They want Israel's support: DMK slams Centre's silence on Palestine issue
Speaking to ANI on Sunday, Elangovan said, 'The Indian Government has supported Palestine earlier and approved it, now they are silent. The policy of the government should be the same, but now they want Israel's support, so they are supporting Israel. Earlier, they said that they approve of Palestine as a separate nation; now, they are silent on this issue, which is wrong...'
Previoulsy, India had abstained during voting at the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) over the ceasefire in Gaza. The United Nations General Assembly adopted a permanent resolution demanding an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza. A total of 149 countries voted in favour of a ceasefire in Gaza in the UNGA; meanwhile, 19 countries abstained and 12 nations voted against the resolution.
In the intervening hours of Saturday and Sunday (June 21-22), the US and Israel targeted Iran's nuclear sites in Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow. Fardow is Iran's main enrichment location for uranium enrichment to 60 per cent. According to a CNN report, the US likely used six B-2 bombers to drop a dozen GBU-57 A/B 'bunker buster' bombs, also known as Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOP), on the Fordow nuclear site, which is Iran's main location for uranium enrichment.
A US official also told CNN that a full payload of bombs was dropped on Fordow.In his first public remarks following the strikes, President Trump warned that further action could be taken if Tehran fails to agree to a satisfactory peace settlement.
Last week, India's Representative Office in Ramallah urged Indian nationals in Palestine to remain vigilant and observe locally advised safety and emergency procedures 'in view of the current situation'. It has also released a number which Indian nationals can contact in case of emergency.'
'In view of the current situation in the region, all Indian nationals in Palestine are requested to remain vigilant and observe locally advised safety and emergency procedures. Please exercise caution and avoid unnecessary movement. In case of an emergency, please contact us at +970592916418 or cons.ramallah@mea.gov.in. We remain at your disposal for any further guidance,' India's Representative Office in Ramallah said in a post on X.
The advisory came amid escalating tensions in West Asia following Israel's strikes on Iran. The Israel Defence Force (IDF) had said Israel has launched a 'precise, preemptive strike' in Iran. The spokesperson, BG Effie Defrin, said the strikes were aimed at damaging Iran's nuclear programme and in response to the Iranian regime's ongoing aggression against Israel. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Morne Morkel hails Mohammed Siraj, reflects on Day 4 twist and rain delay
Trump Breaks Silence on India & Russia's Oil 'Breakup' | 'New Delhi May Stop…' 'I heard India may stop buying Russian oil,' said US President Donald Trump, calling it a 'good step.' But reports say Indian refiners are still sourcing discounted Russian crude. As U.S. pressure mounts, New Delhi defends its ties with Moscow as 'steady and time-tested,' while balancing key strategic relations with Washington. Will India bow to American pressure or stick with its long-time energy partner? 29.0K views | 1 day ago
News18
39 minutes ago
- News18
Is Hindi A Marker Of National Identity?
Last Updated: The status of Hindi in Bharat today is unusual. It is definitely some kind of a linking language, if it is not exactly a link language Bhārat, that is India, is a country now in a critical period in its history where it is seeking an identity which will become ineluctable in its advancement into nationhood. A national identity includes people with that identity and excludes those who do not. Both these inclusionary and exclusionary attributes qualify any nation, howsoever defined, and whether it is or not congruent with a country. Markers of identity in Bhārat could be one of many: religion, bloodline, domicile, culture, geography, diet, history, economics, and finally, and contentiously, language. Language is a social necessity because its use is the easiest way for an individual to communicate with his or her neighbour. It is defined by necessity — a necessity to communicate. If it is required for an individual to communicate with another individual, they will construct a common language to do so. Language, therefore, is formed as a link between individuals as a matter of practicality, and usually it is a matter of convenience and common sense. The origin of a language is therefore rarely emotional. Language is not an emotive issue, and yet it has seemingly become one in contemporary India, with some states feeling that their identity is being threatened. This is not a purely Indian issue — the Catalans, Basques, Ukrainians, Romansch and Maoris have all been through this emotional wringer and yet have not succumbed to centrifugal pressures. India is a polyglot country. There are many languages spoken all over the subcontinent, from Brahui to Bihari to Beary, and if one counts all the myriad dialects and variations that constitute our micro diversity tapestry, one will run into several thousands of them. Out of this linguistic panorama, let us address the question as to whether one of them, namely a language we call Hindi, is the natural marker of our national identity as Bhāratiyas. Hindi, as we understand it, is the language that is used in the newspapers, media and various types of documentation. It is easier to define it in its written form rather than through its spoken variations. As spoken, it is hardly defined in a sharp manner. It is a hybrid – to use scientific jargon, it is a linear combination of several linguistic components with variable coefficients. The Hindi that is spoken in Kashi, Ayodhya and Mathura, to take these cities as mere examples, is different. Moving into an outer arc, these varieties of Hindi are different from those that are commonly used in, say, Chandigarh, Bhopal and Patna. Let us also not forget that the Hindi which is spoken today in our country and what one might attempt to make a marker of national identity has also evolved from something called Hindustani that was widely understood in the northern parts of undivided India, after culling words and phrases from Urdu, another hybrid with a Persian component that served and, to some extent, still serves the needs of Muslims in India. Indonesia and Turkey made similar attempts to 'homogenise' a national language with mixed success. In summary, Hindi cannot even be defined as a single language, and any attempt to sanitise it towards trying to make it a national identity marker will inevitably disturb and eventually destroy the fabric of micro diversity that has evolved naturally in Hindi — as a social necessity — within the group of Hindi speakers that stands today at a mind-blowing 60 crore in India conservatively speaking. The status of Hindi in Bhārat today is unusual. It is definitely some kind of a linking language, if it is not exactly a link language. In this respect, it shares many features with English, which is also a linking language — the only difference being that Hindi and English link different sets of people. Both languages are highly useful and important in that they help to bring people together in a country where there are so many factors that tend to tear people apart. The formation of linguistic states in independent India after 1953 (Orissa was the first linguistic state and was created by the British in 1916) was a singularly ill-conceived decision that was taken as a knee-jerk reaction to an immediate political crisis brought about by a hunger strike by a single individual leading to his death after eleven days. Linguistic states were roundly criticised in 1955 by Ambedkar, who viewed them as facilitating Balkanisation and divisions within the country. Subsequent events have proved him, sadly enough, to have been unerringly accurate. We face today the spectre of states like Maharashtra, Karnataka, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal that are politically empowered linguistic entities within the Union of India. These states go against Ambedkar's wise dictum that one must have a single language spoken in any given state but that one must never have a state defined in such a way that all people who speak a single language must belong to it. Effectively, language that had only communicability among individuals as its motivation has morphed into an emotional issue with deleterious socio-economic consequences. It was possible for many in the Hindi-speaking areas of the country to disregard the so-called Hindi-imposition problem as a peculiarity of Tamil Nadu and its supposedly jingoistic tendencies or of West Bengal with its long and shambolic tradition of opposing anything from Delhi as an infringement on the so-called independence of Bengal. Karnataka too has recently joined this club of linguistic naysayers with the more drastic add-on that no language other than Kannada will be tolerated in this state; any language other than Kannada, except Urdu, is being considered an imposition. Why Urdu should be acceptable while Hindi is not is beyond the comprehension of at least this author. Let us just say that language has become an entirely political issue. The recent happenings in Maharashtra have taken the language issue into new and disturbing dimensions. Here, the championing of the Marathi language has brought two feuding cousins together on the same political platform after 20 years of not communicating with one another in any way whatsoever. This is a political message to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and its parent organisation, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), and any member of the group that was sarcastically termed 'Hindiwallahs" by TT Krishnamachari in the Constituent Assembly debates (1946-1950). Let us make no mistake about the latest political developments in Maharashtra. This Hindiwallah group issued a clarion call in the constituent assembly debates for a unitary structure for the country with Hindi, Hindu, and Hindustan being its main, exclusionary themes. It is well known that the debate on a national language and Hindi numerals was the lengthiest of the debates. Finally, it was decided after two full days of debate that India would not have a national language; Hindi and English became primary co-equals among the 22 official languages in the Eighth Schedule of our Constitution. Why is Maharashtra important in a way that Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and West Bengal are not with respect to the so-called Hindi imposition by the central government? Marathi is an Indo-European language that shares many linguistic and etymological features with Hindi. It shares the Nagari script too, unlike Gujarati, Punjabi, and Bengali, other Indo-European languages that are also related to Hindi. According to the 2011 Census of India, approximately 81.26 per cent of the population in Maharashtra speaks Marathi as their first, second or third language. As both Marathi and Hindi are Indo-European languages derived from Sanskrit, with the further influence of Hindi through media and Bollywood, education and migration, it is likely that a majority of Marathi speakers have a working knowledge of Hindi. Without precise census data isolating Marathi speakers' proficiency in Hindi, a conservative estimate based on the linguistic and cultural context would place a figure of 70-90 per cent of Marathi speakers having a knowledge of Hindi. As additional information, 42 per cent of native Hindi speakers in Maharashtra know Marathi. With so much linguistic similarity between Marathi and Hindi, the emotional reaction of Maharashtrians to the introduction of Hindi as a compulsory subject in Class I and beyond is an unexpected development and warrants close attention by the political class. This reaction should not snowball into a wider conflict that affects all non-Hindi-speaking states, even threatening the unity and integrity of Bhārat. This is as clear a signal as a political signal can get, and it would be foolhardy of the BJP and RSS to ignore it. The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 has talked about the medium of education in schools in terms of the three-language formula, but what these three languages will be and whether they will be uniform in all or most of the states is left unsaid. Little is mentioned in NEP about how all its recommendations (including the ones on language) are ever going to be implemented. This is the biggest, even catastrophic, deficiency in the document and one which can even render the entire NEP nugatory. As an immediate ad hoc, stopgap measure, the central government will do well to announce that Hindi will not be a medium of instruction in a non-Hindi speaking state, at any level, without the express concurrence of the state in question to so include it. How the rest of the 3-language formula is to be implemented, whether it should be a 2-language formula or whether we do not even need any 'formula' for language in a polyglot country, will be a matter for further mature discussion. For now, the immediate priority is to cool the political temperatures south of the Vindhyas so that this discussion on Hindi ceases forthwith. top videos View all Hindi is not a marker of national identity, and any attempt to force-feed this language to large numbers of non-Hindi speaking people will only lead to deleterious consequences for the BJP at the hustings. (Gautam Desiraju is in the Indian Institute of Science and UPES, Dehradun. He has discussed the formation of linguistic states in a recent book, 'Delimitation and States Reorganisation', which he has co-authored with Deekhit Bhattacharya. He has a working knowledge of Hindi and speaks three South Indian languages. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views) tags : Hindi maharashtra view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: August 04, 2025, 00:16 IST News opinion Opinion | Is Hindi A Marker Of National Identity? Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
D-G Shipping crackdown, shipbuilding tensions & port concessions: What was important in the week gone by!
Advt Advt India's bid to grab a larger slice of the seafarers required by the global shipping industry has, of late, been dented by reports of unapproved private entities offering competency certificates that does not fit with the training and assessment standards set by India following a structured programme of examination, assessment and certification, as per a global treaty known as the STCW Convention adopted by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO).The Indian seafarers were lured by authorised as well as unauthorised manning agents to take up assignments on foreign flagged ships without adequate scrutiny of the fraudulent certificates issued to curb the fraudulent practices, India's Directorate General of Shipping issued an order on July 18, banning Indian seafarers holding certificates issued by the maritime administration of countries that are not recognised by India from sailing on foreign flagged order, though, sparked widespread protests over fears that it would render thousands of seafarers jobless and led to a court August 1, the day when the Bombay High Court heard the petition filed by a couple of seafarers, the D G Shipping issued a new order prohibiting foreign governments, maritime administrations, agencies, institutions, or representatives from conducting maritime training, including online or distance learning accessible in India, leading to issuance of seafarers' competency certificates under the STCW Convention, without its prior written new order strikes at the very root of the malaise and is not seen as overtly hitting the seafarers, some of whom might have wittingly or unwittingly fallen for the trap, in their desire to get jobs on board ships, and took a shortcut to attain competency certificates. It also seeks to rectify the situation by asking the unauthorised private entities to fall in line with Indian Infra reported in detail the moves by D G Shipping aimed at ensuring that India becomes a bigger supplier of quality crew to the global shipping other significant developments of the week, we reported that Prime Minister Narendra Modi 's ambitious plans for India's shipbuilding industry are facing resistance from local fleet owners due to reasons explained in this that hasn't deterred policy makers from finalising the technical specifications for constructing so-called Very Large Gas Carriers (VLGC's) India's oil and gas giant, ONGC Ltd, is scouting for local shipyards to build so-called Platform Supply Vessels that are used to support oil and gas drilling operations along the Nayara Energy is being squeezed from all sides as the latest round of sanctions by the EU on the refiner based in Gujarat has forced a couple of Indian ship owners to back out of contracts for hauling petroleum products along the coastET Infra also reported how the Andhra Pradesh government led by N Chandrababu Naidu facilitated a key captive port facility for the integrated steel plant proposed by ArcelorMittal Nippon Steel India by tweaking the concession agreement for the Kakinada Gateway Port Let us know what stood out most this week and how we can make your infra brief even more insightful.
