a contributor to ABC News and former chair of the Democratic National Committee. She is the author of 'Hacks: Inside the Break-ins and Breakdowns That Put Donald Trump in the White House.'
