logo
A Mystery Killer Wiped Out Billions of Sea Stars. Biologists Just Solved the Case.

A Mystery Killer Wiped Out Billions of Sea Stars. Biologists Just Solved the Case.

Gizmodo3 days ago
Columbo, eat your heart out: A team of scientists has just solved a massive marine murder mystery, nabbing the culprit behind the deaths of billions of sea stars over the past decade.
In a new study, researchers in the U.S. and Canada argue that the bacterial cousin of cholera is behind the epidemic. Through a series of experiments involving both wild and captive sea stars, they found evidence that Vibrio pectenicida is the likely cause of sea star wasting disease—a devastating condition that causes the invertebrates to decay and essentially 'melt.'
The team's findings appear to be well supported with evidence, Zak Swartz, a biologist specializing in sea stars at the Marine Biological Laboratory who was not involved with the study, told Gizmodo.
'This study definitely passes the sniff test for me. It seems quite convincing that V. pectenicida bacteria are at least one causative agent of SSWS,' Swartz said.
Sea stars started disappearing in 2013, when a massive outbreak of SSWD struck the North American Pacific coast. The disease swept the seas from Alaska to Mexico, decimating more than 20 different species of sea stars, which are also known as starfish. Afflicted creatures first develop visible lesions on their skin, and then their tissue starts to decay. Death by SSWD is often swift, killing the sea star within days.
There have been other mass sea star die-offs in recent decades, but the sheer scale and spread of this outbreak makes it possibly the largest marine disease epidemic ever recorded in the wild. Researchers estimate that one particular sea star species, Pycnopodia helianthoides, has lost 90% of its population to SSWD. The destruction has also dramatically changed the environments where the sea stars once thrived. In the aftermath of SSWD outbreaks, some areas have also lost kelp forests, as sea urchins—once kept in check by sea stars—decimated the underwater forests.
Marine scientists have been looking for the cause of SSWD ever since its emergence. And like any great mystery, there have been some twists. In 2014, a research team published a paper that argued a sea star-associated densovirus caused SSWD. But subsequent studies showed that this virus—or any potentially pathogenic virus for that matter—could only be found in a minority of affected species, ruling it out as the likeliest suspect.
Swartz noted that some Vibrio bacteria, however, were already known to cause disease in echinoderms—the broad group of marine invertebrates that includes sea stars. 'So in a sense, it feels like the answer was hiding right under our noses. It makes total sense,' he said. Several species of Vibrio can also sicken humans, including cholera (Vibrio cholerae).
The researchers didn't set out on this study with V. pectenicida in mind from the get-go. They exhaustively studied samples of sea stars with SSWD and healthy specimens, eventually finding that only the diseased sea stars carried high levels of the bacteria in their coelomic fluid (the invertebrate version of blood). The researchers were then able to isolate and grow new populations of the bacteria collected from the sick sea stars. And when they exposed healthy sea stars to these bacteria, the creatures rapidly developed and died from SSWD.
These experiments are the same sort used to identify and conclusively show a particular germ causes a specific disease in humans, strengthening the team's case. Further analysis also revealed that SSWD is caused by a specific strain of the bacteria, called FHCF-3.
'Here we use controlled exposure experiments, genetic datasets, and field observations to demonstrate that the bacterium, Vibrio pectenicida strain FHCF-3, is a causative agent of SSWD,' the authors wrote in their paper, published Monday in Nature Ecology and Evolution.
Though the mystery of what causes SSWD appears solved, Swartz and the study authors note that there are still several important unanswered questions. For example, scientists aren't sure exactly how the outbreaks start. It's possible the bacteria could spread via sea stars' shared food, or through physical contact with other sea stars. Low levels of the bacteria may also always be circulating in the environment, but only become a major problem under specific conditions, like at a certain temperature (Vibrio bacteria in general thrive in warmer water).
Still, given that SSWD remains a threat to sea stars, simply knowing its cause could boost sea star recovery efforts, the researchers said. It might be possible to find genetic mutations that help sea stars fend off these infections, for instance, enabling scientists to breed sea stars carrying these mutations in captivity with the aim of reintroducing them into the wild to bolster the population's resilience.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Great Barrier Reef records largest annual coral loss in 39 years
Great Barrier Reef records largest annual coral loss in 39 years

Yahoo

time38 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Great Barrier Reef records largest annual coral loss in 39 years

Australia Great Barrier Reef MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — The Great Barrier Reef has experienced its greatest annual loss of live coral across most of its expanse in four decades of record-keeping, Australian authorities say. But due to increasing coral cover since 2017, the coral deaths — caused mainly by bleaching last year associated with climate change — have left the area of living coral across the iconic reef system close to its long-term average, the Australian Institute of Marine Science said in its annual survey on Wednesday. The change underscores a new level of volatility on the UNESCO World Heritage Site, the report said. Mike Emslie, who heads the tropical marine research agency's long-term monitoring program, said the live coral cover measured in 2024 was the largest recorded in 39 years of surveys. The losses from such a high base of coral cover had partially cushioned the serious climate impacts on the world's largest reef ecosystem, which covers 344,000 square kilometers (133,000 square miles) off the northeast Australian coast, he said. 'These are substantial impacts and evidence that the increasing frequency of coral bleaching is really starting to have detrimental effects on the Great Barrier Reef,' Emslie said on Thursday. 'While there's still a lot of coral cover out there, these are record declines that we have seen in any one year of monitoring,' he added. Emslie's agency divides the Great Barrier Reef, which extends 1,500 kilometers (900 miles) along the Queensland state coast, into three similarly-sized regions: northern, central and southern. Living coral cover shrunk by almost a third in the south in a year, a quarter in the north and by 14% in the central region, the report said. Because of record global heat in 2023 and 2024, the world is still going through its biggest — and fourth ever recorded — mass coral bleaching event on record, with heat stress hurting nearly 84% of the world's coral reef area, including the Great Barrier Reef, according to the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's coral reef watch. So far at least 83 countries have been impacted. This bleaching event started in January 2023 and was declared a global crisis in April 2024. It easily eclipsed the previous biggest global coral bleaching event, from 2014 to 2017, when 68.2% had bleaching from heat stress. Large areas around Australia — but not the Great Barrier Reef — hit the maximum or near maximum of bleaching alert status during this latest event. Australia in March this year started aerial surveys of 281 reefs across the Torres Strait and the entire northern Great Barrier Reef and found widespread coral bleaching. Of the 281 reefs, 78 were more than 30% bleached. Coral has a hard time thriving and at times even surviving in prolonged hot water. They can survive short bursts, but once certain thresholds of weeks and high temperatures are passed, the coral is bleached, which means it turns white because it expels the algae that live in the tissue and give them their colors. Bleached corals are not dead, but they are weaker and more vulnerable to disease. Coral reefs often bounce back from these mass global bleaching events, but often they are not as strong as they were before. Coral reefs are considered a 'unique and threatened system' due to climate change and are especially vulnerable to global warming beyond 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) since pre-industrial times, the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change proclaimed in 2018. The world has now warmed 1.3 degrees Celsius since pre-industrial times. That report said 'tropical corals may be even more vulnerable to climate change than indicated in assessments made in 2014.' The report said back-to-back big bleaching events at the Great Barrier Reef in the mid 2010s 'suggest that the research community may have underestimated climate risks for coral reefs.' 'Warm water (tropical) coral reefs are projected to reach a very high risk of impact at 1.2°C, with most available evidence suggesting that coral-dominated ecosystems will be non-existent at this temperature or higher. At this point, coral abundance will be near zero at many locations,' the report said. ____ Associated Press Science Writer Seth Borenstein in Washington, D.C., contributed to this report.

Sea Turtles Aren't the Only Victims of Plastic
Sea Turtles Aren't the Only Victims of Plastic

Bloomberg

time40 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Sea Turtles Aren't the Only Victims of Plastic

Here's a fact that might make you feel a little strange inside: You and I have plastic in our brains. Tiny particles of polymers are also hanging about in our livers, kidneys, heart and bloodstream. If that doesn't make your insides itch, consider that in just eight years, scientists have observed an increase in the amount of bodily plastic. A study published in Nature compared post-mortem organ samples from 2016 and 2024 autopsy specimens. The more recent cadavers had far higher concentrations in the liver and brain. You might wonder if it matters if we are all steadily becoming part-plastic (even a newborn baby contains plastic these days). What harm could such tiny particles do? Akin to climate change's image of a polar bear on a lone ice float, the poster children of the plastic crisis thus far have been marine creatures choking on straws and carrier bags. These images are emotive, but have kept the issue at arm's length — a problem for the deep sea. In reality, it's so much worse than you thought.

Great Barrier Reef records largest annual coral loss in 39 years
Great Barrier Reef records largest annual coral loss in 39 years

Washington Post

timean hour ago

  • Washington Post

Great Barrier Reef records largest annual coral loss in 39 years

MELBOURNE, Australia — The Great Barrier Reef has experienced its greatest annual loss of live coral across most of its expanse in four decades of record-keeping, Australian authorities say. But due to increasing coral cover since 2017, the coral deaths — caused mainly by bleaching last year associated with climate change — have left the area of living coral across the iconic reef system close to its long-term average, the Australian Institute of Marine Science said in its annual survey on Wednesday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store