logo
A job-hopping slowdown could be a boon for retirement savings

A job-hopping slowdown could be a boon for retirement savings

Yahoo30-03-2025

When it comes to boosting your salary, it pays to ... stay?
That's the newest finding from wage growth data out of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, which tracks the three-month rolling average of median wage growth for "job switchers" and "job stayers."
A tight labor market in recent years helped drive wage growth for job switchers far above what workers who stayed in their current positions saw. That gap hit a multi-decade high in August 2022, when job switchers saw their median wage growth hit 8.4%, 2.8 percentage points higher than wage growth for job stayers during that time.
Wage growth for the two groups has been converging over recent years, with job stayers now seeing higher median wage growth. In February, workers who switched jobs saw 0.2 percentage points less wage growth than those who stayed. That's the most that job switcher wage growth has lagged job stayers in over six years.
Slowing wage growth is hardly ideal for workers looking to boost their income, but financial advisors say the shift could offer a silver lining for long-term retirement savings.
"Job-hopping can no doubt be detrimental to retirement savings," said Carla Adams, founder of Ametrine Wealth in Lake Orion, Michigan.
READ MORE: Social Security call wait times soar — what advisors need to know
Recent research from Vanguard supports that claim. Researchers looking at earnings from over 50,000 job switchers found that a worker starting with a $60,000 salary who changes jobs eight times throughout their career could forfeit an estimated $300,000 in total retirement savings.
"The typical (median) job switcher experienced a 10% pay increase in our income sample," the authors wrote. "Despite this notable increase, the median job switcher saw a 0.7 percentage point drop in their saving rate."
Adams said that drop is likely due to low auto-enrollment rates in employee-sponsored retirement accounts.
Under Secure 2.0, companies must auto-enroll employees in most 401(k) and 403(b) plans. Doing so can help boost retirement savings participation, but advisors say the standard contribution rates aren't high enough to adequately save for retirement.
Auto-enrollment plans typically set employee contributions at between 3% to 6% of their pay. Many plans now include an "auto-escalation" feature that increases the employee's contribution rate by 1% annually until it reaches a maximum of 10%. That feature helps, but it can take years to reach its escalation cap, Adams said. For someone who was contributing 10% at their previous job, starting a new role where they are auto-enrolled at only 3% can significantly reduce their contribution rate.
READ MORE: A checklist for advisors assisting federal employees
"Employees can, of course, override the auto-enroll contribution rate and opt for a higher rate from the get-go, a great solution to this issue," Adams said. "However, many people neglect to do this. Starting a new job is overwhelming enough and new employees have plenty of forms from HR to fill out in addition to learning their new job, so overriding auto-enrollment contribution rates often gets overlooked."
Theoretically, job switchers who receive large salary boosts could see their retirement contributions increase in dollar terms even as their savings rate decreases. In Vanguard's study, job switchers who saw more than a 10% increase in their wages managed to save more in terms of absolute dollars, even while contributing a lower percentage of their total wages.
Still, such significant wage jumps are outside the norm. That's especially true when looking at wage boosts for job switchers now. Data used in Vanguard's research ranged from 2014 to 2022, when job switchers saw greater wage growth compared to job stayers.
For advisors working with clients considering a job switch, it's important to remind them to set their contribution rates to a suitable level for their retirement goals, usually above the default rate.
Frequent job-hoppers can also lose out on retirement savings due to restrictions on vesting periods of employer-matched contributions.
"Employer matching and profit sharing contributions can be a great employee benefit; however, they can be fully or partially lost for employees who job-hop," Adams said.
READ MORE: Women face unique retirement challenges — but advisors can help
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) requires employer contributions to become fully vested through one of two schedules. Under the three-year cliff vesting schedule, employer contributions become entirely the employee's after three full years of service, with no vesting before the three-year mark. Alternatively, under the six-year graded vesting schedule, employer contributions vest incrementally: 20% after two years, 40% after three years, 60% after four years, 80% after five years and 100% after six years of service.
Some companies might offer immediate vesting for their employer contributions, but doing so is not required under the law. It's crucial that advisors check with their clients to see what the vesting schedule is for their employer-sponsored retirement plans before making the switch to another job.
"If an employee leaves a job prior to their employer matches being fully vested, they lose some or all of the employer contributions that were made to their plan, decreasing their 401k balance," Adams said.
Watching out for these common pitfalls can help avoid some of the drawbacks to job switching, but such strategies may be moot if the new wage growth trend continues. As long as job switcher wage growth lags that of job stayers, advisors might be better off telling their clients to stay where they're at for the moment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dave Ramsey sends major message to Americans on IRAs, Roth IRAs
Dave Ramsey sends major message to Americans on IRAs, Roth IRAs

Miami Herald

time8 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Dave Ramsey sends major message to Americans on IRAs, Roth IRAs

Americans preparing for retirement encounter various challenges, primarily centered on maintaining financial security and sustaining the lifestyle they envision after leaving the workforce. Key concerns involve estimating potential Social Security payments and evaluating how much they will be able to depend on their accumulated retirement funds. Dave Ramsey, bestselling personal finance author and radio host, offers important words for Americans on traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs and some key advice on ways to achieve a financially comfortable retirement. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Making sure retirement funds can adequately cover future expenses is a top priority for many Americans. With rising life expectancies and the uncertainty of financial markets, retirees must strategize how to extend their savings throughout their retirement years. To build financial security, individuals wisely invest in 401(k)s, IRAs, and similar accounts while factoring in tax considerations. Another significant concern is health care costs, which tend to increase as medical needs grow with age. Although Medicare helps alleviate some expenses, it does not cover everything, requiring retirees to account for out-of-pocket costs such as medications, long-term care, and some additional medical services. Related: Dave Ramsey warns Americans on Social Security The impact of rising inflation is a significant concern, as it reduces the purchasing power of fixed retirement incomes. Many retirees worry that inflation could hinder their ability to maintain their preferred lifestyle, especially those who depend heavily on Social Security benefits. While Social Security remains a crucial source of retirement income, relying on it entirely brings uncertainty. Questions surrounding its long-term viability, cost-of-living adjustments, and possible benefit reductions due to solvency concerns add to the financial stress many retirees face. Recognizing these challenges, Ramsey issues a caution regarding traditional IRAs and Roth IRAs, offering Americans guidance on setting financial priorities and navigating the complexities of retirement planning. Ramsey explains that both Roth IRAs and traditional IRAs are valuable tools for retirement savings, but the key distinction lies in how they are taxed. A Roth IRA is funded with after-tax dollars, allowing investments to grow tax-free. When retirement arrives, withdrawals from the Roth IRA remain tax-free, providing financial flexibility. In contrast, a traditional IRA is funded with pretax money, offering an immediate tax advantage. However, when funds are withdrawn during retirement, both the contributions and their accumulated growth are subject to taxation. "While a Roth IRA doesn't offer any current-year tax benefits like a traditional IRA, it gives you something even better: tax-free growth and tax-free withdrawals once you retire," Ramsey wrote. "Now, that's a sweet deal!" More on retirement: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social SecurityScott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threatShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has message on Social Security, 401(k)s Another significant difference between these accounts is the income limits. A traditional IRA has no income restrictions, meaning individuals can contribute regardless of how much they earn annually. A Roth IRA, on the other hand, has specific eligibility requirements. In 2025, those filing as single or head of household can contribute the full amount if their gross income is below $150,000. For married couples filing jointly, the threshold is $246,000. Related: Dave Ramsey sends strong message to Americans on 401(k)s Once a person turns 59-and-a-half and has held their Roth IRA for at least five years, they are free to withdraw both contributions and earnings without facing taxes or penalties - an excellent advantage for retirees. However, if one's Roth IRA has been open for less than five years, any earnings they take out will be subject to taxes. In 2025, the Roth IRA contribution limit remains $7,000 for those under 50, translating to a monthly contribution of $583.33 when divided over 12 months. Individuals aged 50 and older can contribute up to $8,000, which allows for monthly contributions of $666.67. These limits require savers to plan smartly, ensuring steady growth in their retirement accounts while optimizing tax advantages, Ramsey explains. By making consistent contributions, individuals can build financial security for their future while taking advantage of tax-free growth. Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary makes bold prediction on U.S. economy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

A New Social Security Garnishment Is Set to Begin This Summer -- but There Are 2 Legal Ways Most Retirees Can Avoid It
A New Social Security Garnishment Is Set to Begin This Summer -- but There Are 2 Legal Ways Most Retirees Can Avoid It

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

A New Social Security Garnishment Is Set to Begin This Summer -- but There Are 2 Legal Ways Most Retirees Can Avoid It

Getting as much as possible out of Social Security isn't a luxury for most retirees -- it's an absolute necessity. This summer, the Trump administration will begin garnishing up to 15% of Social Security benefits for delinquent federal student loan borrowers. Two perfectly legal solutions exist that may allow a majority of tardy federal student loan borrowers to avoid having their Social Security checks garnished. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook › For most retirees, Social Security isn't just income that's deposited into their checking or savings account on a monthly basis. It represents a financial lifeline that many would likely struggle to make do without. In 2023, Social Security was responsible for lifting 22 million people above the federal poverty line, some 16.3 million of whom were adults aged 65 and above. Meanwhile, 23 years of annual surveys from national pollster Gallup find that up to 90% of retirees require their monthly benefit, to some degree, to make ends meet. Getting as much out of Social Security isn't a luxury -- it's often a necessity. But beginning sometime this summer, select retirees can expect their Social Security checks to shrink by up to 15%. For some of these beneficiaries, it's income they simply can't afford to lose. For well over six decades, the federal government has played a role in subsidizing and guaranteeing student loans. As of April 2025, the U.S. Department of Education (DOE) notes that 42.7 million Americans had a cumulative $1.6 trillion in federal student loans outstanding. However, the collection of federal student loan repayments was halted during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020) and was simply never lifted. According to the DOE, more than 5 million borrowers haven't made a payment in 360 days, and another 4 million are between 91 and 180 days late on their monthly payments. While higher education student loans may sound like something that affects relatively younger Americans, they've become a prominent issue for retirees. Whereas the aggregate number of student loan borrowers under the age of 62 has declined by 1% from 2017 to 2023, the number of student loan borrowers aged 62 and above has surged 59% to approximately 2.7 million over the same period, based on data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Per the CFPB, an estimated 452,000 of these senior borrowers have defaulted on their federal student loans and are likely receiving Social Security benefits. Since President Donald Trump took office in January, his administration has targeted perceived government fraud and is aiming to make federal operations more efficient. One of the many changes under Trump, vis-à-vis the Social Security Administration (SSA), is the reimplementation of Social Security garnishments for delinquent federal student loan borrowers. Beginning "sometime this summer," per Trump's administration, tardy borrowers receiving a Social Security benefit -- this applies to all types of beneficiaries (retired workers, survivors of deceased workers, and workers with disabilities) -- could see their payouts garnished by up to 15%. The one caveat to this garnishment is that recipients must be left with at least a $750 monthly Social Security benefit. Thus, if your normal payout is $825 per month, the maximum garnishment would be $75 per month instead of the flat 15%. Additionally, the Trump administration isn't planning to offer delinquent federal student loan borrowers a 65-day warning prior to potential garnishment, as has been customary in the past. Rather, communications sent out provide just 30 days' notice that garnishments are possible if borrowers are still in default. According to the CFPB, 37% of the Social Security beneficiaries who have a federal student loan outstanding (delinquent or not) currently rely on their monthly check from America's leading retirement program for 90% (or more) of their income. Even a 15% garnishment for defaulted borrowers in this category has the potential to be financially devastating. It goes without saying that the easiest way to avoid this new garnishment by the Trump administration is to not be in default on your federal student loan(s). But for the roughly 452,000 Social Security retirees set to be impacted by this change in policy, there are two under-the-radar yet perfectly legal solutions that should allow a majority to avoid having their payouts garnished. To begin with, some of these defaulted borrowers may qualify for the Total and Permanent Disability (TPD) discharge program, which cancels federal student loans and stops forced collections. As the CFPB pointed out in a January research report, the DOE entered into a data-matching agreement with the SSA in 2021 to automate the TPD eligibility and federal student loan cancellation processes for beneficiaries who become disabled prior to reaching full retirement age (currently age 67 for anyone born in or after 1960). However, this TPD application process is failing Social Security beneficiaries who become permanently disabled after they reach full retirement age. The CFPB notes that the onus of applying for a TPD discharge of their federal student loans and/or garnishment falls onto aged beneficiaries. Census survey data shows that approximately 22% of Social Security recipients with federal student loans report having a permanent disability, per the CFPB's report. Social Security retirees currently in default on their federal student loan(s) can also potentially avoid having their monthly check garnished by applying for a financial hardship with the DOE. Defaulted borrowers will be required to provide documentation of their income and qualifying expenses to the DOE. If an individual's qualifying expenses are larger than their documented income -- especially pertaining to a possible 15% garnishment of their Social Security payout -- the DOE will likely grant a financial hardship exemption. Based on data from the Federal Reserve Board's Survey of Household Economics and Decisionmaking, the CFPB estimates that a whopping 82% of Social Security beneficiaries currently in default on their federal student loans would qualify for the hardship exemption -- in other words, their qualified expenses would exceed their documented income. Yet, a 2015 Government Accountability Office report found that fewer than 10% of Social Security recipients with forced federal student loan collections applied for a hardship exemption. If delinquent borrowers were to simply apply for this financial hardship with the DOE, a majority would likely be granted it. If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Join Stock Advisor to learn more about these Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. A New Social Security Garnishment Is Set to Begin This Summer -- but There Are 2 Legal Ways Most Retirees Can Avoid It was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

BlackRock, Vanguard Fight High-Stakes Collusion Case in Texas
BlackRock, Vanguard Fight High-Stakes Collusion Case in Texas

Bloomberg

time14 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

BlackRock, Vanguard Fight High-Stakes Collusion Case in Texas

The world's largest asset managers are heading to court over a lawsuit brought by Republican state attorneys general claiming they colluded to reduce coal output, in a case that threatens how US firms oversee trillions of dollars. Lawyers for BlackRock Inc., Vanguard Group Inc. and the asset management arm of State Street Corp. are set to urge a federal judge at a hearing on Monday to dismiss the lawsuit, which claims the firms coordinated to pressure coal producers to reduce their output. The firms have large stakes in coal producers and profited when energy prices soared, according to the suit, which claims the firms used environmental goals as cover.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store