Repeat drunk driver saw jail as ‘free vacation;' then an opportunity came in Bernalillo County
KRQE Investigates initially highlighted Whitey's multiple drunk driving arrests and dug into the details of her plea agreement, because when it came to her punishment, it appears Whitey got a break. While she admitted to five DWIs, Whitey only pleaded to four. By law, a fourth DWI offense conviction results in a mandatory six months in jail. But the prosecutor and judge agreed that if Whitey graduated from the DWI Court Program, she could serve that six-month sentence on house arrest with a GPS ankle monitor instead.
'Very frustrating': Lawmaker disagrees with court system's definition of jail
'It was good. I want to thank you. Because without that video, me seeing it, um, that's what changed my whole perspective on myself,' Whitey told Pierret in June 2025. The story included lapel footage of Whitey's eighth drunk driving arrest, including her attempt to escape from deputies while being booked at the substation. 'That was not me,' Whitey said. 'That's just somebody that was crying for help, who needed help, and she didn't know how to ask for help.'
Whitey shared that she watched the story and read the community's comments posted on social media. Many believed Whitey already had too many chances and took to social media, calling her 'a waste of human life,' writing 'this makes me sick,' and demanding, 'lock her up and throw away the key.'
'I think they didn't judge me wrongly,' Whitey said. 'I think they kind of knew it, but they didn't know the whole story of why I was doing it.' The root of her alcoholism: 'I was raised, you know, poor on the reservation with an alcoholic mom as well,' she explained.
Whitey shared that she was 17 years old the first time she got caught drinking and driving. 'I have five children, but one is deceased. That was also part of the alcohol use,' Whitey, now 46 years old, said. 'I was a kid having a kid at the age of 15. So, I realized a lot of trauma, abuse, rape, kidnap, everything. I've been through it.'
That reflection is the point of the DWI Court Program. The Bernalillo County District Attorney's Office said program participants typically have a long history of substance abuse and are facing their fourth or higher offense.
'The easy answer is to simply say, 'here's the jail and I'm going to forget about you,'' Chief Deputy DA Joshua Boone said. 'What I have to think about is this: when that person gets out of jail, have we actually helped them or cured them from that addiction?'
Because, as Whitey admitted, jail has never been a deterrent. 'It was just more like a, like a free vacation in a way,' she explained. 'Then you just start where you left off until you get in trouble again.'
A short break from her addiction, but no real help. 'Nobody's listening, because most of the people will think, 'Oh, well, they're going to be back next week,'' Whitey said.'And my fear always is if they re-offend, are we going to end up in a tragic situation? Right. So, my hope with a lot of these individuals, and my goal, is to give them the tools so that we never get there,' Boone said.
He explained that's what the DWI Court Program provides. Off the bat, the defendant spends 30 days in treatment. Then, they must complete four phases and be sober for six months to move on to the next phase. So, the program can take two years or more.
Since it started in 2013, the court said only 3% of the 94 participants reoffended within three years of graduating.'It's a really great to see that change in individuals and, honestly, to never see them again,' Judge Britt Baca, who first started presiding over the program in 2021, said.
Throughout, participants attend counseling up to six days a week, can only drive with an interlock, meet weekly with a case manager, are subject to random drug testing, and stand in front of Judge Baca every two weeks for a case review.
'Both responsibility and honesty are extremely crucial to this program. Because if they are not honest, then that is usually seen as more of a violation than something where if they're struggling with their sobriety,' Baca explained.
The judge said violations can result in sanctions like writing an essay for being late, or the more severe consequence, house arrest with a GPS monitor through the Metropolitan Detention Center's Community Custody Program, CCP.During the 29 months Whitey spent in the program, she had ten hearings on violations. Judge Baca sanctioned her to CCP twice, for a total of 69 days. 'It's expected to have these hiccups. And that's what the program is for. That's what the support is for,' Whitey's defense attorney Jenna Purpura explained.
Whitey graduated in May. But, as Purpura pointed out, she is not free yet. 'Right now, she's technically in custody. She's on CCP, so it's not like she just did the program and —'
'Then I left,' Whitey cut in.
'It's very restrictive, what she can and can't do right now,' Purpura said.
Whitey is now under house arrest and on a GPS ankle monitor for six months. 'Once I'm done from work, I go, I go to my counseling, and then I go home. So, it's just, it's really strict,' Whitey explained. 'I have a tracker that's assigned to me, she knows my whereabouts, where I'm at, every day.'
It's attention and structure Whitey is grateful to finally have. 'I tell everybody, don't look at my gain. Look at my, look at my struggles. You know, listen to my story,' she said. 'I got my own life back.'
Judge Baca said the DWI Court Program typically has about thirty participants at a time. She added that they do not turn anyone away. But the judge believes at least two people have been let go before graduating.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Police say 3 are dead in a shooting at a Target in Austin, Texas, and the suspect has been caught
Police say 3 are dead in a shooting at a Target in Austin, Texas, and the suspect has been caught
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nevada Supreme Court approves Jon Gruden appeal in NFL lawsuit, blocks arbitration
The Nevada Supreme Court has sided with Jon Gruden in an appeal, marking the latest victory in his ongoing lawsuit against the NFL. The decision, which was made official on Monday, blocks the NFL from sending the case into arbitration. One of the issues at hand was an arbitration clause in the NFL's constitution, which the league argued kept Gruden from being able to make the lawsuit public. But on Monday, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled 5-2 in favor of the former Las Vegas Raiders coach, finding that the clause is "unconscionable" and does not apply to Gruden, as he is a former employee, via NBC's Mike Florio. Gruden sued the NFL shortly after resigning from the Raiders in 2021, but his latest legal battles have been around the manner of the lawsuit. Gruden has wanted his trial to be public, as part of a quest to expose what he believes were deliberate leaks in the NFL; the league, meanwhile, wanted a closed-door arbitration. Gruden originally won before a trial court, but a Nevada Supreme Court panel overturned the ruling in May 2024 as part of a lengthy appeal. Per court documents, Gruden's lawyers filed for a rehearing on the appeal last summer, which was denied. A month later, they filed for an en banc reconsideration, which was granted in October. The panel officially sided with Gruden on Monday. The NFL has yet to comment on Gruden's latest legal victory, but it is likely that the league will appeal the ruling in the U.S. Supreme Court, which may or may not decide to hear the case. Gruden sought public lawsuit in court to expose 'the truth' Gruden resigned from his job as Raiders head coach in 2021 after a New York Times report exposed his email exchanges with former Washington Football Team executive Bruce Allen, among others, that showed his use of racist, anti-gay and misogynistic language. Gruden sued the NFL and commissioner Roger Goodell in 2021, accusing them of plotting to destroy his career via a "malicious and orchestrated campaign" by leaking those emails. The emails surfaced from an investigation into the Washington Commanders and then-team owner Dan Snyder. The lawsuit argues that Gruden was targeted in the alleged leaks and that "there is no explanation or justification" for why the correspondence of others in the league was not exposed. Gruden had previously vowed that "the truth will come out" regarding unnamed others around the NFL. NFL sought closed-door arbitration The NFL has since made multiple attempts to strike down the lawsuit, arguing that a clause in Gruden's contract with the Raiders requires him to seek dispute settlement via arbitration. Gruden's attorneys have argued that the clause doesn't apply since he his no longer an employee of the Raiders and that his dispute is with the NFL, not the Raiders. In 2022, Nevada 8th Judicial District Court Judge Nancy Allf denied the NFL's effort to dismiss the lawsuit and ruled that the case could continue in open court. NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy dismissed Gruden's lawsuit as meritless after the district court ruling and vowed to appeal. 'The allegations are entirely meritless and the NFL will vigorously defend against these claims,' McCarthy's 2022 statement reads.
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Texas businessmen indicted for allegedly bribing officials at Mexico's Pemex
By Stefanie Eschenbacher MEXICO CITY (Reuters) -Two Texas businessmen were indicted for allegedly bribing officials at Mexico's state energy company Pemex with $150,000 and luxury items to secure contracts, the U.S. Justice Department announced on Monday. Between 2019 and 2021, Ramon Rovirosa and Mario Avila, both Mexican citizens and U.S. lawful permanent residents, conspired to pay bribes to officials at Pemex and its exploration and production arm, known as PEP, according to an indictment unsealed in the Southern District of Texas. Rovirosa is also alleged to have ties to Mexican cartel members, the Department of Justice said in a statement. Rovirosa, 46, was arraigned while Avila, 61, remains at large. Reuters was unable to immediately contact the lawyers for Rovirosa and Avila. Pemex did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Together with co-conspirators, Rovirosa and Avila allegedly paid bribes in the form of cash and luxury goods, including from Louis Vuitton and Hublot, to at least three Pemex and PEP officials. In exchange, those Pemex officials are accused of helping companies associated with Rovirosa obtain contracts worth at least $2.5 million, the statement said. Mexico and its ailing state company Pemex have for decades been awash with corruption, with several former senior officials facing charges, including former Chief Executive Officer Emilio Lozoya. Lozoya, in turn, has accused ex-presidents Felipe Calderon and Carlos Salinas of corruption, along with former President Enrique Pena Nieto, his ex-finance minister, Luis Videgaray, and more than a dozen others. Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, who was Mexican president during the time covered in the indictment, had vowed to root out the corruption that had plagued the country and its most important company for decades. Even so, Mexico's corruption ranking slipped. Rovirosa and Avila are each charged with one count of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and three substantive violations of it. The act makes it illegal for citizens, U.S. companies, or foreign persons and businesses in the United States to pay foreign officials to win business. Sign in to access your portfolio