Rahul to protest 'theft of votes' at Freedom Park
Following the protest, a select group of party leaders will go to the Election Commission office here and submit a memorandum.
Amid the raging row over the revision of electoral rolls in Bihar, Rahul Gandhi, Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha, had alleged that elections were being 'stolen' in the country and that his party had figured out the modus operandi of the 'votes' theft' by studying a parliamentary constituency in Karnataka.
'On August 5, we are organising a protest meeting. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, myself, AICC general secretary Randeep Singh Surjewala, all our Ministers, legislators have discussed on how and where to organise it. It is the opinion of everyone that we organise this protest meeting at the Freedom Park,' Shivakumar said.
Speaking to reporters, he said a memorandum will be submitted to the EC officials in the state.
'We will organise this protest within the framework of law and rules laid down, abiding by the directions of the court. We will not violate. We don't want to disturb anyone,' he said, as he called on the party workers and leaders from across the state to participate in the protest.
Shivakumar, along with Surjewala and other leaders, held deliberations regarding the nature of the protest and the venue, considering 'technical issues' and court directives for holding such events in the city. Later they inspected the protest meeting venue -- Freedom Park.
Clarifying that there won't be any mega foot march, the KPCC chief said, 'we will gather at the Freedom Park and after the protest meeting and address by leaders, a select five to six leaders will go to the Election Commission office here and submit a memorandum.' Asked if the leaders, who will submit the memorandum, would march to the EC office from Freedom Park, he said, 'we may go by foot or by vehicle, we will abide by the police instructions based on the situation.'
Noting that there were lots of examples for 'votes theft', and the Congress had done research on this, Shivakumar said. 'Our leader (Rahul Gandhi) will inform you about all this.' 'This protest is to safeguard -- the right to vote, the Constitution and the democracy,' he said, adding, Rahul Gandhi was coming for this cause, despite the Parliament session.
'We had earlier identified several faults (in the election process) during the Assembly elections and then during the parliament polls. We are doing this protest to inform people about it,' he added.
Responding to BJP's questions as to why the Congress did not approach the Election Commission when the draft rolls were issued, Shivakumar said, 'We had objected but the Election Commission did not accept it.
In Mahadevapura constituency, Congress candidate Nagesh and his son produced documents. The same thing happened in Dinesh Gundu Rao's constituency in Gandhinagar, where around 7,000 voters were added in one ward...there are so many examples. We have documents
to prove...'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Speak less, fill vacant cabinet berths, says Raj Gopal to Revanth
Hyderabad: Congress MLA Komatireddy Raj Gopal Reddy on Wednesday said his suggestion to chief minister A Revanth Reddy is to control his language, speak less, fill the three vacant cabinet berths, and focus more on the development of Telangana. Of late, Raj Gopal has been making statements against Revanth, which has been termed as "pressure tactics" by Congress seniors, to secure a cabinet berth for himself. Raj Gopal, who has openly expressed that he is upset with the party for not fulfilling its promise of allotting him a cabinet berth, met Karnataka deputy chief minister DK Shivakumar at a hotel in Hyderabad and termed it a courtesy call. Shivakumar was in the city on a personal visit. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Speaking to media persons after the meeting, Raj Gopal said Revanth should focus more on explaining to the people what the Congress govt was doing for their welfare, instead of going after the opposition. "The Congress leadership had promised me a cabinet berth. Revanth will continue to be the CM for another three-and-a-half years. Thereafter, the party high command will decide based on the public mandate in the next elections. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Daughter thought she had saved 'cute bunnies.' The vet pales when he realizes what they really are Interesticle Undo Revanth's comments on social media journalists were not fair," he said. He also questioned the lack of action by Revanth against Andhra Pradesh-based contractors involved in the Kaleshwaram project. "Several Andhra contractors looted public money, but Revanth has been delaying taking action against them on the pretext of investigations and inquiry commissions. Over 20 Andhra-based contractors were looting Telangana's resources. I will expose them soon," he said, vowing to speak out against anyone looting the state's wealth — be it in the form of land, sand, or contracts, irrespective of party affiliations. Responding to Raj Gopal's comments, TPCC disciplinary action committee chairman and MP Mallu Ravi said they will speak to him in a day or two. "Based on his version, we will decide our future course of action. We were busy making arrangements for the dharna at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi. But I want to make it clear that indiscipline will not be tolerated, irrespective of the leader's stature. Everyone has to follow the party's discipline," he said, when asked whether disciplinary action would be taken against the MLA.
United News of India
34 minutes ago
- United News of India
'What is legal and constitutional is moral': Justice Abhay Oka's powerful call for judicial integrity and constitutional morality
New Delhi, Aug 6 (UNI) 'Traditional morality is shaped by popular opinion. But judges are bound only by the Constitution.' In a thought-provoking keynote address that struck at the heart of judicial ethics, Justice Abhay S. Oka, former judge of the Supreme Court of India, delivered a scathing and insightful critique of the misuse of personal moral convictions in legal decision-making. Delivering a lecture on "Morality in Judiciary: A Paradigm or a Paradox", hosted by The Global Jurists, Justice Oka made it emphatically clear that for judges, morality must align solely with constitutional and legal principles. 'My personal view is simple,' he declared. 'Something which is legal and constitutional is moral. Something which is not legal and not constitutional is immoral nothing else matters for a judge.' Justice Oka argued that judges must resist the temptation to allow personal beliefs, societal expectations, or political noise to influence their decisions. 'A judge may follow a religion, hold personal moral values, or believe in a philosophy. But once he assumes office, these views must be locked away in a watertight compartment,' he said. He strongly cautioned that moral convictions have no place in jurisprudence. Referring to cases where individuals spend over a decade in prison without legal evidence, he called such decisions 'moral convictions masquerading as justice.' Justice Oka urged for a shift in how we view the judiciary at the grassroots level. 'It is wrong to call them subordinate or lower courts. They are the main courts of this country because it is here that the common man goes for justice,' he stated. Recalling his time as Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court, he said his first administrative order was to ensure the term 'subordinate courts' was discarded. 'The real mistake we made in the last 75 years was not focusing enough on the trial and district judiciary.' Justice Oka addressed the rising pressure judges face, particularly in heinous crimes or economic offenses. He cited how public outrage, media coverage, or political statements such as a Chief Minister declaring an accused will be hanged can create an atmosphere of fear for grassroots judges. 'The involvement of large sums of money or the gravity of the allegations may be one factor, but judges must decide bail strictly within the four corners of the law,' he affirmed. He added, 'Judges must be prepared to deliver verdicts that are not popular.' Touching upon exceptions, he noted that in rare cases, judges may invoke Article 142 of the Constitution to ensure complete justice. However, even in such circumstances, he reiterated that decisions must stem from constitutional morality, not personal values. He also referenced dissenting judgments such as Justice H.R. Khanna's in the ADM Jabalpur case and the Kesavananda Bharati verdict to highlight the importance of judges staying true to constitutional principles, even at great personal cost. 'Three judges who gave the majority opinion in Kesavananda Bharati were superseded. But they were not swayed by the views of the ruling government.' Justice Oka acknowledged the flaws in the current judicial appointment system, particularly the delay between Collegium recommendations and appointments. He cited the example of Senior Advocate Aditya Sondhi, who withdrew his consent for judgeship after waiting nearly a year. 'The real challenge for Chief Justices is to convince good lawyers to join the Bench. But delay in appointments dissuades them,' he said, urging immediate government attention to this issue. Justice Oka concluded by recognizing the crisis of credibility in the judiciary and called for a recommitment to constitutional morality. 'Judges must set aside personal notions of morality, faith, religion, or political inclinations. That is the only way to meet the challenges before the judiciary today.' 'The job of a judge is not to preach. The question is not whether an action is good or bad, but whether it is legal or illegal.' He emphasized that criticism of judgments must be legal and balanced, urging the public and professionals to acknowledge both the right and wrong decisions of the courts. Justice Oka's powerful address served as a sobering reminder that justice cannot and must not be shaped by personal or societal moralities. Instead, it must emerge from the spirit and letter of the Constitution. 'The Constitution is our moral compass. That is the only morality a judge must know,' he concluded to resounding applause from a hall filled with eminent judges and legal luminaries. UNI SNG RN
The Hindu
36 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Brinda Karat voices concern against Chhattisgarh's approval for mining in Hasdeo region
In a letter to Union Minister for Environment, Forests and Climate Change Bhupender Yadav, senior Communist Party of India (Marxist) leader Brinda Karat has opposed a recent Chhattisgarh government's approval of diversion of a large forested land in the Hasdeo region of the State for mining purposes. In her letter, the former MP and Special Invitee, CPI(M) Central Committee, wrote there was no public interest involved in the project and it would only lead to exploitation of mineral resources for private gain. A recommendation letter dated June 26, in which the Forest department has approved the proposal for diversion of forest land for non-forestry purpose — coal excavation work in the Kete Extension Coal Block Open Mine Project of the Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam or RNUVL, surfaced online on August 4. In the letter uploaded on government's PARIVESH website, Forest department official from Surguja district Abhishek Jogawat has based the recommendation on a survey done by him. The approval has also faced criticism from the Opposition Congress and environmentalists in the State. Demanding its cancellation, they have accused the ruling BJP of sacrificing the interests of the people of State as well as ecological concerns for the benefit of their capitalist friends, specifically the Adani conglomerate that is the mine developer and operator for RVUNL. Echoing similar concerns, Ms. Karat in her August 6 letter sought Mr. Yadav's intervention to 'reverse the destructive decision of the Chhattisgarh Forest department to give the green signal for the operationalisation of the Kente Extension Coal Project which requires the destruction of 1,742 hectares of dense forest land.' The approval follows the so-called inspection of the site by the Surguja District Forest Officer in June this year, she added. Ms. Karat further wrote that these projects were being taken up ignoring the opinions of the gram sabhas involved and the provisions of the Constitution and legal frameworks that made consent of the gram sabhas mandatory. 'Open cast mining affects a very large geographical area beyond the actual project. So even though human habitation in this specific area is negligible, many villages outside the area will be deeply affected. Earlier, more than 1,500 written objections from local communities were given to the government. But these have been ignored,' she wrote.
