logo
Lawmaker hopes to extend paid family leave law to Nevada's private sector

Lawmaker hopes to extend paid family leave law to Nevada's private sector

Yahoo12-02-2025

Assemblymember Selena La Rue Hatch during the 2023 Legislative Session. (Photo by Trevor Bexon for Nevada Current)
Only a fraction of Nevadans work for an employer that is required to offer paid family and medical leave, but one state lawmaker is hoping that might change this year.
Assemblywoman Selena La Rue Hatch last week announced she submitted a bill draft request aimed at expanding the availability of paid family and medical leave in Nevada.
In 2023, state lawmakers unanimously approved a bill establishing up to eight weeks of paid family and medical leave for state employees. Employees, who must meet certain qualifications, are paid 50% of their regular wages.
'My goal is just to build on that work and continue expanding the number of people eligible, as well as (expanding) the types of leave that are available,' La Rue Hatch told the Nevada Current.
Specifics — such as who would be eligible for the leave, how many weeks of leave they would be eligible for, and what percentage of their wages they could receive — are still being worked out, La Rue Hatch said, but the idea is to expand the availability of paid family and medical leave to additional public employees and those in the private sector. She expects it to match or exceed what last session's bill established for state employees.
La Rue Hatch, a public teacher within the Washoe County School District, is among the tens of thousands of public employees in Nevada who were not covered by last session's bill. But she says her desire to tackle the issue was driven by conversations with constituents about how the lack of paid family and medical leave was causing financial and emotional hardships.
'I talked to a (University of Nevada Reno) student who had to go back to work within just a couple of weeks of giving birth and has serious health complications that came from that,' she said. 'I've had students (whose) family members have had serious, long-term illnesses and their parents can't take off to care for them.'
She added, 'This is a real issue that is affecting people across the state.'
The Reno Democrat intends her paid leave bill to cover post-birth recovery and bonding time for new parents, as well as time caring for ill family members. She also wants to include paid leave for victims of stalking or sexual assault and exigency leave for members of the military.
Nevada does not have broad paid family and medical leave requirements for private employers. The state is only five years into requiring large employers provide any kind of accrued paid time off.
In 2023, state lawmakers passed a bill requiring businesses receiving tax abatements through the Governor's Office of Economic Development (GOED) to offer paid family and medical leave. Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo vetoed the bill, but its provisions were resurrected and made law as part of a special session bill that gave $380 million in public subsidies to the Athletics for a baseball stadium on the Las Vegas Strip.
That paid family and medical leave requirement, which only applies to businesses with at least 50 employees, requires the businesses to offer at least 55% of a worker's salary for up to 12 weeks.
Leaders from GOED in spring of last year told lawmakers the requirement has brought 'some headwinds' and resulted in at least one company not relocating to Southern Nevada.
According to GOED's most recent annual report, more than half of the companies that have received abatements from the State of Nevada since 2012 had fewer than 50 employees, and 14 of the 25 companies approved for abatements in 2023 planned to have fewer than 50 employees.
Chambers of commerce and businesses typically oppose legislation mandating paid family and medical leave.
'With any bill in the Legislature, there's always opposition,' said La Rue Hatch of potential pushbacks to her proposal. 'My door is always open for folks that want to come talk about that. But I will say, 13 other states have paid family medical leave and businesses are operating just fine in those other states.'
Feb. 5 marked the 32nd anniversary of the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, better known as FMLA, which protects many employees from losing their job while taking up to 12 weeks leave after qualifying events, like giving birth or needing to take care of an ill family member. FMLA only requires unpaid leave, and generally only applies to employees who've worked at least a year at a business with more than 50 workers.
According to a report released this month by the National Partnership for Women & Families, nearly half of all workers nationwide, and 66% of workers in Nevada, are ineligible for FMLA.
The United States is one of only six countries that does not have a national guaranteed, comprehensive paid leave program.
Several groups expressed early support for La Rue Hatch's legislation.
'Nevadans have family members who need or will need care in the future and worrying about having to choose between your job or family member is a choice no one should have to make,' said Nevada State AFL-CIO Executive Secretary-Treasurer Susie Martinez in a statement.
Mi Familia Vota Civic Engagement Director William Moore noted that 'Latinos have significantly less access to paid family leave compared to other groups in Nevada.'
Amy-Marie Merrell, co-executive director of The Cupcake Girls, a nonprofit that assists sex workers and survivors of sex trafficking, said a lack of paid family leave creates financial hardships that traffickers exploit.
'When workers–especially parents, caregivers, and survivors–have access to paid leave, they can recover from medical issues, bond with their children, and care for their families without falling into financial crisis,' she said in a statement. 'This helps break cycles of poverty and exploitation, making communities safer and more resilient.'
Representatives from the Children's Advocacy Alliance, Northern Nevada Central Labor Council, SEIU Local 1107, Nevada State Education Association, and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society also expressed support for paid family and medical leave.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump Says 'Bring in the Troops' as LA Riots Escalate
Donald Trump Says 'Bring in the Troops' as LA Riots Escalate

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump Says 'Bring in the Troops' as LA Riots Escalate

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump called for troops to enter Los Angeles amid rioting in the Californian city that stemmed from protests against immigration enforcement. The Republican president is deploying 2,000 California National Guard troops to L.A. to quell the intense violence, despite opposition from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. "Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!" Trump posted to his Truth Social platform in the early hours of Monday morning. This is a developing story. Updates to follow.

BlackRock, State Street to urge dismissal of collusion case, Bloomberg says
BlackRock, State Street to urge dismissal of collusion case, Bloomberg says

Business Insider

time3 hours ago

  • Business Insider

BlackRock, State Street to urge dismissal of collusion case, Bloomberg says

BlackRock (BLK), Vanguard Group, and the asset management arm of State Street (STT) are headed to court over a lawsuit brought by Republican state attorneys general claiming they colluded to reduce coal output, Josh Sisco and Silla Brush of Bloomberg reports. Lawyers from the companies are set to urge a federal judge to dismiss the case. The suit claims the firm have large stakes in coal producers and profited when energy prices soared. Confident Investing Starts Here:

Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses
Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses

BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — As Louisiana Rep. Kimberly Landry Coates stood before her colleagues in the state's Legislature she warned that the bill she was presenting might 'seem strange' or even crazy. Some lawmakers laughed with disbelief and others listened intently, as Coates described situations that are often noted in discussions of 'chemtrails' — a decades-old conspiracy theory that posits the white lines left behind by aircraft in the sky are releasing chemicals for any number of reasons, some of them nefarious. As she urged lawmakers to ban the unsubstantiated practice, she told skeptics to 'start looking up' at the sky. 'I'm really worried about what is going on above us and what is happening, and we as Louisiana citizens did not give anyone the right to do this above us,' the Republican said. Louisiana is the latest state taking inspiration from a wide-ranging conspiratorial narrative, mixing it with facts, to create legislation. Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee signed a similar measure into law last year and one in Florida has passed both the House and the Senate. More than a dozen other states, from New York to Arizona, have introduced their own legislation. Such bills being crafted is indicative of how misinformation is moving beyond the online world and into public policy. Elevating unsubstantiated theories or outright falsehoods into the legislative arena not only erodes democratic processes, according to experts, it provides credibility where there is none and takes away resources from actual issues that need to be addressed. 'Every bill like this is kind of symbolic, or is introduced to appease a very vocal group, but it can still cause real harm by signaling that these conspiracies deserve this level of legal attention,' said Donnell Probst, interim executive director of the National Association for Media Literacy Education. Louisiana's bill, which is awaiting Republican Gov. Jeff Landry's signature, prohibits anyone from 'intentionally" injecting, releasing, applying or dispersing chemicals into the atmosphere with the purpose of affecting the 'temperature, weather, climate, or intensity of sunlight.' It also requires the Department of Environmental Quality to collect reports from anyone who believes they have observed such activities. While some lawmakers have targeted real weather modification techniques that are not widespread or still in their infancy, others have pointed to dubious evidence to support legislation. Discussion about weather control and banning 'chemtrails' has been hoisted into the spotlight by high-profile political officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. Recently, Marla Maples, the ex-wife of President Donald Trump, spoke in support of Florida's legislation. She said she was motivated to 'start digging' after seeing a rise in Alzheimer's. Asked jokingly by a Democratic state senator if she knew anyone in the federal government who could help on the issue, Maples smiled and said, 'I sure do.' Chemtrails vs. contrails Chemtrail conspiracy theories, which have been widely debunked and include a myriad of claims, are not new. The publication of a 1996 Air Force report on the possible future benefits of weather modification is often cited as an early driver of the narrative. Some say that evidence of the claims is happening right before the publics' eyes, alleging that the white streaks stretching behind aircrafts reveal chemicals being spread in the air, for everything from climate manipulation to mind control. Ken Leppert, an associate professor of atmospheric science at the University of Louisiana Monroe, said the streaks are actually primarily composed of water and that there is 'no malicious intent behind' the thin clouds. He says the streaks are formed as exhaust is emitted from aircrafts, when the humidity is high and air temperature is low, and that ship engines produce the same phenomenon. A fact sheet about contrails, published by multiple government agencies including NASA and the Environmental Protection Agency, explains that the streaks left behind by planes do not pose health risks to humans. However, the trails, which have been produced since the earliest days of jet aviation, do impact the cloudiness of Earth's atmosphere and can therefore affect atmospheric temperature and climate. Scientists have overwhelmingly agreed that data or evidence cited as proof of chemtrails 'could be explained through other factors, including well-understood physics and chemistry associated with aircraft contrails and atmospheric aerosols,' according to a 2016 survey published in the journal Environmental Research Letters. In the survey of 77 chemists and geochemists, 76 said they were not aware of evidence proving the existence of a secret large-scale atmospheric program. 'It's pure myth and conspiracy,' Leppert said. Cloud seeding While many of the arguments lawmakers have used to support the chemtrails narrative are not based in fact, others misrepresent actual scientific endeavors, such as cloud seeding; a process by which an artificial material — usually silver iodide — is used to induce precipitation or to clear fog. 'It's maybe really weak control of the weather, but it's not like we're going to move this cloud here, move this hurricane here, or anything like that,' Leppert said. Parker Cardwell, an employee of a California-based cloud seeding company called Rainmaker, testified before lawmakers in Louisiana and asked that an amendment be made to the legislation to avoid impacts to the industry. The practice is an imprecise undertaking with mixed results that isn't widely used, especially in Louisiana, which has significant natural rainfall. According to Louisiana's Department of Agriculture and Forestry, a cloud seeding permit or license has never been issued in the state. Geoengineering While presenting Louisiana's bill last week, Coates said her research found charts and graphics from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on spraying the air with heavy metals to reflect sunlight back into space to cool the Earth. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022 directed the Office of Science and Technology Policy, with support from NOAA, to develop an initial governance framework and research plan related to solar radiation modification, or SRM. A resulting report, which Coates holds up in the House session, focuses on possible future actions and does not reflect decisions that had already been made. SRM 'refers to deliberate, large-scale actions intended to decrease global average surface temperatures by increasing the reflection of sunlight away from the Earth,' according to NOAA. It is a type of geoengineering. Research into the viability of many methods and potential unintended consequences is ongoing, but none have actually been deployed. Taking focus In recent years, misinformation and conspiratorial narratives have become more common during the debates and committee testimonies that are a part of Louisiana's lawmaking process. And while legislators say Louisiana's new bill doesn't really have teeth, opponents say it still takes away time and focus from important work and more pressing topics. State Rep. Denise Marcelle, a Democrat who opposed Louisiana's bill, pointed to other issues ailing the state, which has some of the highest incarceration, poverty, crime, and maternal mortality rates. 'I just feel like we owe the people of Louisiana much more than to be talking about things that I don't see and that aren't real,' she said. ___ Associated Press writers Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida, and Jack Dura in Bismarck, North Dakota, contributed to this story.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store