A job-hopping slowdown could be a boon for retirement savings
When it comes to boosting your salary, it pays to ... stay?
That's the newest finding from wage growth data out of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, which tracks the three-month rolling average of median wage growth for "job switchers" and "job stayers."
A tight labor market in recent years helped drive wage growth for job switchers far above what workers who stayed in their current positions saw. That gap hit a multi-decade high in August 2022, when job switchers saw their median wage growth hit 8.4%, 2.8 percentage points higher than wage growth for job stayers during that time.
Wage growth for the two groups has been converging over recent years, with job stayers now seeing higher median wage growth. In February, workers who switched jobs saw 0.2 percentage points less wage growth than those who stayed. That's the most that job switcher wage growth has lagged job stayers in over six years.
Slowing wage growth is hardly ideal for workers looking to boost their income, but financial advisors say the shift could offer a silver lining for long-term retirement savings.
"Job-hopping can no doubt be detrimental to retirement savings," said Carla Adams, founder of Ametrine Wealth in Lake Orion, Michigan.
READ MORE: Social Security call wait times soar — what advisors need to know
Recent research from Vanguard supports that claim. Researchers looking at earnings from over 50,000 job switchers found that a worker starting with a $60,000 salary who changes jobs eight times throughout their career could forfeit an estimated $300,000 in total retirement savings.
"The typical (median) job switcher experienced a 10% pay increase in our income sample," the authors wrote. "Despite this notable increase, the median job switcher saw a 0.7 percentage point drop in their saving rate."
Adams said that drop is likely due to low auto-enrollment rates in employee-sponsored retirement accounts.
Under Secure 2.0, companies must auto-enroll employees in most 401(k) and 403(b) plans. Doing so can help boost retirement savings participation, but advisors say the standard contribution rates aren't high enough to adequately save for retirement.
Auto-enrollment plans typically set employee contributions at between 3% to 6% of their pay. Many plans now include an "auto-escalation" feature that increases the employee's contribution rate by 1% annually until it reaches a maximum of 10%. That feature helps, but it can take years to reach its escalation cap, Adams said. For someone who was contributing 10% at their previous job, starting a new role where they are auto-enrolled at only 3% can significantly reduce their contribution rate.
READ MORE: A checklist for advisors assisting federal employees
"Employees can, of course, override the auto-enroll contribution rate and opt for a higher rate from the get-go, a great solution to this issue," Adams said. "However, many people neglect to do this. Starting a new job is overwhelming enough and new employees have plenty of forms from HR to fill out in addition to learning their new job, so overriding auto-enrollment contribution rates often gets overlooked."
Theoretically, job switchers who receive large salary boosts could see their retirement contributions increase in dollar terms even as their savings rate decreases. In Vanguard's study, job switchers who saw more than a 10% increase in their wages managed to save more in terms of absolute dollars, even while contributing a lower percentage of their total wages.
Still, such significant wage jumps are outside the norm. That's especially true when looking at wage boosts for job switchers now. Data used in Vanguard's research ranged from 2014 to 2022, when job switchers saw greater wage growth compared to job stayers.
For advisors working with clients considering a job switch, it's important to remind them to set their contribution rates to a suitable level for their retirement goals, usually above the default rate.
Frequent job-hoppers can also lose out on retirement savings due to restrictions on vesting periods of employer-matched contributions.
"Employer matching and profit sharing contributions can be a great employee benefit; however, they can be fully or partially lost for employees who job-hop," Adams said.
READ MORE: Women face unique retirement challenges — but advisors can help
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) requires employer contributions to become fully vested through one of two schedules. Under the three-year cliff vesting schedule, employer contributions become entirely the employee's after three full years of service, with no vesting before the three-year mark. Alternatively, under the six-year graded vesting schedule, employer contributions vest incrementally: 20% after two years, 40% after three years, 60% after four years, 80% after five years and 100% after six years of service.
Some companies might offer immediate vesting for their employer contributions, but doing so is not required under the law. It's crucial that advisors check with their clients to see what the vesting schedule is for their employer-sponsored retirement plans before making the switch to another job.
"If an employee leaves a job prior to their employer matches being fully vested, they lose some or all of the employer contributions that were made to their plan, decreasing their 401k balance," Adams said.
Watching out for these common pitfalls can help avoid some of the drawbacks to job switching, but such strategies may be moot if the new wage growth trend continues. As long as job switcher wage growth lags that of job stayers, advisors might be better off telling their clients to stay where they're at for the moment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is the Vanguard 500 Index ETF the Smartest Investment You Can Make Today?
The Vanguard 500 Index ETF is a low-cost way to track the S&P 500 index. The S&P 500 is a simple way to track the broader U.S. stock market. The index trades at lofty levels today, but remains a great long-term strategy. 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard S&P 500 ETF › So far, 2025 has been a very volatile year for the stock market. The S&P 500 index fell into a correction early in the year and then quickly climbed out of that drawdown. While the recovery was nice to see, it also means that the S&P 500 index is back near its all-time highs. Is the S&P 500-tracking Vanguard 500 Index ETF (NYSEMKT: VOO) the smartest investment you can make today? The Vanguard 500 Index ETF is an exchange-traded fund (ETF). Much like a mutual fund, it allows many investors to pool their assets so they can hire a professional money manager to invest for them. The biggest difference is that mutual funds can only be bought and sold at the end of each trading day, while ETFs can be bought and sold all day long, just like a stock. As the Vanguard 500 Index ETF's name hints, it is an index fund that tracks the S&P 500. This index is the generally accepted benchmark for U.S. stocks. However, the index is really meant to track the U.S. economy. The 500 or so stocks in the index are selected by a committee, not for investment merit, but based on how well the overall collection of stocks represents the economy. The mix shifts and adjusts over time. The index is market-cap weighted, meaning the largest companies have the biggest effect on performance, just like in the broader economy. As for costs, the Vanguard 500 Index ETF has an ultra-low expense ratio of 0.03%. That is roughly one-third the cost of the first-ever S&P 500 index-tracking ETF, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF. Since the Vanguard 500 Index ETF and SPDR S&P 500 ETF do the exact same thing, that cost advantage makes the Vanguard 500 Index ETF the smarter choice. There are clearly better and worse times to invest in the S&P 500 index. Right now, with the market near all-time highs, is probably a worse time. There's a good chance that buying today will mean sitting on some near-term capital losses in the not-too-distant future. But that doesn't necessarily mean you shouldn't buy the Vanguard 500 Index ETF if you have some cash to put to work today. Notice the 2020 recession and bear market in the above chart. At the time, there was a massive amount of uncertainty because of the coronavirus pandemic. Yet, just five years or so later, the market has not only recovered all the ground it lost, but has moved notably higher. That drop just looks like a random bit of noise. Even if you'd bought the Vanguard 500 Index ETF right before that deep price decline, you would have made out OK. Stitching the view to the SPDR S&P 500 ETF because it has been around for longer allows an even greater appreciation of the S&P 500 index's historical growth. As the chart below shows, the recession and bear market after the turn of the century and deep downturn during the Great Recession also look like mere blips in 2025. This is the big point here. Buying the market has worked out well over time, even if you timed the purchase (shockingly) poorly. The key is to stay invested for the long term. Even better would be to reinvest your dividends so you can compound your returns. And even better still would be continuing to add cash at regular intervals to benefit from dollar-cost averaging. The big-picture goal is to start investing and keep investing for as long as possible. If you do that, history suggests you'll end up just fine. For some investors, the fun in all of this is picking individual stocks. But there are far more investors who don't want to do that because it is time-consuming and difficult. For investors who want to keep their investing lives simple, the Vanguard 500 Index ETF is a wonderful choice. That's as true today as it was just before the pandemic, the Great Recession, and the crash. Focus on the long term and just get started! Before you buy stock in Vanguard S&P 500 ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 173% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Reuben Gregg Brewer has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Vanguard S&P 500 ETF. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is the Vanguard 500 Index ETF the Smartest Investment You Can Make Today? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


USA Today
31 minutes ago
- USA Today
Can you pass this quiz on Social Security, savings and debt? Most Americans could not.
Can you pass this quiz on Social Security, savings and debt? Most Americans could not. Show Caption Hide Caption How are tariffs and your 401(k) retirement savings intertwined? Experts say a rise in tariffs can lead to several factors that impact your retirement savings. If you think you are financially literate, then try to answer this question: How much of your healthcare expenses do Medicare and other government programs cover in retirement? Over 90%? About two-thirds? Or about half? If you chose 'about two-thirds,' you're correct, and you're in the minority. Only about one in four Americans answered that question right on a financial literacy quiz, completed online in January by 3,371 consumers. Overall, Americans got correct answers on just under half of the quiz questions. The findings come from the 2025 Personal Finance Index, published in late May by the TIAA Institute and the Global Financial Literacy Excellence Center. Each of the 28 questions covers a basic concept of financial literacy: Saving and investing, borrowing and managing debt, spending money and comprehending financial risk. Most Americans don't pass this financial literacy quiz In a financially literate society, the quizmasters say, most of us would know most of the answers. Yet, only 16% of quiz-takers got 22 or more of the 28 questions right. The average test-taker knew about half of the answers. 'In a capitalist economy, when human beings are responsible for managing their own finances, including their own lifestyle in retirement, a certain amount of financial knowledge is assumed,' said Michael Finke, professor of wealth management at the American College of Financial Services. 'And people who don't have financial knowledge are vulnerable.' The Personal Finance Index and attendant quiz have been offered annually since 2017. The results suggest that Americans aren't making much progress in financial literacy. In the best year, 2020, quiz-takers answered 52% of the questions correctly. The results matter 'because the lack of financial awareness is what holds people back from either building wealth or getting out of a cycle of debt,' said Caleb Silver, editor in chief of Investopedia, the financial journalism site. Financial literacy runs low, according to Silver and others, because most Americans don't learn much in school about saving, investing or managing debt. The next generation may do better. More than two-thirds of states now require personal finance classes for high school graduation, compared with fewer than half of states in 2022, according to the Council for Economic Education. Financial literacy: We know a lot about debt . . . The Personal Finance Index quiz measures literacy in eight subjects. The share of correct answers in 2025 ranged from a high of 59%, on the subject of borrowing, to a low of 36%, in the area of comprehending risk. Test-takers showed greater knowledge on the basics of saving, and less literacy on insurance and investing. If you don't understand the basics of managing debt, then you might not know that a credit card balance with a 20% interest rate costs the borrower more over time than a balance with a 10% rate. If you aren't financially literate on investing, then you might not appreciate the power of compound interest in building retirement savings over multiple decades. 'How much of your paycheck to save for retirement: This is an incredibly important decision that can have a huge impact on the standard of living that you have in retirement,' Finke said. . . . And not a lot about risk Nothing flummoxed the quiz-takers more than risk, a set of questions that covered uncertain financial outcomes. Here is a sample question about risk: There's a 50/50 chance that Malik's car will need engine repairs within the next six months, which would cost $600. At the same time, there is a 10% chance that he will need to replace the air conditioning unit in his house, which would cost $4,000. Which poses the greater financial risk for Malik? The air conditioning replacement? The car repair? Or is there no way to tell? To get the correct answer, you multiply the cost of each scenario by its probability. As it turns out, the A/C replacement poses the greater risk. One-third of quiz-takers figured that out. 'It's a very simple scenario, but there's a lot going on there,' said Surya Kolluri, head of the nonprofit TIAA Institute. Test your knowledge on these financial literacy questions Here are some other questions from the Personal Finance Index quiz. Test your financial literacy! Latisha plans to start saving for retirement by setting aside $2,000 this year. Her employer offers a 401(k) plan and fully matches a worker's contributions up to $5,000 each year. Under which scenario does Latisha have the largest amount in retirement savings at year-end? A) She contributes $2,000 to the 401(k) plan and invests the money in a mutual fund that earns a 5% return during the year. B) She contributes $2,000 to an IRA, or Individual Retirement Account, and invests the money in a mutual fund that earns a 5% return. C) It doesn't matter: She will have the same amount of year-end savings either way. Answer: A. Anna saves $500 each year for 10 years and then stops saving additional money. At the same time, Charlie saves nothing for 10 years but then receives a $5,000 gift, which he decides to save. If both Anna and Charlie earn a 5% return each year, who will have more savings after 20 years? A) Anna B) Charlie C) Anna and Charlie will have the same amount Answer: A. Which statement about Social Security is false? A) The amount someone receives in Social Security benefits depends upon his/her earnings during the last two years of full-time employment. B) A worker receives Social Security benefit payments if he/she becomes disabled before retiring. C) Social Security benefit payments will continue as long as an individual is alive, no matter how long he/she lives. Answer: A.


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Germany To Start Saving for Gen Alpha's Retirement
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. For the youngest generations, saving for retirement isn't at the top of the agenda. But in Germany, youngsters are getting a leg up from the government to begin putting cash away for later in life. The country's new government plans to roll out an "early start pension," giving children as young as 6 a head start on retirement savings. Under the proposal, students aged 6 to 18 who are in school would receive 10 euros—about $11—each month from the government. Over 12 years, this would total 1,440 euros per child, not including any additional gains from investing the funds. When they reach 18 years, account holders will be able to add in their own funds, subject to annual limits. The profit will be tax-free until retirement, when the money becomes accessible. Germany's current retirement age is 67—and could increase in the future—meaning these savings could grow over more than 60 years. While relatively speaking in the scope of saving for retirement, 1,440 euros is a relatively small sum—but when interest comes into the mix, there are potentially large gains to be made by the time retirement comes around. "The idea is very forward-thinking," said Aaron Cirksena, founder and CEO of MDRN Capital. "Especially in a world where I believe time is your biggest asset." Indeed, time is the key ingredient behind the idea—the financial snowball effect where early, steady savings can yield exponential gains over time, and starting in childhood gives that snowball a massive head start. According to Cirksena, the long-term benefits of such a policy could be transformative. "The positives could be huge…a shift toward long-term planning for a whole generation." "The risks are also very real," Cirksena warned. "If the funds are mismanaged or politically steered, you're setting up a system that could easily lose the trust of the public. Plus, if families can't contribute regularly, it might widen the wealth gap rather than close it." Generation Alpha typically refers to individuals born between 2010 and 2024. Generation Alpha typically refers to individuals born between 2010 and 2024. Photo-illustration by Newsweek This concern becomes even more pressing when imagining a similar system in the U.S. Millions of Americans—particularly gig economy workers and low-income families—already struggle to save for retirement. Without strong government support, a U.S. version of the early start pension could reinforce existing disparities. "For this to work in the U.S., there'd need to be automatic contributions or government matching," Cirksena explained. "Otherwise, it just becomes another plan only the financially stable can benefit from." Still, the long-term appeal is certainly enticing. With Social Security under strain and Americans living longer, a supplemental, privately funded retirement system could reduce reliance on public benefits—if designed well and made widely accessible. "In theory, a funded system could relieve some future burden by creating personal retirement wealth that doesn't rely on Social Security," Cirksena said. "But it takes decades to see that impact. "It's not a replacement, but it might be a smart layer on top if done right." As it stands, there is no similar program for young people to get saving early for retirement in the U.S. But some lawmakers want to make building a nest egg easier. In May, Texas Senator Ted Cruz introduced the Invest America Act, which would establish a private tax-advantaged account with a $1,000 seed investment from the federal government for every American child when they are born. Cruz said the change would "trigger fundamental and transformative changes for the financial security and personal freedoms of American citizens for generations." "Every child in America will have private investment accounts that will compound over their lives, enhancing the prosperity and economic participation of the vast majority of Americans," he said in a statement. "When people years from now talk about the changes created by Republican efforts this Congress, this is one of the landmark achievements they will talk about."