Clean Air Act must be amended to end EPA mandates. We pay for Chicago pollution.
An environmental utopia? Not according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Unfortunately, air pollutants don't recognize state lines and emissions originating from northern Illinois and Indiana are moving upwind along Lake Michigan. Case in point: Ozone level readings made in Racine show that only 3 percent of the emissions detected there are attributed to activity here in Wisconsin.
Wisconsin's air quality is actually better than ever recorded, but now the Clean Air Act's standards call for even greater air quality improvements than the region has realized over the last 30 years. It's causing big issues for our long-term economic outlook.
For decades, elevated ozone levels along the lake have prompted the EPA to designate all or parts of seven counties in southeastern Wisconsin – from Kenosha to Sheboygan – as non-attainment zones. This designation forces businesses to pay for costly pollution mitigation or, in some cases, limit operations to avoid triggering federal Clean Air Act requirements despite emissions not originating in Wisconsin.
An analogy: Imagine two men on a scale, one man weighs 200 pounds, the other 800 pounds. Essentially the EPA is grabbing the 200-pound man and telling him he needs to lose 500 lbs. for both to be healthy. The Clean Air Act never foresaw this scenario and it's time the issue was addressed.
Milwaukee and the area have been on a roll over the past several years. Billions of dollars in capital investment, highlighted by Microsoft's $3 billion-plus data center project in Racine County, have all signs pointing in a positive direction for economic development, job creation and all that goes with it.
Opinion: UWM has weathered cuts, delivered research to improve health and commerce
But that trajectory is at risk due to these unfair and outdated mandates originating in Washington. If the issue is not corrected, you can certainly bank on our leadership in the manufacturing sector eroding. This means fewer opportunities for this generation and those to follow.
Economic development is a competitive sport. Cities and their surrounding regions across the country are fighting tooth and nail for the same expansion, relocation and start-up activity we want to see in our region. It's a game of inches and any competitive disadvantage placed on our region is a disincentive to businesses looking to invest here. These more stringent regulations could mean the difference between a win and a loss.
So, what can we do? The Clean Air Act must be amended to hold the Milwaukee region harmless and, at the same time, the EPA and Wisconsin should collaboratively work with relevant parties in northern Illinois and Indiana on reducing their emissions.
Opinion: We Energies Kenosha County power plant threatens public health and environment
'Good Neighbor' laws are on the books but fail to have the teeth necessary to put enough pressure on the sources of emissions causing our increased ozone levels. The state of Wisconsin has filed suit arguing these rules aren't sufficiently stringent, but cases like this, and others across the U.S., have stalled. It's time for the Trump administration to hit the pause button on enforcement and for Congress to make better sense of the otherwise critically valued Clean Air Act.
As time grows short, MMAC and our coalition partners will fight for our business members and the economic climate in southeastern Wisconsin by advocating for policies to reduce upwind emissions. Our residents deserve to breathe clean air and our employers — and therefore our larger community — should not pay the price for a problem they don't own.
Dale Kooyenga is president of the Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce.
This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: EPA mandates threaten economic growth in Milwaukee region | Opinion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
9 minutes ago
- New York Post
Cancel those Microsoft subscriptions — this $55 bundle has you covered for life
Discover startups, services, products and more from our partner StackCommerce. New York Post edits this content, and may be compensated and/or receive an affiliate commission if you buy through our links. TL;DR: For just $54.97, you get lifetime access to Microsoft Office 2021 and Windows 11 Pro — no recurring fees, no strings attached. Microsoft subscriptions? Say goodbye. This deal gives you the pro tools you actually need — Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, and more — without that monthly charge lurking on your credit card forever. Get this epic combo of Office and Windows 11 Pro on sale for $54.97 (reg. $418.99). With a lifetime license to Microsoft Office Professional 2021, you get all the essentials in one download: Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams (free version), Publisher, Access, and OneNote. It installs on one Windows PC and stays there — no cloud drama or subscription traps. It's the suite you know, but this time it's yours to keep. Advertisement New York Post Composite But this bundle isn't just about Office — it also throws in a lifetime license to Windows 11 Pro, Microsoft's newest OS built for serious productivity. Think smooth multitasking with snap layouts, smart AI features like Copilot, and legit security tools like BitLocker and Windows Hello. Plus, Windows 11 Pro includes extras you'll love if you're a power user — like Hyper-V, Windows Sandbox, and Azure AD support. Together, these two licenses unlock the full Microsoft ecosystem for work, side hustles, or just looking like you've got your tech life together. It's great for small business owners, remote workers, freelancers, and anyone tired of renting their software. At just under $55, it's less than a monthly gym membership — and it lasts forever. For a limited time, get lifetime licenses to Microsoft Office Professional 2021 and Windows 11 Pro for just $54.97. StackSocial prices subject to change.


New York Times
10 minutes ago
- New York Times
Setbacks in the Fight Against Climate Change
To the Editor: Re 'E.P.A. to Retract Bedrock Finding on Climate Crisis' (front page, July 30): The Environmental Protection Agency has decided to dispense with the scientific finding that recognizes climate change as a danger to humans, despite a consensus to the contrary among scientists around the world, thus revoking the E.P.A.'s ability to regulate climate change. When a democratically elected government lies to its citizens on a matter of life and death, what legitimacy does that government have? I ask Lee Zeldin, the E.P.A. administrator, and Republicans in Congress: Which is more important, protecting the citizens of the U.S. from the life-threatening effects of climate change, or pleasing President Trump? David BaldwinPetaluma, Calif. To the Editor: Re 'NASA Website Will Not Provide Previous National Climate Reports' (news article, July 14): It's a grim irony that as responders searched for and recovered bodies from climate-intensified flooding in Texas, the Trump administration was burying the nation's premier climate assessment. President Trump's relentless gutting of climate and weather science means that more Americans will get hurt and die while the fossil fuel polluters driving the climate crisis reap the benefits. For 25 years, the National Climate Assessments have mapped out vital information about how climate change is affecting the nation and our neighborhoods, now and into the future. They're critical guides to helping governments plan and prepare. They serve as warnings of what awaits if we don't quickly move from climate-heating fossil fuels to affordable, clean energy. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's EPA is targeting key vehicle pollution rules. What that means for carmakers
DETROIT (AP) — The Environmental Protection Agency's plan this week to relax rules aimed at cleaning up auto tailpipe emissions is the latest Trump administration move to undo incentives for automakers to go electric. As part of a larger effort to undo climate-based governmental regulations, the EPA on Tuesday said it wants to revoke the 2009 finding that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare. That would cripple the legal basis for limiting emissions from things like power plants and motor vehicles. Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You The Insurance Savings You Expect Great Rates and Award-Winning Service President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending law already targets EV incentives, including the imminent removal of a credit that saves buyers up to $7,500 on a new electric car. The tax law approved in early July also includes another provision that will hit Tesla and other EV makers in the pocketbook — repealing fines for automakers that don't meet federal fuel economy standards. Automakers can buy credits under a trading program if they don't meet the mileage standards. EV makers like Tesla, which don't rely on gasoline, earn credits that they can sell to other carmakers. The arrangement has resulted in billions of dollars in revenue for Tesla and millions for other EV makers like Rivian. That is all set to go away under the new law. Trump has also challenged federal EV charging infrastructure money and blocked California's ban of new gas-powered vehicle sales. It adds up to less pressure on automakers to continue evolving their production away from gas-burning vehicles. And that's significant because transportation — which also includes ships, trains and planes — is the sector that contributes the most to planet-warming emissions in the U.S. Push and pull on tailpipe and mileage rules Stringent tailpipe emissions and mileage rules were part of the Biden administration's pledge to clean up the nation's vehicles and reduce use of fossil fuels by incentivizing growth in EVs. EVs do not use gasoline or emit greenhouse gases. The Trump administration and the auto industry have said both rules were unreasonable for manufacturers. Automakers could meet EPA tailpipe limits with about 56% of new vehicle sales being electric by 2032 — they're currently at about 8% — along with at least 13% plug-in hybrids or other partially electric cars, and more efficient gasoline-powered cars that get more miles to the gallon. The latest mileage targets set under the Biden administration required automakers to get to an average of about 50 miles (81 kilometers) per gallon for light-duty vehicles by model year 2031, and about 35 miles per gallon for pickups and vans by model year 2035. But Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy pressured the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration earlier this year to reverse the rules, and has recently said Biden's inclusion of EVs in calculating them was illegal. NHTSA will likely reset or significantly weaken them. The fines that are going away Then there are the fines that automakers will no longer face for falling short on the fuel economy rules. 'With the signing of the One Big Beautiful Bill, new penalties for automakers not complying with an illegal fuel economy standard designed to push EVs will be zero,' NHTSA spokesman Sean Rushton said in a statement. Some legacy automakers have paid hundreds of millions of dollars in penalties for not meeting them. Just last year, Jeep-maker Stellantis paid $190.7 million for model years 2019 and 2020, and General Motors paid $128.2 million for the 2016 and 2017 model years. Automakers that didn't meet the standards could also instead buy credits from carmakers that did — or even surpassed them — such as Tesla. That provision earned Tesla $2.8 billion in 2024 — revenue it will no longer see. Elon Musk sharply criticized the big tax-and-spending bill in June, saying it 'gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' Tesla did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the law's effect on those credits. The agency wrote to carmakers earlier this month informing them the penalties wouldn't be issued from the model year 2022 onward. Some automakers confirmed receiving the letter but declined to comment further. Experts say without them, the law 'invites automakers to cheat on government fuel economy rules by setting fines to $0, ensuring consumers will buy more gas guzzlers, pay more at the pump and enrich Big Oil,' said Dan Becker, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Safe Climate Transport Campaign. Ann Carlson, an environmental law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, and a former acting NHTSA administrator under Biden, called it a 'stunning decision' for NHTSA to essentially forgive the fines from 2022 onward. She said it amounted to a windfall for companies that chose to pay penalties rather than produce more efficient cars. Carlson said backing away from future fines also 'poses a dilemma for auto manufacturers who may feel bound to comply with the law, even if there is not a financial consequence for failing to do so.' Where auto manufacturers go from here It takes a while for carmakers to shift their product lines, and experts say automakers might be locked into their technology and manufacturing decisions for the next few model years. But changes could come for model year 2027 and beyond, they said. EVs aren't as profitable as gas-engine cars, so automakers may make fewer of them if they no longer have to offset emissions from their gasoline models. Already, some automakers have pulled back on their ambitions to go all-electric with a slower pace of EV sales growth. 'Automakers also know every presidential administration eventually comes to an end, so they won't abandon their EV development efforts," said Karl Brauer, executive analyst at "But they will reduce their near-term efforts in this area.' ___ Alexa St. John is an Associated Press climate reporter. Follow her on X: @alexa_stjohn. Reach her at ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data