A job-hopping slowdown could be a boon for retirement savings
When it comes to boosting your salary, it pays to ... stay?
That's the newest finding from wage growth data out of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, which tracks the three-month rolling average of median wage growth for "job switchers" and "job stayers."
A tight labor market in recent years helped drive wage growth for job switchers far above what workers who stayed in their current positions saw. That gap hit a multi-decade high in August 2022, when job switchers saw their median wage growth hit 8.4%, 2.8 percentage points higher than wage growth for job stayers during that time.
Wage growth for the two groups has been converging over recent years, with job stayers now seeing higher median wage growth. In February, workers who switched jobs saw 0.2 percentage points less wage growth than those who stayed. That's the most that job switcher wage growth has lagged job stayers in over six years.
Slowing wage growth is hardly ideal for workers looking to boost their income, but financial advisors say the shift could offer a silver lining for long-term retirement savings.
"Job-hopping can no doubt be detrimental to retirement savings," said Carla Adams, founder of Ametrine Wealth in Lake Orion, Michigan.
READ MORE: Social Security call wait times soar — what advisors need to know
Recent research from Vanguard supports that claim. Researchers looking at earnings from over 50,000 job switchers found that a worker starting with a $60,000 salary who changes jobs eight times throughout their career could forfeit an estimated $300,000 in total retirement savings.
"The typical (median) job switcher experienced a 10% pay increase in our income sample," the authors wrote. "Despite this notable increase, the median job switcher saw a 0.7 percentage point drop in their saving rate."
Adams said that drop is likely due to low auto-enrollment rates in employee-sponsored retirement accounts.
Under Secure 2.0, companies must auto-enroll employees in most 401(k) and 403(b) plans. Doing so can help boost retirement savings participation, but advisors say the standard contribution rates aren't high enough to adequately save for retirement.
Auto-enrollment plans typically set employee contributions at between 3% to 6% of their pay. Many plans now include an "auto-escalation" feature that increases the employee's contribution rate by 1% annually until it reaches a maximum of 10%. That feature helps, but it can take years to reach its escalation cap, Adams said. For someone who was contributing 10% at their previous job, starting a new role where they are auto-enrolled at only 3% can significantly reduce their contribution rate.
READ MORE: A checklist for advisors assisting federal employees
"Employees can, of course, override the auto-enroll contribution rate and opt for a higher rate from the get-go, a great solution to this issue," Adams said. "However, many people neglect to do this. Starting a new job is overwhelming enough and new employees have plenty of forms from HR to fill out in addition to learning their new job, so overriding auto-enrollment contribution rates often gets overlooked."
Theoretically, job switchers who receive large salary boosts could see their retirement contributions increase in dollar terms even as their savings rate decreases. In Vanguard's study, job switchers who saw more than a 10% increase in their wages managed to save more in terms of absolute dollars, even while contributing a lower percentage of their total wages.
Still, such significant wage jumps are outside the norm. That's especially true when looking at wage boosts for job switchers now. Data used in Vanguard's research ranged from 2014 to 2022, when job switchers saw greater wage growth compared to job stayers.
For advisors working with clients considering a job switch, it's important to remind them to set their contribution rates to a suitable level for their retirement goals, usually above the default rate.
Frequent job-hoppers can also lose out on retirement savings due to restrictions on vesting periods of employer-matched contributions.
"Employer matching and profit sharing contributions can be a great employee benefit; however, they can be fully or partially lost for employees who job-hop," Adams said.
READ MORE: Women face unique retirement challenges — but advisors can help
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) requires employer contributions to become fully vested through one of two schedules. Under the three-year cliff vesting schedule, employer contributions become entirely the employee's after three full years of service, with no vesting before the three-year mark. Alternatively, under the six-year graded vesting schedule, employer contributions vest incrementally: 20% after two years, 40% after three years, 60% after four years, 80% after five years and 100% after six years of service.
Some companies might offer immediate vesting for their employer contributions, but doing so is not required under the law. It's crucial that advisors check with their clients to see what the vesting schedule is for their employer-sponsored retirement plans before making the switch to another job.
"If an employee leaves a job prior to their employer matches being fully vested, they lose some or all of the employer contributions that were made to their plan, decreasing their 401k balance," Adams said.
Watching out for these common pitfalls can help avoid some of the drawbacks to job switching, but such strategies may be moot if the new wage growth trend continues. As long as job switcher wage growth lags that of job stayers, advisors might be better off telling their clients to stay where they're at for the moment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
See how the national debt grew to more than $36 trillion
See how the national debt grew to more than $36 trillion The United States owes more than $36 trillion. Washington now spends close to $2 trillion more each year than it collects in revenue, forcing the Treasury Department to borrow to make up the difference. Which means the national debt is still growing. Without major changes, the debt will soon be bigger as a share of the economy than when it peaked at the end of World War II. Most of that debt has accumulated over the past 20 years. In 2001, the nation actually had a cash surplus, when the Treasury collected more in taxes than it spent on government services. Since then, four presidents, 10 sessions of Congress and two wars have contributed to the tide of red ink. Thanks in part to policy decisions made generations ago, Social Security and Medicare are growing in cost, also adding to the debt. More recent decisions — budget-busting tax cuts, bipartisan spending deals and staggering sums to cope with the coronavirus pandemic — have all forced the nation to sink more deeply in debt. Here are eight key moments that show how we got here. The Bush tax cuts | June 7, 2001 A chart of the national debt from 1995 through 2024, with a line indicating June 2001 when the Bush tax cuts were passed. Tax cuts signed into law $5.7 trillion Total debt before the Bush tax cuts President George W. Bush signs the first of two major tax cuts into law, slashing rates on ordinary income as well as on capital gains and dividends. In 2012, the Congressional Budget Office estimated that the Bush tax cuts added roughly $1.5 trillion to the national debt. The majority of these tax cuts would later be made permanent in a deal between congressional Republicans and President Barack Obama, adding to their cost. Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan | March 19, 2003 A chart of the national debt from 1995 through 2024, with a line indicating March 2003 when the U.S. invaded Iraq. Start of war in Iraq $6.5 trillion Total debt before the war in Iraq After the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the United States invades Iraq. America would go on to spend roughly 20 years fighting wars in the Middle East, leading to a surge in spending on the Pentagon and veterans. A Harvard analysis has found that the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan cost the nation between $4 trillion and $6 trillion. Prescription drug expansion | Jan. 1, 2006 A chart of the national debt from 1995 through 2024, with a line indicating January 2006, when Medicare Part D was enacted. Medicare Part D enacted $8.4 trillion Total debt when Medicare Part D went into effect Medicare Part D — a major expansion of Medicare that offered prescription drug coverage to seniors — goes into effect nearly three years after being signed into law by Bush. Republicans who controlled Congress did not pay for the popular, but expensive, initiative. Story continues below advertisement Advertisement Great Recession and response | Dec. 1, 2008 A chart of the national debt from 1995 through 2024, with a line indicating December 2008, the start of the Great Recession. Start of Great Recession $10.1 trillion Total debt at the start of the Great Recession A crisis in financial markets triggers the Great Recession, the worst downturn since the Great Depression. This dramatically expands the national debt in two ways: First, there is a sharp drop in tax collections. Second, there is a big jump in spending on increased unemployment benefits and other programs to help people weather the downturn. Congress and the Obama administration also approved a major economic stimulus package. Brian Riedl, an economist at the Manhattan Institute, estimates the Bush and Obama administrations together enacted about $2 trillion in emergency measures to respond to the financial crisis and the ensuing recession. Obama-Republican deal to extend Bush tax cuts | Jan. 1, 2013 A chart of the national debt from 1995 through 2024, with a line indicating January 2013, when Obama and congressional Republicans agreed to extend the Bush tax cuts. Tax cuts extended $16.8 trillion Total debt when cuts were extended With the Bush tax cuts set to expire amid a sluggish recovery, Obama agrees to make almost all of them permanent, extending tax relief for all but the very richest Americans. Congressional Republicans, in turn, agree to extend some economic stimulus measures. At the time, the Congressional Budget Office estimated the deal would cost roughly $4 trillion over 10 years. Trump tax cuts | Dec. 22, 2017 A chart of the national debt from 1995 through 2024, with a line indicating December 2017, when President Donald Trump's tax cuts were passed. Tax cuts passed $20.5 trillion Total debt when cuts were enacted President Donald Trump signs a sprawling tax cut bill, centered on a plan to reduce the rate paid by large U.S. corporations from 35 percent to 21 percent. The law also cut taxes for most individual taxpayers. The congressional Joint Committee on Taxation estimated the measure would cost roughly $1.5 trillion over 10 years. A later analysis by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a Washington think tank, found the cumulative impact of the law could be closer to $2.9 trillion. Story continues below advertisement Advertisement Coronavirus emergency response | March 14, 2020 A chart of the national debt from 1995 through 2024, with a line indicating March 2020, when the coronavirus emergency was declared. Coronavirus emergency declaration $27.7 trillion Total debt at the start of the pandemic Trump signs into law the first and most expensive of what will eventually be three major relief packages approved by Congress in response to the coronavirus pandemic. The first is a bipartisan $3.4 trillion deal reached in March 2020, with the U.S. economy in a black hole. An additional $900 billion follows in December 2020. In 2021, Democrats under President Biden approve an additional $1.9 trillion with no Republican support. Biden, second Trump term | Aug. 16, 2022 A chart of the national debt from 1995 through 2024, with a line indicating August 2022, when the Inflation Reduction Act passed. Inflation Reduction Act passed $30.9 trillion Total debt when the Inflation Reduction Act is passed Biden successfully pushed Congress to spend more on veterans' health, physical infrastructure and government agencies. Biden's Inflation Reduction Act included some provisions designed to reduce the deficit, such as giving more funding to the Internal Revenue Service, but ultimately did very little to reduce the deficit and may have increased it, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan think tank. Spending agreements between Biden and House Republicans do restrain budget growth slightly. Now, congressional Republicans and the Trump administration are this year moving forward with a plan that would increase federal deficits by more than $2 trillion over the next 10 years — and possibly more than $5 trillion. Story continues below advertisement Advertisement
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
FAFSA deadline nears: Las Vegas students urged to seek aid now
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — An important deadline is quickly approaching for Las Vegas valley students heading to college this fall. The FAFSA, or Free Application for Federal Student Aid, must be submitted by the end of the month. The application is the first step to accessing billions of dollars in financial aid. 'FAFSA unlocks federal grants, loans, and work-study as well as many state and college programs aid on a first-come come-first first-served basis,' Shaan Patel, Founder and CEO of an online college prep service, said. The entire application can be completed online. 'Make sure you have all your necessary documents… so you get the maximum financial aid possible for college this fall,' Patel said. Dr. Rhea Watson, also known as The Scholarship Doctor and CEO of Scholarship Solutions, warns that skipping the FAFSA could cost you thousands of dollars. She emphasizes that it's a mistake to assume you won't qualify for financial aid. 'If you don't have a FAFSA application on file, it is nearly impossible, very difficult for your scholarship applications and even those financial aid packages you want to receive from a college,' Watson said. Roughly $3 billion in aid goes unclaimed every year, Watson said. 'Don't leave money on the table… it just goes and recycles through the government versus going to students who can use it to go to school and go without debt,' Watson said. The FAFSA only takes a few hours to complete if one is prepared. Once submitted, one can expect the financial aid award letter within 2 to 3 weeks. However, keep in mind that state and school-specific aid can run out quickly, so it's best to apply as early as possible. Documents needed for filling out the FAFSA include: Social Security number Parents' Social Security numbers (if you are a dependent student) Tax returns Records of child support received Current balances of cash, savings, and checking accounts Social Security card, driver's license, and/or alien registration card (if not a US citizen) Federal income tax returns, W-2s, and other records of money earned For more information on what students need to know before they fill out the FAFSA form, click here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why are more Americans filing for Social Security benefits?
(NewsNation) — More older Americans are claiming their Social Security benefits earlier, a potentially alarming trend that could significantly reduce the income many rely on in their golden years. As of May, individual retirement claims are up 13% in the current fiscal year compared to the same period last year, an increase of nearly 320,000 claims, according to the latest Social Security data. To put the recent surge in perspective: From 2012 to 2024, retirement claims rose by an average of just 3% per year, according to an analysis by the Urban Institute, a research group. Plan to garnish Social Security checks for student loan debt paused Part of the recent uptick is due to more retirees claiming Social Security benefits earlier, a choice that permanently reduces their monthly checks if done before full retirement age. Jack Smalligan, a senior policy fellow at the Urban Institute, described the increase in earlier claims as 'disconcerting' because it can impact people's 'long-term retirement security.' 'For most individuals, delaying the time that they claim Social Security is a smart retirement decision,' Smalligan said. While demographic factors, such as an aging population, have contributed to the rise, increased concern over the Trump administration's handling of the system may also help explain the surge. Social Security data shows the spike in monthly claims was especially pronounced in November and January — the month Trump was elected and the month he took office. Polling shows public concern about Social Security is now at a 15-year high, an uptick that coincides with the Trump administration's plans to slash the agency's workforce. The president and advisers, like Elon Musk, have made unfounded claims about rampant fraud within the system, while website outages have also caused confusion. Smalligan pointed to the recent surge in calls to Social Security and the rise in field office visits as further signs of growing anxiety. At the same time, top Democrats, including former President Joe Biden, have amplified those fears with misleading claims that give the impression Americans' monthly retirement checks may not arrive. Democrats sound alarm on Social Security as Biden returns to stage Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has warned that Trump and Musk are coming for people's benefits and hiding behind bogus fraud claims to justify stealing people's checks. The political rhetoric appears to be resonating, but it's also fueling the broader uncertainty, potentially causing real harm. During a meeting in March, Social Security officials said that 'fearmongering has driven people to claim benefits earlier,' The Wall Street Journal reported. Overall, 52% of Americans say they worry a 'great deal' about the Social Security system, up from 43% in 2024, according to Gallup. Among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents, that figure rises to 65% — a 30-point increase from the previous year. 'No one's scheming right now to privatize Social Security or dismantle it … that type of fearmongering is not helpful,' said Charles Blahous, a researcher at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University who specializes in Social Security. While Social Security does face long-term financial challenges, the system isn't going away, and future policy uncertainty isn't a good reason to claim benefits early today, Blahous said. Trump has repeatedly promised not to cut Social Security benefits, while Democrats argue that staffing reductions will make it harder for retirees to access services, undermining the system in a different way. Other factors, unrelated to political rhetoric, could also be driving the rise in retirement claims. There are three key reasons for the uptick, according to a Social Security official: The start of the peak 65 baby boom, a massive surge of Americans turning 65 years old Implementation of the Social Security Fairness Act, which increased benefits for certain workers receiving pensions from jobs not covered by Social Security Improved outreach notifying spouses of Social Security beneficiaries that they may be eligible for a higher benefit Blahous acknowledged that the three factors are real but thinks 'the jury's still out' on how much of the recent rise is due to anxiety about the program's future. Another possibility is that stock market volatility, partly driven by Trump's ever-changing trade policies, temporarily lowered the balances of millions of retirement accounts and prompted some older Americans to claim their more reliable Social Security benefits earlier than planned. Americans can start collecting Social Security retirement benefits as early as age 62, but that doesn't mean they should. Claiming before full retirement age permanently reduces monthly benefits, which is why waiting often makes more financial sense. It's even more concerning when that decision is driven by fear about the program's future rather than a careful assessment of personal circumstances. 'It's basically an irrevocable decision, which is all the more reason why people should be very cautious about when they make it,' Blahous said. When is the best age to take Social Security? Someone who turns 62 in 2025 would see their monthly benefit lowered by about 30% versus what it would be at their full retirement age of 67. On the other hand, those who delay claiming until after their full retirement age receive an 8% increase for each year they wait, up to age 70. That can amount to thousands of dollars. In 2025, the maximum Social Security benefit is $2,831 for someone retiring at 62, but it rises to $5,108 for those retiring at 70. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
